What's new

India v Australia| 1st ODI | Bangalore | [29/9/07]

Status
Not open for further replies.
kashmiri said:
i make that 6 scores for to 5 scores against. so much for consistency. hey , it is your one trick pony team, you want to keep it that way, be my guest. did you pick up tendo's best patch, by the way :))) :)))


well you clearly havent been following the last few innings of tendulkar for sure
 
kashmiri said:
i am still fuming since the stoopid indians one on monday. i have not been able to take it well. i cant stand the sight of their tricolour

Thanks for making my day :P
 
okay i think rain is getting heavier and heavier. Chances are remote. So now it has become a 6 match series. Kochi next which is also getting lots of rain.
 
well cricinfo says its started to drizzle again

I think this match is going to get called off
 
kashmiri said:
mohammad yousuf, but sorry he did not do that, he just scored centuries.
now Mohammad Yousuf is all class.

i was talking about odis. clearly you have no clue. thanks
 
cricinfo say that the drizzle has stopped now
has anyone got any local knowlage of the weather in Bangalore. Is it a case of when it starts to rain, its not gonna completely stop?
 
Last edited:
Here is the Duckworth-Lewis equation. If the match is restricted to 26 overs, India's revised target would be 201.

Overs Runs
26 201
27 207
28 212
29 218
30 223
31 228

bloody duckworth-lewis!!!!!!!!!
 
yes if u wanna talk about kashmir make a new thread on time pass
 
India will need 201 from 26 overs by D/L. Looks extreme even on a good pitch. With rain brining some juice and outfield gone heavy .. it will be a daunting task. That's if they do have a match.
 
India will need 201 from 26 overs by D/L
but 3 overs are gone ???? and India has 9. so 192 from 23 overs. But doesn't the score change as wickets fall
 
12thMan said:
but 3 overs are gone ???? and India has 9. so 192 from 23 overs. But doesn't the score change as wickets fall

that's right do they expect india to score 201 without losing any wickets :13:
 
there you go just when india looks like winning the match the rain spoils it.
 
jackal786 said:
How do you say that in couple of overs?

ball was doing a bit

would have very difficult for India to chose 300 in 48 overs.
 
nikred said:
well doesnt matter the aussies couldnt defeat india
DL says

26 overs: 201 runs
27 overs: 207
28 overs: 212
29 overs: 218
30 overs: 223
31 overs: 228

that would have been one target for the one track ponies
 
nikred said:
there you go just when india looks like winning the match the rain spoils it.

optimistic bharat wasi. next you will be saying that you are tops at soccer after winning the subroto cup and even squash
 
thats too bad...its not going to be 7-0 now!
 
Australia played like a mediocre team for first 20 overs, as they did in T20. Then after 20 overs, they realized that its serious cricket. Australia showed their class & a century came from a player who was a super-flop in shortest version of game.
 
kashmiri said:
i am still fuming since the stoopid indians one on monday. i have not been able to take it well. i cant stand the sight of their tricolour

good. hope to see you fuming at the end of this serious too
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top