What's new

If India attacks Pakistan, Bangladesh along with China should occupy 7 Northeastern states: Major General (Rtd) Fazlur Rehman

Bangladesh got inspired by GoT and considers himself the king-maker.

Delusional bunch.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Begam shaadi mein Bangladesh deewana… Bangladesh has no business to with India Vs Pakistan war, if they try to join war by any means, then RSS dream of “Akhand Bharat” will come in reality
 
but he sounded like Retard

I would've agreed with you if he only said Bangladesh.

He mentioned Bangladesh and China. Are you saying China can't occupy Indian states? :inti

As a matter of fact, China can annex whole of India. China already grabbed 2000 sq km of Indian territory since 2020 without any major war. India is no match to China militarily.

Anyway, these are hypothetical I guess. The guy is not in the army anymore; he has retired.
 
I would've agreed with you if he only said Bangladesh.

He mentioned Bangladesh and China. Are you saying China can't occupy Indian states? :inti

As a matter of fact, China can annex whole of India. China already grabbed 2000 sq km of Indian territory since 2020 without any major war. India is no match to China militarily.

Anyway, these are hypothetical I guess. The guy is not in the army anymore; he has retired.


India is not going to do anything. All they can do is ban some unknown YouTuber like Uzair Cricket. They are making a noise that they will do this, they will do that, but in reality, they forgot their BSF soldier PK Singh. The noise you are hearing from Indian media and some Indian Posters is hogwash. Modi Jee is making a fool of them :yk3. Sooner or later, they will come back to their senses :yk
 
What is the Bangladesh armed forces capability in 2025? Could they cause significant damage or occupy Indian miltary forces on that border, which would put unnecessary strain purely brought on themselves by India's political heavy-handed approach?
Somewhere I heard that Hasina/IND was making BD military very weak over the years deliberately. BD dont need to worry about gaining any lands from IND as that would be suicidal, they just need to worry about thwarting any aggression from Myanmar which is very likely.
 
Your desire may be to establish a "new normal" but it is against International norms and regulations. Pakistan has Kulbushan Yadav in Jail and convicted of meddling in the internal affairs of Pakistan (in Baluchistan). If Pakistan was to use this as precedence and attack some sort of facility (inside India) as a strategic facility, would that be acceptable and allowed by India?

The attack will be medium scale public and a strategic target like a port airbase munitions depot..maybe a hq etc. the message being if the best time there is a terror attack..another base or port will see an attack. So there will be a price paid for sending Terrorists to a sovereign country. This will be the extent of Pakistans' response.

Is that acceptable to you?
We are enemy countries..there is bound to be spies and traitors in both our country . ...it is Pakistans's prerogative to take action .as far as I know no Indian citizen has gone into Pakistan and killed unarmed civilians after checking they were Muslim...I am just shocked you are saying both are same. Before that we had uri pathankot Pulwama and Mumbai attacks...if you say it's false flag and we are just blaming Pak..if you remember we didn't when Indian Mujhadeen were active..we knew you supported them but we didn't blame you....every country can determine their best course of action .for Pakistan it's terror and how it can hurt India story...why would I be afraid of going to Mumbai or Kashmir and feel I can be shot dead for no reason...
 
Evidently Bangladesh is top 50 most powerful country in the world now which holds good deal of influence on world politics and economy. I didnt even know, but all these times IND fans on Pakpassion keep asserting "who even cares about BD." @sweep_shot
 
Stand back everybody, the mighty Bengal Tigers have entered this battle to turn the tables. Be very scared.

IMG_0616.gif
 
We are enemy countries..there is bound to be spies and traitors in both our country . ...it is Pakistans's prerogative to take action .as far as I know no Indian citizen has gone into Pakistan and killed unarmed civilians after checking they were Muslim...I am just shocked you are saying both are same. Before that we had uri pathankot Pulwama and Mumbai attacks...if you say it's false flag and we are just blaming Pak..if you remember we didn't when Indian Mujhadeen were active..we knew you supported them but we didn't blame you....every country can determine their best course of action .for Pakistan it's terror and how it can hurt India story...why would I be afraid of going to Mumbai or Kashmir and feel I can be shot dead for no reason...
Kulbushan Jadav is an Indian soy caught by Pakistan and convicted of Terrorism and there are many others.

Although I can provide evidence but entertain me hypothetically...

If Pakistan has evidence that there are training grounds inside India which are training Baloch separatists or anyone else on Pakistani soil, does Pakistan has the right to bomb the location? Baloch separatists and other Terrorists guilty of Terrorism inside Pakistan availing any facilities inside India, does Pakistan have the right to bomb the location?
 

Businesses count costs as India and Bangladesh impose trade restrictions​

Businesses are bracing for possible impact after neighbours India and Bangladesh recently imposed ***-for-tat trade restrictions after months of verbal sparring.

Last month, Bangladesh restricted land imports of cotton yarn from India to shield local industries from cheaper imports.

Dhaka's move came days after India abruptly stopped the transhipment facility it had offered Bangladesh to export its cargoes to third countries via its ports and airports, citing "congestion".

Relations between the countries have soured since former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was ousted in August after massive protests. She is currently in exile in India and an interim administration headed by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus is in charge.

Since then Dhaka has demanded Hasina be extradited to face charges of crimes against humanity, money laundering and corruption. Hasina denies the accusations against her, and Delhi has not officially reacted to the demand.

India has also frequently criticised reports of attacks on the minority Hindu community in Bangladesh. It recently said the alleged killing of a Hindu community leader "reflects a pattern of systematic persecution under the interim government".

Bangladesh, a Muslim-majority nation, denies targeting minorities, calling most incidents politically motivated or ordinary crimes. Hindus make up less than 10% of its 170 million population.

Border Security Force (BSF) personnel inspect a truck carrying supplies to Bangladesh at the India-Bangladesh border in Fulbari on the outskirts of Siliguri on August 7, 2024.

As the countries spar, firms are counting the cost.

Yarn, vital for Bangladesh's clothing factories, can still enter by sea and air - but they are slower and costlier routes.

In 2024, India had exported $1.6bn (£1.2bn) worth of cotton yarn to Bangladesh, a third of it via land ports.

The now-halted transhipment facility let Bangladeshi exporters send clothes made for high-end brands by road to Indian cities, from where it would be flown to Europe and the US.

"It's a blow [to Bangladesh's fast-fashion export industry]," says Anis Ahmed, head of supply chain firm MGH Group, which ships for European fast-fashion brands. "The India route got cargo to Western countries in a week. By sea, it takes up to eight weeks."

Bangladesh, the world's second-largest garment exporter after China, shipped $38bn in clothing last year. Over $1bn of this moved via the India land-air route, which Ahmed says was thriving.

Limited air freight capacity and under-equipped airports hamper direct exports from Bangladesh.

Many see Delhi's withdrawal of the transhipment facility as a response to remarks by Yunus during a recent China visit.

He had called Bangladesh the "only guardian of the ocean" for India's landlocked north-east and suggested that the region could become an "extension of the Chinese economy."

Leaders from India's north-eastern states called the comments "offensive".

Yunus's remarks, spotlighting India's strategic vulnerability in the region to China, raised alarms in Delhi.

India's north-east is linked to the mainland by the 20km-wide Siliguri Corridor - dubbed the "chicken's neck" - flanked by Nepal and Bangladesh and close to Tibet's Chumbi Valley.

With a history of border tensions and having lost a war in 1962, Indian defence planners fear that China could target the corridor to cut off the north-eastern states from the rest of the country in any future conflict.

Bangladeshi analysts say Yunus's remarks were misinterpreted and aimed at promoting regional connectivity.

During his China visit, Dhaka also welcomed Beijing's interest in a $1bn Teesta River project in northern Bangladesh.

Indian analysts warn that Chinese involvement in the project, which is not far from the strategic Siliguri Corridor, could unsettle Delhi.

Source: BBC
 
Kulbushan Jadav is an Indian soy caught by Pakistan and convicted of Terrorism and there are many others.

Although I can provide evidence but entertain me hypothetically...

If Pakistan has evidence that there are training grounds inside India which are training Baloch separatists or anyone else on Pakistani soil, does Pakistan has the right to bomb the location? Baloch separatists and other Terrorists guilty of Terrorism inside Pakistan availing any facilities inside India, does Pakistan have the right to bomb the location?

Kulbhushan Jadhav is falsely implicated by Pakistan government and convicted by banana courts of Pakistan. Therefore India took this matter to ICJ where Pakistan was exposed by India’s lawyers who stripped Pakistan’s evidence before ICJ.

Baloch freedom fighters are fighting against Pakistan corrupt government, atrocities by pak army, no development in their province etc. there try to give false pictures to Pakistani pps
 
Kulbhushan Jadhav is falsely implicated by Pakistan government and convicted by banana courts of Pakistan. Therefore India took this matter to ICJ where Pakistan was exposed by India’s lawyers who stripped Pakistan’s evidence before ICJ.

Baloch freedom fighters are fighting against Pakistan corrupt government, atrocities by pak army, no development in their province etc. there try to give false pictures to Pakistani pps
India should start supporting the Balochistan freedom movement against the brutal pakistani occupation.
 
India should start supporting the Balochistan freedom movement against the brutal pakistani occupation.

No such thing, no matter how hard India tries. Balochis are our brothers and entire region calls themselves Pakistani, those rogue terrorist group supported by India mean nothing and don't pose any potential long term threat. Baloch situation is nothing like IOK where a million army is holding the population hostage for 80 years. There is no army rule and no countless check points in Balochistan like IOK, and our Baloch brothers and sisters move freely inside Balochistan and all over Pakistan. The fact is we Pakistanis love and respect our Baloch people and have no hatred for them or anyone within Pakistan, unlike your bhakt Hindutva extremist racist who deeply hate Muslims hence you got worsening situation in India.

As for unfair treatment of Balochistan, that sure is there, just like how corrupt governments and establishment of Pakistan disregard other regions of Pakistan and Pakistanis all around in general, Balochistan isn't the exception
 
Balochis are our brothers and entire region calls themselves Pakistani, those rogue terrorist group supported by India mean nothing and don't pose any potential long term threat. Baloch situation is nothing like IOK where a million army is holding the population hostage for 80 years. There is no army rule and no countless check points in Balochistan like IOK, and our Baloch brothers and sisters move freely inside Balochistan and all over Pakistan. The fact is we Pakistanis love and respect our Baloch people and have no hatred for them or anyone within Pakistan, unlike your bhakt Hindutva extremist racist who deeply hate Muslims hence you got worsening situation in India.

The Balochis hate you and don't want to be a part of your country.
 
The Balochis hate you and don't want to be a part of your country.

You are confusing Kashmirirs in IOK who hate India to core. When a group hate you, you deploy a million army to keep a "forceful" hold of it, that's what hate looks like. There are many Balochis in Karachi and other parts of Pakistan. Kashmiris hate your facist Hindutva population, you wouldn't have a million army for over 80 years in IOK if they "loved" you :)
 
Geedar and cowards look like these -


Haha I knew that refrence was coming on, the only thing Indians resort to to save their face. Last I checked Bangladesh didn't become India and we Pakistanis in general were and are happy they got their independence. We don't live in historical events hence why we rarely make refrence to mauling of India in 48 when we took half of Kashmir, or to 65 when we sent Indian terrorists back in boxes when they came to occupy Lahore, or a few other historical events. In current times all we can recall is Abhinandan humiliation type events, now seeing Indian cowards getting a beating from Bangladesh, when you enter another country's sovereign state, Indian cowards deserve the humiliation :) Where is that video of Chinese army beating India army with punches and kicks, that was quite recent too lol
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Haha I knew that refrence was coming on, the only thing Indians resort to to save their face. Last I checked Bangladesh didn't become India and we Pakistanis in general were and are happy they got their independence. We don't live in historical events hence why we rarely make refrence to mauling of India in 48 when we took half of Kashmir, or to 65 when we sent Indian terrorists back in boxes when they came to occupy Lahore, or a few other historical events. In current times all we can recall is Abhinandan humiliation type events, now seeing Indian cowards getting a beating from Bangladesh, when you enter another country's sovereign state, Indian cowards deserve the humiliation :) Where is that video of Chinese army beating the India army with punches and kicks, that was quite recent too lol
You can call us cowards and all other names, but fact still remains that we carved out a new country from, made you rub your nose in dirt, and made your 93,000 surrender instead of fighting till death. A soldier would prefer to die rather than surrender. That's what you call real humiliation.

What exactly did you do to us in 65'? You launched Operation Gibralter to capture Kashmir, and instead had to run back to save Lahore. How many inches of Kashmir did you get? What exactly did you get when you started 99' in Kargil to capture Kashmir? How many inches of Kashmir did you get? Instead you ran away once again and even refused to take the dead bodies of your own soldiers. We had to bury them in our own land with all respects.

For you to get even stevens, you'll have to make 93,000 Indian soldiers surrender in front of you, lkike we did and carve out a new country out of us.​
 
You can call us cowards and all other names, but fact still remains that we carved out a new country from, made you rub your nose in dirt, and made your 93,000 surrender instead of fighting till death. A soldier would prefer to die rather than surrender. That's what you call real humiliation.

What exactly did you do to us in 65'? You launched Operation Gibralter to capture Kashmir, and instead had to run back to save Lahore. How many inches of Kashmir did you get? What exactly did you get when you started 99' in Kargil to capture Kashmir? How many inches of Kashmir did you get? Instead you ran away once again and even refused to take the dead bodies of your own soldiers. We had to bury them in our own land with all respects.

For you to get even stevens, you'll have to make 93,000 Indian soldiers surrender in front of you, lkike we did and carve out a new country out of us.​

You don't see us going on about 200,000 cowards surrendering Azad Kashmir to Pakistan. Bangladesh seems to be hating you more than us so how did that work out? Seeing the beating your armyman is getting tells a different story, from being humiliated by bloodied face of Abhinandan, to getting a beating from Chinese army to now a Bengali solider mauling your coward is what you seem to be making the news off late.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You don't see us going on about 200,000 cowards surrendering Azad Kashmir to Pakistan. Bangladesh seems to be hating you more than us so how did that work out? Seeing the beating your armyman is getting tells a different story, from being humiliated by bloodied face of Abhinandan, to getting a beating from Chinese army to now a Bengali solider mauling your coward is what you seem to be making the news off late.
You're wrong. POK was captured in the absence of Indian army. Once Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession, Indian army entered Kashmir and by then POK was already captured. Bangladesh can hate us all they want, matters zilch to us since all they are capable of doing is send illegal immigrants to India.

Abhinandan was captured, he did not surrender like those 93,000 gutless cowards. Therein lies the difference. I really feel bad for the children and grandchildren of those cowards. Imagine having to live in humiliation in the society when everyone knows their father or grandfather are among those 93,000 specimen.​
 
Last edited by a moderator:
India and Pakistan in 2025 :inti

images
 
You're wrong. POK was captured in the absence of Indian army. Once Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession, Indian army entered Kashmir and by then POK was already captured. Bangladesh can hate us all they want, matters zilch to us since all they are capable of doing is send illegal immigrants to India.

Abhinandan was captured, he did not surrender like those 93,000 gutless cowards. Therein lies the difference. I really feel bad for the children and grandchildren of those cowards. Imagine having to live in humiliation in the society when everyone knows their father or grandfather are among those 93,000 specimen.​
unlike you guys we dont buy into a sanitised state approved history without question, we are more than aware that what happened in the run up to bangladeshi independence was wrong, however there is absolutely no doubt that at the prospect of facing an force 3x, or 4x the size, in what was then enemy territory with no hopes of resupply the pragmatic decision was taken.

the fact that Pakistan despite being so much smaller, poorer, and less equipped still draws this level of emotional hatred out of indians shows how little you can do to Pakistan, and it is this truth, that, despite protestation to being a global power, that you cant even influence your own neighbourhood, that irks the indian psyche far far more than anything Pakistan actually does or doesnt do.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You're wrong. POK was captured in the absence of Indian army. Once Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession, Indian army entered Kashmir and by then POK was already captured. Bangladesh can hate us all they want, matters zilch to us since all they are capable of doing is send illegal immigrants to India.

Abhinandan was captured, he did not surrender by pulling his pants down like those 93,000 gutless cowards. Therein lies the difference. I really feel bad for the children and grandchildren of those cowards. Imagine having to live in humiliation in the society when everyone knows their father or grandfather are among those 93,000 specimen.​
Brutal.

The biggest nemesis of these patently ill-informed Pakistanis: Facts staring at their faces 😁
 
unlike you guys we dont buy into a sanitised state approved history without question, we are more than aware that what happened in the run up to bangladeshi independence was wrong, however there is absolutely no doubt that at the prospect of facing an force 3x, or 4x the size, in what was then enemy territory with no hopes of resupply the pragmatic decision was taken.

the fact that Pakistan despite being so much smaller, poorer, and less equipped still draws this level of emotional hatred out of indians shows how little you can do to Pakistan, and it is this truth, that, despite protestation to being a global power, that you cant even influence your own neighbourhood, that irks the indian psyche far far more than anything Pakistan actually does or doesnt do.

Have you noticed one thing? It is the Indians who generally bring up 1971 over and over. Bangladeshi posters hardly mention 1971.

I have read reports than Indian soldiers killed innocent Bangladeshis and then blamed it on Pakistani soldiers. Not sure how accurate it is but I wouldn't be surprised if it happened. Indian soldiers have done many war crimes in Kashmir too.

Anyway, most Bangladeshis have moved on from 1971. Our biggest enemy right now is India. A weaker and balkanized India is good for Bangladesh and all other subcontinental countries.

:inti:inti
 
Is it 1971 all over again? Pak was hoping China would intervene back then too. China even had encouragement from Nixon and Kissinger, but Iron Brother chose to stand back and watch.

Why is Pak always depending on others to fight their fight?

Pak seems to prefer to take on civilians whether in Bengali or Jordan or Mumbai
For what is India waiting then?
Seriously these keyboard warriors are next level.
 
Noble thoughts but there is only one country among the three sending killers to another country and also killing their own in their own country...so not Bangladesh until now .future is dark for them and not India are sending Govt sponsored terrorists
If you think India and Bangladesh and Sri Lanka do not have a bloody history you are sorely mistaken. India has also used brute force on its own people and interfered in other countries in the past and they are doing it today as well.
It will behoove all of us to, for once, grow out of the ultra nationalistic mindset to recognize the reality. What happened in Dhaka, Golden Temple, Kashmir, Baluchistan, the NE Indian states, Sri Lanka, etc are all examples of the same mindset.
 
You're wrong. POK was captured in the absence of Indian army. Once Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession, Indian army entered Kashmir and by then POK was already captured. Bangladesh can hate us all they want, matters zilch to us since all they are capable of doing is send illegal immigrants to India.

Abhinandan was captured, he did not surrender like those 93,000 gutless cowards. Therein lies the difference. I really feel bad for the children and grandchildren of those cowards. Imagine having to live in humiliation in the society when everyone knows their father or grandfather are among those 93,000 specimen.​

The only gutless cowards are those who openly support genocide of kids.
 
No such thing, no matter how hard India tries. Balochis are our brothers and entire region calls themselves Pakistani, those rogue terrorist group supported by India mean nothing and don't pose any potential long term threat. Baloch situation is nothing like IOK where a million army is holding the population hostage for 80 years. There is no army rule and no countless check points in Balochistan like IOK, and our Baloch brothers and sisters move freely inside Balochistan and all over Pakistan. The fact is we Pakistanis love and respect our Baloch people and have no hatred for them or anyone within Pakistan, unlike your bhakt Hindutva extremist racist who deeply hate Muslims hence you got worsening situation in India.

As for unfair treatment of Balochistan, that sure is there, just like how corrupt governments and establishment of Pakistan disregard other regions of Pakistan and Pakistanis all around in general, Balochistan isn't the exception

Balochistan will be a new country in 6 months.. they will defeat Pakistan army
 
No such thing, no matter how hard India tries. Balochis are our brothers and entire region calls themselves Pakistani, those rogue terrorist group supported by India mean nothing and don't pose any potential long term threat.
Sure, if one buries his head in the sand, the world will be dark. And no they are not rogue, they are fighting for their freedom and they are not currently supported by India.
Baloch situation is nothing like IOK where a million army is holding the population hostage for 80 years.
Majority of the Indian force in Kashmir is there to prevent Pakistani army from trying any adventures and to stop cross border terrorism exported by Pakistan.
There is no army rule and no countless check points in Balochistan like IOK, and our Baloch brothers and sisters move freely inside Balochistan and all over Pakistan.
Our brothers and sisters from Jammu and Kashmir can not only move freely inside anywhere in India, they can do business, work in government jobs, private jobs, play and represent India in international sports. In other words, they are us, Indian citizens.
The fact is we Pakistanis love and respect our Baloch people and have no hatred for them or anyone within Pakistan, unlike your bhakt Hindutva extremist racist who deeply hate Muslims hence you got worsening situation in India.
I am sure the radicalized islamists love the minorities in Pakistan.
As for unfair treatment of Balochistan, that sure is there, just like how corrupt governments and establishment of Pakistan disregard other regions of Pakistan and Pakistanis all around in general, Balochistan isn't the exception
When the cross border terrorism stops, Kashmir will get back to normalcy and will be like any other state in India.
 
You're wrong. POK was captured in the absence of Indian army. Once Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession, Indian army entered Kashmir and by then POK was already captured. Bangladesh can hate us all they want, matters zilch to us since all they are capable of doing is send illegal immigrants to India.

Abhinandan was captured, he did not surrender like those 93,000 gutless cowards. Therein lies the difference. I really feel bad for the children and grandchildren of those cowards. Imagine having to live in humiliation in the society when everyone knows their father or grandfather are among those 93,000 specimen.​

The whole Pakistan considering the Capturing of pilot Abhinandan is the proudest moment in Pakistan’s history. However all Pakistanis are living in illusion …..

Abhinandan entered into POK, Dropped some Bombs, got arrested by locals, sipped a cup of tea, didn’t revealed anything and returned back in 2 days.

India calling it operation successful
 
You're wrong. POK was captured in the absence of Indian army. Once Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession, Indian army entered Kashmir and by then POK was already captured. Bangladesh can hate us all they want, matters zilch to us since all they are capable of doing is send illegal immigrants to India.

Abhinandan was captured, he did not surrender like those 93,000 gutless cowards. Therein lies the difference. I really feel bad for the children and grandchildren of those cowards. Imagine having to live in humiliation in the society when everyone knows their father or grandfather are among those 93,000 specimen.​

Yes… also it’s nehru’s big mistake of not kicking of Pakistan intruders and army… instead he took the matter in UN again he committed big mistake
 
India should start supporting the Balochistan freedom movement against the brutal pakistani occupation.
Then Pakistan support the indigenous struggle of Kashmiri people against the oppression and occupation of Indian state.

Going ahead, respond and prove your hypocrisy!
 
Kulbhushan Jadhav is falsely implicated by Pakistan government and convicted by banana courts of Pakistan. Therefore India took this matter to ICJ where Pakistan was exposed by India’s lawyers who stripped Pakistan’s evidence before ICJ.

Baloch freedom fighters are fighting against Pakistan corrupt government, atrocities by pak army, no development in their province etc. there try to give false pictures to Pakistani pps


The whole case of (state of Pakistan) implicated in Pehelgam is even worse! There is no dosier, there is no evidence and it isn't even worthy of even going to ICJ and yet India is wrongly talking about "Terror Factories" inside Pakistan.

Zero, zilch evidence in Pehelgam for retaliation.

Go ahead, respond and declare your double standards
 
The whole case of (state of Pakistan) implicated in Pehelgam is even worse! There is no dosier, there is no evidence and it isn't even worthy of even going to ICJ and yet India is wrongly talking about "Terror Factories" inside Pakistan.

Zero, zilch evidence in Pehelgam for retaliation.

Go ahead, respond and declare your double standards

We don’t have a system of providing evidence to criminals. Do you think thieve will admit the theft evidence provided by police. Pakistan also denied laden is hiding in Pakistan, denied terrorists Ajmal Kasab is pak national later Pakistan media exposed them.
 
India should start supporting the Balochistan freedom movement against the brutal pakistani occupation.

I agree, the Balochis deserve freedom and nothing is going to stop them from getting it. They are fed up with being part of a Pakistan that oppresses them.
 
Kashmiris deserve freedom too. Khalistanis and Manipuris too perhaps. :inti

Kashmiri ppls gave big slap on the face of Pakistan as they stands firm behind Modi government. So forget about Kashmir. For Khalistan Pakistan can give land in Pakistan like IK give for kartarpur corridor.
 
Yes… also it’s nehru’s big mistake of not kicking of Pakistan intruders and army… instead he took the matter in UN again he committed big mistake
Sardar Patel time and time again asked Nehru not to approach the UN. There's a big reason I have such disdain for Nehru.
 
Kashmir is not India. And secondly catch the killers before blaming Pak army. Your intelligence can't even do that.
Fair enough ..but which country did operation search light after not accepting election results and killed 3 million of fellow citizens...you are confusing limited police action vs. military genocide....you will bring up Kashmir but that's a fight against a foreign enemy country ...India doesn't use army against naxals or other miitant groups
 
How is it occupation? Balochistan is not a disputed territory. It has been with Pakistan since 1947. :inti

IOK is a disputed territory.
Balochistan is a disputed territory. It didn't join Pakistan and Pakistan's army took it forcefully. Kashmir legally joined India and it is a disputed territory only because of some dumb politicians who handled the issue at that time.
 
Then Pakistan support the indigenous struggle of Kashmiri people against the oppression and occupation of Indian state.

Going ahead, respond and prove your hypocrisy!
My post about Balochistan was to highlight the hypocrisy of pakistanis and their muslim umma posters from other countries. They constantly portray the terrorism in Kashmir as "freedom struggle". Sure, when Pakistan exports terrorism into Kashmir, it is indigenous struggle.
 
I think Bangladesh Hindus and mountain tribes deserve freedom from the Razakar too.....
With the way the minorities get oppressed in Bangladesh, it could happen. However, I am against dividing a country based on religion. We know radicalized people want to have exclusive rights to the land. But we all need to coexist peacefully, help each other. Human life is too precious to be spent on conflicts and hatred.
 
Balochistan is a disputed territory. It didn't join Pakistan and Pakistan's army took it forcefully. Kashmir legally joined India and it is a disputed territory only because of some dumb politicians who handled the issue at that time.

No it is not - Balochistan was always part of the original Pakistan borders given to Jinnah in 1947
 
Sardar Patel time and time again asked Nehru not to approach the UN. There's a big reason I have such disdain for Nehru.
Yes… also it’s nehru’s big mistake of not kicking of Pakistan intruders and army… instead he took the matter in UN again he committed big mistake

Sardar Patel time and time again asked Nehru not to approach the UN. There's a big reason I have such disdain for Nehru.

Then UN is to blame - not Indian Govt right?
 
No it is not - Balochistan was always part of the original Pakistan borders given to Jinnah in 1947

It it remarkable how out of touch Indians are with basic history. :inti

They need to read history from real textbooks instead of BJP WhatsApp University.
 
It it remarkable how out of touch Indians are with basic history. :inti

They need to read history from real textbooks instead of BJP WhatsApp University.

I tried to refrain from commenting on all this nonsense in the last few days for this very reason….
 
No it is not - Balochistan was always part of the original Pakistan borders given to Jinnah in 1947
(y) You are partially correct. I stand corrected.

Here is what I found:
--------------------------------------------
Balochistan was not originally part of Pakistan. Before the partition of India in 1947, it consisted of four princely states: Kalat, Kharan, Las Bela, and Makran, which were under British influence but not directly administered by them. When India was partitioned in 1947, these states were given the option to join either India or Pakistan, or to maintain their independence.

Under the influence of Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan, Kharan, Las Bela, and Makran chose to join Pakistan.

The Khan of Kalat initially declared independence, but later agreed to accession to Pakistan after military intervention.

--------------------------------------------
It appears only the Kalat state was forced by military.
 
Have you noticed one thing? It is the Indians who generally bring up 1971 over and over. Bangladeshi posters hardly mention 1971.

I have read reports than Indian soldiers killed innocent Bangladeshis and then blamed it on Pakistani soldiers. Not sure how accurate it is but I wouldn't be surprised if it happened. Indian soldiers have done many war crimes in Kashmir too.

Anyway, most Bangladeshis have moved on from 1971. Our biggest enemy right now is India. A weaker and balkanized India is good for Bangladesh and all other subcontinental countries.

:inti:inti
I have bangladeshi friends who have no problems with Pakistan and never bring it up, and theres a good reason for that, because bangadesh won, they got their country, they got their closure, and moved on. its only the losers who keep going on about it like pakistanis used to before people got educated to what really happened. now you can have educated pakistanis and bangladeshis sit together and admit that was a very bad thing to happen, but it did, and you cant change the past, only focus on the future.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Balochistan will be a new country in 6 months.. they will defeat Pakistan army

Anything to comfort yourself. Indians and their comical miserable state, keep crying about Pakistan. You cowards are toothless, you were showed your worth through Abhinandan and you never ventured back into another soveirgn nation ever since.

Continue with your Hindutva facism and India will naturally follow the balkan route and will be broken into numerous pieces, starting off from IOK
 
Sure, if one buries his head in the sand, the world will be dark. And no they are not rogue, they are fighting for their freedom and they are not currently supported by India.

Majority of the Indian force in Kashmir is there to prevent Pakistani army from trying any adventures and to stop cross border terrorism exported by Pakistan.

Our brothers and sisters from Jammu and Kashmir can not only move freely inside anywhere in India, they can do business, work in government jobs, private jobs, play and represent India in international sports. In other words, they are us, Indian citizens.

I am sure the radicalized islamists love the minorities in Pakistan.

When the cross border terrorism stops, Kashmir will get back to normalcy and will be like any other state in India.

The only thing one needs to mention to toss all your points out of the window is Azad Kashmir was always free and no million or even a dozen army patrolling the indigenous Kashmirirs, while in India a million forceful army been curfewng, torturing, raping, blinding, killed over 100k Kashmiris for over 80 years. UN has documented proof of thousands of humanitarian crisis evidence against Terrorist army of India, just some simple obvious facts tell the facts.

You are a nation that made a Hindutva Gujrat butcher Terorrist your PM, so spare us the rhetorics
 
Anything to comfort yourself. Indians and their comical miserable state, keep crying about Pakistan. You cowards are toothless, you were showed your worth through Abhinandan and you never ventured back into another soveirgn nation ever since.

Continue with your Hindutva facism and India will naturally follow the balkan route and will be broken into numerous pieces, starting off from IOK

You haven’t read my post on great pilot Abhinadand. Though Pakistan treating its as proudest moment in their history, but it was mission successful for India…. How?

Abhinandan entered into POK, dropped some bombs, got arrested by locals, enjoyed Pakistan hospitality, didn’t reveal anything and returned back to India in 2 days
 
So much for isolating Pakistan. Two of India's neighbours are supporting Pakistan. Modi's narrative has failed
you must have mistaken modi for an astute statesman. he is nothing but a communal fearmonger. any other half intelligent statesman would have spent the last decade on farm reform, implementing land use taxation, and expansion of the renewable energy sector by onboarding solar or wint manufacturing. all while amassing a robust surplus.

then realized that with the united states contracting its foreign policy, now is not the time for adventures to the west. if anything use the ruse of communal violence and destabilization to push the border with bangladesh and create a more robust land bridget to the north east states.

there is little of avail to india by fighting pakistan or annexing any paksitani territory.
 
Back
Top