India asks UK to stop Kashmir event in London, UK says not in their hands

[slipcatch]

Again. No answer to why will India want to talk to Pakistan? What has Pakistan got to offer?Anything?

Who told you peace talks will happen after election? Whoever will be elected is more likely to commit suicide than have peace talks with Pakistan and get a hammering in the media and from the opposition.

Take these threats elsewhere. Its pakistan that is so unsafe and vulnerable that cricket teams regularly refuse to go there.Economy is a mess and is in need of bailouts and rating agencies are downgrading Pakistan.

Terror attacks are down becauss there is no complacency due to some stupid peace talks. Pakistani state is receiving retaliation for its action.

India is doing very well right now and has no need to change the status quo vis a vis Pakistan.

Why should any Indian govt care about what people outside India think? They are elected by people inside India.

Boy you really think highly of yourself, why would I threat a random keyboard hindutva, who openly support radicalized extremists Hindu groups?

Gandhi jee told me that India will have ask Pakistan for the talks , stop acting ignorant but again those who support radicalized extremists religious groups has known history of being ignorant.

Retaliation? A Sir G Kal Strike? Provide an evidence, and Bollywood movie isn’t an evidence, lol, I’m sure you wet your lungi with excitement after watching that movie, lol.

What status quo? There is no status quo, other than “one meal a day Army” appearing tough to supporters of radicalized extremists Hindus and banning entertainment from Pakistan so extremists Hindu can become a PM, again, lol.

Pakistan is a strong nation, Pakistan has successfully eliminated terrorists groups supported by both Indian government and Kabul’s government, India has failed in Baluchistan and Afghanistan, that doesn’t make Pakistan vulnerable. Remember, Pakistan doesn’t stay quiet when Indian government try to venture into support of Indian sponsored terrorism in Pakistan. India can never win a proxy war, hence India is always vulnerable.

Go to Kashmir, I doubt you’re brave enough to ever set a foot in Kashmir then you’ll see many Kashmiri proudly flying Pakistani flags in the presence of “one meal a day Army”.

Big LOL at Indian don’t care what the rest of work think of them.

This guy. Lol

 

[cricketjoshila]

Plenty of Indians who work in charities have said they want the aid. Of course the odd politcian will say no we dont , esp as they think India is some sort of great economic superpower but the reality is it has hundreds of millions in deep poverty. If no Indians wanted it , the UK wont give it.

I was replying to an Indian poster who bought up the economic status of British Pak and I informed him their taxes contribute to Indian aid not the other way round.

The Finance Minister of India said it in the Parliament that they dont want UK aid. Thats not some random politician making a statement.

Some random charity working somewhere will ofcourse want to get money in its pocket. You must ask your govt that to whom they paid £52mn last year and what was it used for.

 

[cricketjoshila]

Boy you really think highly of yourself, why would I threat a random keyboard hindutva, who openly support radicalized extremists Hindu groups?

Gandhi jee told me that India will have ask Pakistan for the talks , stop acting ignorant but again those who support radicalized extremists religious groups has known history of being ignorant.

Retaliation? A Sir G Kal Strike? Provide an evidence, and Bollywood movie isn’t an evidence, lol, I’m sure you wet your lungi with excitement after watching that movie, lol.

What status quo? There is no status quo, other than “one meal a day Army” appearing tough to supporters of radicalized extremists Hindus and banning entertainment from Pakistan so extremists Hindu can become a PM, again, lol.

Pakistan is a strong nation, Pakistan has successfully eliminated terrorists groups supported by both Indian government and Kabul’s government, India has failed in Baluchistan and Afghanistan, that doesn’t make Pakistan vulnerable. Remember, Pakistan doesn’t stay quiet when Indian government try to venture into support of Indian sponsored terrorism in Pakistan. India can never win a proxy war, hence India is always vulnerable.

Go to Kashmir, I doubt you’re brave enough to ever set a foot in Kashmir then you’ll see many Kashmiri proudly flying Pakistani flags in the presence of “one meal a day Army”.

Big LOL at Indian don’t care what the rest of work think of them.

This guy. Lol

So no answers on why India needs to talk to Pakistan. No answers regarding what Pakistan has got to offer.

Status Quo is India progressing economically and having minimum relations with Pakistan. There seems to be no need to change that.

Pakistan is economically in doldrums and running around looking for bailouts. Its so unsafe that many cricket teams dont travel there and is considered unsafe for travel according to travel advisory of many countries. Fix Pakistan, dont worry about vulnerabilities of India.

Pakistan army has tried 3 times and failed to get Kashmir from Indian Army. Infact Pakistan army lost Dhaka and 90000 Pakistanis bend their knees in front of the Indian Army. We showing big heart returned all of them to Pakistan. Be grateful for that.

I have been to Srinagar a couple of times? Can you come there? NO.

Its shameful that your biryani munching army cant get Kashmir from Indian Army.


Now give me a reason why you think India will be forced to talk to Pakistan?

 

[slipcatch]

So no answers on why India needs to talk to Pakistan. No answers regarding what Pakistan has got to offer.

Status Quo is India progressing economically and having minimum relations with Pakistan. There seems to be no need to change that.

Pakistan is economically in doldrums and running around looking for bailouts. Its so unsafe that many cricket teams dont travel there and is considered unsafe for travel according to travel advisory of many countries. Fix Pakistan, dont worry about vulnerabilities of India.

Pakistan army has tried 3 times and failed to get Kashmir from Indian Army. Infact Pakistan army lost Dhaka and 90000 Pakistanis bend their knees in front of the Indian Army. We showing big heart returned all of them to Pakistan. Be grateful for that.

I have been to Srinagar a couple of times? Can you come there? NO.

Its shameful that your biryani munching army cant get Kashmir from Indian Army.


Now give me a reason why you think India will be forced to talk to Pakistan?

Lol

Gandhi Jee said India will have to sit down for talks.

Can you come up with a different response, you are sounding like key operated parrot, who repeat the same over and over, it’s getting boring.

Pak economy is bad.
India economy is good.
No cricket in Pakistan.
Bangladesh war.
No Indian Muslim hate Modi and RSS for getting killed for transporting cows.
RSS isn’t extremists Hindu group who doesn’t promote racism and ignorance against minority, particularly Muslims.

Between how would you feel when Indian government sit down for talks with Pakistan without any preconditions? It will probably kill you.

Stop lying you wouldn’t dare to mingle with Muslims of Kashmir. You wouldn’t go there without “one meal Army”.

Try Pakistani biryani with potatoes next time, it is much better then what you have ever had.

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

The Finance Minister of India said it in the Parliament that they dont want UK aid. Thats not some random politician making a statement.

Some random charity working somewhere will ofcourse want to get money in its pocket. You must ask your govt that to whom they paid £52mn last year and what was it used for.

Britain will always give help to the poor and disadvantaged, charity is a big part of our culture, and British people are proud of the work we do worldwide. It may sting your sense of pride that Indians accept charity, but pride doesn't fill empty bellies or protect children from slave labour or sexual exploitation in south Asia.

Britain will always stand for values we hold dear, whether that is supporting the poor or disenfranchised, or allowing well meaning and peaceful protest within the law.

 

[KingKhanWC]

The Finance Minister of India said it in the Parliament that they dont want UK aid. Thats not some random politician making a statement.

Some random charity working somewhere will ofcourse want to get money in its pocket. You must ask your govt that to whom they paid £52mn last year and what was it used for.

The FACT is Indians are eating off money from the British taxpayer, including the British Pakistani taxpayer.

British Pakistani's have enough political influence(more than British Indians) in the UK to organise such events in Parliament and will continue to do so highlighting the the oppression of Kashmiri's. Indians can get upset as much as they like, means nothing to the UK.

 

[mustang]

The FACT is Indians are eating off money from the British taxpayer, including the British Pakistani taxpayer.

British Pakistani's have enough political influence(more than British Indians) in the UK to organise such events in Parliament and will continue to do so highlighting the the oppression of Kashmiri's. Indians can get upset as much as they like, means nothing to the UK.

Actually that is NOT a fact and I have already proved it to you in this thread with valid sources and logical conclusions one can derive from those. If around $80M of "charity" into a $2.3 Trillion economy especially when the private charity you donate to has whatever vested interests is NOT the equivalent of Indians eating off your tax payer money.

I spent 2 years in India - Yes it has poverty but I can tell you first hand they are not a Somalia/East Timor/Papua New Guinea where YOUR $80M charity to some private UK propagandist organization makes zero difference.

To the 2 British Pakistanis who posted above me - Save your condescension and use that $80M donation to speed up your Brexit shizzle dizzle.

 

[mustang]

Britain will always give help to the poor and disadvantaged, charity is a big part of our culture, and British people are proud of the work we do worldwide. It may sting your sense of pride that Indians accept charity, but pride doesn't fill empty bellies or protect children from slave labour or sexual exploitation in south Asia.

Britain will always stand for values we hold dear, whether that is supporting the poor or disenfranchised, or allowing well meaning and peaceful protest within the law.

Pretty rich thing to say!! Wonderful charity work done by the British here ... some 3 Million dead thanks to the British war hero. Your own ancestors in Pakistan I'm sure would have suffered in some form from British colonial exploits while you sit here glorifying some non-existent good will.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/thereporters/soutikbiswas/2010/10/how_churchill_starved_india.html

http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2031992,00.html

 

[KingKhanWC]

Actually that is NOT a fact and I have already proved it to you in this thread with valid sources and logical conclusions one can derive from those. If around $80M of "charity" into a $2.3 Trillion economy especially when the private charity you donate to has whatever vested interests is NOT the equivalent of Indians eating off your tax payer money.

I spent 2 years in India - Yes it has poverty but I can tell you first hand they are not a Somalia/East Timor/Papua New Guinea where YOUR $80M charity to some private UK propagandist organization makes zero difference.

To the 2 British Pakistanis who posted above me - Save your condescension and use that $80M donation to speed up your Brexit shizzle dizzle.

lol You havne't proved anything. It's a fact British taxpayer money is being used by Indians in India. How they use it or what difference it makes is up for debate but no relevant to this fact.

 

[mustang]

lol You havne't proved anything. It's a fact British taxpayer money is being used by Indians in India. How they use it or what difference it makes is up for debate but no relevant to this fact.

British tax payer money used by private entities (propped up by vested British interests) in India. Really not the same as making statements such as - "The FACT is Indians are eating off money from the British taxpayer, including the British Pakistani taxpayer."

How they use it is very relevant. If CIA sends tiny aid to Pakistan under the guise of local charity for the sake of their own interests when the government of Pakistan says "no thanks" will you honestly conclude that Pakistanis are eating off money from American tax payer?

 

[slipcatch]

Know plenty of Muslim doctors from US been travelling to India to improve the lives of Indian patients as a charity.

Not stating this fact to look down up on Indian, nothing wrong in asking for help, but radicalized patriots should stop talking about all the economy and wealth when they still require charities to help the poor of India.

 

[mustang]

I proved to you that money sent is tiny, Indian government says no thanks, and it is going to some private entity. If you cannot make logical conclusions and still want to make fantastic generalized statements that all Indians are living off of your British tax payer funded aid money, then good luck with taking those fun pills

 

[mustang]

Know plenty of Muslim doctors from US been travelling to India to improve the lives of Indian patients as a charity.

Not stating this fact to look down up on Indian, nothing wrong in asking for help, but radicalized patriots should stop talking about all the economy and wealth when they still require charities to help the poor of India.

Now this I firmly agree with. I personally know a an Indian American muslim couple from my social network who did some work in northern India. Anyone who claims India/Pakistan does not need any aid or India/Pakistan is rich is as much in the wrong as someone who claims a tiny donation to some private Indian charity equals all Indians living off of his/her aid money.

 

[KingKhanWC]

British tax payer money used by private entities (propped up by vested British interests) in India. Really not the same as making statements such as - "The FACT is Indians are eating off money from the British taxpayer, including the British Pakistani taxpayer."

How they use it is very relevant. If CIA sends tiny aid to Pakistan under the guise of local charity for the sake of their own interests when the government of Pakistan says "no thanks" will you honestly conclude that Pakistanis are eating off money from American tax payer?

The aid has been used by Indians to improve their lives in many ways such as housing projects, infastructure to wealth creation. This in turn puts food in the mouth of Indians. It might be nothing to you but to those who have benefited it means a lot.

 

[mustang]

The aid has been used by Indians to improve their lives in many ways such as housing projects, infastructure to wealth creation. This in turn puts food in the mouth of Indians. It might be nothing to you but to those who have benefited it means a lot.

If you claim so! Who knows how that private entity is using that money and how transparent they are! The level of impact even if true is insignificant .... too small for someone to take credit and make statements saying all Indians are funded by British Pakistani tax money. You are claiming credit for 0.004% of aid (80 million/2 trillion) and speaking in a condescending tone as a result. Your data, inference from data, and your conclusion are all inherently flawed and lack any logic.

 

[KingKhanWC]

If you claim so! Who knows how that private entity is using that money and how transparent they are! The level of impact even if true is insignificant .... too small for someone to take credit and make statements saying all Indians are funded by British Pakistani tax money. You are claiming credit for 0.004% of aid (80 million/2 trillion) and speaking in a condescending tone as a result. Your data, inference from data, and your conclusion are all inherently flawed and lack any logic.

Again, poor Indians have benefited. It wont matter to you but it does them. You can spin it like how you like but this is the reality and poor Indians who have made a better life know it.

 

[mustang]

Again, poor Indians have benefited. It wont matter to you but it does them. You can spin it like how you like but this is the reality and poor Indians who have made a better life know it.

You do not know my socioeconomic background, so I request you stop making assumptions at a personal level.

Poor Indians benefitted according to some private charity marketing spiel. Even if true (big IF), it is such a small number (0.004%) - does it make valid sense for British Pakistanis like yourself to make unnecessary condescending comments such as Indians in general are living off of your tax dollar?

Have you ever questioned why YOUR government is using tax payer money to thrust into an area forcibly? If you claim it is all out of British goodwill then you choose to be naive for the sake of argument. Don't you think your tax payer money could be put to better use in your own country? Have the British muslim community voiced their concern regarding this? Or are they too busy making condescending comments to poorer South Asians that their tax money is funding the next naan/roti/rice?

 

[Iqbal'sh]

You do not know my socioeconomic background, so I request you stop making assumptions at a personal level.

Poor Indians benefitted according to some private charity marketing spiel. Even if true (big IF), it is such a small number (0.004%) - does it make valid sense for British Pakistanis like yourself to make unnecessary condescending comments such as Indians in general are living off of your tax dollar?

Have you ever questioned why YOUR government is using tax payer money to thrust into an area forcibly? If you claim it is all out of British goodwill then you choose to be naive for the sake of argument. Don't you think your tax payer money could be put to better use in your own country? Have the British muslim community voiced their concern regarding this? Or are they too busy making condescending comments to poorer South Asians that their tax money is funding the next naan/roti/rice?

You seem to be posting as if this is a one-off payment. The British have been giving aid to India since Independence.
Even in 2009 the aid was around £300m, by 2015 it was still around £150m.
Are you going to honestly tell us that in all this time this aid has not led to poverty alleviation, development of services or infrastructure and had no role to play in India’s economic upturn?

 

[cricketjoshila]

The FACT is Indians are eating off money from the British taxpayer, including the British Pakistani taxpayer.

British Pakistani's have enough political influence(more than British Indians) in the UK to organise such events in Parliament and will continue to do so highlighting the the oppression of Kashmiri's. Indians can get upset as much as they like, means nothing to the UK.

The fact is that Britain is giving money to some people in India despite Indian govt telling them that their money is not needed.

Why UK is doing that, UK taxpayers must ask their govt.

Lol at British Pakistanis have more influence. British govt didnt even acknowledge the Pak FM. The british Indian community is better off economically and numerically.

Organising a meeting of Pak origin MPs and a few others on Kashmir means zilch. The day the UK govt says something it will hold some importance in the world.

 

[cricketjoshila]

Lol



Can you come up with a different response, you are sounding like key operated parrot, who repeat the same over and over, it’s getting boring.

Pak economy is bad.
India economy is good.
No cricket in Pakistan.
Bangladesh war.
No Indian Muslim hate Modi and RSS for getting killed for transporting cows.
RSS isn’t extremists Hindu group who doesn’t promote racism and ignorance against minority, particularly Muslims.

Between how would you feel when Indian government sit down for talks with Pakistan without any preconditions? It will probably kill you.

Stop lying you wouldn’t dare to mingle with Muslims of Kashmir. You wouldn’t go there without “one meal Army”.

Try Pakistani biryani with potatoes next time, it is much better then what you have ever had.

So Pakistan has nothing to offer. Good. Indian govt knows it and hence keeps bare minimum relations with Pakistan. Must feel very bad when your PM us constantly ignored by India. Isnt it?

Have been to Kashmir quite a few times. Kashmiri muslims mingle with tourists quite a lot. Esp at place like Gulmarg and Pahalgam.

 

[cricketjoshila]

Again, poor Indians have benefited. It wont matter to you but it does them. You can spin it like how you like but this is the reality and poor Indians who have made a better life know it.

Who knows who was benefitted? Do you have a list of charities who got money and what did they do with it?

 

[Iqbal'sh]

Kashmiri muslims mingle with tourists quite a lot. Esp at place like Gulmarg and Pahalgam.

, is it similar to how locals from London mingle with day trippers from the rest of the UK near Trafalgar Square.

See my post above regarding Britain giving aid to India since the 1950’s.

 

[Salma_T]

Had an interesting conversation with an Indian colleague in Aus and she alluded to the fact that minorities in India get preferential treatment in the education system due to quotas that is why the best of the best of India is overseas!
So you have a privileged Hindu begrudging those less fortunate than her.
Also re the Aid the issue isn't how much it is and who provides it is that fact that fastest growing economy is still taking aid from it former colonial master. Indians do not want to address the mass poverty in the nation and only want to portray shinning India image etc the discussion could have got heated but i bit my tongue

 

[Salma_T]

A question to Pakistan based PPs how much do Pakistani news channel report on Indian news (apart from Kashmir)?
As it seems Indian channels cover more of Pakistan (source someone from Mumbai and Srinagar) both in Sydney now

 

[mustang]

Had an interesting conversation with an Indian colleague in Aus and she alluded to the fact that minorities in India get preferential treatment in the education system due to quotas that is why the best of the best of India is overseas!
So you have a privileged Hindu begrudging those less fortunate than her.
Also re the Aid the issue isn't how much it is and who provides it is that fact that fastest growing economy is still taking aid from it former colonial master. Indians do not want to address the mass poverty in the nation and only want to portray shinning India image etc the discussion could have got heated but i bit my tongue

Not getting preferential treatment from government does NOT make that person to be from privileged background. Try saying that to a white person from 2-3 generations of challenging economic background in the US/UK.

 

[KingKhanWC]

The fact is that Britain is giving money to some people in India despite Indian govt telling them that their money is not needed.

Why UK is doing that, UK taxpayers must ask their govt.

Lol at British Pakistanis have more influence. British govt didnt even acknowledge the Pak FM. The british Indian community is better off economically and numerically.

Organising a meeting of Pak origin MPs and a few others on Kashmir means zilch. The day the UK govt says something it will hold some importance in the world.

India should put in place laws so no aid is seen in India from the UK.

There are more British Pak in councils and parliament than Indians.

Again. The Pak FM wasn't scheduled to meet any official of the UK. I've pointed this out but you seem to be blind to this fact. The other fact is India's objection was thrown out , the UK said No to their pathetic demand.

Who knows who was benefitted? Do you have a list of charities who got money and what did they do with it?

There are detailed reports from the UK government, try searching for them.

 

[KingKhanWC]

You do not know my socioeconomic background, so I request you stop making assumptions at a personal level.

Poor Indians benefitted according to some private charity marketing spiel. Even if true (big IF), it is such a small number (0.004%) - does it make valid sense for British Pakistanis like yourself to make unnecessary condescending comments such as Indians in general are living off of your tax dollar?

Have you ever questioned why YOUR government is using tax payer money to thrust into an area forcibly? If you claim it is all out of British goodwill then you choose to be naive for the sake of argument. Don't you think your tax payer money could be put to better use in your own country? Have the British muslim community voiced their concern regarding this? Or are they too busy making condescending comments to poorer South Asians that their tax money is funding the next naan/roti/rice?

You dont need aid , they do. Unless your government didn't give you any money for serving in their army?

Fact is people in India have benefitted, something you seem to struggle to understand. It doesn't matter if it's a small amount in the larger context, their lives improved via the British taxpayer inc Pak British taxpayer.

I dont need to question my government as im happy to help poor Indians with my taxes.

 

[finalfantasy7]

the Indians really need to understand that the UK declined thr DEMAND.

simple get over it, Indians needs to get real and understand many people consider the issue on kashmir as the same as palestine but not as bad.

Indians on here need to understand the British stance on Kashmir.

 

[mustang]

You dont need aid , they do. Unless your government didn't give you any money for serving in their army?

Fact is people in India have benefitted, something you seem to struggle to understand. It doesn't matter if it's a small amount in the larger context, their lives improved via the British taxpayer inc Pak British taxpayer.

I dont need to question my government as im happy to help poor Indians with my taxes.

Someone who is truly happy about their choice will not make condescending statements.

I don't need aid for sure but that does not mean I cannot empathize others' need for aid which is what you had alluded to.

I do not question aid to any of the millions of poor in Pakistan/Africa/China/India. What I do question is a section of people using that data point to make comments showing themselves as superior. You really care about aid and care about helping the poor - then stop making over the top bloated statements like "my tax money helps all Indians" and learn to be humble because if not, then you never had good intentions to begin with.

 

[mustang]

the Indians really need to understand that the UK declined thr DEMAND.

simple get over it, Indians needs to get real and understand many people consider the issue on kashmir as the same as palestine but not as bad.

Indians on here need to understand the British stance on Kashmir.

Fair point. Do also understand that countries make such protest statements all the time, not just India. My own country makes countless statements, and China has made numerous objections when Dalai Lama or Tibetans hold an event of political significance in India. So it is not one specific country (India) alone that does this. Perhaps Pakistanis need to understand that this is customary behavior by all governments and not make knee jerk statements like "how dare the Indian government protests about a UK event" ... it is all part of the world political drama.

 

[Salma_T]

Not getting preferential treatment from government does NOT make that person to be from privileged background. Try saying that to a white person from 2-3 generations of challenging economic background in the US/UK.

She was coming across very entitled as to "her people"were suffering due to minorities being preferred.

 

[finalfantasy7]

Fair point. Do also understand that countries make such protest statements all the time, not just India. My own country makes countless statements, and China has made numerous objections when Dalai Lama or Tibetans hold an event of political significance in India. So it is not one specific country (India) alone that does this. Perhaps Pakistanis need to understand that this is customary behavior by all governments and not make knee jerk statements like "how dare the Indian government protests about a UK event" ... it is all part of the world political drama.

Mustang - your government has a pathetic stance on this issue, and demanded the UK government to BAN this event.

You cannot do this in the UK - simple. You need to look at your government why it does this, as well as banning many stances with pakistani's - look mustang why did india ban oman cricket team to play in india?

 

[mustang]

Mustang - your government has a pathetic stance on this issue, and demanded the UK government to BAN this event.

You cannot do this in the UK - simple. You need to look at your government why it does this, as well as banning many stances with pakistani's - look mustang why did india ban oman cricket team to play in india?

Small correction - I'm a 2nd generation American. I also never justify specific actions of a government - who knows what undercurrents are in play. I do not know about those events you had mentioned, but if it seems unnecessary, then it is probably wrong on their part for sure.

 

[mustang]

She was coming across very entitled as to "her people"were suffering due to minorities being preferred.

Entitled to you could be genuine concern for her people on her part.

 

[finalfantasy7]

Small correction - I'm a 2nd generation American. I also never justify specific actions of a government - who knows what undercurrents are in play. I do not know about those events you had mentioned, but if it seems unnecessary, then it is probably wrong on their part for sure.

see now your being a typical Indian, you have clearly stated that you dont know why the indians DEMANDED the UK to stop this event/protest. WHY ARE YOU IN THIS THREAD?

lets keep the thread on topic

 

[mustang]

see now your being a typical Indian, you have clearly stated that you dont know why the indians DEMANDED the UK to stop this event/protest. WHY ARE YOU IN THIS THREAD?

lets keep the thread on topic

1. I'm an American who has served in the military and I'm proud of my service record. Saying this to clarify where my loyalty lies.
2. Words like typical followed by country/religion/ethnicity/race reek of generalization unless you can back it up with a point to make.
3. I said I do not know about Oman cricket team issue and whatever politics that is being played with them and India. I never said I did not know anything about Kashmir issue and I suggest you do not extend one comment to another issue.

The things I have mentioned are related to the topic unless you believe that agreeing with your view is the only definition of staying on topic.

 

[slipcatch]

So Pakistan has nothing to offer. Good. Indian govt knows it and hence keeps bare minimum relations with Pakistan. Must feel very bad when your PM us constantly ignored by India. Isnt it?

Have been to Kashmir quite a few times. Kashmiri muslims mingle with tourists quite a lot. Esp at place like Gulmarg and Pahalgam.

You’ve been coming of as a little guy with radicalized views, your insults are as good as “one meal Army” and “fictional Bollywood Sir Jee Kal Strike”.

It felt good that a PM who is loved and respected all over the world made genuine initiative to start a peace talk with a government who is absolutely filled with radicalized extremists Hindus.

What felt bad that a nation who take pride on education and tech would elect a radicalized extremists nationalists Hindu government and miss an opportunity to hold peace talk.

Stop feeling proud about that you support a radicalized extremists nationalists Hindu government and RSS, who had openly promoted to eliminate minority, especially Muslims. If you do feel proud of that then you are a sick individual and burden on society and peace for a region.

Stop asking what Pakistan can offer, Pakistan isn’t part of India, where Muslim of Pakistan are demanded to be subservient to radicalized extremists Hindus and if they don’t obey they are told to go back to Pakistan or get killed.

Come back with a better talking point.

You don’t mingle with Muslims, stop lying.

 

[slipcatch]

A question to Pakistan based PPs how much do Pakistani news channel report on Indian news (apart from Kashmir)?
As it seems Indian channels cover more of Pakistan (source someone from Mumbai and Srinagar) both in Sydney now

True.

Most of the Pak media coverage is limited to when there is news regarding India or analysis, such as current Afghanistan talk.

India media love sensationalize news related to Pak.

Need to understand that current Indian government needs a boogeymen to stay in power and fetch votes, all that economy reasons to elect radicalized extremists nationalists Hindu is just a diversion and excuse to legitimize their racism, ignorance and hate toward minority, there is a reason you’ll hear a lot more Muslims told to go to Pakistan when they disagree with radicalized BJP government and RSS.

India’s economy wouldn’t have declined if they had not elected extremists Hindu as PM, one of the best economy, which started to exponentially growing in the late 90’s.

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

The fact is that Britain is giving money to some people in India despite Indian govt telling them that their money is not needed.

Why UK is doing that, UK taxpayers must ask their govt.

Lol at British Pakistanis have more influence. British govt didnt even acknowledge the Pak FM. The british Indian community is better off economically and numerically.

Organising a meeting of Pak origin MPs and a few others on Kashmir means zilch. The day the UK govt says something it will hold some importance in the world.

You do realise that British Pakistanis are actually British, and the Pakistani FM is representing....Pakistan?

I'll let you think about that for a while to see if you can come to a conclusion as to why the two might not be one and the same thing.

If you don't want British aid, then I would suggest you uplift the downtrodden masses in India so they won't need outside help. The world would be a better place if all poverty stricken countries could bring their people to a healthy standard of living so no one needed to beg for aid.