What's new

"I feel we will be well prepared for the next Test" : Waqar Younis

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,132
Waqar Younis speaking to the press

"We will make an assessment about the conditions which are expected in the next match and give our views to Misbah and he will decide what's the best XI to play"

"I don't see that happening [Amir playing last Test match] and we aren't even preparing him for this. He's done with the red ball format & is working hard with white ball cricket so we'll stick with him with the white ball for now"

"Test match cricket has been played like this in England for a long time and only one Test match has happened with a pink ball here; Pink ball cricket is still being played on a trial basis across the world to see if there aren't any problems because if this and it is able to generate revenues as well; Big runs were scored and seamers took wickets in the pink ball game in England but what needs to be seen is how the pink Duke ball will behave in this condition; It might do a bit too much as we saw in Australia when the lights came on, the ball used there moved around a bit too much; Strategies need to be changed and toss becomes important; So lots to consider but I feel its a very good idea and I personally feel that Test cricket can be played in the night time, people will adapt in the same way they adapted and adjusted to OD and T20 formats; From what I have seen of pink ball cricket, I feel it can work"

"I have always been in favour of as few changes to Test cricket as possible; This the traditional form of cricket and the only format that completely tests [your abilities]; It should be left as is - increasing or decreasing duration of Test matches is not wise in my view; Its beautiful as is, where the result can come in 3, 4 or 5 days depending upon the conditions of the pitch etc; 5 days are perfect for Test match cricket"

"Players, umpires have said that when artificial light completely takes over it becomes difficult to play as they have difficulty sighting the ball; However I feel play can continue unless light is really bad - I feel under certain artificial light conditions match should continue and the Test should be completed"

"Now I suppose I can say anything as the match didn't complete! But fact is that when we reached 200+ runs, a positive energy did come in the dressing room because we had a decent total, the ball was swinging a lot and we knew that our bowlers had the ability to trouble England batsmen; This is something you must have seen today that Abbas, Naseem and Shaheen all bowled well; I feel that we had prepared well for the full match but unfortunately we weren't able to complete it due to rain; The next game is coming up which will be played in these or similar conditions and I feel we will be well prepared for that"

"Conditions were very tough, Rizwan played a brave innings coming at number 7 and batting with the tail and scoring 72 runs; It was a positive and well calculated innings as its not easy to bat with the tail; He created some short partnerships and brought Pakistan to such a total that we all started to feel confident that we were in the game"

[How does he feel about the fact that Pakistan missed a Test vs Bangladesh, and this Test lost to rain - how is it effecting our chances in the WTC?]

"What can one say? No one can fight the weather as it's an act of God, and this does happen in England; We saw in the England games vs West Indies that there was some rain and the matches were interrupted but unfortunately here we just didnt get any cricket; If you play a series in England then you must be prepared for the fact that the weather will play its role; You cannot complain about it as that's how cricket goes"

"I cannot answer the question on team selection; We have three days before next game and you cannot predict the English weather; This will be considered and Misbah will know which team to play or what changes to make if the weather changes; At the moment, no thought has been given to this"
 
Not sure if other than Abbas and Yasir, the Pakistan bowlers did too well in this game.
 
Not sure if other than Abbas and Yasir, the Pakistan bowlers did too well in this game.

Both young guns learning on the job, even Shaheen in red ball cricket - no issue with that just it might take time in international cricket to see results.

Hassan/Amir (like in 2018) would be more dangerous than the youngsters, it’s a shame - as them two with the current 3 would be a strong test fast bowling quintet.
 
Waqar Younis speaking to the press

"We will make an assessment about the conditions which are expected in the next match and give our views to Misbah and he will decide what's the best XI to play"

"I don't see that happening [Amir playing last Test match] and we aren't even preparing him for this. He's done with the red ball format & is working hard with white ball cricket so we'll stick with him with the white ball for now"

"Test match cricket has been played like this in England for a long time and only one Test match has happened with a pink ball here; Pink ball cricket is still being played on a trial basis across the world to see if there aren't any problems because if this and it is able to generate revenues as well; Big runs were scored and seamers took wickets in the pink ball game in England but what needs to be seen is how the pink Duke ball will behave in this condition; It might do a bit too much as we saw in Australia when the lights came on, the ball used there moved around a bit too much; Strategies need to be changed and toss becomes important; So lots to consider but I feel its a very good idea and I personally feel that Test cricket can be played in the night time, people will adapt in the same way they adapted and adjusted to OD and T20 formats; From what I have seen of pink ball cricket, I feel it can work"

"I have always been in favour of as few changes to Test cricket as possible; This the traditional form of cricket and the only format that completely tests [your abilities]; It should be left as is - increasing or decreasing duration of Test matches is not wise in my view; Its beautiful as is, where the result can come in 3, 4 or 5 days depending upon the conditions of the pitch etc; 5 days are perfect for Test match cricket"

"Players, umpires have said that when artificial light completely takes over it becomes difficult to play as they have difficulty sighting the ball; However I feel play can continue unless light is really bad - I feel under certain artificial light conditions match should continue and the Test should be completed"

"Now I suppose I can say anything as the match didn't complete! But fact is that when we reached 200+ runs, a positive energy did come in the dressing room because we had a decent total, the ball was swinging a lot and we knew that our bowlers had the ability to trouble England batsmen; This is something you must have seen today that Abbas, Naseem and Shaheen all bowled well; I feel that we had prepared well for the full match but unfortunately we weren't able to complete it due to rain; The next game is coming up which will be played in these or similar conditions and I feel we will be well prepared for that"

"Conditions were very tough, Rizwan played a brave innings coming at number 7 and batting with the tail and scoring 72 runs; It was a positive and well calculated innings as its not easy to bat with the tail; He created some short partnerships and brought Pakistan to such a total that we all started to feel confident that we were in the game"

[How does he feel about the fact that Pakistan missed a Test vs Bangladesh, and this Test lost to rain - how is it effecting our chances in the WTC?]

"What can one say? No one can fight the weather as it's an act of God, and this does happen in England; We saw in the England games vs West Indies that there was some rain and the matches were interrupted but unfortunately here we just didnt get any cricket; If you play a series in England then you must be prepared for the fact that the weather will play its role; You cannot complain about it as that's how cricket goes"

"I cannot answer the question on team selection; We have three days before next game and you cannot predict the English weather; This will be considered and Misbah will know which team to play or what changes to make if the weather changes; At the moment, no thought has been given to this"

Why would Misbah decide the final 11? It should be Azhar.

Or they could put a stickman in there as captain since all the decisions are being made in the dugout. No wonder Azhar looks relaxed - no responsibility.
 
Didn't Waqar say something very similar after the 1st Test

Rinse&Repeat
 
Not sure if other than Abbas and Yasir, the Pakistan bowlers did too well in this game.

It feels so harsh to expect so much from Naseem and Shaheen though. It's not that they aren't performing, they've been dunked into the deep end before they've developed appropriately.

Both should play the final test. After that the think tank need to consider whether Naseem is going to be a mainstay and develop internationally, or whether he takes what he's learnt over to FC for a few seasons and we pick a more seasoned campaigner in that time.
 
Why would Misbah decide the final 11? It should be Azhar.

Or they could put a stickman in there as captain since all the decisions are being made in the dugout. No wonder Azhar looks relaxed - no responsibility.

What does the coach do then? lol.

Every team sport, head coach decides who plays or who doesn't, not the captain.
 
The one change I would bring in Imam instead of Fawad. Fawad's technique will mean he is a sitting duck in seaming English conditions.

Iman at number 3
Barbar at number 4
Azhar at number 5
Asad at number 6
 
What does the coach do then? lol.

Every team sport, head coach decides who plays or who doesn't, not the captain.
Absolutely not in cricket - this isn’t football.

In cricket the Chief Selector gives the Captain the squad, and the Captain picks the Starting Eleven.

The Coach can be consulted by the Captain if he wishes, but he is equally free to consult his wife, his kids or his pets for their opinion.

Misbah’s role in selection ended when he picked the squad.
 
Why would Misbah decide the final 11? It should be Azhar.

Or they could put a stickman in there as captain since all the decisions are being made in the dugout. No wonder Azhar looks relaxed - no responsibility.

playing 11 is decided by both coach and captain.
 
Waqar Younis speaking to the press

"We will make an assessment about the conditions which are expected in the next match and give our views to Misbah and he will decide what's the best XI to play"

"I don't see that happening [Amir playing last Test match] and we aren't even preparing him for this. He's done with the red ball format & is working hard with white ball cricket so we'll stick with him with the white ball for now"

Let's be totally honest about this situation, and use the vocabularly which best describes the situation.

Mohammad Amir quit red ball cricket just like Adil Rashid and Josh Buttler did.

But England's Chief Selector Ed Smith is a grown up, not a petulant ****-hurt child (defined by the Oxford English dictionary as "acting overly or unjustifiably offended or resentful"), and he asked them both to return when they would strengthen the team, and they agreed. (As per Imran Khan in 1985, 1986, 1988, 1989 and 1990, when he returned from self-imposed Test exile).

But clearly Waqar and Misbah are smaller men than Ed Smith is. As a psychiatrist I see small men like them all the time, who respond to a perceived affront by blocking the return of someone they actually need, and damage themselves more in the process.

How many men live in lonely misery after prematurely ending perfectly viable marriages following a perceived affront? How many men quit their job in anger and then wish they hadn't?

"You can't be leaving me because I'm leaving you!"

The behaviour towards Mohammad Amir from when they whinged and moaned about the timing of his retirement to now reminds me of David Brent in the original version of "The Office", unable to do what he had to to help himself and ending up in a cycle of misery.

This is a real turning point for Pakistan. Either Misbah and Waqar do a lot of growing up in the next three days, or Pakistan is going into a deciding Test with an under-strength team because two ****-hurt grown men can't put their vanity to one side for the best interests of their team.

We all saw how Southampton was. Those condition were made for Mohammad Amir, and with Amir and Abbas England would be incapable of scoring 150.

Forget 2010 because Waqar and Misbah have selected him for the T20i series. They clearly have no moral problem with that.

Small, small men.
 
What does the coach do then? lol.

Every team sport, head coach decides who plays or who doesn't, not the captain.

This post reflects your lack of knowledge in cricket but you’re not alone in this regard. In fact it’s a common trait among the Misbah fan base.
 
Maybe we would have a chance if Azhar was sacked as captain, he is the ultimate beta male I've ever seen captain the team.
 
What does the coach do then? lol.

Every team sport, head coach decides who plays or who doesn't, not the captain.

Coach's role in cricket is a bit different, at least till now - it's the Captain that runs the show. In fact, there was no concept of "Coach" in cricket before 1980s - AUS lost several senior players and few others opted for SAF tour, suddenly by 1983-84 AUS was left with a very young team and no experienced leader (past 3 captains - Greg retired, Hughes cried out, Yellop went to SAF) - so, they started from scratch with a new Captain, who happened to be their only experienced batsman (player). To assist Border, they brought one former player, an strict disciplinarian and a man of pride for the baggy green cap - Bobby Simpson as their Head Coach. It started from there on and Simpson was hired by BCCI to help Indian team in 1992 WC (It worked in reverse gear, but different discussion).

Gradually, the game got diversified and "specialist" players & skills were required for longer and shorter format (now three), and first problem that most teams faced was to find a Captain unanimous for both formats - which brought Coach's role into lime light you may say. On top of that, Woolmer's lap top coaching gave the role an added status. Still, captains like Ganguly, Inzi, Fleming, any AUS Captain, Smith, Misbah ......... ran the show keeping the coach in shadow. On top of that, emerging teams like SRL, BD, Kenya were bringing high profile foreigners as Head Coach, and the status of those coach often out weighted their cricket might, hence they started to power-play; for example, I can say Whatmore used to give the list of players he wants to take on a tour/tournament and CS/BCB Chairman's role was to read that out in press briefings - at least once I know Dav tore down the list and threw in bin for just one change in front of BCB CEO & Chairman, asking the CS to leave the discussion room - even he gave lots of respect to his Captain Basher, more than the CS or even CEO!!!!

Here, I think Azhar allowed him to be spoon feeded and for a soft spoken guy like him, I doubt he has the guts (or will) to confront with two of the most egomaniac great of PAK cricket - YK & WY + the guy almost like his cricketing father figure. ...... I really, really feel sorry for Azhar, because he is being bashed by every fan, but guy is an honest trier and served PCT to his limit, now stuck between three pillars - EACH ONE will use him as a shield for failure.
 
What does the coach do then? lol.

Every team sport, head coach decides who plays or who doesn't, not the captain.
[MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION] is correct.

Coach is a new and unnecessary position in cricket.

Pakistan touring teams tended to have someone like Imran Khan as the Captain and Haseeb Ahsan or Intikhab Alam as the Manager - not coach.

And the Manager coordinated net bookings and dressing rooms and buses and restaurants and daily money allocation, but left the on-field management - including the choice of the final starting eleven - to the captain.
 
Last edited:
It started from there on and Simpson was hired by BCCI to help Indian team in 1992 WC (It worked in reverse gear, but different discussion).

Would love to learn more about Simpson’s role in the 92 Indian dressing room. What’s the story?
 
What does the coach do then? lol.

Every team sport, head coach decides who plays or who doesn't, not the captain.

Pakistan would be better off with a traditional cricket structure:

Chairman of Selectors - one of 3 members of the selection panel. Their roles terminate when the squad is given to the captain.

Team Manager - an administrator, not an ex-cricketer.

Batting Coach - Younis Khan.

Fast Bowling Coach - ?

Spin Bowling Coach - Mushtaq Ahmed

Fielding Coach - ?

Captain - who has sole authority over the Final playing eleven and tactics and strategy.
 
Last edited:
Let's be totally honest about this situation, and use the vocabularly which best describes the situation.

Mohammad Amir quit red ball cricket just like Adil Rashid and Josh Buttler did.

But England's Chief Selector Ed Smith is a grown up, not a petulant ****-hurt child (defined by the Oxford English dictionary as "acting overly or unjustifiably offended or resentful"), and he asked them both to return when they would strengthen the team, and they agreed. (As per Imran Khan in 1985, 1986, 1988, 1989 and 1990, when he returned from self-imposed Test exile).

But clearly Waqar and Misbah are smaller men than Ed Smith is. As a psychiatrist I see small men like them all the time, who respond to a perceived affront by blocking the return of someone they actually need, and damage themselves more in the process.

How many men live in lonely misery after prematurely ending perfectly viable marriages following a perceived affront? How many men quit their job in anger and then wish they hadn't?

"You can't be leaving me because I'm leaving you!"

The behaviour towards Mohammad Amir from when they whinged and moaned about the timing of his retirement to now reminds me of David Brent in the original version of "The Office", unable to do what he had to to help himself and ending up in a cycle of misery.

This is a real turning point for Pakistan. Either Misbah and Waqar do a lot of growing up in the next three days, or Pakistan is going into a deciding Test with an under-strength team because two ****-hurt grown men can't put their vanity to one side for the best interests of their team.

We all saw how Southampton was. Those condition were made for Mohammad Amir, and with Amir and Abbas England would be incapable of scoring 150.

Forget 2010 because Waqar and Misbah have selected him for the T20i series. They clearly have no moral problem with that.

Small, small men.

So you are advocating to drop one of (in your own words) Fred Truman's modern day reincarnation or Starc on Steroids?
 
Would love to learn more about Simpson’s role in the 92 Indian dressing room. What’s the story?

I think, Simpson took the job for the money & glamour attached with it, but not from passion. Don’t get me wrong here, not saying he was unprofessional or not committed enough; but people like Simpson, Ian Chappel... are too emotionally attached with their cricket - you’ll not get the same service from them that an Australian team would get. Simpson stepped down from captaincy and retired at 31 thinking he wasn’t good enough any more to serve Australia; then came back to take charge of packer reject Australia at the age of 42, 10 years later. And, he probably failed to understand the essence of Indian cricket - during his time, India played 1992 New Years Test at SCG with four pacers - Kapil, Srinath, Manoj & Shubroto Banarjee (?) .... should have been sacked that very day. He was hired to support another young captain, Mo Azharuddin, but there was a clear disconnect between them.
 
The role of captain & coach in cricket was clearly defined by none other than the man himself - Kerry Packer.


For his WSC, he first hired two people - Ian Chappel & Tony Greig; his two captains and then asked them to recruit their team. Later Lloyd was appointed to hire WIN players. There were former players attached with all three teams for sure - to help players on minor adjustments, net session and other supports, hardly anyone knows their name.

And, Packer backed his captains - to the extent that he accepted Ian Chappel’s decision not to consider the hottest poster boy of Australian cricket that time - Jeff Thompson for his grand show.
 
Pakistan bowling coach Waqar Younis said he wanted to see teams "staying out there a bit longer" after bad light blighted the second Test against England at Southampton.

Monday saw a match where a draw had long appeared an inevitable end with England still in their first innings at 110-4 as they replied to Pakistan's 236.

Only 134.3 overs were bowled in total, with the whole of Saturday's third day washed out.

But while there is an understanding rain can delay play, many pundits were scathing about the repeated stoppages for bad light at a ground where the floodlights were in use.

While some observers suggested a pink ball, as happens in day/night Tests, could be used to aid greater visibility, fast-bowling great Waqar suggested greater flexibilty from the match officials was the best way of maximising playing time.

"I feel unless light gets really bad, we can stay out there a bit longer," said Waqar.

"But I'm generally in favour of changing as little in Test cricket as possible," he added after a result that left Pakistan still 1-0 down in a three-match series ahead of the third Test, also at Southampton, starting Friday.

"It's the oldest and most traditional format. What we need to be careful of is which kind of cricket ball is used."

Waqar added: "I don't yet know how a Dukes pink ball is going to behave in this country. If conditions are overcast and the lights are on, maybe it'll do too much. It can work, but we'd need further trials in England."

- 'Do as we're told' -

Meanwhile England captain Joe Root, although sympathetic to the position on-field umpires Richard Kettleborough and Michael Gough found themselves in at the Ageas Bowl, said changes must be made "somewhere, somehow" to help prevent future Tests being so disrupted by bad light.

"I think it's hard to blame the umpires here," said Root, with the officials in the firing line after calling off play on Sunday shortly before 1500 GMT.

"There's something bigger that needs looking at higher up the chain," he added. "I think it needs to be addressed somewhere, somehow.

"I don't think I've ever seen a game be affected by bad light as much as this. I'm not exactly sure what the answers are to be honest.

"But until those things change from the ICC (International Cricket Council), the umpires have to follow the rules in front of them and as players we have to do as we are told."

Root insisted his side "don't want to be sat watching, we want to be involved in exciting Test cricket and make an impact on the world stage".

But he added: "If you're facing someone really quick it can feel a bit more dangerous -- in the field, square of the wicket is where you feel most vulnerable.

"Similarly the umpires might feel in danger if someone crunches a pull shot or hits one straight back at them.

"They've also got to be able to see and make the right decisions on the field."

https://sports.yahoo.com/pakistans-waqar-wants-stay-longer-195500651.html
 
What does the coach do then? lol.

Every team sport, head coach decides who plays or who doesn't, not the captain.

Selection committee hands over the players. On the day, it is the captain's call with coach's input.

You think Imran, Ganguly, Williamson, Kohli, Waugh let the coaches decide who plays on the day? This is not football.
 
This post reflects your lack of knowledge in cricket but you’re not alone in this regard. In fact it’s a common trait among the Misbah fan base.

Ahh okay, so not trashing Misbah in every conceivable post makes me knowledgeable. Got it.

Coaching selecting the lineup is quite common in every sport from Football, Basketball, Hockey, Baseball and North American Football. In fact, their whole job is X's and O's and selecting the best lineup to play. If a coach is not doing that in Cricket, then what exactly are they doing? There's a batting coach for the batsmen, there's a bowling coach for the bowler, there's a fielding coach for fielding.

I presume the coach just twiddle his thumbs, acts like a cheerleader and the pats the guys on the butt for a job well done?

I am sure the captain has a great input too and sometimes maybe they can select the lineup but I highly doubt that would be anyone being named captain. If you prove yourself like the greats have done like Imran and Dhoni, I am sure they are essentially selecting their own lineups but it ain't like a coach is getting paid all that money to do nothing.

Aim for a less clownish post next time.
 
Both Misbah and Waqar should be lucky that 2nd test washed out. England could have won that test easily if it played even 3.5 days
Waqar is nothing but all talk. He has no skill to teach our fast bowlers, has no personality of his own, a yes man of Misbah and terrible eyes to judge talents.
 
Ahh okay, so not trashing Misbah in every conceivable post makes me knowledgeable. Got it.

Coaching selecting the lineup is quite common in every sport from Football, Basketball, Hockey, Baseball and North American Football. In fact, their whole job is X's and O's and selecting the best lineup to play. If a coach is not doing that in Cricket, then what exactly are they doing? There's a batting coach for the batsmen, there's a bowling coach for the bowler, there's a fielding coach for fielding.

I presume the coach just twiddle his thumbs, acts like a cheerleader and the pats the guys on the butt for a job well done?

I am sure the captain has a great input too and sometimes maybe they can select the lineup but I highly doubt that would be anyone being named captain. If you prove yourself like the greats have done like Imran and Dhoni, I am sure they are essentially selecting their own lineups but it ain't like a coach is getting paid all that money to do nothing.

Aim for a less clownish post next time.

Once again, you're proving that to be another Misbah fan who has little to no grasp of the sport. The fact that you have to use examples from other sports is just laughable itself, so that "clownish" tag is merely a self reflection of yourself.

In cricket, the captain has always been (and still is) responsible for deciding the playing XI. The exception of course is in the current Pakistan camp where Misbah dictating everything and using Azhar Ali as his puppet. Everyone can see that.
 
playing 11 is decided by both coach and captain.

I'm not sure if you're saying this to defend Misbah or whether you're another Misbah fan who has a poor grasp of the sport but either way your post doesn't make sense.

I'll explain in simple terms why, you're basically saying the coach and captain both have the final say on the XI, which cannot be the case. Only one of them can have the final say, whoever does is ultimately responsible for picking the team on the day.

In cricket, the captain has always been (and still is) responsible for deciding the playing XI. The exception of course is in the current Pakistan camp where Misbah is dictating everything and using Azhar Ali as his puppet. Everyone can see that.
 
Both Misbah and Waqar should be lucky that 2nd test washed out. England could have won that test easily if it played even 3.5 days
Waqar is nothing but all talk. He has no skill to teach our fast bowlers, has no personality of his own, a yes man of Misbah and terrible eyes to judge talents.

How would they have won easily pakistan took 4 wickets england top order got blown away

Terrible eye to judge talents like naseem shaheen Rauf?
 
I hope azhar wins the toss on friday and misbah decides to bat first again
 
I would say we werent prepared at all.

What did we learn from previous Tests about bowling to Buttler etc?

Waqar has a lot to answer for.
 
Shaheen and Naseem seem exhausted, clearly lacked discipline on day 1. Huge dip in quality of bowling from those 2

Why weren't they rested, there are 9-10 fast bowlers in the squad. What exactly does Waqar do besides giving meaningless interviews
 
Don't know how it's possible but the longer the series has gone on the worse we have gotten.
 
No reverse swing from the pacers. The bowling tactics were very predictable. England knew Abbass would do the holding role along with Yasir and have targetted Shaheen and Naseem for runs. Pakistan should have played Faheem Ashraf instead of Fawad Alam who was a very defensive selection. We needed a 5th bowler and a 4th pacer to allow the other bowlers to be used in short sharp bursts instead of being made to bowl 10 over spells and be out of Gas in their 3rd and 4th spells onwards when the batsmen are looking to cash in.

Just pathetic stuff and planning for the team management which continues to blindly apply UAE tactics regardless of the conditions on the ground.
 
Don't know how it's possible but the longer the series has gone on the worse we have gotten.

It was on the cards the first test was the best chance of a win a thrashing is on the cards here hopefully rain can keep on coming over the next five days.
 
Is this Waqar's 4th or 5th stint in the backroom?

What was that quote they say relates to madness again?
 
Is this Waqar's 4th or 5th stint in the backroom?

What was that quote they say relates to madness again?

Waqar has been hired a dozen times by PCB and he has never delivered. No organization in the world would hire the same employee after firing him multiple times. This is complete madness.
 
Great bowlers don't always make great coaches. Waqar should never be near any coaching role with the first team.
 
Is this Waqar's 4th or 5th stint in the backroom?

What was that quote they say relates to madness again?

"Insanity is trying the same thing over and over again and expecting different results"
 
Waqar Younis on TV this morning


"Keep it simple. We made mistakes and these guys will learn from those mistakes. If you try to tell them too many things they will get lost. They are both young and have hardly played any cricket. When they are bowling well, I leave them alone. I think that’s the way you want to go. On the hard days, like what we had yesterday, you have to be a bit more disciplined but I think that will come with time."

"There was inexperience, for sure. The pitches we played on in the last couple of games did a bit and I guess our youngsters got carried away at times. We did bowl poorly at time – but that is to take nothing away from the England batsmen, who played extremely well. They were positive and really exploited our inexperience."
 
That was a pretty average interview by Sky's usual high standards. Neither of Ward, Wasim, nor Hussain bothered to ask Waqar about the lack of bouncers being bowled during this series. Waqar easily played a straight bat to all those dollies that they lobbed up to him.
 
That was a pretty average interview by Sky's usual high standards. Neither of Ward, Wasim, nor Hussain bothered to ask Waqar about the lack of bouncers being bowled during this series. Waqar easily played a straight bat to all those dollies that they lobbed up to him.

The VIDEO of the interview:

<div style="width: 100%; height: 0px; position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.250%;"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/e/dtw9jl" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="100%" allowfullscreen style="width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute;"></iframe></div>
 
Back
Top