What's new

"In England you'll see us play more aggressively" : Haris Sohail

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,049
Haris Sohail, the Pakistan middle-order batsman, said it was important for his team to focus on getting used to conditions during the five one-day internationals in England before the ICC Men's Cricket World Cup 2019 gets under way.

Of the overseas teams, Pakistan are at the greatest advantage in terms of adapting to conditions for the World Cup as they will be facing hosts England, the No.1 team on the MRF Tyres ICC Men's ODI Team Rankings, in an ODI series days before the World Cup begins on 30 May.

Counting the sole Twenty20 International and the World Cup warm-up matches to follow, Pakistan will end up playing close to 10 matches before the World Cup starts, and want to make it count.

"The World Cup is still a little while away," said Sohail. "Before that, we have a very important series against England. England is a quality side, the No.1 team. If we win that series, we'll get a great deal of help in getting used to those conditions. We still have about 10 matches to go before the World Cup if you count all the practice matches. So we're hopeful of getting acclimatised well and producing good results at the World Cup."

On a personal note, Sohail is enjoying great form and will hope to take that into the showpiece event. He goes into the England series on the back of two centuries against Australia in UAE.

"Since the Australia series, my confidence and form is in a good place," Haris said. "Over the past few days, I wasn't feeling too great, but a match situation is different, and the [practice] match we played today, the ball felt great on the bat."

Despite Haris Sohail scoring 291 runs at 72.75 in that series against Australia, Pakistan conceded each of the five ODIs. Some felt that part of the reason for the repeated failures was the inability of batsmen to score quickly enough. There have been concerns that the team are falling behind in that area, but Sohail downplayed those doubts.

"Cricket is a different game nowadays," Haris said. "Now, when your No.3 or 4 plays a big innings or gets a hundred, batsmen play around him. In ODI cricket, a total above 300 is now par. Not in the UAE, where pitches are slower and you need to take more time. But definitely that applies in countries like England. So over there, you'll see us play more aggressively."

Babar Azam, Pakistan's middle-order star, is known for his more classically styled shots along the ground, but he too feels he is equipped to go big when the situation demands that of him.

"If I can be No.1 in the world [on the MRF Tyres ICC T20I Rankings for batting] without power hitting, then I don't need power hitting," he said. "But when I need to, I utilise it well. I don't just play along the ground. I practice hitting the ball big and when needed, I use it. My role is to play out the full overs. My individual role is to take the innings as deep as I can and perform in a way that benefits the team most of all."

Pakistan's series against England will start with a one-off T2OI in Cardiff on 5 May and the all-important ODI series will begin on 8 May.

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/1194065
 
fighting talk but good to hear this from our guys!
 
The boys look confident, they will get far in the WC.

Excellent to see.
 
He'll be in for a bit of a surprise when his spot in the XI is blocked by Hafeez and Malik.
 
The fact that Pak doesn't have power hitters down the order, puts more onus on our top 6 . . Essentially, the only way to counter our inability to strike big at the end is to maintain a healthy scoring rate through the middle overs . . which means, people like Babar and Haris and Malik and Hafeez can not afford to be 25 of 35 or 40 balls . you more or less need to be going at close to 6 an over throughout the innings so that the burden at the back end of the innings isn't too much
 
Problem with Pakistan is whenever they try to adopt the aggressive approach, they try to hit out and lose wickets and then eventually lose the match. After that the aggressive approach is scraped and then its rinse and repeat after couple of months.

I hope if they are going with the aggressive approach, they should at least do it in the whole ODI series.
 
If this is the plan then they should have picked Asif Ali and Imad will have to play almost all the games as his hitting has looked really impressive in recent times.

Fakhar up the order will also have to get some solid scores again.

The fact that Asif Ali hasn't been picked makes me wonder if all this aggression talk is real.
 
Just talk as usual.
I think Mickey teach his boys how to talk big without playing well.
They well play same brand of cricket which they always from last 1 decade.........poor and minnow bashers
 
If this is the plan then they should have picked Asif Ali and Imad will have to play almost all the games as his hitting has looked really impressive in recent times.

Fakhar up the order will also have to get some solid scores again.

The fact that Asif Ali hasn't been picked makes me wonder if all this aggression talk is real.

Picking Asif Ali is akin to playing with 10 players. Hes an absolute dud. Wrong coorelation.
 
Best captain since IK doesn’t have you in the starting line up. Sarfraz is just as bad as Inzi.
 
Best captain since IK doesn’t have you in the starting line up. Sarfraz is just as bad as Inzi.

His supporters will blame inzi for not playing harris in the playing 11. Tough times for for people who support haris and sarfraz.
 
His supporters will blame inzi for not playing harris in the playing 11. Tough times for for people who support haris and sarfraz.

Inzi said he selects the squad and than the team management and captain decide the 11. Clearly it’s Sarfraz and Mickey who have decided this batting line up. Malik and Hafeez aren’t better than Haris. 1 of them has to make way, but our captain is too scared too drop senior players.
 
Picking Asif Ali is akin to playing with 10 players. Hes an absolute dud. Wrong coorelation.

The guy has a phenomenol odi strike rate, has a fifty and two 40+ scores under his belt in just 8 appearances for the national side.

How is he a dud?
 
Inzi said he selects the squad and than the team management and captain decide the 11. Clearly it’s Sarfraz and Mickey who have decided this batting line up. Malik and Hafeez aren’t better than Haris. 1 of them has to make way, but our captain is too scared too drop senior players.

Exactly, but wait for sarfraz's fans to blame it on inzi.
 
The guy has a phenomenol odi strike rate, has a fifty and two 40+ scores under his belt in just 8 appearances for the national side.

How is he a dud?

One 50* & one 46 to be precise. Excluding that famous ZIM series, his stats stands at 86 runs @ 17/96 in 5 innings 9, 7, 30, 31 & 9 to be precise. And, that 31 had one absolute sitter dropped by Liton when he was still in single digit, otherwise this stats would have been something like <70 runs @ <14/<90.

That's pretty DUD to be honest for a specialist batsman who is not even a part-timer with ball and needs to be hidden in out-field.
 
One 50* & one 46 to be precise. Excluding that famous ZIM series, his stats stands at 86 runs @ 17/96 in 5 innings 9, 7, 30, 31 & 9 to be precise. And, that 31 had one absolute sitter dropped by Liton when he was still in single digit, otherwise this stats would have been something like <70 runs @ <14/<90.

That's pretty DUD to be honest for a specialist batsman who is not even a part-timer with ball and needs to be hidden in out-field.

Liton das droppped asif ali!! A dud dropped a dud! Dud bros!!!
 
One 50* & one 46 to be precise. Excluding that famous ZIM series, his stats stands at 86 runs @ 17/96 in 5 innings 9, 7, 30, 31 & 9 to be precise. And, that 31 had one absolute sitter dropped by Liton when he was still in single digit, otherwise this stats would have been something like <70 runs @ <14/<90.

That's pretty DUD to be honest for a specialist batsman who is not even a part-timer with ball and needs to be hidden in out-field.

Again, just 8 chances to bat, quite low in the order with the top order often not providing. We cant merely use stats to look at him, we have to actually watch him play and boy does he hit a big ball. That should be enough to give him a run in the side.
 
Excellent outing for Haris Sohail so far in the game against Kent
 
True to his word today:

50 off 36 balls at a strike-rate of 138.89
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">22nd April 2019 - Haris Sohail "In England you'll see us bat more aggressively"<br><br>Today - Haris Sohail 50 off 36 balls at a strike-rate of 138.89<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/ENGvPAK?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#ENGvPAK</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/1125058363367350272?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 5, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Well he certainly held up on his end of the bargain, really shifted that momentum to propel us to a 170+ score.
 
Doing an excellent job - beautiful strokes so far.
 
Playing well so far... unfortunately he has nephew at the other end who is tuk tuking to a selfish fifty.
 
Playing well so far... unfortunately he has nephew at the other end who is tuk tuking to a selfish fifty.

Correct, Haris is playing wonderfully.

Imam is sucking out all the momentum.
 
Pakistan haven't played aggressively for the last two decades. Every time they bat first they will always look to set a score which isn't disastrous first and foremost, after that if it's defend able by a brilliant bowling performance then happy days.
 
Pakistan haven't played aggressively for the last two decades. Every time they bat first they will always look to set a score which isn't disastrous first and foremost, after that if it's defend able by a brilliant bowling performance then happy days.

/PakistanStrategy
 
Pakistan haven't played aggressively for the last two decades. Every time they bat first they will always look to set a score which isn't disastrous first and foremost, after that if it's defend able by a brilliant bowling performance then happy days.

They did under Inzi and chased 300+ several times. I don't rate him as a captain overall, but one thing he never comprised on was attacking cricket with the bat.
 
Haris seems to be getting there with good strike rates but just feel that he will not get to the big scores against good oppositions.
 
They did under Inzi and chased 300+ several times. I don't rate him as a captain overall, but one thing he never comprised on was attacking cricket with the bat.

How many times did they set 300+ totals under Inzi? You see this is the problem with Pakistan mindset, when they are forced to chase a 300 score then they have no choice but to bat aggressively. But when they are setting the target they will be happy to set 270-280 which is often a losing score against the top sides.
 
How many times did they set 300+ totals under Inzi? You see this is the problem with Pakistan mindset, when they are forced to chase a 300 score then they have no choice but to bat aggressively. But when they are setting the target they will be happy to set 270-280 which is often a losing score against the top sides.

Precisely 10 times
 
Against who? Any decent teams in there?

England: 1
SA: 1
Zimbabwe: 1
India: 4
Hong Kong: 1
Bangladesh: 1
New Zealand: 1

These are scores of 313+, so there's more than 10x 300+ totals set during Inzy's captaincy.

I would post the source but it's from cricinfo (which I believe is banned).
 
Last edited:
Speaking at end of the 1st ODI

"Even though today's game was affected by rain, I feel that our preparation is very good"

"Today the conditions were helping the bowlers and just as Imam and I were settling down, it started to rain"

"There is no doubt that England are good side and their bowling is very good but we will try and give them a tough time"

"Alhamdolillah, I am feeling that I have the same form which I had when I played against Australia recently"

"I feel I am in good nick and will try and perform as well as I can for Pakistan"
 
Good to see this kind of stuff from them. Hopefully Haris can get a ton in these matches too so he can cement his spot as #4 but if we really play Malik and Hafeez and exclude him then there is no chance of us winning.
 
England: 1
SA: 1
Zimbabwe: 1
India: 4
Hong Kong: 1
Bangladesh: 1
New Zealand: 1

These are scores of 313+, so there's more than 10x 300+ totals set during Inzy's captaincy.

I would post the source but it's from cricinfo (which I believe is banned).

So basically two scores against a decent bowling attack, four of them came against India who were rubbish back then. I knew in my mind that we never had an aggressive approach when batting for the last 20 years, pretty sure it would have stood out if we did. Although it should be mentioned, during Inzi's time he had access to a lot better quality batsmen than today's lot.
 
So basically two scores against a decent bowling attack, four of them came against India who were rubbish back then. I knew in my mind that we never had an aggressive approach when batting for the last 20 years, pretty sure it would have stood out if we did. Although it should be mentioned, during Inzi's time he had access to a lot better quality batsmen than today's lot.

Oh come on you know there was more 300+ totals set by Pakistan (under Inzi), I could only find the top 10. If there are 10 totals of 313+, I am pretty sure there are at least 15 totals in excess of 300.

So lets not jump to any conclusions just yet - if I get the time I'll go through each ODI played under Inzi's captaincy to finalise this.

Yes we had a couple world class batsman (Inzi, Moyo) and some firepower down the order (Afridi, Razzaq etc) during that period but the captain has to lead from the front and utilise his leadership to provide strategic direction, as to how the innings should be paced.

Under Waqar Younis you could argue we had an even stronger batting line up (with the addition of Saeed Anwar at the top), however he has always been known to deploy defensive strategies when he was skipper and coach (2 stints). Hence under his authority, Pakistan's strike rates (or average run rate) were always lower and at times below the average across the major teams in ODIs.

I started watching cricket 20 years ago and I don't ever remember Pakistan chasing down 300+ successfully as much as they did between post-2003 WC until 2007 WC (Inzi's captaincy tenure), despite the fact, during those days ODIs was far more balanced between bat and ball. ODIs in the 2010s has been a far more batting friendly game, but the rate at which we have chased 300+ chases was far less abundant.
 
Last edited:
Oh come on you know there was more 300+ totals set by Pakistan (under Inzi), I could only find the top 10. If there are 10 totals of 313+, I am pretty sure there are at least 15 totals in excess of 300.

So lets not jump to any conclusions just yet - if I get the time I'll go through each ODI played under Inzi's captaincy to finalise this.

Yes we had a couple world class batsman (Inzi, Moyo) and some firepower down the order (Afridi, Razzaq etc) during that period but the captain has to lead from the front and utilise his leadership to provide strategic direction, as to how the innings should be paced.

Under Waqar Younis you could argue we had an even stronger batting line up (with the addition of Saeed Anwar at the top), however he has always been known to deploy defensive strategies when he was skipper and coach (2 stints). Hence under his authority, Pakistan's strike rates (or average run rate) were always lower and at times below the average across the major teams in ODIs.

I started watching cricket 20 years ago and I don't ever remember Pakistan chasing down 300+ successfully as much as they did between post-2003 WC until 2007 WC (Inzi's captaincy tenure), despite the fact, during those days ODIs was far more balanced between bat and ball. ODIs in the 2010s has been a far more batting friendly game, but the rate at which we have chased 300+ chases was far less abundant.

Not going to argue on this too much, you may be right. My impression has been that certain teams upped their game in the 2000s and suddenly 300 stopped becoming a huge score, and became the norm. England with KP and a couple of others suddenly became a lot more attacking with the bat. Pakistan has been plodding on with the 1990s tactic of getting 250+ and relying on the bowlers to defend it. Unfortunately we don't have Waqar, Wasim and Saqlain these days.
 
Oh come on you know there was more 300+ totals set by Pakistan (under Inzi), I could only find the top 10. If there are 10 totals of 313+, I am pretty sure there are at least 15 totals in excess of 300.

So lets not jump to any conclusions just yet - if I get the time I'll go through each ODI played under Inzi's captaincy to finalise this.

Yes we had a couple world class batsman (Inzi, Moyo) and some firepower down the order (Afridi, Razzaq etc) during that period but the captain has to lead from the front and utilise his leadership to provide strategic direction, as to how the innings should be paced.

Under Waqar Younis you could argue we had an even stronger batting line up (with the addition of Saeed Anwar at the top), however he has always been known to deploy defensive strategies when he was skipper and coach (2 stints). Hence under his authority, Pakistan's strike rates (or average run rate) were always lower and at times below the average across the major teams in ODIs.

I started watching cricket 20 years ago and I don't ever remember Pakistan chasing down 300+ successfully as much as they did between post-2003 WC until 2007 WC (Inzi's captaincy tenure), despite the fact, during those days ODIs was far more balanced between bat and ball. ODIs in the 2010s has been a far more batting friendly game, but the rate at which we have chased 300+ chases was far less abundant.


Ive been following pakistan cricket for the last 25 years I can categorically state that barring a couple of innings here and there against minnows or india pakistan were always a middleing team posting 275 on avge to win So this thought that inzy was an aggressive batting captain is nonsense
 
Not going to argue on this too much, you may be right. My impression has been that certain teams upped their game in the 2000s and suddenly 300 stopped becoming a huge score, and became the norm. England with KP and a couple of others suddenly became a lot more attacking with the bat. Pakistan has been plodding on with the 1990s tactic of getting 250+ and relying on the bowlers to defend it. Unfortunately we don't have Waqar, Wasim and Saqlain these days.

I wasn't a fan of Inzi's captaincy overall because he was defensive with field placings and was reluctant to bring in new blood to the team (a habit he still possesses as a selector). Also he allowed the Tableeghi to infiltrate the dressing room.

But one thing he never comprised on was devising the team to bat with intent, which should come to no surprise as he was an attacking batsman himself.

You put a more sedate batsman as captain, like Misbah, the rest of the team will show less intent. It's not just about what the captain advises his players, but also whether he leads from the front.
 
Ive been following pakistan cricket for the last 25 years I can categorically state that barring a couple of innings here and there against minnows or india pakistan were always a middleing team posting 275 on avge to win So this thought that inzy was an aggressive batting captain is nonsense

Pakistan's batting resources are dropping in quality generation after generation.

And our bowling resources are at an all time low as well.

It's no surprise why Pakistan is struggling.
 
Ive been following pakistan cricket for the last 25 years I can categorically state that barring a couple of innings here and there against minnows or india pakistan were always a middleing team posting 275 on avge to win So this thought that inzy was an aggressive batting captain is nonsense

I would advise comparing Pakistan's totals and number of 300+ totals chased under Inzi, in comparison to his predecessor Waqar Younis and with the likes of Misbah + Azhar Ali.

Rather than making blanket statements, bring out supporting evidence to dismiss my views. To reinforce my argument further, Inzi himself has said, he prefers batsman who score at a faster rate, contrary to Waqar Younis/Misbah/Azhar Ali who all had a preference for a far more conservative approach.

But I'll think the best of you and assume your roza has hit you hard.
 
I would advise comparing Pakistan's totals and number of 300+ totals chased under Inzi, in comparison to his predecessor Waqar Younis and with the likes of Misbah + Azhar Ali.

Rather than making blanket statements, bring out supporting evidence to dismiss my views. To reinforce my argument further, Inzi himself has said, he prefers batsman who score at a faster rate, contrary to Waqar Younis/Misbah/Azhar Ali who all had a preference for a far more conservative approach.

But I'll think the best of you and assume your roza has hit you hard.


The comparsion with misbah and azhar is false as these guys were pretty negative batsmen by nature They also had pretty thin batting resources at their disposal (Pakistan hasnt produced a world class ODI bat since moyo who was a integral part of inzys team)

A more apt comparison is with other teams of that era and inzys team were behind 2-3 teams of that era when it came to strike rate.

Inzy talked a good game but usually was content to hide away himself at 5 n the rest of the best bats down the middle order and have expendables protecting him and the others at the top The better teams of thay era would play their best at the top and take the game from uptop not vice versa

His strategy was to score 200 off 40 overs and launch from there with afridi and razzaq He employed a pretty defensive bowling strategy based on containment
Not saying that was a poor strategy but was Nothing special and behind teams like india sth africa and aus

Inzy can talk a good game but if he was all about aggression he wouldnt be picking his nephew, and the likes of malik who just cant cut it in modern day odi cricket
 
Oh come on you know there was more 300+ totals set by Pakistan (under Inzi), I could only find the top 10. If there are 10 totals of 313+, I am pretty sure there are at least 15 totals in excess of 300.

So lets not jump to any conclusions just yet - if I get the time I'll go through each ODI played under Inzi's captaincy to finalise this.

Yes we had a couple world class batsman (Inzi, Moyo) and some firepower down the order (Afridi, Razzaq etc) during that period but the captain has to lead from the front and utilise his leadership to provide strategic direction, as to how the innings should be paced.

Under Waqar Younis you could argue we had an even stronger batting line up (with the addition of Saeed Anwar at the top), however he has always been known to deploy defensive strategies when he was skipper and coach (2 stints). Hence under his authority, Pakistan's strike rates (or average run rate) were always lower and at times below the average across the major teams in ODIs.

I started watching cricket 20 years ago and I don't ever remember Pakistan chasing down 300+ successfully as much as they did between post-2003 WC until 2007 WC (Inzi's captaincy tenure), despite the fact, during those days ODIs was far more balanced between bat and ball. ODIs in the 2010s has been a far more batting friendly game, but the rate at which we have chased 300+ chases was far less abundant.

you are right , pakistan posted totals of 300 plus 17 times under inzamams captaincy and 15 we won. Only one win while chasing, we posted 300 plus against india 7 times under inzamams captaincy.
 
you are right , pakistan posted totals of 300 plus 17 times under inzamams captaincy and 15 we won. Only one win while chasing, we posted 300 plus against india 7 times under inzamams captaincy.

Thanks for digging this up. Much appreciated.

In an era which was more forgiving for bowlers, Pakistan were still a far more aggressive batting side under Inzy.
 
I hope he keeps on batting with intent. He doesn’t look very good when he plays in a shell. He should start at the WC.
 
Play with intent but don't be reckless. Tried to hit Rashid into another city, didn't read him and should have been stumped if it hadn't been for some awful wicketkeeping.
 
I would advise comparing Pakistan's totals and number of 300+ totals chased under Inzi, in comparison to his predecessor Waqar Younis and with the likes of Misbah + Azhar Ali.

I will never forget the Ahmedabad match in 2005 v India where we chased down 315 in front of a baying crowd. Remember this was only three years after the Gujarat riots so the atmosphere was tense. It's matches like that which separate the men from the boys.

We chased it with Inzy masterfully leading from the front. This was a shortened over match too. Could you imagine this meek bunch chasing 300 in India in such circumstances or even against most teams ?
 
I will never forget the Ahmedabad match in 2005 v India where we chased down 315 in front of a baying crowd. Remember this was only three years after the Gujarat riots so the atmosphere was tense. It's matches like that which separate the men from the boys.

We chased it with Inzy masterfully leading from the front. This was a shortened over match too. Could you imagine this meek bunch chasing 300 in India in such circumstances or even against most teams ?

Even if you put the same Indian bowling attack in front of these guys, they would still crumble because of the occasion.

I don't think this team is capable of chasing 300+ against a SL bowling attack with a success rate of above 50%.
 
Absolutely terrible innings today from this aggressive player.
14 off 18 balls when RR is near 10!
 
Not the first time he have put up this "aggressive batting" charade in recent times. In the last few years, almost every time England and Australia have smashed us for a mammoth score, we have been forced to come out swinging.

It is one thing to bat aggressively when you are chasing 370, but the true test of your approach is how you bat first. One can guarantee that if Pakistan would have batted first today, they would have aimed for 270-280.

We need to aim for 320 every time we bat first, but we don't back ourselves because we fear collapsing in a heap.
 
Not the first time he have put up this "aggressive batting" charade in recent times. In the last few years, almost every time England and Australia have smashed us for a mammoth score, we have been forced to come out swinging.

It is one thing to bat aggressively when you are chasing 370, but the true test of your approach is how you bat first. One can guarantee that if Pakistan would have batted first today, they would have aimed for 270-280.

We need to aim for 320 every time we bat first, but we don't back ourselves because we fear collapsing in a heap.

Which is what I have been saying for ages now. Does anyone seriously think we would have scored 350 plus batting first? We have a horrible attitude to the game, driven by selfish ambitions of individuals over the team.
 
Absolutely terrible innings today from this aggressive player.
14 off 18 balls when RR is near 10!

If Haris was ever considered aggressive, then Mudassar Nazar should have been considered Asian Richards...
 
Really enjoyed Haris' shot timing today.. until he ran himself out.. silly silly run out.. but good to get it out of the way before worldcup and be more 'aware' between the crease. I really think he is in good form and should make the most out of this worldcup opportunity at 4.
 
True to his word. 350+ back to back vs England.
 
Its good weve got this prep before the world cup

The pitches in eng are flat and 350 is a must something pak are finding out quickly

Theres no reason not to go hard from ball one snd score at a run a ball plus throughout
Urgency throughout is the key

No plodding along at 4 an over in the middle orvers anymore
 
Last edited:
Imo the he is the most techincal proper batsmen not just for Pakistan but for both teams. What a talent, hope he improves his fitness, jump on the treadmill. His running is terrible.
 
Alright then, "aggresive" lad is playing today ahead of Malik and Asif. He must score big today and try to field better today.
 
Rubbish player!!! Should not play any more matches in this World Cup. I would rather take Malik over him.
 
Got a peach of a delivery today, sometimes when you get such good deliveries you get out. Happens to the best of players
 
Harris Sohail- work ethic and body language watch thread

Don’t get me wrong. High quality batsman, terrible work ethic and attitude to the game. I categorically lay the entire blame on him for yesterday’s sudden decline. He set the tone for the West Indies by casually going into a shell against Andre Russell and ducking everything. He ducked 2 good length deliveries also. Why is he so scared to take an initiative? Babar Azam will be Babar Azam and always play second fiddle (all of his life). So this guy is the senior, premier batsman and he just surrenders!

Pathetic really. He comes across as such a whimp at times and yesterday was a prime example. His physical condition is well below par. His fielding has become suspect and his running between the wickets also came into question during the England series.

If this guy doesn’t want to be out there and fight for the dreams 220 Million people in Pakistan and the thousands of fanatics around the world, he should honestly step aside!
 
Don’t get me wrong. High quality batsman, terrible work ethic and attitude to the game. I categorically lay the entire blame on him for yesterday’s sudden decline. He set the tone for the West Indies by casually going into a shell against Andre Russell and ducking everything. He ducked 2 good length deliveries also. Why is he so scared to take an initiative? Babar Azam will be Babar Azam and always play second fiddle (all of his life). So this guy is the senior, premier batsman and he just surrenders!

Pathetic really. He comes across as such a whimp at times and yesterday was a prime example. His physical condition is well below par. His fielding has become suspect and his running between the wickets also came into question during the England series.

If this guy doesn’t want to be out there and fight for the dreams 220 Million people in Pakistan and the thousands of fanatics around the world, he should honestly step aside!

High quality batsman in what sense? Been saying this for a long time- the guy is overrated, lazy, unfit and at times horrible to watch.
 
The only thing I see aggressively increasing is his belly along with Sarfaraz and Imad. These 3 clowns make Pakistan look like the most unfit side in the world.
 
Harris Sohail - Fitness Watch

everyone is going on about how sarfraz had a belly and should even be in the playing for Pakistan due to his belly and the same people want Harris sohail to be the first name on the sheet for the playing 11

Why the double standards?

IMG_20190619_083320.jpg

IMG_20190619_083347.jpg
 
What is there to watch? It’s too late. Damage is done.
 
And this guy was touted as the ‘future of Pak batting’ by some experts here lmao
 
Back
Top