What's new

India all out for 36 in the first Test against Australia (2020/21)

OffDrive

Debutant
Joined
May 31, 2019
Runs
291
EplDO-HU8AIpeEr


The greatest test team ever, greater that the West Indies and Australia bowled out for a park cricket score of 36

The best top six in the world, the number 3 in the world.

But yet could only manage 36.

What went wrong? LOL

Can't find any words to describe the destruction of this so called great team.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
India needs to organise a West Indies tour or home series to get their batting averages back up. Lol
 
India needs to organise a West Indies tour or home series to get their batting averages back up. Lol

They will all run back to India to play in the greatest cirrus on earth.

They will beat Lanka at home, and then we will hear again how they are the greatest team on earth.

And all this will be forgotten and forgiven.
 
Worst performance ever I have seen.it was so so fun to watch.They are HTBs of highest level.They can't compete overseas that's the fact.
 
Thank you India for all your Christmas presents.

**** poor fielding, but the biggest joke is India is No 3 in the WTC.

And the even bigger joke is all out for 36, even my 6th grade team would have scored more.
 
Yasir Shah will retire soon. India can try to get him as their batting coach.

Yasir scored a 100 in a pink ball Test in Adelaide

India scored 36 in a pink ball Test in Adelaide

Same bowlers, same conditions, different results. :yasir
 
4.00pm: India 36 all out!

India have recorded their lowest ever total in Test cricket as they startling second innings ended on 36 when Mohammed Shami was forced to retire hurt following a crunching blow on the arm from Pat Cummins. Their previous lowest was 42 against England at Lord's in 1974. What a session that was. Australia need 90 to win.

Congratulation India.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A day to remember for Australia as they bowled India out for their lowest total in Test history &#55357;&#56879; <br><br>Have you seen a more clinical bowling performance?<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AUSvIND?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AUSvIND</a> <a href="https://t.co/FOmSNKfYbm">pic.twitter.com/FOmSNKfYbm</a></p>— ICC (@ICC) <a href="https://twitter.com/ICC/status/1340184904374599680?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 19, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
They as a team scored more than Mohamad Rizwan did in NZ. Tough luck for India. Better luck next time boys.
 
Going to be a comedy show at the press conference, wonder what Kohli is going to say?

40 minutes of bad cricket cost us?

We are still a good cricket team?

40 minute's of bad cricket shouldn't take away from our number 3 ranking?

I am looking forward to running away? I am late for my flight?

We are the greatest team in the world, even better than the West Indies and Australia?

We scored more than those park cricketer's?
 
Last edited:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A day to remember for Australia as they bowled India out for their lowest total in Test history <br><br>Have you seen a more clinical bowling performance?<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AUSvIND?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AUSvIND</a> <a href="https://t.co/FOmSNKfYbm">pic.twitter.com/FOmSNKfYbm</a></p>— ICC (@ICC) <a href="https://twitter.com/ICC/status/1340184904374599680?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 19, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This shouldn’t be recognized as the lowest score because India lost 9 wickets not 10.
 
This shouldn’t be recognized as the lowest score because India lost 9 wickets not 10.

So you want aus bowler to end shami or umesh cricket career even they will be happy to leave out field without breaking their fingers or getting hit on body :))):)))
 
Last edited:
The lowest score in modern day cricket and some people are calling it just a bad hour.
It's not a bad hour when no one has made less runs in the last 65 years.

Great record to hold for Kohli's India.
 
This is just ** spread by a particular poster about this being greatest Asian side etc. Even Prithvi Shaw who leaves a gap as big as distance between moon and Earth is supposed to be a superstar and we have to accept it. Even unborn Indian cricketers are supposed to be best as per this poster
 
Yasir scored a 100 in a pink ball Test in Adelaide

India scored 36 in a pink ball Test in Adelaide

Same bowlers, same conditions, different results. :yasir
Yasir actually scored 113, so he scored over 3 times more then India lol. There is a bit of time before the second test, Indian batsman should contact Yasir, I am sure he can give them a few tips.
 
MIG and SAJ are old enough to have seen all of these inns.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A day to remember for Australia as they bowled India out for their lowest total in Test history <br><br>Have you seen a more clinical bowling performance?<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AUSvIND?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AUSvIND</a> <a href="https://t.co/FOmSNKfYbm">pic.twitter.com/FOmSNKfYbm</a></p>— ICC (@ICC) <a href="https://twitter.com/ICC/status/1340184904374599680?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 19, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This shouldn’t be recognized as the lowest score because India lost 9 wickets not 10.

Please feel to write a letter of complaint to ICC :)))
 
Australia is going to go the full monty and whitewash them.

India and England come over to these shores with a lot of hype and hoopla and go back with their tail between their legs 9 out of 10 times.
 
This shouldn’t be recognized as the lowest score because India lost 9 wickets not 10.

Aur kitna zaleel hoge bhai. Even ur lack of basic cricket knowledge has been exposed now. Retired Hurt means final score was 36
 
bro, you are just tarnishing your reputation and losing respect here by such posts.

Aur kitna zaleel hoge bhai. Even ur lack of basic cricket knowledge has been exposed now. Retired Hurt means final score was 36

If I cared about respect and reputation, I wouldn’t speak my mind. I am not here to make friends.

When if comes to these lowest totals records, ICC should have the ends to distinguish between a 10 wickets innings and a 9 wickets innings because they aren’t the same.

Australia took 9 wickets not 10. If Shami didn’t get inured, who knows what the final total would have been.

It could have still been 36 and that would probably have been the case, but stranger things have happened in cricket and Shami and Yadav could have fluked a few boundaries with edges and India could have ended up with 45 or even 50.

However, it is clear that ICC doesn’t care much about such useless records. For example, they happily hand out “youngest to XYZ” records to the likes of Rashid Khan and Naseem even though it is blatantly obvious to everyone that they have fake ages.
 
May be that's what Shami thought as well and got retired hurt but unfortunately it's still counts as lowest score [MENTION=131701]Mamoon[/MENTION]
 
Last edited:
If I cared about respect and reputation, I wouldn’t speak my mind. I am not here to make friends.

When if comes to these lowest totals records, ICC should have the ends to distinguish between a 10 wickets innings and a 9 wickets innings because they aren’t the same.

Australia took 9 wickets not 10. If Shami didn’t get inured, who knows what the final total would have been.

It could have still been 36 and that would probably have been the case, but stranger things have happened in cricket and Shami and Yadav could have fluked a few boundaries with edges and India could have ended up with 45 or even 50.

However, it is clear that ICC doesn’t care much about such useless records. For example, they happily hand out “youngest to XYZ” records to the likes of Rashid Khan and Naseem even though it is blatantly obvious to everyone that they have fake ages.

Last player retired hurt as per ICC rules it's the lowest score: Mamoon no it's stupid
India manipulates ICC rules to play Chahal in T20: Mamoon ICC has clearly stated it.
 
Indian fans should blame the toss having to bat 1st on such a seaming wicket.

Indiam fans should blame the toss having to bat last on a crumbling wicket.

Oh wait this is batting friendly surface in Adelaide :))
 
If I cared about respect and reputation, I wouldn’t speak my mind. I am not here to make friends.

When if comes to these lowest totals records, ICC should have the ends to distinguish between a 10 wickets innings and a 9 wickets innings because they aren’t the same.

Australia took 9 wickets not 10. If Shami didn’t get inured, who knows what the final total would have been.

It could have still been 36 and that would probably have been the case, but stranger things have happened in cricket and Shami and Yadav could have fluked a few boundaries with edges and India could have ended up with 45 or even 50.

However, it is clear that ICC doesn’t care much about such useless records. For example, they happily hand out “youngest to XYZ” records to the likes of Rashid Khan and Naseem even though it is blatantly obvious to everyone that they have fake ages.
ur logic is flawed, you are clutching straws here.

Same argument could be used in a chase, that if flana wasn't injured or didnt retire hurt we would had won thus the result of match should be nullified.

You bash paksitani fans for using excuses, but today thats what you are doing
 
If I cared about respect and reputation, I wouldn’t speak my mind. I am not here to make friends.

When if comes to these lowest totals records, ICC should have the ends to distinguish between a 10 wickets innings and a 9 wickets innings because they aren’t the same.

Australia took 9 wickets not 10. If Shami didn’t get inured, who knows what the final total would have been.

It could have still been 36 and that would probably have been the case, but stranger things have happened in cricket and Shami and Yadav could have fluked a few boundaries with edges and India could have ended up with 45 or even 50.

However, it is clear that ICC doesn’t care much about such useless records. For example, they happily hand out “youngest to XYZ” records to the likes of Rashid Khan and Naseem even though it is blatantly obvious to everyone that they have fake ages.

Let's have long post mortem essay. Lol
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A day to remember for Australia as they bowled India out for their lowest total in Test history <br><br>Have you seen a more clinical bowling performance?<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/AUSvIND?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#AUSvIND</a> <a href="https://t.co/FOmSNKfYbm">pic.twitter.com/FOmSNKfYbm</a></p>— ICC (@ICC) <a href="https://twitter.com/ICC/status/1340184904374599680?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 19, 2020</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This shouldn’t be recognized as the lowest score because India lost 9 wickets not 10.

POTW and post of 2020 a gem by Mamoon
 
ur logic is flawed, you are clutching straws here.

Same argument could be used in a chase, that if flana wasn't injured or didnt retire hurt we would had won thus the result of match should be nullified.

You bash paksitani fans for using excuses, but today thats what you are doing

Apples and oranges. The result of a match affects both teams because only one side can win of course.

However, when it comes to these lowest total records, it only impacts one team. It doesn’t make any difference to the outcome of the match if India enters the record book for lowest total or not.

A lowest total after losing all 10 wickets should not be considered the same as a lowest total when you still have a wicket in hand.
 
That is their final total for that respective innings mate. A total is a total.

The total scored, is the total scored. It's not the total per wickets taken. It's the sum total that the team made.

How is this difficult to understand.
 
We were missing the services of 3 I mean 3 potentially 50+ averaging batsman in this test. Rahul, Pandya and Pant. On top of that we were also missing the services of Rohit Sharma (whose exclusion was a blessing in disguise before this series). Not to mention Ishant Sharma who gave his all for the Indian Pyjama League and got himself injured for this tour. :inti
 
A very dark day for Indian test cricket.

Kohli still getting out in the same manner as Anderson used to get him :facepalm:

Indian openers are a joke. They should open with chucker, he might be better than these clowns.

And finally, Australian bowling attack is legendary. They don't mess around. I've never witnessed such accurately ruthless display of bowling. Maybe Amir when he was 17 against Aussies.
 
Kohli is to blame here he should have been smart enough to declared indias inns at 20/5 and blamed a dangerous pitch. Just like bishen bedi did with india in barbados in 1976. My dear brother [MENTION=81]Monsee[/MENTION] will tell you more.
 
Apples and oranges. The result of a match affects both teams because only one side can win of course.

However, when it comes to these lowest total records, it only impacts one team. It doesn’t make any difference to the outcome of the match if India enters the record book for lowest total or not.

A lowest total after losing all 10 wickets should not be considered the same as a lowest total when you still have a wicket in hand.

Your total is when the innings ends, not when you decide.lol
 
A very dark day for Indian test cricket.

Kohli still getting out in the same manner as Anderson used to get him :facepalm:

Indian openers are a joke. They should open with chucker, he might be better than these clowns.

And finally, Australian bowling attack is legendary. They don't mess around. I've never witnessed such accurately ruthless display of bowling. Maybe Amir when he was 17 against Aussies.

As long as we have IPL with all that glitz, glamour and shiny 0 watt bulbs there will never be any dark day in Indian cricket. :inti
 
Kohli just made his excuse.

"We lost in the the first 1 hour"

LOL what a sad, disgraceful, pathetic team and cowardly captain.
 
Virat Kohli: Very hard to put those feelings to words. We had a lead of 60-odd coming and just collapsed. When you work hard for two days and put yourself in a strong position and then an hour puts you in a position where it's literally impossible to win...I think we should have showed a little more intent today. They bowled similar kind of areas in the first inning as well but probably our mindset was to score runs. To be honest there were some good balls but the ball didn't do anything drastic. I think it was the mindset, it was very evident. It felt like the runs were so difficult to come by and the bowlers got confident. I think it was a combination of lack of intent and the bowlers hitting their areas. [On leaving] obviously you want to be committed to the team's cause, a result would have been really nice. But I'm pretty confident that the boys going forward will reflect on this and come back stronger on Boxing Day. No news on Shami, he's going for a scan now. Could hardly lift his arm. We'll get the scans now and will know more in the evening.

Take your pathetic Indian team and go back to India, where your IPL and bashing up on minnows awaits.
 
As long as we have IPL with all that glitz, glamour and shiny 0 watt bulbs there will never be any dark day in Indian cricket. :inti
You could be right. It has to be something mental. Maybe lack of grit and taking responsibility.

Indian bowlers were also in the IPL and they did their job splendidly. Indian batsmen batted like Umar Akmal/Shehzad.

Too much depends on Kohli and Pujara.

I woke up saw they were 26/6, facepalmed and went back to sleep.

Hopefully they'll perform better in second. India needs Rohit Sharma more than ever, now that Kohli has to go back.
 
Guys it doesn't matter what india scored, this is not IPL so it doesn't count :))

India deserved this humiliation even Yasir Shah managed more then the whole team combined. What good is being the best thing since sliced bread when your humiliated like this by your rivals.
 
Apples and oranges. The result of a match affects both teams because only one side can win of course.

However, when it comes to these lowest total records, it only impacts one team. It doesn’t make any difference to the outcome of the match if India enters the record book for lowest total or not.

A lowest total after losing all 10 wickets should not be considered the same as a lowest total when you still have a wicket in hand.

This surely has to be a parody account, how are you even arguing this is beyond me?
 
Apples and oranges. The result of a match affects both teams because only one side can win of course.

However, when it comes to these lowest total records, it only impacts one team. It doesn’t make any difference to the outcome of the match if India enters the record book for lowest total or not.

A lowest total after losing all 10 wickets should not be considered the same as a lowest total when you still have a wicket in hand.

Deep Breaths....Deep Breaths..........It helps, it really does.
 
EplDO-HU8AIpeEr


The greatest test team ever, greater that the West Indies and Australia bowled out for a park cricket score of 36

The best top six in the world, the number 3 in the world.

But yet could only manage 36.

What went wrong? LOL

Can't find any words to describe the destruction of this so called great team.

They will perform at Big Stage of IPL : LOL
 
Back
Top