What's new

"If you want to play cricket for England, you've got to deliver" : Alastair Cook [Update Post #47]

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,863
"If you want to play cricket for England, you've got to deliver" : Alastair Cook [Update Post #47]

The first Test of the summer is always great, everyone is buzzing to be back.

The guys are desperate to start afresh after the winter, where we didn't win a game, and try and play better. We want to build towards the next really big thing which is India this summer and then the Ashes again next year.

We all know that, obviously, the Ashes is what English cricket revolves around, so without looking too far ahead, you have to look at the overall picture and we've got to improve as a side.

It's been an interesting start to the summer. I've never been as cold as I was playing for Essex at Hampshire, I think the field temperature was minus one!

Peter Siddle bowled in a beanie, it was deeply unpleasant and at times you were wondering what the hell we were doing out there. But actually, it was the best batting wicket we've played on this summer - maybe the pitch was frozen, I don't know, but it was an absolutely belting wicket.

I've played in a fair few games and I've never seen 20 wickets by tea as there were at Chelmsford when we played Yorkshire, which was an extraordinary game.

When you bowl a side out for 50, more often than not you should win the game, so to lose it was disappointing. We bounced back with a good win at Worcester - albeit in a very close game that could have gone either way - on a good cricket wicket if you were watching, there was always something happening.

Less so as a batsman, there was always a ball in there for you, so it was good to win there and it was good to be back with Essex.

It was a very different three weeks and so turning up here was a bit strange and gave me a real appreciation of how good Lord's is. When the sun shines it is fantastic and there was a real sense of it being great to be here.

The ground looks fantastic. You go to Australia and they are all fantastic stadiums but the one thing Lord's has, and I think The Oval as well, is that it still feels like a cricket ground. The SCG and the MCG, for example, don't quite have that, they feel more like stadiums for AFL.

Lord's is a very special place and it doesn't matter how many times you've played, you always look forward to the week of a home Test match here, and this time we'll be up against a mercurial Pakistan side.

They are very talented cricketers but it is a bit like the French rugby team back in the day, you're not quite sure which side is going to turn up. They're great frontrunners, they love getting their noses ahead and we've got to start well and not let that happen.

Mohammad Amir will be Pakistan's danger man, says Cook

Mohammad Amir is obviously their danger man and he's a very skilful bowler. I know Mohammad from his time at Essex, he's a very proud Essex player now and it'll be good to have that battle with him. When Pakistan were here in 2016 we played him pretty well and we've got to do the same this time around.

It's good to have Jos Buttler back and, put simply: he's a freak, his talent is unrivalled.

I first came across him when I was playing for Essex against Somerset and he scored 70 or 80, he was one of those players that made you stand up and take notice.

Jos Buttler hit six boundaries in an over for Rajasthan on the day he was recalled to England's Test squad

There was something different about him and he's obviously gone on and done some amazing things for English cricket, he's had a really good IPL and you can't ignore people with that much talent. It's really exciting for him and he's always spoken about how desperate he is to succeed in Test cricket and this is a great opportunity for him to do that.

Dom Bess is also in the squad for the first time. He bowled at us over the winter and he gets a good shape on the ball, he's a young spinner and he's been very impressive so far.

Coming into the group for the first time when you're selected is daunting, there's no way around that, but he seems to be handling it very well and has shown a lot of confidence.

Dom Bess believes Pakistan's batting style could play into his hands if he makes his Test debut at Lord's

You can see that excitement in his eyes that he is going to realise a dream on Thursday and how special that is for him and his family. It is a reminder for all of us in the squad that it is special every time you do pull on the cap for England, whether it is the first time or the 100th.

Since my last column, plans for the new 100-ball competition have come out. I'm not against the concept of it. You don't want the sport to be standing still, times change and T20 has been very successful.

It's still a short form of the game and very similar to T20. There is a chance to be very proactive with the rules, you can change a few things, you don't have to be quite so rigid and you can turn it into a tactical game.

Cricket must continue to innovate to attract a wider, younger audience to the game, says ECB chairman Colin Graves

There has been a lot of people being very critical about it but I think if Twitter was around in 2003 when T20 first came in, I think it would have been the same kind of reaction.

We have to be careful because we are very fortunate to have unbelievable support in this country for the game of cricket. Participation levels are going up, there is absolutely no reason why they can't go up more and there are elements of that that need addressing.

Nasser Hussain and Mark Butcher debate the ECB's proposed new 100-ball tournament, saying it's vital that the best players in the world take part

The fans who love cricket will hopefully love this new concept as well, if it goes ahead. We know that participation levels can improve and in any sport, you have to look after the grassroots. It is a very interesting time for cricket and it is exciting to see how this new idea will develop.

http://www.skysports.com/cricket/ne...-buttler-and-the-challenge-of-facing-pakistan
 
Last edited:
The only way I see Cook getting out is either bowled/Lbw or to spin. Catches behind the stump are basically a miracle for any Pakistani side whatsoever!

P.S. Or any catches in general i.e.
 
As if matches against Pakistan are a mere warm up for the India series which is the "next really big thing".
 
The only thing that can save Cook and rest of English top order from Amir is an injury. Pak fielders can drop all they want.. Amir gonna pwn English hard this year.

You heard it here :) I can feel it in air :amir
 
Amir was all over Cook in 2010, need more of the same please!
 
Reading the previews in the English media for this series and all the talk about our bowling threat is about Mohammad Amir.

No mentions of the other bowlers.
 
Reading the previews in the English media for this series and all the talk about our bowling threat is about Mohammad Amir.

No mentions of the other bowlers.

They seem to be unaware of them. I suppose when you write a thousand word article you want to squeeze in a couple of sentences about the opposition
 
In 2010 Amir made Cook look like the tailender he is.... Inshallah he will do the same in 2018.
 
And some posters here think Aamir is mediocre, yet he's rated by almost all of his peers.
 
In 2010 Amir made Cook look like the tailender he is.... Inshallah he will do the same in 2018.

Cook still bounced back in that series with a majestic hundred against the same bowlers who tormented him, I remember his career being on the line. But am not sure either are what they once were which should still make the battle interesting.
 
And some posters here think Aamir is mediocre, yet he's rated by almost all of his peers.

Doesn't mean anything. They rate him because of his performances on the big stage.

Just like Wahab Riaz is often recognised and praised due to his WC performances against Australia and India.
 
If you are reading this Mickey, just please whatever you do, do not let the bowlers bowl short and wide or leg-side.

That’s how Cook batted like a rockstar against us two years ago.

Still have bad memories of Edgbaston. :(
 
Doesn't mean anything. They rate him because of his performances on the big stage.

Just like Wahab Riaz is often recognised and praised due to his WC performances against Australia and India.

What exactly did Wahab achieve in that game? We lost both games...

Amir's big stage games are on another level compared to Wahab.
 
What exactly did Wahab achieve in that game? We lost both games...

Amir's big stage games are on another level compared to Wahab.

its easy to win when you have 340 to defend compared to 230. that's why I hate when folks talking about Matching winning innings. a lot of things involved to win a game. Wahab's WC performances against Australia/India are as good as Amir's performance in CT. both cases Pak batsmen should be blamed, they scored only 230 on that flat track against Aus and they could not chase 260 on the flattest track against India.
 
its easy to win when you have 340 to defend compared to 230. that's why I hate when folks talking about Matching winning innings. a lot of things involved to win a game. Wahab's WC performances against Australia/India are as good as Amir's performance in CT. both cases Pak batsmen should be blamed, they scored only 230 on that flat track against Aus and they could not chase 260 on the flattest track against India.
What did I just read :)))
 
If Sarfaraz and Hafeez dont drop dollies like they did back in 2016, Amir will win the battle against Cook.

However, trundlers like Rahat will be smashed by Cook.
 
I don't even know where to start. There is absolutely no comparison whatsoever between Amir's big game performances and Wahab Riaz.

So Mohali 2011 WC Semi Final is not a big game? Many here mentioned that’s the biggest game played by both teams so far.

Still don’t understand what was silly in my previous post.
 
So Mohali 2011 WC Semi Final is not a big game? Many here mentioned that’s the biggest game played by both teams so far.

Still don’t understand what was silly in my previous post.
Yes Wahab bowled well that day, but Amir has delivered outstanding spells of bowling in two ICC finals. There is absolutely no comparison whatsoever.

The fact that you are, once again predictably so, clutching at straws to make sense of your illogical arguments is whats silly in that post.
 
Yes Wahab bowled well that day, but Amir has delivered outstanding spells of bowling in two ICC finals. There is absolutely no comparison whatsoever.

The fact that you are, once again predictably so, clutching at straws to make sense of your illogical arguments is whats silly in that post.

I would take WC semi finals over CT final or T20 WC final any day. Anyway this is 3xpected from poster like you. Better agree to disagree. Btw stop getting worked up for every little thing. It was just my opinion.
 
its easy to win when you have 340 to defend compared to 230. that's why I hate when folks talking about Matching winning innings. a lot of things involved to win a game. Wahab's WC performances against Australia/India are as good as Amir's performance in CT. both cases Pak batsmen should be blamed, they scored only 230 on that flat track against Aus and they could not chase 260 on the flattest track against India.

I know [MENTION=1650]Usman Chadda[/MENTION] mocked this post, but there's literally nothing wrong with this post if you think about it objectively. Wahab single handedly took out Warner, Clarke and Watson in a space of 2-3 overs had it not been for Rahat's drop.

Had Azhar Ali's drop cost Pakistan the CT final, no one would have rated Amir's spell any higher than Wahab's spell. Secondly, nothing to take away from Amir's spell but chasing 340 in a tournament final would have been a pretty much impossible task regardless of Amir's performance. He bowled well, in fact excellently, but it was actually Fakhar, Azhar and Hafeez who won Pakistan the game, Amir is 4th on the list.

Everyone knows, had the score been 240, Pakistan would have never defended that total, even with Amir's spell.
 
Last edited:
I know [MENTION=1650]Usman Chadda[/MENTION] mocked this post, but there's literally nothing wrong with this post if you think about it objectively. Wahab single handedly took out Warner, Clarke and Watson in a space of 2-3 overs had it not been for Rahat's drop.

Had Azhar Ali's drop cost Pakistan the CT final, no one would have rated Amir's spell any higher than Wahab's spell. Secondly, nothing to take away from Amir's spell but chasing 340 in a tournament final would have been a pretty much impossible task regardless of Amir's performance. He bowled well, in fact excellently, but it was actually Fakhar, Azhar and Hafeez who won Pakistan the game, Amir is 4th on the list.

Everyone knows, had the score been 240, Pakistan would have never defended that total, even with Amir's spell.

Good sensible post. I am still not sure why he got worked up by my post. :))
 
Some very confident statements here.

Beware hubris.
 
I'm worried now. Once Cook starts he tends to capitalize.
 
Yes Wahab bowled well that day, but Amir has delivered outstanding spells of bowling in two ICC finals. There is absolutely no comparison whatsoever.

The fact that you are, once again predictably so, clutching at straws to make sense of your illogical arguments is whats silly in that post.

No team in history has chased 340 in a big tournament final. That match was already won by Pakistan before even a single ball was bowled. Any bowler can take wickets when opposition is chasing 340 in a big final
 
No team in history has chased 340 in a big tournament final. That match was already won by Pakistan before even a single ball was bowled. Any bowler can take wickets when opposition is chasing 340 in a big final

Really? India's batting line up is one of the best in the world.
 
When has india chased 340 away from home?

I know it would have broken a few records but people can't take credit away from Amir using that logic. It was a final of a major world tournament, against your arch rivals, who have one of the best batting line ups in the world. If any team would be capable of chasing this down, it would be India. Not to forget how Pakistan have an awful record against India in world tournaments.
 
I know [MENTION=1650]Usman Chadda[/MENTION] mocked this post, but there's literally nothing wrong with this post if you think about it objectively. Wahab single handedly took out Warner, Clarke and Watson in a space of 2-3 overs had it not been for Rahat's drop.

Had Azhar Ali's drop cost Pakistan the CT final, no one would have rated Amir's spell any higher than Wahab's spell. Secondly, nothing to take away from Amir's spell but chasing 340 in a tournament final would have been a pretty much impossible task regardless of Amir's performance. He bowled well, in fact excellently, but it was actually Fakhar, Azhar and Hafeez who won Pakistan the game, Amir is 4th on the list.

Everyone knows, had the score been 240, Pakistan would have never defended that total, even with Amir's spell.
Pakistan would have won even with 240 on the board, when Amir reduced India to 32-3. Wahab's spell was good, but you forget Smith was playing him like a dream at the other end. Amir literally ripped through India, Wahab merely got on top of the Aussie batsmen. There is absolutely no comparison between these two spells. Furthermore, Amir was good enough to create more chances. While Wahab fans will only get to bash Rahat forever.
 
Fahim, Hassan, Abbas pick up wickets.. Mohammad Amir fans pick up excuses.. No dropped catches off him and no wickets with the new ball.
 
I know it would have broken a few records but people can't take credit away from Amir using that logic. It was a final of a major world tournament, against your arch rivals, who have one of the best batting line ups in the world. If any team would be capable of chasing this down, it would be India. Not to forget how Pakistan have an awful record against India in world tournaments.

India has never chased down a target of 340 away from home because it is a near impossible task if you add the pressure of the finals. The batters won the match for Pakistan. How much does a bowler need to defend in the finals of a match? Certainly not 400, as soon as Pakistan scored 340 pressure was on India from Ball one.

If any team was capable of chasing that score it was India? I don't think finals of a tournament are an occasion when records are broken. This was no dead rubber of an ODI series being played in Bangalore where records will be broken for fun.
 
Last edited:
India has never chased down a target of 340 away from home because it is a near impossible task if you add the pressure of the finals. The batters won the match for Pakistan. How much does a bowler need to defend in the finals of a match? Certainly not 400, as soon as Pakistan scored 340 pressure was on India from Ball one.

If any team was capable of chasing that score it was India? I don't think finals of a tournament are an occasion when records are broken. This was no dead rubber of an ODI series being played in Bangalore where records will be broken for fun.

You can think that but Virat Kohli is sometimes not even human. Great player and Pakistan still needed to bowl well. And Amir's spell was absolutely fantastic, in finals not every team is reduced to 54-5. Amir picked up the first three wickets.
 
Pakistan would have won even with 240 on the board, when Amir reduced India to 32-3. Wahab's spell was good, but you forget Smith was playing him like a dream at the other end. Amir literally ripped through India, Wahab merely got on top of the Aussie batsmen. There is absolutely no comparison between these two spells. Furthermore, Amir was good enough to create more chances. While Wahab fans will only get to bash Rahat forever.

No they wouldn't have. India was only reduced to 32-3 because of the batting approach they had, due to the scoreboard pressure. The scoreboard pressure allowed Amir to get his tail up.

and my post has nothing to do with being a Wahab fan. I just gave him as an example because he also performed at the big stage in ICC knock out games, just like Amir did.
 
You can think that but Virat Kohli is sometimes not even human. Great player and Pakistan still needed to bowl well. And Amir's spell was absolutely fantastic, in finals not every team is reduced to 54-5. Amir picked up the first three wickets.

Do you think India would have been restricted to 54-5 had it not been for the 340 total?

Let's be honest, the match was 80% finished after Hafeez's innings. Amir's spell was the icing on the cake.
 
Cook was looking back to his best , solid as a rock . The ball was magnificent, Amir wins the first battle .
 
its easy to win when you have 340 to defend compared to 230. that's why I hate when folks talking about Matching winning innings. a lot of things involved to win a game. Wahab's WC performances against Australia/India are as good as Amir's performance in CT. both cases Pak batsmen should be blamed, they scored only 230 on that flat track against Aus and they could not chase 260 on the flattest track against India.

I won't even bother elaborating after that comparison.

You seem to be Posting for the sake of posting I guess. 👏
 
Not sure about winners or losers here, because as long as Cook is among the runs, does it really matter if Amir dismisses him eventually?

Cook will happily give all his wickets to Amir as long as Amir allows him to score first.
 
In his latest Sky Sports column, Alastair Cook reacts to England's disappointing first Test defeat to Pakistan at Lord's, talks up Keaton Jennings temperament as he returns to the Test fold and looks forward to the 'Participation Test' at Headingley as England attempt to tie the series...

It's never great when you lose a game of cricket, even more so playing the way we did at Lord's. It's a frustrating time for us at the moment as a side; we're not playing well.

It was a tough week. Leading into it, we practised well. But that doesn't mean anything when you're not able to transfer that out onto the field.

If you want to play cricket for England, you've got to deliver, otherwise we'll be looking for other employment. That's the nature of the beast and, fundamentally, we're not producing out in the middle.

When you're not playing very well and are not winning games of cricket, it's very different from being in a confident side that's playing good cricket. We dropped some chances at Lord's, myself included, and that's another sign of a side that is lower on confidence.

But we have to stick together as a group. The last thing you can do is play the blame game, and the trick is now to not carry the negatives from the first Test with us to Headingley.

Again, that's another thing easier said than done. But clearly we are not going to lose every game of cricket ever, it is going to turn around at some stage, and it's down to us to do that.

Keaton Jennings comes back into the squad. He has been one of the few guys in the County Championship that has scored runs in what has been a tough start to the season for top order batsmen. He has scored two hundreds, and carried that into the one-day format, scoring a century in that as well.

He is a very level-headed guy and seems very suited to Test level, in terms of his mental approach. He got a hundred on debut, which shows he can play, but then against a good South African side last summer things just didn't quite go his way.

It's tough on Mark Stoneman. It's horrible. Playing for England is these guys' dreams, so it's not nice seeing people dropped. I spoke to him on Monday; he was obviously disappointed, as you'd expect, but he has to now go away, score runs and look at areas in which he can improve his game.

It gives Keaton a great opportunity, and we just need people to grab these opportunities with both hands and to start pushing this side forward, like Jos Buttler and Dom Bess - on debut - did at Lord's.

Dom Bess and Jos Buttler of England support each other in their batting partnership during day three of the 1st Test match between England and Pakistan at Lord's Cricket Ground on May 26, 2018 in London, England

On a personal note, it was nice to get a score in the first innings. But it's clearly disappointing that we're again talking about 50s, 60s, 70s. I did all the hard work without then going on to get a score to help set up the game, though I was pleased with how I hit the ball; there have been a few things that I've been working on since the New Zealand series and they seemed to work.

It was tough conditions to bat in - it did a lot more than we thought it would do at Lord's - with the ball moving consistently, with a good deal of pace and carry throughout the game but, with everybody talking about Joe's decision at the toss, I don't think it was a 184 all out wicket.

Rooty is pretty clear with how he wants the guys to play. But it takes time to implement. As I know from my time as England captain, these things don't just happen overnight.

I have some pretty honest conversations with him, but then it's down to him to choose the path he wants to go on. That's the responsibility of the captain.

It's the same with Keaton. I'll be there to be a bit of a sounding board, like with anyone, but at the end of the day you bat on your own. You obviously try to work as a partnership, but when it comes to facing the ball, it's just you.

We've got to train hard over the next couple of days and then transfer that out into the middle at Headingley. It's not a ground we've done well at recently, losing our last three Tests there, but that doesn't mean we can't do well this week. It's about time luck changes for us.

On a personal note, I'm looking forward to playing in my 154th consecutive Test for England (fingers-crossed nothing untoward happens over the next couple of days), which would break Allan Border's record. Without wanting to sound arrogant, it's something I'm very proud of as I think it shows good longevity.

Clearly throughout that period there have been tough times, times when I've been hanging on to my place, but there have also been some amazing times.

The game at Headingley is also being billed the 'Participation Test', with charities like Chance to Shine being highlighted. It's a very worthwhile cause and one I've always supported.

Maldon Cricket Club, where I grew up, has a massive kids section on Friday nights. That's how I, and a lot of people, get introduced to cricket, but there's not always facilities and kit available at certain levels.

We could always do more, but that's where the ECB alongside Chance to Shine and other charities like the Lord's Taverners are doing a great job in promoting the game to kids. It's about making the most of the places and facilities you've got available and bring the game to kids - I played cricket at a school recently on the top of a roof!

Anyway, it's onwards and upwards again for the second Test. As a team, we're determined to have a good five days, get the Yorkshire crowd behind us, play some good cricket and level the series.

Pakistan are very good front-runners, so we've got to get out in front of them from the off on Friday and look to put them under pressure.

http://www.skysports.com/amp/cricke...-test-at-headingley?__twitter_impression=true
 
Last edited:
This battle is entertaining to watch between Amir and Cook. Pakistan need to get wickets with the new ball otherwise it's game over.
 
Back
Top