javiersuka
Debutant
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2015
- Runs
- 275
Pakistan are heavy favorites right before every series and every WC Match against India, there is nothing new here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pakistan is a superior version of India in tests. In a three match series played on rank turners, Pak would win 2:1. On dead tracks, Pak would win 1:0.
They have better batsman, better pacers, a better keeper and one on one, Shah is better than any of India's spinners. Once Younis and Misbah retire, then it will be much closer with India having a slight advantage.
YK just needs to get one century in the rest of the 4 innings and he should be good till half-way of 2017.
With an easy-ish tour of Windies coming along I'm sure YK will plunder on those flat tracks as well. So YK will stick around for a bit, all he needs to do is perform in the ongoing series.
Misbah is playing his last series, but we won't miss him as much since he has been a passenger in the side for a few months now.
If Sarfaraz is given the captaincy and someone like Usman Salahuddin is added to the middle order then our 2017 side may even be stronger than our 2016 side.
Yasir Shah would be a handful on a rank turner.
Easily the toughest competition Indian batsmen would face at home.
Not sure how well our batsmen would do against their spinners. It would be one hell of a series though.![]()
Tougher than facing Herath IN SL ?
People are seriously being delusional if they think Pakistan is anywhere near the no 1 team picture..
In Asian conditions? I disagree.
Pakistan is a robust competitor in Asia because their weaknesses (i.e. swinging ball/slow reflexes) get hidden.
Does it mean they'd beat India? Maybe not, but it would be a tight series.
That's why I mentioned "At home" meaning in India. Herath is a tough challenge in SL conditions, but so is James Anderson in England.
I am talking more about who would make Indian batsmen sweat in their den.
I think Yasir would do a far greater job against India considering he's in his prime.
Herath in India has a horrible record. 11 wkts in 3 Test at 48.
That's my point. Herath isn't good away from home.
Yasir would pose a greater challenge than Herath. Don't forget, Yasir Shah did well in SL (25 wickets in 3 tests at 18 AVG).
Plus, as I said, Yasir Shah is in his prime.
Well India havent lost a series to SL in ages ... Pak did so back in 2014 and 2012 ,,, ( I know you guys won in 2015 ) and secondly Ashwin Outbowled Herath in SL and that too by a big margin.
Lots of chest thumping knowing it probably will not happen soon, and when it does happen, people will forget that you did say that !!!
I'm not comparing Ashwin to Shah in those conditions.
Ashwin won't be bowling against India. From all the spinners who can bowl against India, I'd put Yasir Shah at the top.
Does that mean Pakistan would win? No, but I think Indian batsmen wouldn't walk all over Pakistan because of Yasir.
We can only make educated guesses based on the nearest best comparisons available and that is SL and how Herath fared against India in SL (Unless you think Yasir is a better bowler than what Herath is in SL ) ... if you really want then you can check the one ODI that Yasir has played against India and got completely outbowled by Ashwin. Was wicketless and leaked a lot of runs bowling to Kohli who wasnt even at his best in that WC match in 2015.
Problem with Herath in SL is we don't have a "like-for-like" comparison with Yasir Shah. When Shah played in SL, Herath didn't play.
Yasir is a below par ODI bowler. Always has been. I wouldn't take too much out of that performance.
I'm not suggesting you're wrong as it's a mere opinion at the end of the day. India could very well smash Yasir Shah around but I do feel he would be a handful.
then just look at Herath vs Indian batsmen and Herath vs Pak Batsmen ... it gives a good clue about how spinners will fare and Herath is a better spinner than Yasir.
lets forget Herath for a moment ... even Bishoo did very well and that too in UAE
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...most_wickets_career.html?id=11489;type=series
This is why Pak will be in for a rude shock if and when they play India.
On dead pitches.
What [MENTION=8597]kingusama92[/MENTION] says is perfectly reasonable. I don't know why there are so many disagreements with his statement. Pakistan might not necessarily beat India in India, but they are sure to give the biggest challenge for India more than any other team purely because they play spin better than all teams that have faced Pakistan and ditto with their spin bowling.
Counter argument can be made that if Rashid picked 23 wickets in a test series against India, Yasir can too.
Rashid averaged 28 odd after first 3 tests. Was the highest wicket taker at that point I think.
Yasir could do what all he did and some more.
We can't extrapolate anything.
I would give the edge to India (due to our spin attack, depth in batting) but only when we have a real series, we will know.
23 Wkts at 37 each and a S/R of 60 with Zero 5fers ... thats never going to win you any series in India.
Yes...even that stats flatter him (though he did bowl well in the first 3 tests). Did get a few 4fers though.
But the point I am trying to make is if Rashid can do it, Yasir can do that and much more. Get those cheap wickets (which Rashid did) coupled with a some top order wickets and in a crucial moment....the game can change.
It will be a tight battle imho regardless of the final series scoreline.
Doesnt work like that ... like you said those stats flatter him ... to make a difference Yasir has to be like 50% better than Rashid and then some other bowler has to step up and take like 15-20 Wkts. Not going to happen.
I don't see the likes of Azhar and YK scoring big against Ashwin and Jaddu.
On the other hand, India plays leg spin very well. Yasir will not be effective against us.
Pacers from both sides will not do much.
The biggest difference between both sides is that Pak batting can collapse anytime. Indian batting does not collapse on Indian wickets.
I don't think England played that bad, they just didn't have any capable bowlers. Although Pak has better bowlers for these conditions, but there batting doesn't come close to England. India at the moment is just too good for any current teams to handle.
Pakistan are heavy favorites right before every series and every WC Match against India, there is nothing new here.
Man we are talking about Sub-Continental conditions
Misbah, YK, Sarfraz are world class players against spin
Azhar and Shafiq are good too
In these conditions Pakistan batting >> England
But they've not been tested against good spinners, all they have done is rake up runs against western teams. Ashwin and Jadeja together are far superior to these guys in these conditions. The one thing I noticed with these Pakistani batsmen is they will have a mental degradation at the prospect of facing India.
It is not totally hypothetical ... the Past is replete with Pakistan fans/media making fun of Indian Cricket. The perception built up is such that India weren't worthy of even being taken seriously. Depending on the IQ of the fan the Reasons for such perceptions would vary from puerile jingo bravado such as "Rice eating buzdil/meek people afraid of the Sher-like Pakistan players" ..... to the slightly polished but underneath just as irrational and Biased opinion expressed with a smirk that went along the lines of "Tumharey pas phasth bowler hi nahi hain .... hamarey pas har galli mein milengey etc ". These voices reached a fever pitch around late 80s.
Truth is while all this was happening India quietly won the WC, followed that by B&H World Series, drew a Series IN Pakistan ... ( a 16 yr old kid spanked some of the battle hardened pro's )... repeated that again in the WC 1992 then a avg player like Ajay Jadeja and a whole bunch of pure rice eaters won us 96 WC Q/F against all odds , then we repeated it in 1999 and again in 2003. Now any other set of fans would learn their lesson by now but thats not how Pakistan operates. They had to Goad and do a Aa-bail-mujhe-maar before that memorable jeet lo dill series. Sure enough there were 2 inngs defeats Veeru spanking a triple and then going on to win the ODI series as well. Did that put an end to the usual chest thumping ? Absolutely not. And now it is back again due to Pakistans draw in Eng. But I hope you realize why Indian fans dont take Pakistan as a serious threat anymore. Times have changed. Move on.
Younus has a double ton in India against Kumble and Harbhjan. Misbah had a splendid series in India
Younus has a 17 years long career and he is as good as they come against spinners.
Pakistan is currently ranked #3 in the ICC list and will most likely be ranked #5 by the end of the Australian series. When they were #2, there was some validity in challenging India for the #1 position. A couple of months ago I never bought into this idea (accepted even by many Indian posters) that the Pakistani Test was equal or even better than India's. The reasons were:
1) India lost its #1 ranking only due to rain and umpiring decisions that cost it matches (like in Australia and SL)
2) Pakistan drew with England but the English team seemed quite weak.
3) India's batting resources are simply phenomenal. Players scoring even triple centuries in FC matches have no chance of even being considered for the Indian team. Contrast this with the situation in Pakistan.
4) Even our fast bowlers Sharma, Kumar and Yadav are ranked about the same as Wahab, Sohail and Amir. Our spin duo is the best ever.
5) When India became #1, it was after having played in Aus and Eng. So we reached our #1 ranking AFTER having played AWAY in these countries which have fantastic home advantage.
Reality of course interrupts delusions. Two months later we now have India on a 4 game win streak and a 17 game unbeaten streak whereas Pakistan is on a 4 game losing streak. There are still some who maintain that the Pakistan Test team is better, but they are a bit subdued now.
Behind India's success is the increased professionalism of the sport in India. Professionals will always beat amateurs.
When YK scored that double ton, who were the Indian spinners and how were they ranked? Our spin duo is now ranked the #1 and #2 bowlers in the world. YK would not have the same success this time around.
India will win on square turners. Pakistan will win everywhere else.![]()
When YK scored that double ton, who were the Indian spinners and how were they ranked? Our spin duo is now ranked the #1 and #2 bowlers in the world. YK would not have the same success this time around.
And neither do we care that you don't want to play.
Leave your chest thumping somewhere else and no one gives a toss about your corrupt mafia greedy out of control BCCI.
India will win on square turners. Pakistan will win everywhere else.![]()
Seems like you care enough to get hurt by his post and reply.. Whatever he wrote was the harsh truth, PCB on the other hand would gladly accept a series with India anytime anyday of the year..
Anyways regarding the topic Pakistan vs India in tests will be between two of the cloesest matches teams ever so it should be a great series.. But it's all hypothetical fans here mostly post to incite others it seems, the series won't happen so both set of fans can claim their team would win..
ANd before posting replies see the context. My reply was to a person who said England batting is better than PAkistan in Indian conditions.
YK just needs to get one century in the rest of the 4 innings and he should be good till half-way of 2017.
With an easy-ish tour of Windies coming along I'm sure YK will plunder on those flat tracks as well. So YK will stick around for a bit, all he needs to do is perform in the ongoing series.
Misbah is playing his last series, but we won't miss him as much since he has been a passenger in the side for a few months now.
If Sarfaraz is given the captaincy and someone like Usman Salahuddin is added to the middle order then our 2017 side may even be stronger than our 2016 side.
So IPL is better than test series against Pakistan!!!! He if PCB has an honest chairman we could boycott India long time ago.After the launch of the IPL, the BCCI doesn't consider Pakistan as a worthy opponent.
BCCI would rather arrange a Mini IPL in the free period than some Test Series against Pakistan.
And the Current Indian team is leading the rankings table by some distance. They don't even need to play against Pakistan to prove a point.
It's the Number 1 Team against whom everyone wants to play.
BCCI will arrange series even against poor teams to secure their Vote Block but continue to isolate Pakistan. Neither is Pakistan's Vote important to BCCI, nor is the revenue to be made playing against them too enticing.
And neither do we care that you don't want to play.
Leave your chest thumping somewhere else and no one gives a toss about your corrupt mafia greedy out of control BCCI.
Who said it's Misbah' last series? PCB wants him to stay till 2018 if not 2020
Rahul is yet to be tested against the new ball outside Asia.
He has 2 tons outside of Asia. To put it in perspective, if you take the last 10 years of performance then Ali has one ton, Misbah has 2 tons and YK has 3 tons outside of Asia.
His career has just started, but looking at how he bats, I will say that he has a good prospects.
Wonder how people feel about this topic in light of Chappell comments
Pakistan is currently ranked #3 in the ICC list and will most likely be ranked #5 by the end of the Australian series. When they were #2, there was some validity in challenging India for the #1 position. A couple of months ago I never bought into this idea (accepted even by many Indian posters) that the Pakistani Test was equal or even better than India's. The reasons were:
1) India lost its #1 ranking only due to rain and umpiring decisions that cost it matches (like in Australia and SL)
2) Pakistan drew with England but the English team seemed quite weak.
3) India's batting resources are simply phenomenal. Players scoring even triple centuries in FC matches have no chance of even being considered for the Indian team. Contrast this with the situation in Pakistan.
4) Even our fast bowlers Sharma, Kumar and Yadav are ranked about the same as Wahab, Sohail and Amir. Our spin duo is the best ever.
5) When India became #1, it was after having played in Aus and Eng. So we reached our #1 ranking AFTER having played AWAY in these countries which have fantastic home advantage.
Reality of course interrupts delusions. Two months later we now have India on a 4 game win streak and a 17 game unbeaten streak whereas Pakistan is on a 4 game losing streak. There are still some who maintain that the Pakistan Test team is better, but they are a bit subdued now.
Behind India's success is the increased professionalism of the sport in India. Professionals will always beat amateurs.
It Does that again![]()
Hey, good to see you again. I was going to wait till the end of the series to update my assessment![]()