What's new

"I want to develop a team that can chase scores of 325-350" : Inzamam-ul-Haq

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
Inzamam-ul-Haq speaking after the Pakistan One Day Cup final:

"We've seen some very good cricket in the Pakistan Cup."

"Since I've become Chief Selector, what I'm trying to do is to make us catch up with other countries who are making 300 scores in one day cricket. After a year, we're finally seeing that."

"We chose young captains for the teams to give them experience and we added coaches from the academies to the teams."

"It was a great tournament to watch and I hope the people enjoyed it too."

"Cricket is not going to stop after the Champions Trophy. After announcing the team for the CT, the selection committee is still here watching the matches (for the future)."

"I was seeing before the tournament that some youngsters like Sami Aslam were playing a little slowly so I spoke to them and told them to play a bit quicker."

"It's great for us that Aamer Yamin has performed as we're lacking quality all-rounders."

"I am happy as a Chief Selector when players in domestic cricket perform well because that will improve our bench strength."

(Regarding Sohail Khan) "I spoke to the coach and captain and the planning is that going forward, we will try to replace some of the older players with youngsters. 35 years is quite an advanced age for a fast bowler. He is a good boy and has given performances but we're trying to go forward according to our policy. There's no need for anyone to be disheartened, this isn't a personal thing."

"Wahab Riaz has been playing constantly but if he doesn't perform then the pressure will increase on him due to performances of players in domestic cricket."

"If we compare to the quality of cricket from decades past then it's not the same nowadays. We can't find players from that era anymore. In those days, players were more focused on technique but nowadays the focus is on hitting. Doesn't matter to me if your technique is a little deficient but what I am working on is to develop a team where I feel that if our opponent scores 325-350, then we chase it as well. I don't think we have reached that stage yet. So we don't want players like the ones from past eras, we need players who can play fast and can start well from the beginning."

"In 1989 I played an innings of 80 runs and I played a lofted shot so the umpire told me 'you played one bad shot'. Today these shots are considered good. So cricket has changed and we need to adjust accordingly."
 
Nonsense from Inzi. He has done nothing to develop the team infact he has taken all the steps to bring back TTFs especially Akmals and Hafeez back into the side permanently.
 
325?? 350 is standard these days. All talk..no action. Shows how out of touch he is.
 
We lack all rounders yet you don't pick a performing all rounder LOL.

You want us to score 325 plus yet you pick Azhar and Hafeez meaning Sarfraz and Malik are demoted down the order.

Wahab has been rubbish in LO for a while yet he is selected.

The revolutionary strikes again. :salute .

I have lost patience with Inzi. I supported him for long enough but he has proven to be no better then previous selectors. He has made some good decisions but most of selections have been baffling and just sticking with the same squad regardless of conditions.
 
Oh inzi bas kar.

He talks and talks but does not deliver. 325 plus? But selects shezad and azhar as openers with a mighty sr of 70 odd.
 
Lmao I just watched his interview.

His opinions were very similar to most Ppers, but he selected a trash team with Azhar Ali in it.
 
Inzi has played under Imran Khan, he played odis and tests in all of the top countries. He has played in many icc tournaments. He has been involved in cricket for over 20 years. Despite all of this he is selecting squads that aren't suited to the conditions (look at Australia and NZ tour), in odis he is not picking players on merit and he is not picking players who aren't suitable for modern day odi cricket.

It's clear he doesn't follow domestic cricket much and that some of his selections are through favouritism and some through political connections.

He says all the right stuff but selections are the opposite of what he says.

Inzi is one of Pakistans greats batsmen but proving to be one of Pakistans worst selectors.
 
Last edited:
Hypocrisy is drooling out of his mouth.:119:

He always says the right things and does the opposite of that.:110:

He should become a politician, he would have a better career because of good hypocrisy skills.:sharif

He said that technique is not important, hitting ability is important, then why did he select garbage squad for CT? Is CT some kind of joke and have no importance?

Yamin, Khurram, Farhan, Sohail, all should get on the plane then based on PC performance.

I expect garage selections to continue after CT as well, no deserving player will get a chance.

Salman Butt will make a comeback in test side based on his exceptional PC performance and some random top performer from QeA trophy will join ODI squad again.

#InziOut
 
Last edited:
Inzi dissapoints again; Sohail khan is 33 and what about the selection of Kamran; who is more than 35? Hafeez is also more than 36; so this is all crap from Inzi; there isnt any transparency in selection process and only dictatorship among the selectors. The list of deserving youngsters is very long who should be in the test / ODIs teams.
 
Yes Inzi and I'm sure a top order containing Azhar Ali, Ahmed Shehzad and Mohammad Hafeez will certainly do that.
 
Says this while all the fast paced players are playing in domestic and Azhar, Shehzad, etc. in the national team. Drops Kamran who actually scored fast and keeps Shehzad who played at a pathetic strike rate.

Why aren't Yamin, Talat, Sahibzada in the team? What the hell are you waiting for? We don't need them in the future, we need them now.
 
Does this mean Inzi is anticipating other teams scoring 325-350 more often than not?
 
Says one thing, does another. By his words he is a dream selector, by his actions, he is garbage.
 
Inzamam said some great things in that interview, including identifying Yamin, Amin, Aslam... he also said how he wants to mould all level of Pakistan cricket to be able to chase 350 regularly and how they are incapable of doing that now

but his actions have been the total opposite, he has been a total politician so far- saying one thing and doing the opposite
 
I think the current cup has proven that teams are trying to hit those big scores. Inzi is right to focus on this. Totally agree with everything he has said. I think his strategy for this CT is simply to put out a relatively competent team and hope they win a match or two. He is rightly looking beyond this CT. Good stuff Inzi.
 
Your actions have to support such words and his don't.

The squad selected will barely muster 280 on a good day.
 
Your actions have to support such words and his don't.

The squad selected will barely muster 280 on a good day.

any squad selected by the 12 year olds on this forum wouldnt get to 50..so inzi has done the best he can considering..
 
I know the squad for the CT disappointed everyone but I think external pressure was a huge factor due to it being a major tournament. These comments are very encouraging but he'll have to make sure he backs up his words next opportunity when selecting players for the tours following the CT.
 
any squad selected by the 12 year olds on this forum wouldnt get to 50..so inzi has done the best he can considering..

He really hasn't.

He doesn't follow the rules he's setting for selection. Wants to remove older ODI players, selects Azhar Ali and Mohammad Hafeez. Wants to play fast, picks Azhar Ali and Ahmed Shahzad.

I don't mind a selector having a specific opinion and following it.

Inzi doesn't do that. He's all over the place.
 
Last edited:
Please resign. You don't have honesty and intellectual to select proper players. Stop bluffing people!!!!!
 
tv channels and newspapers criticise him a lot, a few journalists have criticised him on his face, he is a stubborn guy, he don't care simply, he is running the show like a dictator, no acountability
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just like his captaincy days which by the end of his tenure was based on being part of his clique e.g. Arshad Khan etc...

Woolmer even said Inzi would just stop talking to him for a few days whenever they had a disagreement until Inzi got his way.
 
poor thinking.

He should make a team that shouldn't be allowed to be spanked above 280 runs.

He should strengthen our bowling attack.
 
tv channels and newspapers criticise him a lot, a few journalists have criticised him on his face, he is a stubborn guy, he don't care simply, he is running the show like a dictator, no acountability

After the CT flop show he may be forced to resign. After all SK and Sethi will not tolerate extreme poor show which will also force them them to retire.
 
Inzamam-ul-Haq speaking after the Pakistan One Day Cup final:

"We've seen some very good cricket in the Pakistan Cup."

"Since I've become Chief Selector, what I'm trying to do is to make us catch up with other countries who are making 300 scores in one day cricket. After a year, we're finally seeing that."

"We chose young captains for the teams to give them experience and we added coaches from the academies to the teams."

"It was a great tournament to watch and I hope the people enjoyed it too."

"Cricket is not going to stop after the Champions Trophy. After announcing the team for the CT, the selection committee is still here watching the matches (for the future)."

"I was seeing before the tournament that some youngsters like Sami Aslam were playing a little slowly so I spoke to them and told them to play a bit quicker."

"It's great for us that Aamer Yamin has performed as we're lacking quality all-rounders."

"I am happy as a Chief Selector when players in domestic cricket perform well because that will improve our bench strength."

(Regarding Sohail Khan) "I spoke to the coach and captain and the planning is that going forward, we will try to replace some of the older players with youngsters. 35 years is quite an advanced age for a fast bowler. He is a good boy and has given performances but we're trying to go forward according to our policy. There's no need for anyone to be disheartened, this isn't a personal thing."

"Wahab Riaz has been playing constantly but if he doesn't perform then the pressure will increase on him due to performances of players in domestic cricket."

"If we compare to the quality of cricket from decades past then it's not the same nowadays. We can't find players from that era anymore. In those days, players were more focused on technique but nowadays the focus is on hitting. Doesn't matter to me if your technique is a little deficient but what I am working on is to develop a team where I feel that if our opponent scores 325-350, then we chase it as well. I don't think we have reached that stage yet. So we don't want players like the ones from past eras, we need players who can play fast and can start well from the beginning."

"In 1989 I played an innings of 80 runs and I played a lofted shot so the umpire told me 'you played one bad shot'. Today these shots are considered good. So cricket has changed and we need to adjust accordingly."

Inzamam is the only captain during who's tenure we got close to chasing a target of 350, and have chased multiple 300 targets in his captaincy. Despite the injustices in selection for the WI, I hope he lives upto his word and give us a side that can achieve those targets..

The next step is the ability to chase these targets with less wickets down... a trend I noticed in all the games is that they go down to the wire, we chase down these totals in the last over, with 7-8 wickets down... our batsmen need to be able to do that with the loss of 4-5 wickets like all the modern teams are doing, if one batsmen gets his eye in, he should take it to the end, not get a 50-100 and then get out coz he considers his 'job is done'

Alot of credit goes to the organizers for making this a successful event, and the final also got a decent audience, so it did create a good and exciting atmosphere for the players to play in
 
Last edited:
In 200 overs vs a local team from Multan? Yes.

Have you ever watched Shehzad bat? Although he has 15 off 30 balls, he finishes off with 50 off 65. Not to forget, he is young and has scored a hundred in every format of the game. A legend!
 
prepare a bowling attack to limit the target score to 270 and a batting unit to chase 330 but you are not going to do it with azhar, shehzad and hafeez.
 
If we flop CT i can see it being the end of quite a few players.
He is saying the right things and we seem to have hit on a working pool of players since he started as chief selector, who r actually putting performances in that have people sitting up.

Shadab Hasan Talat Yamin Sahibzada etc
Sami has picked up in odis too
Add to that the performances of amin haris
Then there r the guys not knocking quite as loud but had solid performances in Pakistan cup.
We do have a talent pool that can help babar sarfaraz malik amir and form a team around them for 2019

I'm willing to give this time
 
Drops Sohail, keeps in Wahab and Malik if age is a factor.

Says Sami needs to up strike rate, brings in Shan Masood, Ahmed Shehzad and Azhar Ali.

Biggest hypocrite. Looks like no integrity.
 
Very good. At least he has a target as chief selector.

its looks like theres 2 inzi one who select the team consist of ttf akmal,shehzad,tanvir
another inzi who talk in media about youngsters & chasing 350.
i would rather believe shabbir words that they can chase 400+ .
then believing a team.consist of shehzad,azhar ali,hafeez chasing 325+
 
Great interview. One of his biggest qualities is how he speaks about the players. No disrespect, no agenda-pushing but rather, constructive criticism and level-headed praise. He's already identified guys like Yamin and through this interview its clear that Sami Aslam is definitely part of the future plans. The players not selected for the CT should keep honing their skills and when their time comes, grab the opportunity with both hands and get themselves established into the side.

Riaz is a couple of bad performances from being being dropped for good so I hope he turns up in both tests and ODIs like everyone knows he can. Inzi's right in trying to assemble a team that can chase 300+ regularly but he also needs to ensure that the bowling is strong enough to not making the 300 chase a routine. He has selected a good group of bowlers though so the rest of it is up with Sarfaraz.

Overall, a great team selected for the CT, given the resources available to Pakistan at the moment and all signs point to good things in the future as well. I was initially unsure about Inzamam as the CS and no the coach but he's done a fantastic job ever since he took over and is transitioning our team into the new generation.

Sami, Babar, Hassan, Shadab, Sarfaraz the captain are some of the most promising players that have become regulars because of Inzamam. Afridi, Kamran and now Misbah and Younis have all been transitioned out because of him too. Next on the list are Hafeez, Riaz and Malik but it shouldn't be rushed job.
 
Is he the coach?Why does a selector get so much of air time,the scouts actually find youngsters get them tracked to domestic teams ,what does a national selector do anyway,making sure the balance is there.

Not sure "what" development is he talking about,at best the support staff working with team does it.
 
Seems as though Sohail khans international career is over . .
 
Great interview. One of his biggest qualities is how he speaks about the players. No disrespect, no agenda-pushing but rather, constructive criticism and level-headed praise. He's already identified guys like Yamin and through this interview its clear that Sami Aslam is definitely part of the future plans. The players not selected for the CT should keep honing their skills and when their time comes, grab the opportunity with both hands and get themselves established into the side.

Riaz is a couple of bad performances from being being dropped for good so I hope he turns up in both tests and ODIs like everyone knows he can. Inzi's right in trying to assemble a team that can chase 300+ regularly but he also needs to ensure that the bowling is strong enough to not making the 300 chase a routine. He has selected a good group of bowlers though so the rest of it is up with Sarfaraz.

Overall, a great team selected for the CT, given the resources available to Pakistan at the moment and all signs point to good things in the future as well. I was initially unsure about Inzamam as the CS and no the coach but he's done a fantastic job ever since he took over and is transitioning our team into the new generation.

Sami, Babar, Hassan, Shadab, Sarfaraz the captain are some of the most promising players that have become regulars because of Inzamam. Afridi, Kamran and now Misbah and Younis have all been transitioned out because of him too. Next on the list are Hafeez, Riaz and Malik but it shouldn't be rushed job.
Interesting, you genuinely believe Inzi is a good selector? What's your view on the selection of Shan Masood/Dropping off Sami Aslam (never mind anything else).
 
its looks like theres 2 inzi one who select the team consist of ttf akmal,shehzad,tanvir
another inzi who talk in media about youngsters & chasing 350.
i would rather believe shabbir words that they can chase 400+ .
then believing a team.consist of shehzad,azhar ali,hafeez chasing 325+

The first inzi may be he who have to listen many persons to keep their relatives in the team and may be the 2nd inzi is the actual one who wants to do the same as he speaks in press conference.
 
It's pretty sad how Inzamam is turning out to be the same as Haroon Rasheed, Iqbal Qasim.

His excuses are also the same: experience and the wishes of the team management.

Except Aamir Sohail all CS have been like this and maybe there isn't any other way if you want to continue working for the PCB. But the thing is that INzamam is being wasted. He can do a lot more as a batting coach in the NCA.

Anyone can be CS but not everyone can be a batting consultant or coach. That is where Inzamam truly was needed (and still is). Fortunately Younis Khan understands this and is willing to work with the u-19 team after his retirement.
 
If we flop CT i can see it being the end of quite a few players.
He is saying the right things and we seem to have hit on a working pool of players since he started as chief selector, who r actually putting performances in that have people sitting up.

Shadab Hasan Talat Yamin Sahibzada etc
Sami has picked up in odis too
Add to that the performances of amin haris
Then there r the guys not knocking quite as loud but had solid performances in Pakistan cup.
We do have a talent pool that can help babar sarfaraz malik amir and form a team around them for 2019

I'm willing to give this time

I don't like the selection for CT either but under Inzamam and others PAK for the first time have made the following advances:

1) Pakistan Cup had the right kind of Pitches
2) Captains were selected and evaluated
3) PCB Domestic coaches were assigned to the teams to work with and identify key players
4) Core of Players is identified and available

I am not saying that things are perfect but they are looking a lot healthier than they were 12 months ago.

Yes these are errors and mistakes but (small) steps are being taken in the right direction.

I still think that making Sarfaraz Captain in all 3 formats is putting too much pressure on him, in fact PAK should have a backup Keeper and give Sarfi some rest.

I think Younis should be Test Captain for a year or so
 
Everything he says, aptly contradicts what he does.

I genuinely thought that read like it was a transcript from one of Trump's interviews.
 
Interesting, you genuinely believe Inzi is a good selector? What's your view on the selection of Shan Masood/Dropping off Sami Aslam (never mind anything else).

Inzi's not perfect and there have been some howler selections like that of Shan Masood and Azhar Ali but overall he has done better compared to previous selectors thus far, CT 2017 squad is better then CT 2013 and youngsters have been introduced in both Test ad ODI squad's; think people have gone overboard with their criticism because they wanted Inzi to 100% perfect and select all their favourites; that was never going to be happen plus behind the scenes in the PCB it's a lot harder to select a team then it is from our keyboards on PP because there are other external issues to deal with as well...
 
Last edited:
Inzi's not perfect and there have been some howler selections like that of Shan Masood and Azhar Ali but overall he has done better compared to previous selectors thus far, CT 2017 squad is better then CT 2013 and youngsters have been introduced in both Test ad ODI squad's; think people have gone overboard with their criticism because they wanted Inzi to 100% perfect and select all their favourites; that was never going to be happen plus behind the scenes in the PCB it's a lot harder to select a team then it is from our keyboards on PP because there are other external issues to deal with as well...
Pretty fair assessment this, I've mostly supported him up until the CT squad howlers. He's infinitely better than the previous jobbers but his recent selections have been hugely disappointing.
 
I want to post something but I can't really muster up the effort to do so anymore regarding this sorry lot
 
Last CT 2013, the whole Pakistan (including the media) was howling about the omission of Ahmed Shehzad, and how Shehzad was hard done by the selectors by picking Imran Farhat...

Now 4 years later, we are crying on the same injustice done by the presence of Ahmed Shehzad in the squad in place of a more deserving junior...

This is a memo and tribute to alot of PP'ers, whose perfect squad is the one that isn't selected
 
Pretty fair assessment this, I've mostly supported him up until the CT squad howlers. He's infinitely better than the previous jobbers but his recent selections have been hugely disappointing.

I agree, people also seem to have short memory span with regards to the previous turncoats; Inzi is exactly what we expected which is an improvement and we should not take that for granted, no pak selector has been 100% perfect. We must also remember that this is Inzi's first stint which is why am patient as well, hopefully he improves and gets better with more experience. Overall I give him a solid B+
hhh.png


I wouldn't even grade the ones who came before :mv
 
Last CT 2013, the whole Pakistan (including the media) was howling about the omission of Ahmed Shehzad, and how Shehzad was hard done by the selectors by picking Imran Farhat...

Now 4 years later, we are crying on the same injustice done by the presence of Ahmed Shehzad in the squad in place of a more deserving junior...

This is a memo and tribute to alot of PP'ers, whose perfect squad is the one that isn't selected

there is no comparison between the two

Farhat had a history of failure, and a histroy of corruption. His dad in law would literally issue death threats on tv if he wasn't selected.
 
They almost have the same average

average 33 vs 30 is not almost the same, plusshezhad has 6 tons inlcuding in sa and NZ compared to one by sir farhat.

Not defending Ahmad, but anyone who makes such a comparison clearly didn't have to sit through years of watching Farhat steal a living. The guy didnt even try in the field, he epitomised everything wrong in Pak cricket

I remember when Dav Whatmore went off at him for refusing to give drinks to the batting pair, thats the kind of of player farhat was

the ego of Younis with the performance of a ttf
 
Last edited:
average 33 vs 30 is not almost the same, plusshezhad has 6 tons inlcuding in sa and NZ compared to one by sir farhat.

Not defending Ahmad, but anyone who makes such a comparison clearly didn't have to sit through years of watching Farhat steal a living. The guy didnt even try in the field, he epitomised everything wrong in Pak cricket

I remember when Dav Whatmore went off at him for refusing to give drinks to the batting pair, thats the kind of of player farhat was

the ego of Younis with the performance of a ttf

Point I made was completely different, they have both gone from being the next big thing to a pantomine villain, nobody thought this of Farhat when he was representing Pakistan vs India in 2003-4 series... or when he got a 90 odd against the NZ in their home ground.

33 vs 30 might make a big difference long term, but we are not comparing two batsmen who play in different positions, we are comparing an opener with an opener, and neither Shehzad, nor Farhat are batsmen who average 50+ with a SR of 90 odd... in fact their strike rate is quite similar too
 
Point I made was completely different, they have both gone from being the next big thing to a pantomine villain, nobody thought this of Farhat when he was representing Pakistan vs India in 2003-4 series... or when he got a 90 odd against the NZ in their home ground.

33 vs 30 might make a big difference long term, but we are not comparing two batsmen who play in different positions, we are comparing an opener with an opener, and neither Shehzad, nor Farhat are batsmen who average 50+ with a SR of 90 odd... in fact their strike rate is quite similar too


there is a difference though, you are comparing a player who was openly corrupt and lazy to a player who just mediocre but has had some moments. Yeah shezhad cops some flak and he deserves it, buts its nothing compared to what farhat got and deserved

its like comparing an annoying idiot to a criminal, there is no comparison
 
there is a difference though, you are comparing a player who was openly corrupt and lazy to a player who just mediocre but has had some moments. Yeah shezhad cops some flak and he deserves it, buts its nothing compared to what farhat got and deserved

its like comparing an annoying idiot to a criminal, there is no comparison

You think Shehzad doesn't have something going on in the background to get into the squad? What were his performances in the WI?
 
You think Shehzad doesn't have something going on in the background to get into the squad? What were his performances in the WI?

nothing and he should have been dropped, but if that's the standard than every player in the team has connections.

If shezhad was some don he wouldn't have just missed 18 months of international cricket
 
nothing and he should have been dropped, but if that's the standard than every player in the team has connections.

If shezhad was some don he wouldn't have just missed 18 months of international cricket

He played in t20 World Cup last year.. and now he is back in the squad and ready to enter another World Tournament (remember his failiures in 11,15 edition)
 
He played in t20 World Cup last year.. and now he is back in the squad and ready to enter another World Tournament (remember his failiures in 11,15 edition)

okay thank you for the correction, but my point still stands he missed plenty of games, rightly ill add, but there is no indication that there is foul play here, his father in law isnt a selector, nor is he publically threatening other selectors
 
He says things right and do things wrong... IDK may be he had a dream that Azhar, Shehzad and Hafeez consistently chasing 330+ scores with brilliant performances with the bat...

the biggest decision that i hate the most is dropping sami aslam from tests...
 
Someone tell him that you can't expect to chase even 250 with Azhar , Shehzad and Hafeez in the line up .
 
Interesting, you genuinely believe Inzi is a good selector? What's your view on the selection of Shan Masood/Dropping off Sami Aslam (never mind anything else).

One bad selection makes him a terrible selector? Apart from dropping Sami for Masood, not bringing Junaid back into tests and recalling Azhar, Inzamam has been very close to a perfect selector for me. Even his negatives can be forgiven because Junaid needs to earn his spot back and Azhar is a more viable option than Kamran.

Seeing what a range of different opinions about who should be playing and who shouldn't we have on Pakpassion, this might not be the case with everyone.
 
He says things right and do things wrong... IDK may be he had a dream that Azhar, Shehzad and Hafeez consistently chasing 330+ scores with brilliant performances with the bat...

the biggest decision that i hate the most is dropping sami aslam from tests...

Who says all three are going to play in the same team? Fakhar Zaman is another opening option and should open with one of those three. Inzamam has selected a good squad that can utilize a number of strategies, the actual team selection is down to the team management.

If the team management plays 11 batsmen and opens the bowling with Hafeez and Malik, how is that the selectors' fault? This is what our batting-order should be:

1) Hafeez
2) Fakhar
3) Babar
4) Sarfaraz
5) Malik
6) Akmal
7) Imad/Shadab

A very top seven that can chase 300 down but our strategy should be keeping the opposition down to below 300 with four pacers + three spinners.
 
I agree, people also seem to have short memory span with regards to the previous turncoats; Inzi is exactly what we expected which is an improvement and we should not take that for granted, no pak selector has been 100% perfect. We must also remember that this is Inzi's first stint which is why am patient as well, hopefully he improves and gets better with more experience. Overall I give him a solid B+
hhh.png


I wouldn't even grade the ones who came before :mv

Another classic post by shaz. No selector will be able to appease a nation of 180 million but as long as there is a good reason behind his selections and the guys selected do well, the fans should suck up their pride and repeat after me:

"Inzamam is the greatest Pakistani selector of all-time".
 
Another classic post by shaz. No selector will be able to appease a nation of 180 million but as long as there is a good reason behind his selections and the guys selected do well, the fans should suck up their pride and repeat after me:

"Inzamam is the greatest Pakistani selector of all-time".

You have made it a life time mission to defend inzamam. Good luck.
 
The way Inzi talks is probably one of the reasons why his selections lead to such a backlash.

He has a good grasp on modern day cricket (apparently) yet his selections seem to suggest the complete opposite.
 
Another classic post by shaz. No selector will be able to appease a nation of 180 million but as long as there is a good reason behind his selections and the guys selected do well, the fans should suck up their pride and repeat after me:

"Inzamam is the greatest Pakistani selector of all-time".
[MENTION=135196]waleed88[/MENTION] summed it up beautifully

This is a memo and tribute to alot of PP'ers, whose perfect squad is the one that isn't selected
 
Back
Top