What's new

In debt growth, PTI to surpass PML-N in three years

Something

Tape Ball Star
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Runs
785
The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) led government is projected to add over Rs10 trillion in public debt during its first almost three years, due to rigidity in expenditures, increase in interest rates and currency devaluation. This debt will be equal to the total debt added by the last Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) in its five years term.

The foreign commercial borrowings from Chinese, European and Gulf banks and through floatation of sovereign bonds will also be the preferred tools for the PTI government to raise loans for meeting the budgetary and balance of payments requirements, sources in the Finance Ministry said.

Pakistan has shared these public debt projections with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), suggesting that the public debt could be Rs36 trillion by June 2021. These projections are exclusive of publicly guaranteed debt and private debt.
In terms of size of the economy, the debt to the GDP ratio would remain closer to 70% by June 2021, which will be lower than the level left by the PML-N but far higher than the path set in the Fiscal Responsibility and Debt Limitation Act of 2005.

When the PML-N government completed its 2013-18 term, the public debt was Rs24.95 trillion, according to the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP).

Prime Minister Imran Khan has been very critical of the economic policies followed by the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) and the PML-N governments. During the PPP’s 2008-2013 tenure, the public debt surged from Rs6 trillion to Rs14 trillion. During the next five years, it hit the Rs25 trillion mark.

There was an increase of roughly Rs1 trillion from July through September of this fiscal year. Even after first quarter discount, there will be an addition of Rs10 trillion in a span of 33 months in the public debt that would swell to Rs36 trillion, the sources said.

The debt projections have been made for the period of 2019 to 2021, for the period when Pakistan may be under the IMF programme if both sides mend their differences on the pace of fiscal, monetary and exchange rate adjustments.

The sources said by June 2019, the public debt could hit Rs29.4 trillion, equal to 75% of GDP. It was 72.5% at the end of the PML-N term, far above the statutory limit of 60% of GDP.

The key reason for likely increase in public debt by June 2019 will be a minimum of Rs2.2 trillion budget deficit caused by growing debt and defence expenditures and low tax revenues.

The interest payments that were Rs1.5 trillion in June 2018 could increase to Rs2 trillion by June next year due to increase in discount rate by the SBP and currency devaluation of over 20% in full fiscal year.

The sources said during the second year of the PTI government, the public debt would further jump to Rs32.6 trillion. There is projected addition of Rs3.2 trillion in public debt from July 2019 to June 2020. The assessment is based on Rs2.4 trillion budget deficit and nearly 6% further devaluation of the rupee.

In the fiscal year 2019-20, the interest payments have been projected to increase to Rs2.7 trillion and the defence budget is estimated at Rs1.27 trillion. Similarly in the third year, the public debt could increase by another Rs3.3 trillion to Rs36 trillion. In that year, the budget deficit is estimated at Rs2.5 trillion. The interest payments would shoot to Rs3.2 trillion and defence budget to Rs1.5 trillion.

In a span of three years, the debt servicing cost would double, thanks to interest rate hikes and currency devaluation. The gloomy debt scenario indicates the grave problems that Pakistan’s economy faces due to its low tax revenues and low exports.

In a meeting of the Senate Standing Committee on Finance on Wednesday, the Finance Minister Asad Umar said increasing exports is ‘economic jihad’ in Pakistan and his government is committed to do that.

The worrisome trends also expose the vulnerabilities in shape of growing refinancing risks. The Average time-to-maturity of the public debt has already come down to three years and six months.

During the past one year, the Finance Ministry’s contingent liabilities also increased significantly, which showed deterioration in public sector enterprises and more borrowings by the state-owned companies for various purposes. By June 2018, the last government’s contingent liabilities stood at Rs1.236 trillion.

The sources said Pakistan has assured the IMF that it will reduce reliance on the central bank borrowings. It has also committed to fully book the contingent liabilities aimed at reducing the debt related risks.

The Debt Policy Coordination Office that is currently working without full time director general is promised to be strengthened. But the sources said the government’s reliance on foreign commercial borrowings would continue until situation on the external front improves.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1871496/2-debt-growth-pti-surpass-pml-n-three-years/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We Will Eat Grass but would never go to IMF for Loans : Imran Khan.


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">لکھ لیا تھا :( <a href="https://t.co/IldyA7vy7M">pic.twitter.com/IldyA7vy7M</a></p>— Atif Tauqeer (@atifthepoet) <a href="https://twitter.com/atifthepoet/status/1113150184194740224?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">April 2, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



The day Imran Khan takes oath as Prime Minister the next day Imran Khan will bring back 200 billion dollars of Pakistanis stacked abroad to Pakistan. Murad Saeed.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This specimen has been inducted into the cabinet. <a href="https://t.co/cgcvWU7Lcc">pic.twitter.com/cgcvWU7Lcc</a></p>— Gul Bukhari (@GulBukhari) <a href="https://twitter.com/GulBukhari/status/1038442206678450176?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 8, 2018</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Since PTI will break PML N record of 5 years Loan in first 3 years only than will Imran Khan tell Pakistani Public in his Public meetings about how much Indebted each Pakistani is ?
 
Since PTI will break PML N record of 5 years Loan in first 3 years only than will Imran Khan tell Pakistani Public in his Public meetings about how much Indebted each Pakistani is ?

Why do they need to borrow so much? Where did the money go? The PTI is borrowing to pay for the debts of the duffer and his brother AZ. When Mush left the debt for the whole history of PK of $37bn, when the 2 crooks finished it was $95bn? Where did the money go?
PK loans.jpg
 
Why do they need to borrow so much? Where did the money go? The PTI is borrowing to pay for the debts of the duffer and his brother AZ. When Mush left the debt for the whole history of PK of $37bn, when the 2 crooks finished it was $95bn? Where did the money go?
View attachment 90045

Don't ask logical questions Bhai these cowards can't answer them. Every thread mamoon major and this so called talent spotter run when you expose their nonsense.
 
Why do they need to borrow so much? Where did the money go? The PTI is borrowing to pay for the debts of the duffer and his brother AZ. When Mush left the debt for the whole history of PK of $37bn, when the 2 crooks finished it was $95bn? Where did the money go?
View attachment 90045

PTI is borrowing to clear the debt but the same logic cannot apply to previous governments. Very nice. We will see how much PTI leaves us in debt at the end of the tenure. Lets bookmark this thread for the future.
 
PTI is borrowing to clear the debt but the same logic cannot apply to previous governments. Very nice. We will see how much PTI leaves us in debt at the end of the tenure. Lets bookmark this thread for the future.

When Mush left the debt was $37b, tell me how much debt was repaid?
 
Since PTI will break PML N record of 5 years Loan in first 3 years only than will Imran Khan tell Pakistani Public in his Public meetings about how much Indebted each Pakistani is ?

Evn after 4 years the cries would be that this debt is because of previous govt and not because of them

The country is moving towards hyper inflation, dark days ahead.
 
PTI is borrowing to clear the debt but the same logic cannot apply to previous governments. Very nice. We will see how much PTI leaves us in debt at the end of the tenure. Lets bookmark this thread for the future.

i hope you are not wishing for something bad happen to pakistan .till then enjoy some good news

1: A Singapore-based business group " Global Radiance " is investing $2 billion in Pakistan’s shipping sector. which will create more than 5000 jobs.
2: An Australian group along with Global radiance group will jointly invest $2 Billion Dollars in livestock.
3: Oil and Gas Development Company Limited(OGDCL) has drilled six new wells and made two discoveries during first half of the current fiscal year. further persistent work is in progress to drill Asia’s largest oil and gas reserves near Karachi.
 
i hope you are not wishing for something bad happen to pakistan .till then enjoy some good news

1: A Singapore-based business group " Global Radiance " is investing $2 billion in Pakistan’s shipping sector. which will create more than 5000 jobs.
2: An Australian group along with Global radiance group will jointly invest $2 Billion Dollars in livestock.
3: Oil and Gas Development Company Limited(OGDCL) has drilled six new wells and made two discoveries during first half of the current fiscal year. further persistent work is in progress to drill Asia’s largest oil and gas reserves near Karachi.

Off course not. I earn my bread and butter in Pakistan so why I would wish bad about it. I had opportunity to settle abroad for better future but didn't do that.

I am back to the read-only mode on PakPassion and will concentrate on my work. Had a rough day today so I wanted to some break.
 
Evn after 4 years the cries would be that this debt is because of previous govt and not because of them

The country is moving towards hyper inflation, dark days ahead.

Even four years are not enough to reverse the decades of the looting and plundering by the Bhutto and Sharif clans.
 
I may have missed the rivers of milk and honey that were flowing before they took charge.

You can see them in Peshawar right next to the BRT that was completed in 6 months as promised in Nov 2017.
 
You can see them in Peshawar right next to the BRT that was completed in 6 months as promised in Nov 2017.

No I'm waiting for the Greenline BRT in Karachi that was promised by your leader Nawaz Sharif to be completed in 1 year but 3 years have passed and it is still only 30% complete.
 
No I'm waiting for the Greenline BRT in Karachi that was promised by your leader Nawaz Sharif to be completed in 1 year but 3 years have passed and it is still only 30% complete.

But previous government have successfully launched 3 bus transport system which are operational. So, if they cannot complete Greenline BRT on time then I doubt PTI can even dream about completing it as we have seen their core expertise in BRT.
 
But previous government have successfully launched 3 bus transport system which are operational. So, if they cannot complete Greenline BRT on time then I doubt PTI can even dream about completing it as we have seen their core expertise in BRT.

They have plenty of experience in looting and plundering I give you that..... why is it that Nawaz has been out of jail for 6 weeks on medical grounds and one week has passed but didn't get admitted to the hospital.


What a bloody lying thief.
 
Nawaz Sharif looted and plundered the country, his sons are on the run and aren't even coming to Pakistan to meet their father who supposedly is suffering from every ailment in the world.



Nawaz supporters be like: "kum se kum tehzeeb daar tou hai" :facepalm:
 
But previous government have successfully launched 3 bus transport system which are operational. So, if they cannot complete Greenline BRT on time then I doubt PTI can even dream about completing it as we have seen their core expertise in BRT.

To be honest, the metro bus in Rawalpindi is a joke and is a clear case of corruption.
The bus only covers 1 route of pindi and Islamabd
The amount of money they spent on making a dedicated bus lane could had been spent on having a public bus services for whole pindi and Islmabad that covered multiple routes.

The bus track could had been made into a flyerover in future.

A bus system covering 1 route means nothing.

Even if they wanted a dedicated bus track in pindi, there was no need to have one in Islamabad as Islamabad has big roads.
 
When it comes to public transport, all govts have failed to provide it.

Problem is, at the end of the day Public transport operates on subsisdy, plus there is an automobile monopoly taht exists and won't allow Public busses to operate in Pakistani cities.

The Pindi metro is a joke.

There use to be a bus system in Karachi when i wasted back in 2003, and i have to admit, it was a fantastic system. It came on time. I dont know if it exists now or not.
 
Evn after 4 years the cries would be that this debt is because of previous govt and not because of them

The country is moving towards hyper inflation, dark days ahead.

So trillions stolen is not dark days but trying to fix it is dark days. None of you guys have any idea of how much mess the country has been left in by your crooks. The debt was only 37bn when Mush left it's over $95bn now, so tell us where that money went?
 
They have plenty of experience in looting and plundering I give you that..... why is it that Nawaz has been out of jail for 6 weeks on medical grounds and one week has passed but didn't get admitted to the hospital.


What a bloody lying thief.
It's quite incredible that a criminal has been given bail on fake illnesses.
 
But previous government have successfully launched 3 bus transport system which are operational. So, if they cannot complete Greenline BRT on time then I doubt PTI can even dream about completing it as we have seen their core expertise in BRT.

BRT hasn't been great but as the ADB report report stated that they will finish within the time frame expected by international standards
 
You can see them in Peshawar right next to the BRT that was completed in 6 months as promised in Nov 2017.

It may not be 6 months but within international standard time frame. But you run from Nandipur every time, please explain how these people you want back in 2023 did there.
 
It may not be 6 months but within international standard time frame. But you run from Nandipur every time, please explain how these people you want back in 2023 did there.

It was never possible in 6 months, but they gave fake deadlines to gain momentum and win cheap votes in the 2018 election. How pathetic.
 
BRT hasn't been great but as the ADB report report stated that they will finish within the time frame expected by international standards

What ADB doesn’t know (or perhaps doesn’t care) is that PTI deliberately misguided and misinformed people to get them to vote for them.

That is why they delayed the construction until Nov 2017 and lied about the May 2018 deadline.

Had they been honest about it from the word go instead of using it as a tool to win votes, no one would have criticized them for taking 1.5 - 2 years on this project.
 
What ADB doesn’t know (or perhaps doesn’t care) is that PTI deliberately misguided and misinformed people to get them to vote for them.

That is why they delayed the construction until Nov 2017 and lied about the May 2018 deadline.

Had they been honest about it from the word go instead of using it as a tool to win votes, no one would have criticized them for taking 1.5 - 2 years on this project.

I don't think people voted for the PTI because of BRT and in practical terms made no difference but no doubt it's bad form to try to do something in haste and not tell the truth, But it still doesn't change the fact that they are within international time frames.
 
It was never possible in 6 months, but they gave fake deadlines to gain momentum and win cheap votes in the 2018 election. How pathetic.

I see your narrative of the 7bn Corruption has taken a back seat, the tribune based it's report on this report and you got very excited. So can you give us another source for this allegation.
 
What ADB doesn’t know (or perhaps doesn’t care) is that PTI deliberately misguided and misinformed people to get them to vote for them.

That is why they delayed the construction until Nov 2017 and lied about the May 2018 deadline.

Had they been honest about it from the word go instead of using it as a tool to win votes, no one would have criticized them for taking 1.5 - 2 years on this project.

Why did u fall for that "misguidance" and vote PTI then?
 
Mulk mein kaam hoga to paisa lagee ga. No such thing as a free lunch. Don;t have an issue with debt and increased spending as long and the money is being used to actually make things better rather than filling the coffers of the corrupt. So far I haven't heard of any MAJOR corruption cases against IK or PTI in general . So all in good
 
It almost feels like that we need a Dictator, corruption has seeped in to every part of the government.
A strict dictator with full control of goverment functions and land, more control than Musharraf had.
 
It almost feels like that we need a Dictator, corruption has seeped in to every part of the government.
A strict dictator with full control of goverment functions and land, more control than Musharraf had.

When Mush had the chance he tried be all touchy feely and no real reforms took place and in the end his greed got the better of him and he was humiliated out of office by the crooks he decided to make a deal with. These economic problems are massive and structural and need an educated population to understand but if we had an educated population then we wouldnt have these problems in the 1st place.
 
When Mush had the chance he tried be all touchy feely and no real reforms took place and in the end his greed got the better of him and he was humiliated out of office by the crooks he decided to make a deal with. These economic problems are massive and structural and need an educated population to understand but if we had an educated population then we wouldnt have these problems in the 1st place.

Yea not having an educated population is the real factor in these sort of things, and the reason behind it is also corruption unfortuanately, to keep the vote bank with money.
 
So, as per Ministry of Finance whose head is Mr.Asad Umar :


PML-N took 42 Billion dollars Loan in 5 years and returned 70 Billion dollars in the same time.
 

Attachments

  • 56980CF3-8759-4C3C-9BDD-42EDE30FFD31.jpg
    56980CF3-8759-4C3C-9BDD-42EDE30FFD31.jpg
    34.3 KB · Views: 379
  • A21A1D8C-19D5-449E-A016-642A8FA8FF0B.jpg
    A21A1D8C-19D5-449E-A016-642A8FA8FF0B.jpg
    36.9 KB · Views: 393
  • 8C8DEAB4-85F4-406F-A4DF-DEF2A10E9AFA.jpg
    8C8DEAB4-85F4-406F-A4DF-DEF2A10E9AFA.jpg
    39.8 KB · Views: 367
Prime Ministers Minister Imran Khan had promised with Pakistanis that if PTI forms government they will starve, would eat grass but will not go to IMF ever.

Now they are going to IMF and not just that,


PTI lead government has borrowed 3.36 trillion in just 8 months.
 

Attachments

  • 365A6112-E3CD-40A8-B7FE-71FA07F39178.jpg
    365A6112-E3CD-40A8-B7FE-71FA07F39178.jpg
    25 KB · Views: 367
Prime Ministers Minister Imran Khan had promised with Pakistanis that if PTI forms government they will starve, would eat grass but will not go to IMF ever.

Now they are going to IMF and not just that,


PTI lead government has borrowed 3.36 trillion in just 8 months.

I know the PTI cannot offer you any carrots but read the analysis below and what disaster your crooks left. Even as someone as dishonest can understand.

Asad Umar’s economic shock therapy — crazy or genius?

By M Bilal Lakhani

Published: April 7, 2019

Chemotherapy makes a cancer patient feel even more sick and miserable, before it defeats cancer. Nausea, vomiting and eventually losing hair is a painful cost of the treatment, not the disease. Similarly, Asad Umar is giving chemotherapy to a sick Pakistani economy today. And the side effects of the chemotherapy — inflation, depreciation of the rupee, slowing growth — is the painful part and parcel of the treatment. Should the Pakistani people protest the disease or the medicine?

Miftah Ismail delivered the Pakistani economy on a stretcher to Asad Umar, with the economy gasping for breath in the emergency room. Like any doctor, Asad’s first job was to stabilise the patient and make sure he survives, regardless of how painful the treatment may be. This is the shock therapy we are experiencing today the side effects of which are expressing themselves as inflation, depreciation of the rupee and slowed-down growth. Is there a method to the madness in the PTI’s economic policies or are they just incompetent? In this column, I’ll unpack depreciation of the rupee, inflation and the rise in energy prices to understand whether Asad Umar is overprescribing medicine or if we need to give him more time.

Let’s take depreciation first. The PTI inherited a $19 billion current account deficit per year. This means we owe the world $19 billion in imported goods and debt liabilities every year, which we don’t have the money to pay for.


Why did this happen? Much has been said about Ishaq Dar’s fetish for keeping the dollar-rupee rate stable but the real game was subsidising elite and non-elite consumption. Here’s how this works: suppose we imported a chocolate for $1. This was sold in stores for 100 rupees last year, versus the 140 rupees at real exchange rate. The difference was subsidised by our foreign exchange reserves being used to keep the rupee artificially high, which we now have to borrow more dollars to repay. Essentially, the previous government was subsidising private consumption, with money they didn’t have!

The first sour medicine Asad Umar administered was devaluing the rupee — or bringing it closer to its real price. This helps eliminate subsidies on elite consumption like the import of cars, Swiss chocolate and pet food (yes, the PML-N government was indirectly subsidising these!). This hurts all of us because some of the goods we need like food and medicine are also imported. But the medication is working. We are learning to live within our means and imports are beginning to come down sharply (current account deficit was down to 72% in February).

Now, let’s talk about inflation, being fuelled primarily by devaluation/depreciation, which I explained above, plus the rise in energy prices. Let’s take gas as an example. Previous governments were selling gas at subsidised rates and now the PTI is removing these subsidies. Suppose gas costs 100 rupees per unit but the government was selling it at 60 rupees. Who was paying for those 40 rupees? The Pakistani taxpayer who takes on more government debt to pay for these subsidies.

Now, the PTI government is moving towards a more sustainable financial path — selling gas, petrol and electricity for their actual prices and reducing wasteful consumption. No politician wants to be the one raising prices but the pain is a sign that the medication is working. The PTI is putting the interests of the country — financial stabilisation — ahead of its own interests, which would be to keep prices artificially low and stay popular.

Even if it means they’re going to die, there’s a reason why some cancer patients choose not to get treated for cancer. The treatment is so debilitating that they prefer spending their last few weeks travelling or spending time with family. The good news is that Pakistan is a young patient and our prognosis is strong.

Once the initial shock and side effects of the chemotherapy wear off, Pakistan has a very bright future ahead. We have a young, dynamic population of 200 million and our close friend happens to be the world’s next superpower. All we have to do today is to be patient and channel our energy into fighting the disease, not the medication!

Published in The Express Tribune, April 7th, 2019.
 
I know the PTI cannot offer you any carrots but read the analysis below and what disaster your crooks left. Even as someone as dishonest can understand.

Asad Umar’s economic shock therapy — crazy or genius?

By M Bilal Lakhani

Published: April 7, 2019

Chemotherapy makes a cancer patient feel even more sick and miserable, before it defeats cancer. Nausea, vomiting and eventually losing hair is a painful cost of the treatment, not the disease. Similarly, Asad Umar is giving chemotherapy to a sick Pakistani economy today. And the side effects of the chemotherapy — inflation, depreciation of the rupee, slowing growth — is the painful part and parcel of the treatment. Should the Pakistani people protest the disease or the medicine?

Miftah Ismail delivered the Pakistani economy on a stretcher to Asad Umar, with the economy gasping for breath in the emergency room. Like any doctor, Asad’s first job was to stabilise the patient and make sure he survives, regardless of how painful the treatment may be. This is the shock therapy we are experiencing today the side effects of which are expressing themselves as inflation, depreciation of the rupee and slowed-down growth. Is there a method to the madness in the PTI’s economic policies or are they just incompetent? In this column, I’ll unpack depreciation of the rupee, inflation and the rise in energy prices to understand whether Asad Umar is overprescribing medicine or if we need to give him more time.

Let’s take depreciation first. The PTI inherited a $19 billion current account deficit per year. This means we owe the world $19 billion in imported goods and debt liabilities every year, which we don’t have the money to pay for.


Why did this happen? Much has been said about Ishaq Dar’s fetish for keeping the dollar-rupee rate stable but the real game was subsidising elite and non-elite consumption. Here’s how this works: suppose we imported a chocolate for $1. This was sold in stores for 100 rupees last year, versus the 140 rupees at real exchange rate. The difference was subsidised by our foreign exchange reserves being used to keep the rupee artificially high, which we now have to borrow more dollars to repay. Essentially, the previous government was subsidising private consumption, with money they didn’t have!

The first sour medicine Asad Umar administered was devaluing the rupee — or bringing it closer to its real price. This helps eliminate subsidies on elite consumption like the import of cars, Swiss chocolate and pet food (yes, the PML-N government was indirectly subsidising these!). This hurts all of us because some of the goods we need like food and medicine are also imported. But the medication is working. We are learning to live within our means and imports are beginning to come down sharply (current account deficit was down to 72% in February).

Now, let’s talk about inflation, being fuelled primarily by devaluation/depreciation, which I explained above, plus the rise in energy prices. Let’s take gas as an example. Previous governments were selling gas at subsidised rates and now the PTI is removing these subsidies. Suppose gas costs 100 rupees per unit but the government was selling it at 60 rupees. Who was paying for those 40 rupees? The Pakistani taxpayer who takes on more government debt to pay for these subsidies.

Now, the PTI government is moving towards a more sustainable financial path — selling gas, petrol and electricity for their actual prices and reducing wasteful consumption. No politician wants to be the one raising prices but the pain is a sign that the medication is working. The PTI is putting the interests of the country — financial stabilisation — ahead of its own interests, which would be to keep prices artificially low and stay popular.

Even if it means they’re going to die, there’s a reason why some cancer patients choose not to get treated for cancer. The treatment is so debilitating that they prefer spending their last few weeks travelling or spending time with family. The good news is that Pakistan is a young patient and our prognosis is strong.

Once the initial shock and side effects of the chemotherapy wear off, Pakistan has a very bright future ahead. We have a young, dynamic population of 200 million and our close friend happens to be the world’s next superpower. All we have to do today is to be patient and channel our energy into fighting the disease, not the medication!

Published in The Express Tribune, April 7th, 2019.
Very well explained and simple way to show us what Nooras and MR. Daar did to our economy but some of our educated lot still likee them???
 
I think this article pretty much explains what PTI is trying to do and coming from "The News" it is pretty big since they spend much more time running Nawaz Sharif propaganda. Easiest thing to do for PTI was to go to IMF within the first few months and continue Dar's disastrous strategy of keeping Dollar at around 105 Rs but PTI decided to take the tough but better approach.

An overdue stitch for the economy

History is repeating itself. Like the PPP (2008-13) and PML-N (2013-18) governments, the incumbent PTI government also discovered that its predecessor had left an economic mess for it to sort out.


A close analysis of external and internal factors by the last three governments reveal that while all three (and their respective caretaker governments) had to face some common chronic challenges, the trigger for economic mess was unique in all three cases.

The PPP government inherited a messy economy because the economic boost in the Musharraf-Shaukat Aziz era was dependent on an easy flow of dollars – thanks to the ’US War on Terror Coalition Support Fund’ – rescheduling of foreign debts, consumer led growth, and investment in the speculative (real estate and stick market) sectors. The year 2007-08 saw massive fiscal indiscipline. While international oil prices doubled (from $55 to $110) from January 2007 to March 2008, they were increased by only 9 percent for Pakistani consumers (to please voters for Elections 2018).

Same was the case for the electricity tariff where the impact of oil prices was not passed on. That was the beginning of the energy circular debt and aggravated the power outages. Government borrowing from the State Bank reached an all-time high, leading to widening of the current account deficit, rise in public external debt, loss in foreign exchange reserves, and higher inflation. Fiscal indiscipline by the PML-Q was the root cause of the problems that the following PPP government had to face.

The PML-N too got a messy economy, as the previous PPP government had to survive a huge burden of poor policies from its predecessors, two devastating floods of 2010 and 2011; the blowback of the war on terror – not only in the form of increased militancy but also in financial terms ($251.8 billion as estimated by Dr Hafiz Pasha) – and the historic high international petroleum prices which rose up to $152 per barrel.

This had led to the piling up of the energy circular debt and unprecedented power outages during the PPP era. Four finance ministers, three governors of the State Bank, and four finance secretaries in the first three years of the PPP government were tried for successful economic firefighting but things could not improve and the PML-N government had to accept the challenge of turning around the economy.

The PML-N government (2013-2018) was lucky to have most external factors in its favour. It found petroleum prices at an historic low (prices went down to $20 per barrel). The inflow for CPEC funds and Chinese investment for mega infrastructure and energy projects gave impetus to a stumbling economy. There was no major natural catastrophe. The law and order situation considerably improved, as did the supply of energy.

Apart from the IMF’s $6.5 billion, there were certain other factors that helped build foreign exchange reserves including a one-off payment from a 3G-4G auction, proceeds from Euro and Sukook Bonds, and payment from Saudi Arabia. The question arises: with all these positive externalities, why did the PML-N not leave a healthy economy for the PTI government?

Before answering this question, let us have a look at the chronic issues affecting Pakistan’s economy, which the last three governments found difficult to address.

The first issue is that there is a very narrow tax base. None of the previous governments was very successful in bringing taxable tax-evaders into the tax net (Although the PML-N government doubled the FBR revenue in five years, it failed to broaden the tax base). The second issue is the energy circular debt, which was ignored by the PML-Q (Shaukat Aziz) and which later proved out of control for the PPP because of the extraordinary high crude oil prices. The PML-N government did temporarily clear off the debt after coming into power, but that debt got tripled during the party’s five-year tenure. The third issue affecting our economy is lack of political consensus to reform loss-making public-sector enterprises (LPSEs). Each political party, while in opposition, opposed the then government’s efforts to reform LPSEs.

Now let us see why the PTI finds itself in an economic mess. The biggest problem with the last government’s economic performance was its inability to use the then fortuitous circumstances in addressing the chronic issues faced by Pakistan’s economy. Those issues got further aggravated by a wrong set of policies, especially the policy to artificially stabilize the value of the rupee for which (borrowed) $24 billion were injected by the government in the open market to keep the value of the rupee below Rs105 per dollar from 2014-2017. This overvaluation of rupee from 2014 to 2017, according to Dr Pasha, was a serious mistake, leading to subsidized imports and reduced exports (trade imbalance), large current account deficit and fast rising debt repayment liabilities.

In his latest book, ‘Growth and Inequality’, Dr Pasha writes: “the root causes of the incipient financial crisis today and the need ultimately to go [sic] the IMF are a unique combination of both internal and external factors. Due to a wrong set of policies, especially with regard to the exchange rate, Pakistan has been afflicted by a very rare form of the ‘Dutch Disease’” (apparent causal relationship between the increase in the economic development of a specific sector and a decline in other sectors).

“Large external borrowings have been used to keep the exchange rate nominally stable while leading to plummeting of exports and mushrooming of imports, thereby causing a big widening of the trade gap and resulting in a much larger current account deficit”.

He further writes that “the excessive external borrowing has also led simultaneously to a fast rise in debt repayment liabilities”.

Today, petroleum prices are once again bouncing back, touching nearly $60 per barrel. With the successful conclusion of CPEC’s funded phase-I, flow of funds under CPEC is over. Successive governments’ failure to address the chronic issues of low tax-base, LPSEs, and energy circular debt has led to a stage where circular debt and bailout to LPSE each has exceeded the annual defence budget.

It was quite easy for the current government to go on a lending spree, ignore fiscal discipline and let the economy suffer from a “rare form of the Dutch disease”, leaving a huge economic mess for whoever forms the next government. However, it has chosen a difficult path to address the chronic issues facing Pakistan’s economy.

The unpopular moves to depreciate the value of rupee to its real effective exchange rate, increase energy tariffs to stop further accumulation of energy circular debt, reduce imports through regulatory duties, and possible withdrawal of the unrealistic tax relaxations given in the last budget, will be painful both for the people (who will feel inflationary pressure) as well as the PTI government (which will lose its political capital). However, this pain must be endured by both – considering it an overdue stitch that would save nine stitches in months and years to come.

The writer heads the Sustainable Development Policy Institute.

https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/455305-an-overdue-stitch-for-the-economy
 
Very well explained and simple way to show us what Nooras and MR. Daar did to our economy but some of our educated lot still likee them???

That is because some of the educated lot were doing business with the Bank of PMLN/PPP...

One of the biggest hurdles for the PTI will be the civil service. They are corrupt to the core and have hidden a lot of the land grabbing. Makes you wonder why supporters of PMLN/PPP want to join the civil service..
 
That is because some of the educated lot were doing business with the Bank of PMLN/PPP...

One of the biggest hurdles for the PTI will be the civil service. They are corrupt to the core and have hidden a lot of the land grabbing. Makes you wonder why supporters of PMLN/PPP want to join the civil service..

yes ,,,,,agreed civil services are corrupt,even i have heard people say join civil service and enjoy luxurious life ,,,,,,,,,
 
Anyone who really believes Nawaz and Dar are better at managing economy than Imran and Asad Umar really need their head examined. Yes Imran/Asad lack the experience but we are comparing them to failed combo of Nawaz and Dar (Nawaz can't even properly explain his own medical problem without using p*a*r*c*h*i).
Remember their confession about money laundering? And no forced confession isn't an excuse since every bit of detail Dar provided can be validated and people he named are real and their complaints about Ishaq Dar using their identities is well documented.
Dar master of money laundering was also master of figure fudging and his mega corruption (billions worth assets in Dubai alone) is a proof what his focus was.

Both Imran and Asad have sacrificed their careers/lives to serve Pakistan and their honesty and dedication already makes them far superior to Nawaz/Dar, what is yet to be seen is whether both Imran/Asad have capability to fix damage caused by crooks.
 
Very well explained and simple way to show us what Nooras and MR. Daar did to our economy but some of our educated lot still likee them???

They are dishonest to a man. Some are now paid trolls or acting as such. I dare any Noora to challenge what has been said. The crisis will take time because the mess the country has been left in, people will hate IK because they dont understand but most educated people do know the crooks have bankrupted the country.
 
Taking Debt is not really the problem, what matters is what you do with that money. If that money is going into personal coffers and resulting in zero return on investment, you have the present situation which we find ourselves in today. If the debt is being wisely invested in projects generating massive jobs and returns in the short run and massively boosting the revenue boosting capacity of the country, then it is money well spent.
 
The only criticism i have with the PTI is that their PR cells need to be more effective at nuetralizing the PML and PPP propaganda machinery, the last two parties should not have the face to even talk in public.
 
Anyone who really believes Nawaz and Dar are better at managing economy than Imran and Asad Umar really need their head examined. Yes Imran/Asad lack the experience but we are comparing them to failed combo of Nawaz and Dar (Nawaz can't even properly explain his own medical problem without using p*a*r*c*h*i).
Remember their confession about money laundering? And no forced confession isn't an excuse since every bit of detail Dar provided can be validated and people he named are real and their complaints about Ishaq Dar using their identities is well documented.
Dar master of money laundering was also master of figure fudging and his mega corruption (billions worth assets in Dubai alone) is a proof what his focus was.

Both Imran and Asad have sacrificed their careers/lives to serve Pakistan and their honesty and dedication already makes them far superior to Nawaz/Dar, what is yet to be seen is whether both Imran/Asad have capability to fix damage caused by crooks.

The mafia are liars and are just desperate for anything to get relief. Even their own family members now that Munshi Dar and NS know about much about economics as they do about honesty.
 
Pakistan’s debt pile to swell to 84.1% of GDP by 2023

[UTUBE]yI_B7uWs_Bg[/UTUBE]




ISLAMABAD: The debt pile that Prime Minister Imran Khan would leave behind at the end of his five-year term will be equal to 84.1% of the size of Pakistan’s economy – far higher than the gross public debt at the end of the PML-N government, suggests a new report of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

The report, released on Wednesday from Washington, puts PM Imran’s claim of reducing the country’s debt to test. In its annual flagship report “Fiscal Monitor – Curbing Corruption”, the IMF has shown the public debt-to-GDP ratio at 84.1% of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2023, higher by 12 percentage points than the level left behind by the PML-N government.

The report also says that Pakistan’s total financing needs have shot up alarmingly to 42.3% of the size of its economy, or Rs16 trillion, due to maturing debt and yawning budget deficit – a trend that will further worsen in the next fiscal year.

The IMF has released Pakistan’s fiscal indicators for the next five years, which portray that the country will sink deeper into debt. The IMF has given these indicators in terms of GDP that The Express Tribune has translated into rupees by using the projected size of the economy in fiscal year 2018-19 ending June 30 and fiscal year 2019-20.

At the end of the PML-N’s term, Pakistan’s gross public debt was equal to 72.1% of GDP, which the IMF said would increase to 77% at the end of current fiscal year. By fiscal year 2019-20, the debt-to-GDP ratio would be 79.1% and it would gradually swell to 84.1% of GDP, stated the report.

Last week, Finance Minister Asad Umar said Pakistan’s gross public debt would remain at 70% of GDP by 2023 as no sharp reduction was possible. But the IMF projections were significantly higher than what Umar planned to do.

Under the Fiscal Responsibility and Debt Limitation Act, Pakistan’s debt should not be more than 60% of GDP.

According to the report, Pakistan’s budget deficit – the gap between expenditures and revenues – will widen to 7.2% of GDP or Rs2.8 trillion in the current fiscal year.

IMF’s projected budget deficit is Rs550 billion, or 1.6% of GDP, higher than what the finance ministry has estimated in its revised budget. This paints quite an alarming picture, suggesting that the PTI government will not only miss its first year’s budget deficit target but would also borrow more than its estimates.

During the current fiscal year, the public debt, equal to 35.1% of GDP, will mature, said the IMF. This will be equal to Rs13.4 trillion. On the basis of budget deficit and maturing debt, the IMF has estimated total financing needs at Rs16 trillion or 42.3% of GDP for this financial year, FY19.


Majority of the financing needs are related to maturing domestic debt that the government meets by getting these loans rolled over.


For next fiscal year 2019-20, the IMF has estimated that Pakistan’s total financing needs would surge to 46% of GDP or Rs19.3 trillion. The international lender has estimated budget deficit at 8.7% of GDP or nearly Rs3.7 trillion. The debt maturity has been estimated at Rs15.6 trillion or 37.2% of GDP, according to the report.

The IMF has not shown any improvement in the fiscal indicators till 2023-24. It has shown the budget deficit at 7.6% of GDP by 2023 and 7.7% by 2024. These assumptions are based on the premise that the revenues would remain below 15% of GDP in the next five years – even lower than 15.3%, the level left behind by the PML-N.

The IMF has estimated that expenditures would remain over 22.3% of GDP in the next five years, higher than the level at the end of last fiscal year.

The IMF has also shown the primary deficit for next five years, which is calculated by excluding interest payments. In its programme negotiations, the lender has been pushing Pakistan to show primary balance that can only be achieved by either cutting the development budget or the defence spending.

In its projections, IMF has shown the primary deficit over 2% of GDP for the next five year. But in its economic roadmap, the Ministry of Finance has shown the primary balance in the range of 0.8% of GDP to 2% of GDP. The ministry has shown the primary balance on the back of a steep increase in the revenue, which the IMF is not recognising.

Corruption

The fiscal monitor’s report states that a common element of many anticorruption reforms is increasing civil servants’ wages. In theory, this helps by reducing the need for civil servants to request bribes to complement very low wages and deterring corrupt activities by raising the cost of being caught.

However, there is insufficient evidence that raising wages by itself can play a prominent role in fighting corruption. “On performance-related incentives, an experiment in Pakistan also shows the potential for undesirable consequences: while performance-based salaries of tax officials led to a significant increase in tax collection by as much as 50%, bribe requests also increased by 30%,”added the IMF report.



https://tribune.com.pk/story/1947798/2-pakistans-debt-pile-swell-84-1-gdp-2023/
 
Ironic that the guy who took the biggest U-TURN in the history of PP has the gall to call anyone U-turn.... if I were you I would have the mods ban the word U-TURN so that it cannot be used against you.




Leken Allah al-haq hai, jeet siruf haq aur sach ki hi hoti hai. That is why we won and you lost and you will continue losing Inshallah.
 
[UTUBE]yI_B7uWs_Bg[/UTUBE]




ISLAMABAD: The debt pile that Prime Minister Imran Khan would leave behind at the end of his five-year term will be equal to 84.1% of the size of Pakistan’s economy – far higher than the gross public debt at the end of the PML-N government, suggests a new report of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

The report, released on Wednesday from Washington, puts PM Imran’s claim of reducing the country’s debt to test. In its annual flagship report “Fiscal Monitor – Curbing Corruption”, the IMF has shown the public debt-to-GDP ratio at 84.1% of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2023, higher by 12 percentage points than the level left behind by the PML-N government.

The report also says that Pakistan’s total financing needs have shot up alarmingly to 42.3% of the size of its economy, or Rs16 trillion, due to maturing debt and yawning budget deficit – a trend that will further worsen in the next fiscal year.

The IMF has released Pakistan’s fiscal indicators for the next five years, which portray that the country will sink deeper into debt. The IMF has given these indicators in terms of GDP that The Express Tribune has translated into rupees by using the projected size of the economy in fiscal year 2018-19 ending June 30 and fiscal year 2019-20.

At the end of the PML-N’s term, Pakistan’s gross public debt was equal to 72.1% of GDP, which the IMF said would increase to 77% at the end of current fiscal year. By fiscal year 2019-20, the debt-to-GDP ratio would be 79.1% and it would gradually swell to 84.1% of GDP, stated the report.

Last week, Finance Minister Asad Umar said Pakistan’s gross public debt would remain at 70% of GDP by 2023 as no sharp reduction was possible. But the IMF projections were significantly higher than what Umar planned to do.

Under the Fiscal Responsibility and Debt Limitation Act, Pakistan’s debt should not be more than 60% of GDP.

According to the report, Pakistan’s budget deficit – the gap between expenditures and revenues – will widen to 7.2% of GDP or Rs2.8 trillion in the current fiscal year.

IMF’s projected budget deficit is Rs550 billion, or 1.6% of GDP, higher than what the finance ministry has estimated in its revised budget. This paints quite an alarming picture, suggesting that the PTI government will not only miss its first year’s budget deficit target but would also borrow more than its estimates.

During the current fiscal year, the public debt, equal to 35.1% of GDP, will mature, said the IMF. This will be equal to Rs13.4 trillion. On the basis of budget deficit and maturing debt, the IMF has estimated total financing needs at Rs16 trillion or 42.3% of GDP for this financial year, FY19.


Majority of the financing needs are related to maturing domestic debt that the government meets by getting these loans rolled over.


For next fiscal year 2019-20, the IMF has estimated that Pakistan’s total financing needs would surge to 46% of GDP or Rs19.3 trillion. The international lender has estimated budget deficit at 8.7% of GDP or nearly Rs3.7 trillion. The debt maturity has been estimated at Rs15.6 trillion or 37.2% of GDP, according to the report.

The IMF has not shown any improvement in the fiscal indicators till 2023-24. It has shown the budget deficit at 7.6% of GDP by 2023 and 7.7% by 2024. These assumptions are based on the premise that the revenues would remain below 15% of GDP in the next five years – even lower than 15.3%, the level left behind by the PML-N.

The IMF has estimated that expenditures would remain over 22.3% of GDP in the next five years, higher than the level at the end of last fiscal year.

The IMF has also shown the primary deficit for next five years, which is calculated by excluding interest payments. In its programme negotiations, the lender has been pushing Pakistan to show primary balance that can only be achieved by either cutting the development budget or the defence spending.

In its projections, IMF has shown the primary deficit over 2% of GDP for the next five year. But in its economic roadmap, the Ministry of Finance has shown the primary balance in the range of 0.8% of GDP to 2% of GDP. The ministry has shown the primary balance on the back of a steep increase in the revenue, which the IMF is not recognising.

Corruption

The fiscal monitor’s report states that a common element of many anticorruption reforms is increasing civil servants’ wages. In theory, this helps by reducing the need for civil servants to request bribes to complement very low wages and deterring corrupt activities by raising the cost of being caught.

However, there is insufficient evidence that raising wages by itself can play a prominent role in fighting corruption. “On performance-related incentives, an experiment in Pakistan also shows the potential for undesirable consequences: while performance-based salaries of tax officials led to a significant increase in tax collection by as much as 50%, bribe requests also increased by 30%,”added the IMF report.



https://tribune.com.pk/story/1947798/2-pakistans-debt-pile-swell-84-1-gdp-2023/

Asad Umar’s economic shock therapy — crazy or genius?

By M Bilal Lakhani

Published: April 7, 2019

Chemotherapy makes a cancer patient feel even more sick and miserable, before it defeats cancer. Nausea, vomiting and eventually losing hair is a painful cost of the treatment, not the disease. Similarly, Asad Umar is giving chemotherapy to a sick Pakistani economy today. And the side effects of the chemotherapy — inflation, depreciation of the rupee, slowing growth — is the painful part and parcel of the treatment. Should the Pakistani people protest the disease or the medicine?

Miftah Ismail delivered the Pakistani economy on a stretcher to Asad Umar, with the economy gasping for breath in the emergency room. Like any doctor, Asad’s first job was to stabilise the patient and make sure he survives, regardless of how painful the treatment may be. This is the shock therapy we are experiencing today the side effects of which are expressing themselves as inflation, depreciation of the rupee and slowed-down growth. Is there a method to the madness in the PTI’s economic policies or are they just incompetent? In this column, I’ll unpack depreciation of the rupee, inflation and the rise in energy prices to understand whether Asad Umar is overprescribing medicine or if we need to give him more time.

Let’s take depreciation first. The PTI inherited a $19 billion current account deficit per year. This means we owe the world $19 billion in imported goods and debt liabilities every year, which we don’t have the money to pay for.


Why did this happen? Much has been said about Ishaq Dar’s fetish for keeping the dollar-rupee rate stable but the real game was subsidising elite and non-elite consumption. Here’s how this works: suppose we imported a chocolate for $1. This was sold in stores for 100 rupees last year, versus the 140 rupees at real exchange rate. The difference was subsidised by our foreign exchange reserves being used to keep the rupee artificially high, which we now have to borrow more dollars to repay. Essentially, the previous government was subsidising private consumption, with money they didn’t have!

The first sour medicine Asad Umar administered was devaluing the rupee — or bringing it closer to its real price. This helps eliminate subsidies on elite consumption like the import of cars, Swiss chocolate and pet food (yes, the PML-N government was indirectly subsidising these!). This hurts all of us because some of the goods we need like food and medicine are also imported. But the medication is working. We are learning to live within our means and imports are beginning to come down sharply (current account deficit was down to 72% in February).

Now, let’s talk about inflation, being fuelled primarily by devaluation/depreciation, which I explained above, plus the rise in energy prices. Let’s take gas as an example. Previous governments were selling gas at subsidised rates and now the PTI is removing these subsidies. Suppose gas costs 100 rupees per unit but the government was selling it at 60 rupees. Who was paying for those 40 rupees? The Pakistani taxpayer who takes on more government debt to pay for these subsidies.

Now, the PTI government is moving towards a more sustainable financial path — selling gas, petrol and electricity for their actual prices and reducing wasteful consumption. No politician wants to be the one raising prices but the pain is a sign that the medication is working. The PTI is putting the interests of the country — financial stabilisation — ahead of its own interests, which would be to keep prices artificially low and stay popular.

Even if it means they’re going to die, there’s a reason why some cancer patients choose not to get treated for cancer. The treatment is so debilitating that they prefer spending their last few weeks travelling or spending time with family. The good news is that Pakistan is a young patient and our prognosis is strong.

Once the initial shock and side effects of the chemotherapy wear off, Pakistan has a very bright future ahead. We have a young, dynamic population of 200 million and our close friend happens to be the world’s next superpower. All we have to do today is to be patient and channel our energy into fighting the disease, not the medication!

Published in The Express Tribune, April 7th, 2019.
Quick reply to this message Reply Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message
 
Last edited:
Correction


Pakistan’s Debt to GDP ratio :


2013 : 64 %

2018 : 70.1 %

2023 (Projected) : 84.1 %

THE policy of keeping the rupee-dollar exchange rate fixed over extended periods of time, despite manifest signs of currency overvaluation, has not served Pakistan well. The parity was held around 60 during the Musharraf era, and around 100 in the recent Dar era. In both cases, unsustainable external deficits emerged, culminating in balance-of-payments crises requiring large shock devaluations and foreign bailouts to fix.

These intermittent currency crises are a major impediment to Pakistan’s long-term prosperity. They incentivise businesses to focus on short-term returns rather than long-term investments to boost the country’s economic potential. They deter foreign direct investors demanding macroeconomic stability and policy continuity as prerequisites. And, they weaken Pakistan’s geopolitical standing and sovereignty (bailouts are never a free lunch).

Yet, despite these nontrivial costs, we hardly see any ‘real-time’ opposition to this fixed rupee-dollar policy while it is in full implementation. One cannot recall any commentators (other than IFIs) clamouring for timely adjustment of the rupee during the Musharraf and Dar eras. And if this government decided to stabilise the exchange rate at 150 for the next three years, one expects few to object. Why? Because, unfortunately, the political economy is supportive of such a policy.

Pakistan’s opinion-makers are major beneficiaries of an artificially low rupee-dollar rate.

Pakistan’s opinion-makers are major beneficiaries of an artificially low rupee-dollar rate: it subsidises their spending on luxury imports (such as SUVs), children’s education abroad, and vacation travel. The masses don’t protest, as the more affordable import prices and lower inflation associated with an overvalued currency imply a quality of life improvement of sorts, albeit short-lived. Financing of the resulting higher imports/external deficits is also easier under a fixed parity as global banks generally lend in dollars.

One can ask why exporters do not protest the overvaluation policy. They probably do, but after years of import bias, the export lobby has weakened, and is overtaken in foreign exchange terms by overseas Pakistanis, whose remittances are largely insensitive to exchange rate movements.

The only way to break this unholy bias in favour of a low/fixed rupee-dollar parity is by raising awareness about its economic flaws and costs; and articulating an alternative currency regime to serve a volatile emerging market well. To this end, let’s examine why a fixed rupee-dollar parity makes little economic sense for Pakistan.

The correct measure of a country’s external competitiveness is its real, not nominal, exchange rate; the more appreciated the real exchange rate, the lower the country’s competitiveness, ceteris paribus. A percentage change in Pakistan’s real exchange rate equals the sum of: (i) the percentage change in the nominal exchange rate (where a more depreciated nominal exchange rate raises competitiveness); and (ii) the inflation rate differential between Pakistan and its trading partners (where a positive differential reduces competitiveness).

Assuming the US was Pakistan’s only trading partner, a stable rupee-dollar parity would guard against a loss in Pakistan’s competitiveness only if the inflation rates for Pakistan and the US are aligned. This is far from true: between mid-2013 (when the last IMF programme began) and end-2017, cumulative inflation amounted to 21 per cent in Pakistan vs 6pc in the US, implying a rupee overvaluation of 15pc vs the dollar alone.

But Pakistan did trade not only with the US; 92pc of our recent trade was with other economies, led by China (20pc), the Euro Area (12pc), UAE (11pc). Unfortunately, inflation (21pc) was also higher than these other trading partners’ inflation (8pc), exacerbating the rupee’s overvaluation. Moreover, the currencies of these other trading partners depreciated on average by 9pc against a rising dollar, so with the rupee tied to the dollar, there was also a nominal rupee appreciation vis-à-vis these economies. The combined effect was a 22pc real effective (ie trade weighted) appreciation of the rupee between mid-2013 and end-2017. (A table and a chart, on Pakistan’s trade share with its major trading partners, and real effective exchange rate path, are included in Dawn’s web version of this article.)

The foregoing provides a measure of the massive external imbalance that had accumulated under the last government, and which had to be fixed. The rupee’s nominal depreciation in 2018 of 33pc should deliver a good part of the needed real depreciation, though probably not all of it. Pakistan’s non-US trading partners’ and other competitors’ currencies have also depreciated against the US dollar in 2018 (by 5pc and 18pc respectively, in median terms). Thus, the net improvement in Pakistan’s competitiveness due to the 2018 nominal devaluation of 33pc is likely to have been less than the around 22pc required to remove the overvaluation. (A table on the nominal currency depreciation of several of Pakistan’s competitors has been included in the web version of this article.)

If a stable rupee-dollar framework is not appropriate for Pakistan, what is? We can get a clue from Pakistan’s competitors. Most allowed their exchange rates vis-à-vis the US dollar to adjust early in the 2013-17 period (median depreciation was 13pc). This timely adjustment helped them avoid the cliff drop of 33pc the rupee suffered in 2018.

There’s no reason why a similar, more flexible exchange rate regime, anchored in a basket of trading partner currencies (rather than a single currency), should not work well. However, a more flexible regime will bring its own imperatives. With a more volatile currency, the private sector will need access to better instruments to hedge foreign exchange risk. The government would be well advised to develop futures and forward options that financial institutions and traders can access at reasonable cost.

Finally, a credibly independent State Bank, and clear communication are needed to regain the severely dented market confidence. If markets do not believe in the announced exchange rate policy, it is not worth the paper it is written on. Markets can bet (and win) against a currency even when the latter is in line with fundamentals. And the experience of the UK’s Black Wednesday (Sept 16, 1992) has shown that no sovereign, however powerful, can survive the market’s onslaught.

The writer teaches economics at SOAS, and is a senior research fellow at Bloomsbury Pakistan.
 
THE policy of keeping the rupee-dollar exchange rate fixed over extended periods of time, despite manifest signs of currency overvaluation, has not served Pakistan well. The parity was held around 60 during the Musharraf era, and around 100 in the recent Dar era. In both cases, unsustainable external deficits emerged, culminating in balance-of-payments crises requiring large shock devaluations and foreign bailouts to fix.

These intermittent currency crises are a major impediment to Pakistan’s long-term prosperity. They incentivise businesses to focus on short-term returns rather than long-term investments to boost the country’s economic potential. They deter foreign direct investors demanding macroeconomic stability and policy continuity as prerequisites. And, they weaken Pakistan’s geopolitical standing and sovereignty (bailouts are never a free lunch).

Yet, despite these nontrivial costs, we hardly see any ‘real-time’ opposition to this fixed rupee-dollar policy while it is in full implementation. One cannot recall any commentators (other than IFIs) clamouring for timely adjustment of the rupee during the Musharraf and Dar eras. And if this government decided to stabilise the exchange rate at 150 for the next three years, one expects few to object. Why? Because, unfortunately, the political economy is supportive of such a policy.

Pakistan’s opinion-makers are major beneficiaries of an artificially low rupee-dollar rate.

Pakistan’s opinion-makers are major beneficiaries of an artificially low rupee-dollar rate: it subsidises their spending on luxury imports (such as SUVs), children’s education abroad, and vacation travel. The masses don’t protest, as the more affordable import prices and lower inflation associated with an overvalued currency imply a quality of life improvement of sorts, albeit short-lived. Financing of the resulting higher imports/external deficits is also easier under a fixed parity as global banks generally lend in dollars.

One can ask why exporters do not protest the overvaluation policy. They probably do, but after years of import bias, the export lobby has weakened, and is overtaken in foreign exchange terms by overseas Pakistanis, whose remittances are largely insensitive to exchange rate movements.

The only way to break this unholy bias in favour of a low/fixed rupee-dollar parity is by raising awareness about its economic flaws and costs; and articulating an alternative currency regime to serve a volatile emerging market well. To this end, let’s examine why a fixed rupee-dollar parity makes little economic sense for Pakistan.

The correct measure of a country’s external competitiveness is its real, not nominal, exchange rate; the more appreciated the real exchange rate, the lower the country’s competitiveness, ceteris paribus. A percentage change in Pakistan’s real exchange rate equals the sum of: (i) the percentage change in the nominal exchange rate (where a more depreciated nominal exchange rate raises competitiveness); and (ii) the inflation rate differential between Pakistan and its trading partners (where a positive differential reduces competitiveness).

Assuming the US was Pakistan’s only trading partner, a stable rupee-dollar parity would guard against a loss in Pakistan’s competitiveness only if the inflation rates for Pakistan and the US are aligned. This is far from true: between mid-2013 (when the last IMF programme began) and end-2017, cumulative inflation amounted to 21 per cent in Pakistan vs 6pc in the US, implying a rupee overvaluation of 15pc vs the dollar alone.

But Pakistan did trade not only with the US; 92pc of our recent trade was with other economies, led by China (20pc), the Euro Area (12pc), UAE (11pc). Unfortunately, inflation (21pc) was also higher than these other trading partners’ inflation (8pc), exacerbating the rupee’s overvaluation. Moreover, the currencies of these other trading partners depreciated on average by 9pc against a rising dollar, so with the rupee tied to the dollar, there was also a nominal rupee appreciation vis-à-vis these economies. The combined effect was a 22pc real effective (ie trade weighted) appreciation of the rupee between mid-2013 and end-2017. (A table and a chart, on Pakistan’s trade share with its major trading partners, and real effective exchange rate path, are included in Dawn’s web version of this article.)

The foregoing provides a measure of the massive external imbalance that had accumulated under the last government, and which had to be fixed. The rupee’s nominal depreciation in 2018 of 33pc should deliver a good part of the needed real depreciation, though probably not all of it. Pakistan’s non-US trading partners’ and other competitors’ currencies have also depreciated against the US dollar in 2018 (by 5pc and 18pc respectively, in median terms). Thus, the net improvement in Pakistan’s competitiveness due to the 2018 nominal devaluation of 33pc is likely to have been less than the around 22pc required to remove the overvaluation. (A table on the nominal currency depreciation of several of Pakistan’s competitors has been included in the web version of this article.)

If a stable rupee-dollar framework is not appropriate for Pakistan, what is? We can get a clue from Pakistan’s competitors. Most allowed their exchange rates vis-à-vis the US dollar to adjust early in the 2013-17 period (median depreciation was 13pc). This timely adjustment helped them avoid the cliff drop of 33pc the rupee suffered in 2018.

There’s no reason why a similar, more flexible exchange rate regime, anchored in a basket of trading partner currencies (rather than a single currency), should not work well. However, a more flexible regime will bring its own imperatives. With a more volatile currency, the private sector will need access to better instruments to hedge foreign exchange risk. The government would be well advised to develop futures and forward options that financial institutions and traders can access at reasonable cost.

Finally, a credibly independent State Bank, and clear communication are needed to regain the severely dented market confidence. If markets do not believe in the announced exchange rate policy, it is not worth the paper it is written on. Markets can bet (and win) against a currency even when the latter is in line with fundamentals. And the experience of the UK’s Black Wednesday (Sept 16, 1992) has shown that no sovereign, however powerful, can survive the market’s onslaught.

The writer teaches economics at SOAS, and is a senior research fellow at Bloomsbury Pakistan.

To be honest IK needs to do a better job in terms of educating the masses on the economic front, he needs to give a speech to the nation, imploring them to purchase only Pakistani products for patriotic reasons and in national interest, the govt needs to ban all unnecessary non-essential imports that the country can do without and the local industry needs to be pushed into developing capacity in these areas.

Also as far as tax collection is concerned, like in Canada for e.g. if you don't file a tax return even if you have zero income or zero tax liability, you don't become elligible for certain credits, certain govt refunds. The govt needs to incentivize the population to file tax returns even if they have zero income, zero tax liability i.e. they will not be elligible to get sehat health cards if they have not filed a tax return. A mass demand for filing tax returns will put accountants and sole proprietorships in business.

Similarly for businesses, they will not be ellgible for govt support programs, refunds, benefits if they have not filed a sales tax return, a corporate tax return even if they have zero income. A mass government drive needs to be launched census style throughout the country on educated the masses on filing tax returns and making it easier.

Individuals should not be allowed to buy a house, car or luxury goods without having filed tax returns. Similarly in Canada, the govt gets your T3, T4, T5, T5008 slips, your RRSP contribution slips and information from your suppliers, vendors if you have business income, there is complete integration and the govt knows in advance if you are under reporting your income and tax liabilities. Pakistan has a lot to do on this front, there are so many ways to get the undocumented economy, to get the 50-60 million people if not more elligible and ready to work and working to start filing tax returns.
 
To be honest IK needs to do a better job in terms of educating the masses on the economic front, he needs to give a speech to the nation, imploring them to purchase only Pakistani products for patriotic reasons and in national interest, the govt needs to ban all unnecessary non-essential imports that the country can do without and the local industry needs to be pushed into developing capacity in these areas.

Also as far as tax collection is concerned, like in Canada for e.g. if you don't file a tax return even if you have zero income or zero tax liability, you don't become elligible for certain credits, certain govt refunds. The govt needs to incentivize the population to file tax returns even if they have zero income, zero tax liability i.e. they will not be elligible to get sehat health cards if they have not filed a tax return. A mass demand for filing tax returns will put accountants and sole proprietorships in business.

Similarly for businesses, they will not be ellgible for govt support programs, refunds, benefits if they have not filed a sales tax return, a corporate tax return even if they have zero income. A mass government drive needs to be launched census style throughout the country on educated the masses on filing tax returns and making it easier.

Individuals should not be allowed to buy a house, car or luxury goods without having filed tax returns. Similarly in Canada, the govt gets your T3, T4, T5, T5008 slips, your RRSP contribution slips and information from your suppliers, vendors if you have business income, there is complete integration and the govt knows in advance if you are under reporting your income and tax liabilities. Pakistan has a lot to do on this front, there are so many ways to get the undocumented economy, to get the 50-60 million people if not more elligible and ready to work and working to start filing tax returns.

It's also a cultural thing, and it will take decades. Only Mush could have done what you are suggesting and he got greedy for power.
 
It's also a cultural thing, and it will take decades. Only Mush could have done what you are suggesting and he got greedy for power.

To be honest, a lot of reforms Musharraf introduced like the Police Ordinance, Local Governance Nazim system were done away with by the PPP and PML-N in their hunger for more control and more corruption opportunities.
 
I hope someone has explained why there is a need for this much loan? PTI government will need to repay $24 Billion in first 3 years alone. We are currently taking loan even to keep up with interest payments so yes borrowing will increase.
 
I hope someone has explained why there is a need for this much loan? PTI government will need to repay $24 Billion in first 3 years alone. We are currently taking loan even to keep up with interest payments so yes borrowing will increase.

I have challenged the liar in chief a 1000 times to explain, but alas he runs with his tail between his legs. The master of the U turn is now the biggest liar on the forum.
 
There is no point in arguing. The reality the current system of finance, globally, means that government debts will continue to rise. As each government comes into power, national debt will grow. This is a fact.

USA the richest nation in the world but also the most indebted! UK, piling on more debt each day!

India, fastest growing economy in the world but allegedly added $1 Trillion last fiscal year? India is offering over 7% on the debt (bonds) it sells! Sound healthy to you? No! Well take a look at this : https://commodity.com/debt-clock/india/

We live in a world where debt is considered healthy, this is not true.

It is all a pyramid scam.
 
There is no point in arguing. The reality the current system of finance, globally, means that government debts will continue to rise. As each government comes into power, national debt will grow. This is a fact.

USA the richest nation in the world but also the most indebted! UK, piling on more debt each day!

India, fastest growing economy in the world but allegedly added $1 Trillion last fiscal year? India is offering over 7% on the debt (bonds) it sells! Sound healthy to you? No! Well take a look at this : https://commodity.com/debt-clock/india/

We live in a world where debt is considered healthy, this is not true.

It is all a pyramid scam.

Rising debt is not a problem for countries that use it to invest and use the increased taxation as a result of the growth to pay back.
Our debt has gone up from 37bn to $95bn in one decade, what did we get for this $60bn borrowed,did we get dams? No we got big houses in London and Dubai and brought elections through manipulated exchange rates.
 
Pakistan eyes $22b package from lending agencies in three years

ISLAMABAD: The International Monetary Fund (IMF) on Monday announced that it will send a staff-level mission to Pakistan to finalise a bailout programme, as Finance Minister Asad Umar hoped to secure nearly $22 billion packages from three multilateral agencies in the next three years.

“At the request of the (Pakistani) authorities, an IMF mission will be going to Pakistan before the end of April to continue the discussions,” said a statement of Office of the Resident Representative of the IMF.

It added that the Pakistani authorities and the IMF staff held constructive discussions during the IMF-World Bank (WB) Spring Meetings in Washington DC towards an IMF-supported programme.

Hours before the IMF communiqué, Umar told the National Assembly Standing Committee on Finance and Revenue that Pakistan and the IMF have in principle reached an agreement on all policy matters.

But the finance minister refused to divulge details of the IMF conditions, saying it could ‘jeopardise the negotiations’. After the committee meeting, the minister did say the electricity prices would go up “due to idle capacity payments left behind by the PML-N [Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz] government.”

“Both the sides have documented the agreement and an IMF mission would arrive in Islamabad this month to sort out technical details. The expected size of the IMF loan will be $7.5 billion to $8 billion,” Umar added. The dates of the IMF visit will be finalised in the next couple of days.

Umar said the agreement has been achieved on the budget deficit, exchange rate management, energy sector, state-owned enterprises, and public finance management.

The finance minister insisted that the IMF’s conditions would not burden the poor. The people are facing problems due to the mess left behind by the PML-N, he said.

Umar said the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) would periodically increase the electricity prices to pass on the impact of idle capacity payments to the Independent Power Producers.

But sources said it is a condition of the IMF, as the government was initially against the proposal to bridge the gap between electricity generation cost and consumer price through administrative measures.

The finance minister said in addition to the IMF lending, the programme loans from the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) would also resume once the IMF programme is approved.

Both the multilateral lenders have suspended Pakistan’s budgetary support due to deterioration in macroeconomic conditions. The minister said the three multilateral lending agencies are expected to give a total package of nearly $22 billion in the next three years. He said the WB lending could reach to $7.5 billion in next three years while the ADB may also give over $6 billion in loans.

Pakistan and the IMF have remained engaged for the last eight months and the upcoming IMF staff level mission would finalise the programme. But the conditions that the IMF has imposed in return of the bailout appeared stringent that would keep the PTI government on its toes.

It will also be difficult to approve new legislation due to a thin majority of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) in the National Assembly and its minority status in the Senate. Umar said the international capital markets are also receptive to the government’s economic reforms programme and Pakistan may issue a bond either towards the end of this fiscal year or at the start of the next financial year.

Umar said the foreign currency reserves that have so far remained under pressure would soon start building up after approval of the IMF loan. The members of the standing committee asked the finance minister to share the details about the targets agreed with the IMF.

“The government cannot share the details until completion of the negotiations, as this could jeopardise the whole programme,” he said.

After the meeting, Umar said in the next fiscal year there will be a primary balance on the budget that will be achieved on the back of enhancing revenue collection.

The government’s revenues are not even sufficient for debt servicing. Heavy taxation under the IMF programme may further hurt the economic growth, said the PML-N’s Qaiser Ahmad Sheikh.

But Umar reiterated that it is the IMF that changed the position while accepting Pakistan’s stance. He said the IMF has now admitted that the economy has responded to the government’s policy actions.

Umar said there is no link between the IMF programme and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). He said the government has prepared its draft report that would be sent to the FATF on Monday.

He said the report would become the base for Pakistan’s second review that will take place in the third week of May. The minister said this time the FATF would hold a review in Pakistan and would meet the stakeholders.

Umar said the stabilization phase would continue under the IMF programme and if the government tried to end it prematurely this could result in the recurrence of high current account and budget deficits.

“$9.2 billion financial assistance by China, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates provided a breathing space that was utilized to negotiate a better deal with the IMF,” he added.



https://tribune.com.pk/story/1951648/2-pakistan-eyes-22b-package-lending-agencies/
 
State Minister for Finance aswell as Advisor for Finance have accepted in Senate that PML N returned 33 billion dollars loan in 5 years while PTI has to return 37 billion dollars in its 5 years tenure.


Now PTI waala’s should play Imran Khan’s lies wrt Pakistan’s Debt and PML N’s comtribution. The lies he peddled in last 6 years.



Meanwhile PTI Government in its first 9 months has borrowed 10 billion dollars and IMF package would make it 16.5 billion USD in 10 months Alhamdoulillah.



While PML N doubled FBR’s tax collection in 5 years, PTI is 450 billion rupees short of achieving 1st year target thanks to the Economy that has crashed in hands of PM and his arastooz.




Now IMF is halaal. Yes same IMF whom corrupt Incompetent Kapataan had warned not to lend Pakistan government any money in last tenure otherwise he The Kaptaan won’t return any money when he will be in power. Lolz.



Now Tax Amnesty Scheme is also Halaal which has always benefitted the corrupt maafia previously.



PTI is on course of breaking PPP and PML loans record and after 5 years this shameless leader will either tell the nation how good loans are for nation development or would peddle same lies over and over again that he took loans to return loans taken by PPP and PML N :-)
 
State Minister for Finance aswell as Advisor for Finance have accepted in Senate that PML N returned 33 billion dollars loan in 5 years while PTI has to return 37 billion dollars in its 5 years tenure.


Now PTI waala’s should play Imran Khan’s lies wrt Pakistan’s Debt and PML N’s comtribution. The lies he peddled in last 6 years.



Meanwhile PTI Government in its first 9 months has borrowed 10 billion dollars and IMF package would make it 16.5 billion USD in 10 months Alhamdoulillah.



While PML N doubled FBR’s tax collection in 5 years, PTI is 450 billion rupees short of achieving 1st year target thanks to the Economy that has crashed in hands of PM and his arastooz.




Now IMF is halaal. Yes same IMF whom corrupt Incompetent Kapataan had warned not to lend Pakistan government any money in last tenure otherwise he The Kaptaan won’t return any money when he will be in power. Lolz.



Now Tax Amnesty Scheme is also Halaal which has always benefitted the corrupt maafia previously.



PTI is on course of breaking PPP and PML loans record and after 5 years this shameless leader will either tell the nation how good loans are for nation development or would peddle same lies over and over again that he took loans to return loans taken by PPP and PML N :-)

Liar in chief is back- no carrots for you here. Go to the Nooras who passed a resolution against Atif Mian
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">ن لیگ نے پانچ سال میں 33 ارب ڈالرقرض واپس کیا<br><br>جلسوں میں بچوں اورعام لوگوں کوبےوقوف بنانےکیلیےلگائےجانےوالےجھوٹے سچےالزامات اپنی جگہہ, مگر ایوان میں پوچھےگئےسوالات پر دستاویزی شواہد کی وجہ سے پی ٹی آئی کی حکومت جھوٹ نہ بول سکی<br><br>پاکستان ٹونٹی فور کی رپورٹ <br> <a href="https://t.co/ITBGTcfS8I">https://t.co/ITBGTcfS8I</a></p>— Ahmad Noorani (@Ahmad_Noorani) <a href="https://twitter.com/Ahmad_Noorani/status/1126471576629710848?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 9, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="ur" dir="rtl">ن لیگ نے پانچ سال میں 33 ارب ڈالرقرض واپس کیا<br><br>جلسوں میں بچوں اورعام لوگوں کوبےوقوف بنانےکیلیےلگائےجانےوالےجھوٹے سچےالزامات اپنی جگہہ, مگر ایوان میں پوچھےگئےسوالات پر دستاویزی شواہد کی وجہ سے پی ٹی آئی کی حکومت جھوٹ نہ بول سکی<br><br>پاکستان ٹونٹی فور کی رپورٹ <br> <a href="https://t.co/ITBGTcfS8I">https://t.co/ITBGTcfS8I</a></p>— Ahmad Noorani (@Ahmad_Noorani) <a href="https://twitter.com/Ahmad_Noorani/status/1126471576629710848?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 9, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Liar in chief- look at what the IMF said about the disaster you left behind.
“Pakistan is facing a challenging economic environment, with lackluster growth, elevated inflation, high indebtedness, and a weak external position. This reflects the legacy of uneven and procyclical economic policies in recent years aiming to boost growth, but at the expense of rising vulnerabilities and lingering structural and institutional weaknesses. The authorities recognize the need to address these challenges, as well as to tackle the large informality in the economy, the low spending in human capital, and poverty. In this regard, the government has already initiated a difficult, but necessary, adjustment to stabilize the economy, including thorough support from the State Bank of Pakistan. These efforts need to be strengthened. Decisive policies and reforms, together with significant external financing are necessary to reduce vulnerabilities faster, increase confidence, and put the economy back on a sustainable growth path, with stronger private sector activity and job creation.
 
Senate of Pakistan
 

Attachments

  • 11346A29-FD95-46F6-A52F-CDF024EA868F.jpg
    11346A29-FD95-46F6-A52F-CDF024EA868F.jpg
    17 KB · Views: 182
Senate of Pakistan

“Pakistan is facing a challenging economic environment, with lackluster growth, elevated inflation, high indebtedness, and a weak external position. This reflects the legacy of uneven and procyclical economic policies in recent years aiming to boost growth, but at the expense of rising vulnerabilities and lingering structural and institutional weaknesses. The authorities recognize the need to address these challenges, as well as to tackle the large informality in the economy, the low spending in human capital, and poverty. In this regard, the government has already initiated a difficult, but necessary, adjustment to stabilize the economy, including thorough support from the State Bank of Pakistan. These efforts need to be strengthened. Decisive policies and reforms, together with significant external financing are necessary to reduce vulnerabilities faster, increase confidence, and put the economy back on a sustainable growth path, with stronger private sector activity and job creation.
 
What happens if the PTI govt just refuses to repay?

Is it wise to keep taking loans just to make the interest payments on the previous debt? Why not just tell the world we can't afford to keep paying you forever at the expense of our domestic economic needs?
 
What happens if the PTI govt just refuses to repay?

Is it wise to keep taking loans just to make the interest payments on the previous debt? Why not just tell the world we can't afford to keep paying you forever at the expense of our domestic economic needs?




Meray Aziz, khalajaa se loan naheen liya hua.



Between Dr Hafeez Pasha is an economist who has been acknowledged and quoted proudly by Imran Khan and has been called the best Economist in Pakistan by Asad Umar, so watch his analysis on Aaj Shahzeb Khanzada k saath where he answers this question as to what will happen if we fail to payback these loans including IMF loans. What are costs of failing an IMF program is addressed by him in last 2 months.


Hint : Look no further than Egypt.
 
Update :


Govt’s foreign borrowing soars to $9.5b in 11 months

The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government has busted the annual target of foreign loans in 11 months and acquired $9.5 billion from international creditors



https://tribune.com.pk/story/1998322...-5b-11-months/




Add to this $20.8b borrowed by SBP.




So 20.8 + 9.5 = 31.3 billion USD dollars domestic and foreign debt.
 
Update :


Govt’s foreign borrowing soars to $9.5b in 11 months

The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government has busted the annual target of foreign loans in 11 months and acquired $9.5 billion from international creditors



https://tribune.com.pk/story/1998322...-5b-11-months/




Add to this $20.8b borrowed by SBP.




So 20.8 + 9.5 = 31.3 billion USD dollars domestic and foreign debt.

Haven't the already surpassed pmln?
 
Haven't the already surpassed pmln?


I will summarise :


So PML N took 11000 billion rupees total debt in 5 years. PTI admitted these facts in Senate.


Whereas in less than a year PTI has taken 5000 billion rupees domestic and foreign loans.


PTI may break collective loans record of PPP & PML N in 5 years or atleast PML N record will be easily broken.
 
I will summarise :


So PML N took 11000 billion rupees total debt in 5 years. PTI admitted these facts in Senate.


Whereas in less than a year PTI has taken 5000 billion rupees domestic and foreign loans.


PTI may break collective loans record of PPP & PML N in 5 years or atleast PML N record will be easily broken.

They'll have to borrow even more now cos of the Tethyan Copper fine, thanks alot Nawaz
 
Government’s debt soars to Rs34.5 trillion

The central government’s debt, excluding its liabilities, increased at a double-digit pace to Rs34.5 trillion by the end of May 2020 on an annualised basis, with an average of Rs14.2 billion per day, reported the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) on Monday.

The Rs34.5-trillion central government debt is exclusive of liabilities that the government indirectly owes to creditors. Thus, the gross public debt is far higher than the central government debt and actual figures will be available next month. For instance, the gross public debt has already jumped to Rs35.2 trillion at the end of March 2020.

The SBP’s debt bulletin showed that the central government’s debt stood at Rs34.5 trillion by the end of May 2020. In May last year, the central government’s debt was Rs29.8 trillion, excluding debt and liabilities of the central bank and public sector enterprises.

On a year-on-year basis, the central government’s debt grew 15.8% or Rs4.7 trillion due to depreciation of the currency, a steep shortfall in tax revenues and unforeseen expenditures on coronavirus-related mitigation measures.

But the budget book of supplementary grants showed that the Covid-19-related spending stood at Rs289.4 billion or only 6% of the debt that the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government added from June to May 2019-20.

In the current fiscal year, after remaining largely stable against the greenback, the rupee has started shedding its value. Its impact will be visible in June figures.

Cumulatively, the PTI government has so far added over Rs10.2 trillion to the public debt since coming to power, an increase of 44% that is alarming for the country.

When Imran Khan became prime minister, the central government’s debt was close to Rs24.2 trillion. In February last year, the PM vowed to bring the public debt below Rs20 trillion.

In last fiscal year 2019-20, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) revised upward its projection for Pakistan’s public debt and liabilities to 90% of gross domestic product (GDP). The central bank has not yet released debt statistics for the last month of the previous fiscal year.

The central government debt comprises long and short-term domestic and external debt.

The SBP report showed that the central government’s total domestic debt increased from Rs19.8 trillion in May last year to Rs23.5 trillion in May 2020, a net addition of Rs3.74 trillion or 18.9%.

The report showed that a major increase in the federal government’s debt was on account of long-term debt, which swelled from Rs8 trillion to Rs17.5 trillion. There was an increase of Rs9.6 trillion or 120% in the long-term debt.

It was largely because of the government’s decision to convert its short-term borrowing from the central bank to long-term debt. This helped to increase the maturity period of debt but also increased the cost of debt servicing.

The short-term domestic debt dropped from Rs11.8 trillion in May 2019 to Rs6.2 trillion in May this year due to the shift of borrowing to long-term instruments. There was a reduction of Rs5.8 trillion or 48% in the short-term debt.

The federal government’s debt, acquired through the sale of Market Treasury Bills (MTBs) to commercial banks, increased from Rs4.8 trillion to Rs5.8 trillion, an addition of Rs1 trillion or 21%.

The external debt of the central government increased from Rs10 trillion to Rs11 trillion by the end of May 2020, an addition of Rs977 billion or 9.8% in one year. The external debt did not increase at a rapid pace due to the booking of IMF liabilities and hot foreign money on books of the central bank. In June 2018, Pakistan’s external public debt stood at Rs7.8 trillion.

The federal government has decided to amend the Fiscal Responsibility and Debt Limitation Act to empower its public debt office for planning and raising loans. The World Bank has found deficiencies in Pakistan’s debt management policies and administrative structures.

The proposed legal changes would translate the role of the office from mere debt policy coordination to debt management office.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2254718/governments-debt-soars-to-rs345-trillion
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top