What's new

Indian Chief Minister Nitish Kumar forcibly pulls down the veil of a Muslim woman

HalBass9 said:
It appears you can’t address the argument on its merits, so you’re shifting the standard to an extreme, implying that unless something meets an absolute threshold, it must be neither true nor false. That isn’t a rebuttal, it’s an evasion. Reasoned debate doesn’t work by moving the goalposts when the facts are inconvenient.
Click to expand...
Agree. you'd know, since you are a master of shifting goal posts and running when facts are inconvenient
 
rpant_gabba said:
Agree. you'd know, since you are a master of shifting goal posts and running when facts are inconvenient
Click to expand...
I did try with you, but was confused as to who I was having discussion, atheist or hindutva or Hindutva pretending to be atheist.
 
rpant_gabba said:
Agree. you'd know, since you are a master of shifting goal posts and running when facts are inconvenient
Click to expand...
Dude, he pretty much says the same thing every post, how are you having a long form argument with him 😭🤣🤣🤣 joke is on you lol. Indulge him for some timepass and move on.
 
Local.Dada said:
He literally said, why make a big deal about touching some lady’s hijab, he is an elderly man. It’s not like he touched her anywhere else. That’s not a summary but more or less literal translation 🤮
Click to expand...
It is close to a literal translation. However, the way he is puking the nonsense, he meant to say is: if people are making a big deal out of touching (yanking) women's naqab, what would have happened if he had touched other parts (as private) - what an effing retard man. These illiterate goons exist in ignorant subcontinent politics - many of them are hidden in closets.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What the hell is happening in India.... Radicalism is spreading like fire.


www.facebook.com

416K views · 4.5K reactions | In Haridwar, a group of youths stopped a Muslim girl for not wearing a veil. The girl confronted them and questioned their behaviour, leading to a heated exchange. A video of the incident has since gone viral on social m

In Haridwar, a group of youths stopped a Muslim girl for not wearing a veil. The girl confronted them and questioned their behaviour, leading to a heated exchange. A video of the incident has since...
www.facebook.com www.facebook.com
 
I posted a thread where a bunch of Muslim men were harassing a Muslim girl for not wearing a Hijab. They were even bullying her and asking her why she is out without a guardian.

I can’t find that thread. Looks like it got deleted. What a shame:mv
 
Champ_Pal said:
What the hell is happening in India.... Radicalism is spreading like fire.


www.facebook.com

416K views · 4.5K reactions | In Haridwar, a group of youths stopped a Muslim girl for not wearing a veil. The girl confronted them and questioned their behaviour, leading to a heated exchange. A video of the incident has since gone viral on social m

In Haridwar, a group of youths stopped a Muslim girl for not wearing a veil. The girl confronted them and questioned their behaviour, leading to a heated exchange. A video of the incident has since...
www.facebook.com www.facebook.com
Click to expand...

@Champ_Pal it is right here...
 
Champ_Pal said:
What the hell is happening in India.... Radicalism is spreading like fire.


www.facebook.com

416K views · 4.5K reactions | In Haridwar, a group of youths stopped a Muslim girl for not wearing a veil. The girl confronted them and questioned their behaviour, leading to a heated exchange. A video of the incident has since gone viral on social m

In Haridwar, a group of youths stopped a Muslim girl for not wearing a veil. The girl confronted them and questioned their behaviour, leading to a heated exchange. A video of the incident has since...
www.facebook.com www.facebook.com
Click to expand...

BIMARU gonna BIMARU
 
Rajdeep said:
Very poor stuff from Palturam Nitish Kumar. Though I am certain he didnt mean it in any offensive way but it came across very bad. He should apologize to that young lady.

And LOL at posters calling him RSS member. OP has no clue about Indian politics, which party he represents, what he stands for and how many times he switched for votes.
Click to expand...
He went a step further and said thank god i didnt touch her somewhere else.

So are you still certain he didnt meant offence or still need proof?
 
If the minister was a Muslim and the women was a Hindu the the poster who created this thread would be defending the minister.
He is an extremist who was defending the terrorists in another thread because they were muslims until it turned out they were Indians
 
emranabbas said:
If the minister was a Muslim and the women was a Hindu the the poster who created this thread would be defending the minister.
He is an extremist who was defending the terrorists in another thread because they were muslims until it turned out they were Indians
Click to expand...

lol. You have no ability to debate so like a small brained general write this?
 
Major said:
He went a step further and said thank god i didnt touch her somewhere else.

So are you still certain he didnt meant offence or still need proof?
Click to expand...
Look I have already said what he did is very wrong. This has nothing to do with religion or anything. I would have said the same had he touched dupatta or ghunghat of another woman. The point is, you should not touch women's attire like that publicly. Nitish Kumar should apologise asap (if he has not done so)

However, one thing I can say with conviction, he actually didnt mean it in any derogatory way. Anyone who knows Nitish Kumar knows he is a political opportunist and will not take any step that will reduce his votes. He dont even subscribe himself with the ideology of BJP/RSS. He was present there in his capacity as head of the state empowering woman by distributing appointment letter to newly recruited doctors including this lady. He tried to adjust her hijab (which he shouldn't have done) and it came across very bad from a man who is almost 80 years old. However, the allegations against him of him trying to rip off her hijab, him being Islamophobic, touching woman inappropriately with intention are uncalled for and mud slinging. It was a genuine mistake by him for which he should apologise and move on.

This is my observation from outside but my fellow Indian posters living in India knows the internal politics better.
 
Rajdeep said:
Look I have already said what he did is very wrong. This has nothing to do with religion or anything. I would have said the same had he touched dupatta or ghunghat of another woman. The point is, you should not touch women's attire like that publicly. Nitish Kumar should apologise asap (if he has not done so)

However, one thing I can say with conviction, he actually didnt mean it in any derogatory way. Anyone who knows Nitish Kumar knows he is a political opportunist and will not take any step that will reduce his votes. He dont even subscribe himself with the ideology of BJP/RSS. He was present there in his capacity as head of the state empowering woman by distributing appointment letter to newly recruited doctors including this lady. He tried to adjust her hijab (which he shouldn't have done) and it came across very bad from a man who is almost 80 years old. However, the allegations against him of him trying to rip off her hijab, him being Islamophobic, touching woman inappropriately with intention are uncalled for and mud slinging. It was a genuine mistake by him for which he should apologise and move on.

This is my observation from outside but my fellow Indian posters living in India knows the internal politics better.
Click to expand...
If someone pulled your daughters dress and that person went on to say, I COULD HAD DONE WORSE, would you still be saying that he didnt actually MEAN IT?
 
Major said:
If someone pulled your daughters dress and that person went on to say, I COULD HAD DONE WORSE, would you still be saying that he didnt actually MEAN IT?
Click to expand...
Where did he say that? Any source or video of him saying that?
 
Rajdeep said:
This guy is not Nitish Kumar though. I dont even know who this guy is but should be kicked out from the party.

Disgraceful comments. :mad: :mad:
Click to expand...

It seems in India politicians can touch womens clothing, make derogatory remarks and its laughed. In the UK they would be forced to resign. This seems to be a cultural issue in India, lets hope immigrants nto the UK leave this mindset behind.
 
KingKhanWC said:
It seems in India politicians can touch womens clothing, make derogatory remarks and its laughed. In the UK they would be forced to resign. This seems to be a cultural issue in India, lets hope immigrants nto the UK leave this mindset behind.
Click to expand...

^ Rage-baiter spotted.
 
This has worked out well for the BJP. And you can already see Godi media on the offensive. They've been waiting for an excuse to kick Nitish out once they'd used his alliance in Bihar. Senile old fool played it perfectly for them.
 

She can go to hell: BJP's Giriraj Singh defends Nitish Kumar over hijab row​


www.indiatoday.in

She can go to hell: BJP's Giriraj Singh defends Nitish Kumar over hijab row

Union Minister Giriraj Singh defended Bihar CM Nitish Kumar over the veil-removal incident in Patna, saying the chief minister did “nothing wrong” and even remarking it was the woman’s choice to refuse the job or “go to hell.”
www.indiatoday.in www.indiatoday.in

Union Minister Giriraj Singh defended Bihar CM Nitish Kumar over the veil-removal incident in Patna, saying the chief minister did "nothing wrong" and even remarking it was the woman's choice to refuse the job or "go to hell."​

Union Minister Giriraj Singh on Thursday strongly defended Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar over the controversy triggered by the latter pulling down a Muslim woman’s veil during an official appointment event in Patna, saying Kumar had done “nothing wrong” and remarking that it was the woman’s choice to refuse the job or “go to hell.”

As the row entered its fourth day, Singh waded into the controversy, asserting that showing one’s face was necessary during official procedures.

“If someone is going to collect an appointment letter, should they not show their face? Is this some Islamic country?” Singh said. Drawing parallels with passport verification and airport security checks, he added that India follows the rule of law and that Kumar had acted like a “guardian.”

Responding to reports that the woman had declined the job following the incident, Singh said, “Whether she refuses the job or goes to hell, that’s her choice.”

The remarks came amid mounting outrage from opposition parties, civil society groups and public figures, who demanded an unconditional apology from the chief minister. Bihar Health Minister Mangal Pandey sought to play down the controversy, saying the ruling NDA government in the state had always worked for women’s empowerment and that Kumar had shown respect to women through his policies.

The controversy also saw sharp comments from leaders across party lines. Uttar Pradesh minister Sanjay Nishad drew criticism for a remark questioning what might have happened “if he touched her somewhere else.” Facing backlash, Nishad later claimed that the spirit of his comment had been lost in translation.

Opposition leaders continued to attack Kumar and Singh. Congress MP from Katihar, Tariq Anwar, described them as having a “cheap mindset” and said the incident was shameful and saddening in a secular country where everyone is free to practise their religion. NCP (SP) MP Fauzia Khan said forcibly removing a woman’s veil was akin to disrobing her and warned that such actions sent a wrong message to the world. She said Kumar should have offered a public apology.

PDP leader Iltija Mufti also lashed out at Singh on X, using strong language to condemn his remarks. Congress MP Imran Masood said Singh needed treatment for “mental sickness.”

Veteran writer and lyricist Javed Akhtar also objected strongly to the incident. While reiterating his opposition to the traditional concept of purdah, Akhtar said he could not accept what Kumar had done and that the chief minister owed the woman an unconditional apology. He also rejected ac

The viral video shows Kumar gesturing towards the woman’s headscarf after handing over her appointment letter and asking her about it before pulling it down. The appointee, identified as Nusrat Parveen, was quickly moved aside by an official, while Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary appeared to tug at Kumar’s sleeve, seemingly trying to restrain him.

The incident has sparked widespread political backlash and international criticism, with Kumar facing accusations of disrespecting Muslim traditions, even as the controversy continues to dominate the political discourse in Bihar.
 
Just head over to YouTube and search for Peado-Catcher videos. The majority are from India, and when caught they beg for mercy etc.

The cult is the greatest threat to humanity.
 
finalfantasy7 said:

She can go to hell: BJP's Giriraj Singh defends Nitish Kumar over hijab row​


www.indiatoday.in

She can go to hell: BJP's Giriraj Singh defends Nitish Kumar over hijab row

Union Minister Giriraj Singh defended Bihar CM Nitish Kumar over the veil-removal incident in Patna, saying the chief minister did “nothing wrong” and even remarking it was the woman’s choice to refuse the job or “go to hell.”
www.indiatoday.in www.indiatoday.in

Union Minister Giriraj Singh defended Bihar CM Nitish Kumar over the veil-removal incident in Patna, saying the chief minister did "nothing wrong" and even remarking it was the woman's choice to refuse the job or "go to hell."​

Union Minister Giriraj Singh on Thursday strongly defended Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar over the controversy triggered by the latter pulling down a Muslim woman’s veil during an official appointment event in Patna, saying Kumar had done “nothing wrong” and remarking that it was the woman’s choice to refuse the job or “go to hell.”

As the row entered its fourth day, Singh waded into the controversy, asserting that showing one’s face was necessary during official procedures.

“If someone is going to collect an appointment letter, should they not show their face? Is this some Islamic country?” Singh said. Drawing parallels with passport verification and airport security checks, he added that India follows the rule of law and that Kumar had acted like a “guardian.”

Responding to reports that the woman had declined the job following the incident, Singh said, “Whether she refuses the job or goes to hell, that’s her choice.”

The remarks came amid mounting outrage from opposition parties, civil society groups and public figures, who demanded an unconditional apology from the chief minister. Bihar Health Minister Mangal Pandey sought to play down the controversy, saying the ruling NDA government in the state had always worked for women’s empowerment and that Kumar had shown respect to women through his policies.

The controversy also saw sharp comments from leaders across party lines. Uttar Pradesh minister Sanjay Nishad drew criticism for a remark questioning what might have happened “if he touched her somewhere else.” Facing backlash, Nishad later claimed that the spirit of his comment had been lost in translation.

Opposition leaders continued to attack Kumar and Singh. Congress MP from Katihar, Tariq Anwar, described them as having a “cheap mindset” and said the incident was shameful and saddening in a secular country where everyone is free to practise their religion. NCP (SP) MP Fauzia Khan said forcibly removing a woman’s veil was akin to disrobing her and warned that such actions sent a wrong message to the world. She said Kumar should have offered a public apology.

PDP leader Iltija Mufti also lashed out at Singh on X, using strong language to condemn his remarks. Congress MP Imran Masood said Singh needed treatment for “mental sickness.”

Veteran writer and lyricist Javed Akhtar also objected strongly to the incident. While reiterating his opposition to the traditional concept of purdah, Akhtar said he could not accept what Kumar had done and that the chief minister owed the woman an unconditional apology. He also rejected ac

The viral video shows Kumar gesturing towards the woman’s headscarf after handing over her appointment letter and asking her about it before pulling it down. The appointee, identified as Nusrat Parveen, was quickly moved aside by an official, while Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary appeared to tug at Kumar’s sleeve, seemingly trying to restrain him.

The incident has sparked widespread political backlash and international criticism, with Kumar facing accusations of disrespecting Muslim traditions, even as the controversy continues to dominate the political discourse in Bihar.
Click to expand...
This Giriraj creature is a serial offender in this regard.
 
finalfantasy7 said:

She can go to hell: BJP's Giriraj Singh defends Nitish Kumar over hijab row​


www.indiatoday.in

She can go to hell: BJP's Giriraj Singh defends Nitish Kumar over hijab row

Union Minister Giriraj Singh defended Bihar CM Nitish Kumar over the veil-removal incident in Patna, saying the chief minister did “nothing wrong” and even remarking it was the woman’s choice to refuse the job or “go to hell.”
www.indiatoday.in www.indiatoday.in

Union Minister Giriraj Singh defended Bihar CM Nitish Kumar over the veil-removal incident in Patna, saying the chief minister did "nothing wrong" and even remarking it was the woman's choice to refuse the job or "go to hell."​

Union Minister Giriraj Singh on Thursday strongly defended Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar over the controversy triggered by the latter pulling down a Muslim woman’s veil during an official appointment event in Patna, saying Kumar had done “nothing wrong” and remarking that it was the woman’s choice to refuse the job or “go to hell.”

As the row entered its fourth day, Singh waded into the controversy, asserting that showing one’s face was necessary during official procedures.

“If someone is going to collect an appointment letter, should they not show their face? Is this some Islamic country?” Singh said. Drawing parallels with passport verification and airport security checks, he added that India follows the rule of law and that Kumar had acted like a “guardian.”

Responding to reports that the woman had declined the job following the incident, Singh said, “Whether she refuses the job or goes to hell, that’s her choice.”

The remarks came amid mounting outrage from opposition parties, civil society groups and public figures, who demanded an unconditional apology from the chief minister. Bihar Health Minister Mangal Pandey sought to play down the controversy, saying the ruling NDA government in the state had always worked for women’s empowerment and that Kumar had shown respect to women through his policies.

The controversy also saw sharp comments from leaders across party lines. Uttar Pradesh minister Sanjay Nishad drew criticism for a remark questioning what might have happened “if he touched her somewhere else.” Facing backlash, Nishad later claimed that the spirit of his comment had been lost in translation.

Opposition leaders continued to attack Kumar and Singh. Congress MP from Katihar, Tariq Anwar, described them as having a “cheap mindset” and said the incident was shameful and saddening in a secular country where everyone is free to practise their religion. NCP (SP) MP Fauzia Khan said forcibly removing a woman’s veil was akin to disrobing her and warned that such actions sent a wrong message to the world. She said Kumar should have offered a public apology.

PDP leader Iltija Mufti also lashed out at Singh on X, using strong language to condemn his remarks. Congress MP Imran Masood said Singh needed treatment for “mental sickness.”

Veteran writer and lyricist Javed Akhtar also objected strongly to the incident. While reiterating his opposition to the traditional concept of purdah, Akhtar said he could not accept what Kumar had done and that the chief minister owed the woman an unconditional apology. He also rejected ac

The viral video shows Kumar gesturing towards the woman’s headscarf after handing over her appointment letter and asking her about it before pulling it down. The appointee, identified as Nusrat Parveen, was quickly moved aside by an official, while Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary appeared to tug at Kumar’s sleeve, seemingly trying to restrain him.

The incident has sparked widespread political backlash and international criticism, with Kumar facing accusations of disrespecting Muslim traditions, even as the controversy continues to dominate the political discourse in Bihar.
Click to expand...


@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @JaDed @Devadwal @uppercut @Theanonymousone @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @RexRex @Varun @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six


what do you think
 
finalfantasy7 said:

She can go to hell: BJP's Giriraj Singh defends Nitish Kumar over hijab row​


www.indiatoday.in

She can go to hell: BJP's Giriraj Singh defends Nitish Kumar over hijab row

Union Minister Giriraj Singh defended Bihar CM Nitish Kumar over the veil-removal incident in Patna, saying the chief minister did “nothing wrong” and even remarking it was the woman’s choice to refuse the job or “go to hell.”
www.indiatoday.in www.indiatoday.in

Union Minister Giriraj Singh defended Bihar CM Nitish Kumar over the veil-removal incident in Patna, saying the chief minister did "nothing wrong" and even remarking it was the woman's choice to refuse the job or "go to hell."​

Union Minister Giriraj Singh on Thursday strongly defended Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar over the controversy triggered by the latter pulling down a Muslim woman’s veil during an official appointment event in Patna, saying Kumar had done “nothing wrong” and remarking that it was the woman’s choice to refuse the job or “go to hell.”

As the row entered its fourth day, Singh waded into the controversy, asserting that showing one’s face was necessary during official procedures.

“If someone is going to collect an appointment letter, should they not show their face? Is this some Islamic country?” Singh said. Drawing parallels with passport verification and airport security checks, he added that India follows the rule of law and that Kumar had acted like a “guardian.”

Responding to reports that the woman had declined the job following the incident, Singh said, “Whether she refuses the job or goes to hell, that’s her choice.”

The remarks came amid mounting outrage from opposition parties, civil society groups and public figures, who demanded an unconditional apology from the chief minister. Bihar Health Minister Mangal Pandey sought to play down the controversy, saying the ruling NDA government in the state had always worked for women’s empowerment and that Kumar had shown respect to women through his policies.

The controversy also saw sharp comments from leaders across party lines. Uttar Pradesh minister Sanjay Nishad drew criticism for a remark questioning what might have happened “if he touched her somewhere else.” Facing backlash, Nishad later claimed that the spirit of his comment had been lost in translation.

Opposition leaders continued to attack Kumar and Singh. Congress MP from Katihar, Tariq Anwar, described them as having a “cheap mindset” and said the incident was shameful and saddening in a secular country where everyone is free to practise their religion. NCP (SP) MP Fauzia Khan said forcibly removing a woman’s veil was akin to disrobing her and warned that such actions sent a wrong message to the world. She said Kumar should have offered a public apology.

PDP leader Iltija Mufti also lashed out at Singh on X, using strong language to condemn his remarks. Congress MP Imran Masood said Singh needed treatment for “mental sickness.”

Veteran writer and lyricist Javed Akhtar also objected strongly to the incident. While reiterating his opposition to the traditional concept of purdah, Akhtar said he could not accept what Kumar had done and that the chief minister owed the woman an unconditional apology. He also rejected ac

The viral video shows Kumar gesturing towards the woman’s headscarf after handing over her appointment letter and asking her about it before pulling it down. The appointee, identified as Nusrat Parveen, was quickly moved aside by an official, while Deputy Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary appeared to tug at Kumar’s sleeve, seemingly trying to restrain him.

The incident has sparked widespread political backlash and international criticism, with Kumar facing accusations of disrespecting Muslim traditions, even as the controversy continues to dominate the political discourse in Bihar.
Click to expand...
@Rajdeep
 
Major said:
@Rajdeep
Click to expand...

He is wrong. Then again, its much better than what is happening across both the borders (East and West)

Hindu man in Bangladesh allegedly beaten to death, body tied to tree, and set on fire

A young Hindu man was beaten to death in Bhaluka, Mymensingh, over alleged blasphemy. Police say the body was later tied to a tree and set on fire.

 
Rajdeep said:
He is wrong. Then again, its much better than what is happening across both the borders (East and West)

Hindu man in Bangladesh allegedly beaten to death, body tied to tree, and set on fire

A young Hindu man was beaten to death in Bhaluka, Mymensingh, over alleged blasphemy. Police say the body was later tied to a tree and set on fire.

Click to expand...
what?
 
Unfortunate. By the way what was the nationality and religion of the coward who did this?

Saw this exact question being asked in page 1 of the Aussie thread, almost as a knee jerk reaction as well so it’s important here as well that we are able to categorize such low life criminals.
 
Correct me if I am wrong but I am yet to see any post from fellow indian posters here condemning this act, instead I see them confirming he's not from the party they support
 
Rafale Nidhal Fan said:
Correct me if I am wrong but I am yet to see any post from fellow indian posters here condemning this act, instead I see them confirming he's not from the party they support
Click to expand...
Usual tactic most of the time... Instead of condemning this pathetic behaviour, they try just to make people forget about the incident and use diversion tactics...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Bhaag Viru Bhaag
[VIDEO] German woman abused, harassed in Jaipur by locals, she shares disturbing video which goes viral
Replies
13
Views
491
Justcrazy
Justcrazy
Bhaijaan
India shot down six Pakistani military aircraft in May, indian air force chief says
5 6 7
Replies
545
Views
10K
finalfantasy7
finalfantasy7
Hitman
'Will erase from map, won't exercise restraint': Indian army chief
2 3
Replies
164
Views
3K
Cpt. Rishwat
Cpt. Rishwat
Bhaag Viru Bhaag
Who is Kashish Chaudhary? 1st Hindu woman assistant commissioner in Balochistan
Replies
11
Views
649
HalBass9
HalBass9
R
  • Article Article
Will UK have a Pak-origin PM?
Replies
2
Views
96
RizwanT20Champ
R
Back
Top