What's new

India's economy added $1 trillion under Modi but not the millions of jobs it needs

Romali_rotti

Senior ODI Player
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Runs
21,881
Analysis by Rishi Iyengar, CNN Business

New Delhi (CNN Business)Narendra Modi had lofty ambitions for India when he came to power in a landslide election win in 2014.

The prime minister and his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) promised to overhaul the economy and create millions of jobs for young people, saying they would reverse a decade of "jobless growth" under the previous government. As Modi seeks a second term, he's setting the bar even higher — the election manifesto released by the BJP on Monday aspires to make India the world's third largest economy by 2030.
Here's a look at the Indian leader's record so far.

A much bigger economy The country has surged up the ranks of the world's largest economies and is on track to displace the United Kingdom from fifth spot in 2019, according to data from the International Monetary Fund. India's gross domestic product is forecast to be nearly $1 trillion bigger this year than it was in 2014. Only the United States, China, Japan and Germany can boast a larger GDP.

Now the BJP wants to boost GDP to $5 trillion by 2025, from $2.9 trillion projected for this year. That would allow India to overtake Germany to become the fourth biggest economy. If all goes according to plan, GDP should then rise to $10 trillion by 2032, surpassed only by the United States and China.

Under Modi, GDP per capita has also risen from $1,600 in 2014 to a projected $2,200 in 2019 — an increase of more than 35%.
The country's rise has bolstered its status as a key global market for several industries eager to access its enormous population, increased spending power, and relatively open economy.

Foreign investment has surged, Modi aggressively courted foreign investors, removing several barriers for overseas players in sectors such as manufacturing, retail and aviation. They responded enthusiastically, pouring around $45 billion into India during the last fiscal year, according to official data. That's nearly double the amount in 2014, the year Modi came to power. Still, the growth in foreign direct investment has cooled in recent years, falling to less than 5% between 2017 and 2018. Recent crackdowns on foreign companies, particularly leading online retailers such as Walmart (WMT) and Amazon (AMZN), have led many to question India's unpredictable policy-making.

But analysts say those protectionist regulations reflect election dynamics, rather than a strategic shift, as Modi looks to drum up support from local business owners that form a big part of his base. "There have been a number of FDI-specific reforms, and I would think that would set the tone for the next few years rather than a shift towards more protectionist policies," Shilan Shah, senior India economist at Capital Economics, told CNN. Fluctuating growth The most keenly-watched metric since Modi came to office has been the pace of India's growth.
India overtook China as the world's fastest-growing major economy in 2015, and except for a brief period in 2017, it has held that position ever since.

But there has been a sharp deceleration in the last couple of years, with the biggest hit to growth resulting from some of Modi's signature reforms.
He stunned the country in November 2016 by abruptly banning the two biggest banknotes in circulation, making 86% of the country's cash worthless at a stroke.

While the stated goal was to crack down on illegal funds and move India towards a more digital future, the move wreaked havoc in the cash-dependent economy and brought several sectors to a halt.
A massive overhaul of India's tax system a few months later hit the economy even harder, as businesses still reeling from the cash ban struggled to cope with the changeover.

The economy had rebounded strongly by the beginning of last year, but growth has since slumped from 8.2% to 6.6%.
"If you really look at what this government has done, it has systematically ticked a lot of boxes," said Pronab Sen, India director at the International Growth Centre and the country's former chief statistician. "But the one big error was [the cash ban.] The consequences of that one act, I think, more than outweighs the good things that have been done."

Rising unemployment The government has also disappointed many with its performance on jobs. India needs to create more than 10 million every year just to keep pace with the growth in its working age population.
India has not released official employment data for several years, and the fact that more than 80% of its economy is informal makes it difficult to tell whether Modi has managed to keep his promise.

The Indian government canceled the planned release of its latest labor survey in February. But the numbers it reportedly contained paint a grim picture. The Business Standard newspaper said it had obtained a copy of the survey that showed unemployment at its highest rate in 45 years.

The head of India's government-run think tank said the data had not been adequately verified by the administration. Critics accused the government of trying to suppress the numbers. Independent calculations also show a rise in unemployment. India lost 11 million jobs in 2018, according to the Centre for Monitoring the Indian Economy, an independent think tank.

And a study last year by researchers at India's Azim Premji University showed that rapid economic growth is producing far fewer jobs than it used to. "The increase in unemployment is clearly visible all across India," the study said. What happens next? Modi is still widely considered the frontrunner to win India's upcoming election, but questions over his economic promises have gotten louder as the polls approach.

India's growth is likely to slow further in the coming months as an uptick in government spending around the election fades, Shah said.
And while Modi has pushed through several policies with mixed success, many keenly-awaited promises in more sensitive areas — such as land and labor market reforms -— are yet to be delivered.

Even if Modi wins reelection, changes in those areas will likely "stay off the table," Shah added.


https://edition.cnn.com/2019/04/05/economy/narendra-modi-economy-election-india/index.html
 
unemployment at its highest rate in 45 years. : Damning indeed. That alone should sink his hopes of reelection if that is indeed true. No wonder he is busy pointing his finger at the bogeyman Pakistan
 
Basically because of income inequality. Vast majority of India's wealth is horded by the ultra rich.
 
unemployment at its highest rate in 45 years. : Damning indeed. That alone should sink his hopes of reelection if that is indeed true. No wonder he is busy pointing his finger at the bogeyman Pakistan
Modi and Jaitley have termed this report as bogus since it exposes them as to what they have truly done to India during last 5 years. No wonder NSSO chairman was made to resign by these nincompoops after this report came out
 
Emphasising the fact that GDP, GDP growth, and GDP/Capita are useless figures when determining the health of an economy.

The only number that matters is how much money is in the pockets of a civilian.
 
With the advent of AI, overpopulated developing countries will suffer a huge setback. Our assembly line workers and call centre operatives are next in line to lose their jobs to automation and chatbots.
 
unemployment at its highest rate in 45 years. : Damning indeed. That alone should sink his hopes of reelection if that is indeed true. No wonder he is busy pointing his finger at the bogeyman Pakistan

All of whom are in Modi's pocket. Rest you get the gist.

More unemployment means more frustrated youth who want to shift the blame to someone else for their plight, target an enemy whether Pakistan or Indian so called anti-nationals. More cannon fodder for Hindutva groups who will mould these angry jobless youth into extremists and lynching senas. Sometimes I pity the misguided youth who become terrorists or extremist goons, almost always someone else higher up is manipulating them to achieve their objectives.
 
Unemployment rate at its highest in 45 years, how bhaakts defend their master is beyond me. Only if you hate India will you want Modi to retain power.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Congress has looted the country for 60 years but looks like people have still not learnt the lesson. NAMOs 5 years was better than anything under the congress era. The fact that entire opposition has to come together to topple 1 man shows how much power and support of people he has. Plenty of reason to vote for Modi again but the most important of them all is for the survival of hindus. Congress made hindus as 2nd class citizen in its own country for 60 years and its only due to Modi, common hindus found a voice. Congress mukt bharat is a dream for Indians and anyone who does not vote for Modi is anti national in my view.
 
Unemployment rate at its highest in 45 years, how bhaakts defend their master is beyond me. Only if you hate India will you want Modi to retain power.
They don't love India, they love Modi. To hell with India.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Doesn't sound right, adding $1 trillion in less than five years is impossible. I believe they're fudging the numbers, the indian govt has misrepresented their gdp growth in the past so I don't trust their numbers.
 
Doesn't sound right, adding $1 trillion in less than five years is impossible. I believe they're fudging the numbers, the indian govt has misrepresented their gdp growth in the past so I don't trust their numbers.
Correct. They have faked everything in last 5 years, fudging GDP numbers is child's play for them.
 
Unemployment rate at its highest in 45 years, how bhaakts defend their master is beyond me. Only if you hate India will you want Modi to retain power.

All this is because of nehru's policy and it will take two more terms by BJP to reverse the damage done by the congress.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Congress has looted the country for 60 years but looks like people have still not learnt the lesson. NAMOs 5 years was better than anything under the congress era. The fact that entire opposition has to come together to topple 1 man shows how much power and support of people he has. Plenty of reason to vote for Modi again but the most important of them all is for the survival of hindus. Congress made hindus as 2nd class citizen in its own country for 60 years and its only due to Modi, common hindus found a voice. Congress mukt bharat is a dream for Indians and anyone who does not vote for Modi is anti national in my view.

India boasts about being the world's largest democracy, well I got news for you, every 5 years, the people hold their government accountable. This is why a government should be afraid of the people, and not the people afraid of a government.

Welcome to democracy, and stop moaning.
 
India boasts about being the world's largest democracy, well I got news for you, every 5 years, the people hold their government accountable. This is why a government should be afraid of the people, and not the people afraid of a government.

Welcome to democracy, and stop moaning.

Obviously you have no knowledge about democracy but it looks like your grasp on politics is even weaker. Politics is all about ideology, perception and conviction. This opposition alliance has no common political ideologies but are only binded by the hatred for Modi. I know you are not from India and has got no idea of Indian politics, hence not going into the specifics of the alliance parties. But like fire and water cant live together...parties coming together with different ideologies cant survive together as well.
 
Obviously you have no knowledge about democracy but it looks like your grasp on politics is even weaker. Politics is all about ideology, perception and conviction. This opposition alliance has no common political ideologies but are only binded by the hatred for Modi. I know you are not from India and has got no idea of Indian politics, hence not going into the specifics of the alliance parties. But like fire and water cant live together...parties coming together with different ideologies cant survive together as well.

If you cannot explain in a sentence, the you are bluffing. Then again you are a sycophant [look up the word] of Saffron terror.

I know you do not live in India, lucky you, pretend to be Hindu but have an Anglo saxon name, thus you must be ignored. What's up bruv? Ridiculed because you are fair and lovely, or because first there was darkness then there was light?
 
Doesn't sound right, adding $1 trillion in less than five years is impossible. I believe they're fudging the numbers, the indian govt has misrepresented their gdp growth in the past so I don't trust their numbers.

The IMF estimate doesnot believe its impossible.These are IMF numbers.

And Indian budget is audited by independent CAG.
 
If you cannot explain in a sentence, the you are bluffing. Then again you are a sycophant [look up the word] of Saffron terror.

I know you do not live in India, lucky you, pretend to be Hindu but have an Anglo saxon name, thus you must be ignored. What's up bruv? Ridiculed because you are fair and lovely, or because first there was darkness then there was light?

There is nothing called as Saffron terror. No agencies, courts or public body has ever accused anyone with hindutva ideologies as terrorists. Its a term created by liberals, anti nationals and parosis when they have nothing substantial to add and losing the debate.

Having done the above...another thing they do (when losing the debate) is get personal. How does it matter where do I live, why I have Anglo Saxon profile name etc. We being in internet are all in a virtual world anyway and only posts our views here.

Do you want to re-read my previous post again and come back with a better reply perhaps? No rush bro.
 
Doesn't sound right, adding $1 trillion in less than five years is impossible. I believe they're fudging the numbers, the indian govt has misrepresented their gdp growth in the past so I don't trust their numbers..

Are the IMF lying too?

D3-qqcQU0AAXvsV.jpg


https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-modi-election-metrics/
 
Fudged numbers and saffron terror?

Modi haters are kinda embarrassing with their arguments. :facepalm:
 
Modi supporters look for international recognition and approval (irony alert), but the voice of Indians is ignored.
 
Voice of Indians is heard in a democratically elected government.

Bless your cotton socks, it is Indians who refer to Modi as a Saffron terrorist. Perhaps you can pat your comrade's head above and read my posts above.

Very citrus of you, to say the least.

:)
 
Doesn't sound right, adding $1 trillion in less than five years is impossible. I believe they're fudging the numbers, the indian govt has misrepresented their gdp growth in the past so I don't trust their numbers.

850-900 billion in 5 years is estimates from world bank, imf, etc. USA and China add 1T every year, so 850-900 billion over 5 years is possible.
 
The IMF estimate doesnot believe its impossible.These are IMF numbers.

lol, none other than IMF Chief economist has expressed doubts over Modi's GDP figures. Does that sound credible enough for you? I know Raghuram Rajan is anti national for you, but is IMF's Chief economist too is an anti national?
 
As for CAG, well it lost its credibility ever since Modi's stooge Pankaj Rai (CoA chief) donned its chief's hat. And guess what who is the current CAG, Rajiv Mehrishi, who was Finance secy during biggest scam of all times, the demonetization. How could anyone be asked to audit the scam of which he himself was a presiding officer, is beyond me.

If that doesn't sound extreme corrupt practice to you, nothing else will.
 
When I said that India had it's worst unemployment record for almost half a century, many poster were whooping in ridicule that I was making these numbers up, now we have a thread saying exactly the same thing. :91:

A nation is ultimately valued as a desirable destination based upon the standard of living it provides for it's own citizens. All we can say at the moment is that for the majority, India is at a similar level to Pakistan if not worse. But at least you have a PM who can receive 'rock star' receptions abroad from Indians who don't want to actually live in India.
 
As for CAG, well it lost its credibility ever since Modi's stooge Pankaj Rai (CoA chief) donned its chief's hat. And guess what who is the current CAG, Rajiv Mehrishi, who was Finance secy during biggest scam of all times, the demonetization. How could anyone be asked to audit the scam of which he himself was a presiding officer, is beyond me.

If that doesn't sound extreme corrupt practice to you, nothing else will.

Who pankaj Rai?
 
As for CAG, well it lost its credibility ever since Modi's stooge Pankaj Rai (CoA chief) donned its chief's hat. And guess what who is the current CAG, Rajiv Mehrishi, who was Finance secy during biggest scam of all times, the demonetization. How could anyone be asked to audit the scam of which he himself was a presiding officer, is beyond me.

If that doesn't sound extreme corrupt practice to you, nothing else will.

Really?LOL.

You sure Rajiv Mahrishi was Finance secretary in 2016 when demonetization happened?
 
Really?LOL.

You sure Rajiv Mahrishi was Finance secretary in 2016 when demonetization happened?
ok, so he was home secy at that time and not Finance secy, got my facts wrong there. So you've only these things to cling on to, eh? However he still was a very powerful bureaucrat at that time and to appoint him as CAG which happened to probe PAC's report over demonetization as a dishonest practice whether you like to admit or not.
 
When I said that India had it's worst unemployment record for almost half a century, many poster were whooping in ridicule that I was making these numbers up, now we have a thread saying exactly the same thing. :91:

A nation is ultimately valued as a desirable destination based upon the standard of living it provides for it's own citizens. All we can say at the moment is that for the majority, India is at a similar level to Pakistan if not worse. But at least you have a PM who can receive 'rock star' receptions abroad from Indians who don't want to actually live in India.

These same people will never accept that we are a third world country. :inti
 
I see you've deliberately chosen to ignore IMF's chief economist's comments over veracity of Modi's GDP numbers. I know the reason.
 
The billionaire and corporation craze that took over US since the time of Reagan appears to have taken a hold of India too, and if not corrected it will result in vast inequality and vast number of poor people even if the overall economic numbers look good. Now is the time to nip it in the bud. Economically right wing governments are usually the worst perpetrators of this - they are usually in the pockets of the ultra rich and the corporations.

You see many Indians flaunting their marginally better GDP per capita over Pakistan, however meantime Pakistan has significantly better poverty rate. You could notice similar differences between US and Canada. Despite having about 15-20% less GDP per capita, Canada has an overall better public education system, better healthcare, way less ghettos and crime rate, etc. I am not saying Pakistan has all those better than India, I am saying falling in love with billionaires and corporations has its drawbacks. But US is better if are willing to put in the work and have high ambitions. IMO something like European and Canadian model is what India (and also Pakistan) should strive for rather than neocon US economic model that panders to billionaires and big corporations.
 
Last edited:
ok, so he was home secy at that time and not Finance secy, got my facts wrong there. So you've only these things to cling on to, eh? However he still was a very powerful bureaucrat at that time and to appoint him as CAG which happened to probe PAC's report over demonetization as a dishonest practice whether you like to admit or not.

Can you tell me who was the last CAG of India,who was not a IAS officer and hence not a bureaucrat?
 
I see you've deliberately chosen to ignore IMF's chief economist's comments over veracity of Modi's GDP numbers. I know the reason.

Have you heard of the name A K Gopalan? Do you know where Gopinath worked in India?
 
Can you tell me who was the last CAG of India,who was not a IAS officer and hence not a bureaucrat?
What has that got to do with Mehrishi being Home secy during demonetization and now a CAG? Don't think you got what I was alluding to. I merely pointed out that Mehrishi being a home secy at that time should not have been appointed CAG especially considering that he had to audit the PAC report over demonetization. If this isn't conflict of interest, what else is especially when he owes his allegiance to the ruling regime?
 
A lot of work needs to be done if the government wants to get to its $5 trillion target.

China is still adding the equivalent of a quarter of India’s economy every year. If India were to sustain its GDP growth per person of 7%—about its average for the past two decades—to 2030, it would barely have got to where China is today.


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In the quarter to June, India's growth slipped to 5%, the slowest in six years. A policy shift is sorely needed to kick-start the economy <a href="https://t.co/pmpmITuwdm">https://t.co/pmpmITuwdm</a></p>— The Economist (@TheEconomist) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheEconomist/status/1187948681221328896?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
A lot of work needs to be done if the government wants to get to its $5 trillion target.




<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In the quarter to June, India's growth slipped to 5%, the slowest in six years. A policy shift is sorely needed to kick-start the economy <a href="https://t.co/pmpmITuwdm">https://t.co/pmpmITuwdm</a></p>— The Economist (@TheEconomist) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheEconomist/status/1187948681221328896?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 26, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

So supapowa 2020 is being put off till 2030? I was looking forward to Jan 1, 2020 to apply for an Indian work permit to move from third world Canada to first world supapowa India. Dang it, I shall have to wait another decade.
 
More than a policy a shift focus on improving efficiency of students graduating and allowing people to move up the ladder with a learning curve included is what we should concentrate on.

There is a relaxing attitude esp after one gets a job and then they are bound with societal norms unable to full explore their potential.
 
More than a policy a shift focus on improving efficiency of students graduating and allowing people to move up the ladder with a learning curve included is what we should concentrate on.

There is a relaxing attitude esp after one gets a job and then they are bound with societal norms unable to full explore their potential.

You are talking about moving up the value chain, which is different altogether and dosent create jobs . It’s these low skill jobs which can be potentially mass jobs can be created and that’s what developing countries like India need . After ITES , the only new jobs which have been created , at least I can think off are by the likes of Ola , Swiggy and Zomato . The slowdown has hit us at a bad time,I think we will take a pause of 2-3 years and hopefully China and rest of the world dosent go into a deep recession
 
All of whom are in Modi's pocket. Rest you get the gist.


Seriously why are we so limited in our thinking ? If India has a few more of Reliance, Tata’s , Birlas etc we would not be discussing about unemployment now
 
Seriously why are we so limited in our thinking ? If India has a few more of Reliance, Tata’s , Birlas etc we would not be discussing about unemployment now

That's like saying if IK was PM of Pakistan since 2000, we would not be taking about India.

Lets not deal with the hypotheticals, but the realities.
 
You are talking about moving up the value chain, which is different altogether and dosent create jobs . It’s these low skill jobs which can be potentially mass jobs can be created and that’s what developing countries like India need . After ITES , the only new jobs which have been created , at least I can think off are by the likes of Ola , Swiggy and Zomato . The slowdown has hit us at a bad time,I think we will take a pause of 2-3 years and hopefully China and rest of the world dosent go into a deep recession

While you are right, Im talking from my own personal experience as to how I wasn’t ready at all when I joined IT, which basically is my fault but also coz our education is theoretical, due to which I joined a body shop but thankfully they train you, I feel now am much better but that learning curve of mine happened in the IT training rather than at college, basically the graduates most of them aren’t ready for industry

The second point was abt society which is only part of the problem not complete.
 
The billionaire and corporation craze that took over US since the time of Reagan appears to have taken a hold of India too, and if not corrected it will result in vast inequality and vast number of poor people even if the overall economic numbers look good. Now is the time to nip it in the bud. Economically right wing governments are usually the worst perpetrators of this - they are usually in the pockets of the ultra rich and the corporations.

You see many Indians flaunting their marginally better GDP per capita over Pakistan, however meantime Pakistan has significantly better poverty rate. You could notice similar differences between US and Canada. Despite having about 15-20% less GDP per capita, Canada has an overall better public education system, better healthcare, way less ghettos and crime rate, etc. I am not saying Pakistan has all those better than India, I am saying falling in love with billionaires and corporations has its drawbacks. But US is better if are willing to put in the work and have high ambitions. IMO something like European and Canadian model is what India (and also Pakistan) should strive for rather than neocon US economic model that panders to billionaires and big corporations.

I think Canada is great but Canadian model would at best work till 75 mn population not over it.

USA does whatever necessary it has to be competitive and its good for 310 population, I can clearly see the issues in Canadian system right now, with the resources available for Canada they should actually have better HDI than they do right now but leftist parties and the alt left policies in number of situations are causing huge issues in Ontario, one major being how landlords suffer after renting out their home, so many other such things where they penalize you if you want to make money.
 
Seriously why are we so limited in our thinking ? If India has a few more of Reliance, Tata’s , Birlas etc we would not be discussing about unemployment now

Exactly we need more of Reliance, Tatas and Birlas and less of Nirav Modi, Vijay Mallaya and Singh brothers. :inti
 
Mumbai, India - After six months of working the graveyard shift at a call centre in the city of Pune, a three-hour drive from India's financial capital Mumbai, Rohit Mhatre* had had enough. The 23-year-old resigned in March, hoping to land another job that would allow him to have a social life.

His timing could not have been worse.

Weeks later, India went into a strict, nationwide lockdown to stop the spread of the coronavirus outbreak. The few jobs open to those with little experience and straight out of college dried up. Mhatre's father's stall selling breakfast to city commuters also had to close. Suddenly, the family was left with no income.

"There's just no jobs out there. It's difficult to know what to do," he told Al Jazeera by phone, from his ancestral village in Maharashtra, where he and his family have relocated to avoid the city's expensive living costs. "Many of my friends are in the same boat. We spend all day scrolling through online job sites".

Mhatre's predicament highlights one of India's biggest economic problems: young people who have invested in higher education are finding it increasingly hard to find work, potentially affecting their future prospects and potentially those of future generations. The pandemic is making this issue all the more acute.

Globally, young workers tend to occupy low-skilled, entry-level positions. Firms have invested relatively little on training them. As a result, employers often find it relatively easy to sacrifice these jobs when times are tough.

Young people are also overrepresented in sectors like retail, hospitality and tourism, which have been badly hit by policies enforcing social distancing, according to the Atlantic Council think-tank.

In May, the International Labour Organization (ILO) warned that COVID-19's economic fallout could "leave many young people behind", permanently excluding them from the job market. The virus's legacy could be with us "for decades", it said.

The ILO also says the world's "youth are being disproportionately affected by the pandemic". In its latest report, it estimates that more than one in six young people - roughly 17 percent - have lost their jobs since it began.

In India, the proportion of young workers affected by the crisis appears to be even higher.

About 41 percent of people aged between 15-29 were out of work in May, according to data compiled by the Centre for Monitoring the Indian Economy (CMIE). That is up from 17.3 percent in 2018-19.

An estimated 27 million people between the ages of 20 and 30 lost their jobs in April, the CMIE says.

"The long-term impact of the pandemic will be very severe and take a long time to fix," Mahesh Vyas, the chief executive officer of the CMIE told Al Jazeera. "Young people will not be able to save for the future and that affects the next generation too".

India's shrinking jobs market means it will be increasingly tough for the 1.3 million Indians joining the workforce each month, as per World Bank estimates.

Crucially, the pandemic has also jeopardised India's ability to capitalise on a unique opportunity; it has the world's largest youth population.

Until 2040, the proportion of working-age people in India is expected to outweigh the number of their dependents (children and older people), a phenomenon that economists refer to as a "demographic dividend". But with the pandemic causing enormous economic damage, analysts warn that India is likely to miss out on this benefit.

"The economy was already slowing down severely, and now the lockdown has made everything worse," says the CMIE's Vyas. "If the young generation is not given jobs, then the demographic dividend will become a demographic demon."

Even before the pandemic, India was one of the hardest places to be a young job seeker. Though the country's working-age population is growing, the proportion of young workers active in the labour market is falling, according to the Reserve Bank of India.

Analysts say that the labour surplus created by the pandemic will now worsen their already bleak employment prospects.

"Young people will be more willing to accept less pay and poor working conditions, just because they're so desperate to make a living," Sabina Dewan, executive director of and senior fellow at the New Delhi-based Centre for Policy Research, told Al Jazeera. By accepting whatever job they can get and not necessarily one that suits their education or skills, their potential goes unused, she added. "This sets us back hugely in terms of realising any portion of the demographic dividend," said Dewan.

Mhatre, who spent three years studying for a Bachelor of Commerce degree, is already lowering his expectations. While still on the lookout for a "respectable" marketing or IT job, he admits he would take anything right now if it meant earning a bit of cash. "Before I was focused on getting experience and building up my CV, but now we need any income to survive."

He says many of his former colleagues at the call centre had civil engineering or Masters in Business Administration degrees. Mhatre is thankful he did not splash out more money on another degree.

"If everyone ends up competing for the same kinds of job, what's the use in studying more?" he said.

At 12.7 percent, the unemployment rate for Indian graduates was more than double the overall figure of 6 percent in 2018, a symptom of India's failure to create enough high-quality, non-farming jobs. Developing economies typically raise living standards by increasing employment in manufacturing and construction. But a lack of investment in these sectors has meant this process has stalled in India since 2012, according to a report by Azim Premji University.

Analysts also worry that many young people could end up earning little more than their parents' generation, despite spending more time and money on school. Research from the US shows that the more time spent unemployed or in low-paid work, the greater the hit to future earning potential.

This also rings true for India and its current crisis, says the JustJobs Network's Dewan. "We already have an economy that doesn't provide for a lot of economic mobility for young people," she said, referring to the outsized role that gender, caste and religion can play in securing certain jobs. "I fear now young people are going to be set back even more; locked into jobs that offer them no upward progression."

With cases of COVID-19 still on the rise, the length and severity of the current crisis are hard to predict. While some are hopeful of a rebounding economy once the virus is controlled, others warn that progress on the jobs front will be limited if the structural issues driving the economic slowdown that preceded the outbreak are ignored.

At 12.7 percent, the unemployment rate for Indian graduates was more than double the overall figure of 6 percent in 2018, a symptom of India's failure to create enough high-quality, non-farming jobs [File: Vivek Prakash/Reuters]
"We've been more or less stuck at around 405 million jobs since 2016," says the CMIE's Vyas. "Four policy shocks in four years", including the elimination of a large proportion of currency notes in 2016 and a crisis in the non-banking finance sector, have hindered job creation and pummelled the economy's animal spirits, he added. "Companies have had no room to invest in new capacity. If there's no investment, then there's no new jobs and this problem continues."

Business sentiment fell to a 10-year low in June 2019, according to a survey by research firm IHS Markit. The government has tried to revive private sector confidence through measures like corporate tax cuts and increasing liquidity in the banking sector, but critics say it needs to do more, like delivering on much-needed economic reforms.

During the pandemic, several state governments suspended some labour regulations in a bid to revive industrial activity. But that is precisely the opposite of what authorities should be doing, says JustJobs Network's Dewan. "The idea that this would help businesses to succeed, when they weren't before is strange," she said. "We need to move away from encouraging low-paid, low productivity work and focus on ways to improve jobs and the economy as a whole."

While New Delhi has not announced specific measures for out-of-work youth, it has injected $5.3bn into its rural employment scheme as part of a COVID-19 stimulus package. It hopes this will provide incomes for the millions of jobless workers who left Indian cities and are for now, reluctant to leave their villages. By allocating funds towards loans for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises - the backbone of the economy - the government also expects to create jobs.

Those staring at an uncertain future hope it will not be too long before life gets back on track. Time is passing more slowly in the village and Mhatre says he is desperate to be back in Pune, "roaming around" with friends and hanging out in his favourite eating spots. "This lockdown has been like a jail," he said. "We feel stuck and totally powerless."

https://www.aljazeera.com/ajimpact/...outh-face-jobless-future-200706052703869.html
 
Last edited:
NEW DELHI (Reuters) - The medium-term outlook for the Indian economy remains uncertain with supply chains and demand yet to be restored fully while the trajectory of the coronavirus spread and the length of its impact remain unknown, Reserve Bank of India Governor Shaktikanta Das said on Saturday.

According to most estimates, the Indian economy will register a record contraction of over 4.5% in the current fiscal year that started on April 1 due to the pandemic.

Starting late March, the country was placed under one of the strictest lockdowns in the world for over two months. Since early June, the government has started easing restrictions to help some revival in the economy even though the number of infections in the country continues to rise.

“The Indian economy has started showing signs of getting back to normalcy in response to the staggered easing of restrictions,” Das said in an address to an online forum.

“It is, however, still uncertain when supply chains will be restored fully. How long will it take for demand conditions to normalise and what kind of durable effects will the pandemic leave behind on our potential growth?” he said.

Das said that the 2008 global crisis and the current crisis show that such economic shocks have “fatter tails” than generally believed, and that the country’s financial system should have larger capital buffers.

A recapitalisation plan for Indian banks is necessary as the economic impact of the pandemic may result in higher bad loans and erosion of capital for banks, the RBI governor added.

The central bank has cut policy rates by 115 basis points in response to the pandemic, resulting in a total policy rate reduction of 250 basis points since February 2019, along with providing liquidity of 9.57 trillion rupees ($127.28 billion).

It has also eased some bad loan provisioning norms and allowed loan moratoriums for retail customers.

Das said that the central bank has to carefully unwind the unusual monetary and regulatory measures taken to cushion the economic shocks in the post pandemic world, as the financial sector should return to normal functioning without relying on the regulatory relaxations as the new norm.

India recorded 27,114 coronavirus cases in the last 24 hours, taking the total to 820,915 including 22,123 dead.

The RBI governor also said that inflation will continue to moderate going forward and investment activity will revive.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...tent&utm_medium=trueAnthem&utm_source=twitter
 
Indians are returning to one of their oldest assets amid a raging pandemic that was preceded by a banking crisis, reports the BBC's Nidhi Rai.

To say Indians love gold would be an understatement. Over centuries, households - as well as temples - have hoarded the precious metal.

According to a World Gold Council estimate from last year, total gold reserves across Indian homes were about 25,000 tonnes - the largest in any country.

This time-tested investment has regained popularity as India's economy reels from the devastating effects of a global pandemic. When Covid-19 struck, India's $2.5tn (£1.9tn) economy was already sputtering because of a banking crisis.

One of the results has been a liquidity crunch, which has prompted many Indians to turn to gold as both investment and collateral.

And they are increasingly using it to raise funds, says commodity market expert Kunal Shah.

At a time when traditional bank loans are harder to come by, a hike in gold prices has helped fuel the popularity of these loans.

Gold prices surged 28% this year to more than 50,000 rupees ($668; £515) per 10 grams.

The leap in value is due to several reasons. For one, Western banks are printing currency and buying gold in the international market as long-term security. Two, stock markets around the world are volatile, spurring people to invest in gold, pushing its price up. And with interest rates in several countries in the negative territory, it's unprofitable to keep money in banks.

All of this has affected the price of gold, with experts saying its value is set to rise further in coming months.

Disha Dinesh Parab, from the western city of Pune, is among those who have relied on gold loans to keep their businesses afloat during the pandemic. For the last 10 years, she has been making and selling about 40 to 50 boxes of food a day. But in recent months - due to low demand in a partially open economy - she's had to slash her prices from $1 to 80 cents per lunch box and has only been able to sell a fourth of what she used to.

She says a gold loan was "the quickest and cheapest option available".

Ms Parab pawned six pieces of gold jewellery for a gold loan from a local cooperative bank for $3,340. She is paying interest of 9.15% per year for three years. If she had opted for a personal loan, she would have had to pay a higher interest rate - just over 11% - for the same period.

Farmers too are looking at gold loans as a boost. Housilal Malviya, a farmer in the western state of Maharashtra, borrowed more than $5,000 against gold to start sowing in his farms.

"We tried taking a loan from the banks but they asked too many questions and were reluctant, but the local cooperative bank was ready to help [with a gold loan]," he says.

Gold and personal loans both allow a borrower to use the funds however they wish. But for many, gold loans are the more accessible of the two - they require fewer documents, gold is often easily available with the home as an asset, and the loans currently have a higher value due to high gold prices.

Lower interest rates for gold loans are an added advantage - currently, interest rates begin at just over 7% and go up to 29%, depending on the tenure and repayment options. In comparison, interest on personal loans ranges between 8% and 26% per annum.

Gold loans are slated to grow at a much faster rate compared to personal loans. "We expect them to grow by 10 to 15% this year," says V P Nandakumar, CEO of Manappuram Finance, a non-banking finance company which specialises in gold lending.

Gold loans are also easier to access now as regular commercial banks have tightened their coffers. A history of bad lending decisions has left Indian banks with one of the world's highest ratios of bad loans. And the pandemic only made things worse, leaving banks concerned whether more and more borrowers are likely to default. The result: banks are not lending as much as they used to.

In 2019, Indian banks approved 6% more loans than the previous year, according to domestic rating agency Crisil. This year, they're expected to give just 1% more loans than usual - historically, the loan growth has been in double digits.

"Small companies are coming to us because bank loans will take time. They need short-term working capital as the lockdown dried up all the payment streams," says George Alexander Muthoot, managing director of Muthoot Finance, one of the largest gold loan companies in India.

Even regular banks that specialise in gold loans are reaping the benefits - Federal Bank and Indian Bank have seen a 10-fold rise in demand for gold loans, primarily in small cities and towns.

And experts predict that gold loans will continue to increase as prices go up. Before the lockdown in March, this price stood at $38 per gram - right now, it's around $44 per gram. So a gold loan now would fetch nearly $7 more per gram than it did in March.

"Higher gold prices make both the borrower and lender happy," says Somasundaram PR, managing director for India in the World Gold Council.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-53590846
 
India posts record fiscal deficit as coronavirus hits economy

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - India’s fiscal deficit touched a record $88.5 billion in the April-June quarter, 83.2% of the target for the whole of the current fiscal year, reflecting the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on tax collections and as the government front-loaded its spending.

The deficit is predicted by private economists to cross 7.5% of GDP in the 2020/21 fiscal year beginning April, from initial government estimates of 3.5%, due to a sharp economic contraction caused by the COVID-19 outbreak.

The economy is forecast to shrink 5.1% in the current fiscal year, and 9.1% under a worst-case scenario, according to analysts in a Reuters poll, its weakest performance since 1979.

Government data released on Friday showed total net federal tax receipts in three months through June declined more than 46% year-on-year to 1.35 trillion rupees ($18.05 billion), compared with 2.51 trillion rupees a year ago, even though taxes on fuel products have been increased.

The number of COVID-19 cases jumped to 1.64 million in India on Friday, while the death toll rose to 35,747.

Over three months, total expenditure rose 13% year-on-year to 8.16 trillion rupees, compared with 7.22 trillion rupees a year ago, as the government increased spending on free foodgrains and rural jobs programmes for millions of migrant workers.

Economists said a more than two months-long lockdown since late March has hurt economic activity in Asia’s third largest economy, impacting tax collections and the government’s plans to raise revenue through privatisations of state-run companies.

New Delhi has increased its market borrowings target to 12 trillion rupees for the current fiscal year, from earlier estimates of 7.8 trillion rupees, to fund the budgeted spending.
https://in.reuters.com/article/indi...cit-as-coronavirus-hits-economy-idINKCN24W1NN
 
New Delhi, India: Like many countries, India is experiencing a boom in demand for bicycles, as people shun public transport and gyms for fear of catching the novel coronavirus.

As a result, Inderjit Navyug should be a very happy man right now. But, his bicycle-parts factory in the city of Ludhiana in northern Punjab state has remained shut since late March when India went into lockdown to rein in the spread of the virus.

The nationwide shutdown was lifted in phases starting on June 8, but virus cases have surged past 3.3 million, making India the third-worst affected country globally. Some states, like Punjab, have decided to maintain some restrictions, and Navyug's 35 workers are afraid to return until the virus has been brought under control, he says.

"My sales have dropped completely," Navyug told Al Jazeera. His company had a revenue of $140,000 last year, and he is not hopeful of achieving anything near that this year. "I have sent money to the workers. I hope they'll rejoin next month," he said.

Navyug's firm is one of the hundreds of thousands of small Indian manufacturers whose business has been decimated by the virus. His plight is a reflection of the deep economic slump India is likely to face for some time.

India's economy - the world's fifth largest - had already been sputtering before the pandemic. But the lockdown, one of the world's strictest, crippled most economic and commercial activities.

The economy is expected to have shrunk by about 20 percent in the April-June quarter compared with the same period last year, likely setting a record, according to recent polls of economists by the Reuters and Bloomberg news agencies, capturing most of the lockdown period.

For the full financial year to end-March 2021, the Reuters survey predicts gross domestic product (GDP) will shrink by 5.1 percent, the weakest performance since 1979. The government is due to release its GDP data for the April-June quarter on Monday.

Rahul Bajoria, an economist at London-based lender Barclays, has an even more pessimistic outlook. In a research note this month, he said the economy probably shrank by 25.5 percent over the three months, which is worse than his earlier 22.2 percent contraction forecast.

"If you shut everything down for six to seven weeks, obviously everything is going to be impacted," Bajoria told Al Jazeera. "India's biggest challenge right now is how do you go back to a certain amount of normalcy and how do you grow from there?"

In an attempt to do that, India's finance minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, in May launched a $265bn fiscal stimulus package, which it said amounted to 10 percent of the country's GDP. But, economists say the actual amount of money spent is expected to be just 1 percent of total economic output and that it is unlikely to significantly boost consumer demand.

Business unusual
After the government began reopening the economy in phases on June 8, there was a noticeable jump in several sectors. Sales of passenger cars and motorbikes, among other goods, rose, as did electricity demand and commercial activity, including manufacturing. But those metrics have since started to slow down, a sign that, while the number of coronavirus cases continues to increase, the economy will not return to pre-pandemic levels, economists warn.

"Things can't be business as usual [while] the health crisis persists," said Bajoria, adding that even if all sectors of the economy, such as travel and tourism, opened up, people have to feel safe enough to want to pursue those activities.

"It's one thing [for] the government not allowing certain types of economic activity and it's another to see if people want to partake like they used to. Economic normalcy will only come when the health crisis appears under control."

While the economy has improved in comparison to where it was at the start of the lockdown, "the pace of the improvement is looking much shallower than what we were anticipating and that concerns us," said Barclays's Bajoria.

India informal economy
India's small- and medium-sized businesses, and its informal workers, are among the hardest-hit parts of the economy due to the coronavirus pandemic [File: Anushree Fadnavis/Reuters]
The other problem is that even as the country has opened up for business, sporadic local lockdowns continue. Because of its federal structure, individual states have a large degree of autonomy over whether they open parts of the economy allowed by New Delhi, or not.

Among the latest such decrees, Punjab imposed a night-time curfew from 7pm to 5am and a weekend lockdown from August 21 in all towns and villages across the state. On the same date, Haryana announced that only essential shops and offices will be allowed to operate on weekends.

Gurpargat S Kahlon, who manufactures auto parts in Ludhiana, mostly for export to the Middle East, Germany and the United States, is also feeling the effects of Punjab's measures.

He had already been dealing with a drop in orders, a shortage of workers and looming bank repayments, among other issues, during the nationwide lockdown. As a result, his two factories are running at half capacity, he said.

Now, with the 7pm curfew in place, he has to shut shop earlier than normal and expects annual revenue to halve to about $700,000.

"Our industry has been badly hit and now not even half the business is left and it's getting difficult to pay salaries," he told Al Jazeera, adding, "There's no sight on orders down the line and we can't go abroad to secure new orders and neither can they come here."

"That's the worst part right now," said Madan Sabnavis, chief economist at research firm CARE Ratings, adding that measures such as the ones Punjab are implementing are disrupting supply chains, limiting businesses from operating and increasing costs. "What they're doing is not serving any purpose," he told Al Jazeera.

CARE has predicted a 20.2 percent shrinkage in India's economy for the quarter ending June, citing a steep contraction in industrial activity including mining and quarrying, manufacturing, utility services and construction.

Selling the family silver?
The government is somewhat hamstrung in its ability to provide much more of a fiscal stimulus. The slowdown in activity has resulted in a 41 percent drop in tax collections, amounting to about $25bn for the quarter to end-June compared with the same period last year, according to CARE.

The government's measures to protect small businesses and rural populations are expected to result in a fiscal deficit - a shortfall between revenue and expenditure - amounting to 7.4 percent of GDP in 2020, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

That is a smaller gap than the IMF's 9.1 percent average forecast for emerging-market and middle-income countries.

But, India has already seen a cut in its credit rating and outlook by Moody's in June, and a change in outlook from the Fitch ratings agency. Analysts say the government is wary of increasing spending in case it results in more downgrades, pushing its cost of borrowing funds from international markets higher.

To raise the extra funds, one option could be to sell off some government assets, says Jagannarayan Padmanabhan, director at CRISIL Ltd, a unit of rating agency S&P Global.

In July, state-owned Indian Railways invited bids from private firms to operate some passenger trains, a step towards diluting its long-held monopoly. The government is inviting bids for 109 rail routes (which it calls origin and destination pairs) which will cover the major economic hubs of the country including, Mumbai, Bengaluru, New Delhi, Chennai, Howrah, among others, for an estimated investment of about $4bn.

"No doubt this is an opportunity with a fair amount of interest for the private sector," said Padmanabhan.

The vast network of Indian railways is tested daily with millions of passengers travelling on it. The private companies wading into this sector are being drawn in by the same incentives that helped India's budget airlines take off: the aspiration among Indian people for faster, more pleasant travel at an affordable price.

Achieving that balance will be the tricky part for any company getting involved, as Indian consumers are very price-conscious, warns Padmanabhan.

But ultimately, the "need for travel will continue, and if this is successful, the government can open this sector further and the initial set of operators [who bid for the routes] can catch the population in the first mover advantage," he added.

Padmanabhan has other suggestions to help the government not only find some revenue streams in the short term, but also help it meet an ambitious target of investing $1.4 trillion through the National Infrastructure Pipeline over the next five years to upgrade the country's ports, airports, railways and mass-transit metro systems. It also aims to provide affordable and clean energy as well as high-quality education and health services, among other investments.

"Where will you get so much money?" he asked.

If, given the current economic uncertainty, companies are unwilling to invest money in new projects, Padmanabhan suggests auctioning to them existing ones so the government can use those funds to create new infrastructure. "Milk the tier-one airports [and highways] and use that to fund regional airports, for instance. It can be one of the pillars of go-to market strategy," he said.

However, such strategies may not be useful in providing any immediate economic relief, other economists warn.

CARE Ratings' Sabnavis said: "These things will work over a period of time, and are good in the medium term to earn income but they won't be of any help to the economy right now."

https://www.aljazeera.com/ajimpact/...-storm-coronavirus-rages-200828084524932.html
 
The government will release the gross domestic product (GDP) numbers for the first quarter of the current financial year on Monday, which experts have said could be worst since the publication of quarterly data in 1996.

India’s economy is expected to contract mainly because the April-June 2020 quarter had seen more of the 68-day nationwide lockdown restrictions, which were enforced by the government from March 25 to contain the spread of the coronavirus disease (Covid-19) outbreak, according to experts.

Here is what the experts say about the GDP data:

* According to the Economy Watch, the monthly report published by consultancy firm EY India, the GDP growth in the first quarter (Q1) is also likely to be the worst among the four quarters of FY21.


* This implies that the economy may perform better in the successive three quarters of the current fiscal year.

* Ecowrap, a research report published by State Bank of India (SBI) on August 17, estimates Q1 FY21 GDP degrowth will be around -16.5%, though with the relevant caveats in the current uncertain scenario due to the pandemic.

* Economists in a Reuters poll predicted that gross domestic product in world’s fifth-largest economy will contract by 18.3% in the June quarter, compared to 3.1% growth in the previous quarter, the worst performance in at least eight years.

https://www.hindustantimes.com/busi...experts-say/story-Kmes4fMS2UzdmM010Iq0AN.html
* The same economists predict a contraction of 8.1% and 1.0% in the September and December quarters respectively, the agency said.

* Reuters also reported that Shilan Shah, India economist at Singapore’s Capital Economics, has said the economic damage caused by the coronavirus pandemic-related lockdowns was much worse in India than any other country in Asia.

* “Timely indicators show that the post-lockdown recovery is now stalling, underscoring the long and difficult road ahead for India’s economy,” Shah, who is predicting a 15% contraction in June quarter, said in a note on Friday.


* Reuters also reported that some private economists said the fiscal year that began in April could see a contraction of nearly 10%, the worst performance since Independence.

* According to economists surveyed by Bloomberg, data due later Monday will likely show GDP declined 18% in the quarter to June from a year ago.

* Rahul Bajoria, the Mumbai-based chief India economist at Barclays Plc, is estimating a 25.5% contraction in GDP last quarter given the “unprecedented blow to the economy” from the lockdown.


* “With the national lockdown measures being extended through all of April and May, and most states extending their own partial restrictions through all of June, the rural economy, government spending and essentials will likely be the only sectors mitigating some of the decline,” Bajoria said, according to Bloomberg.

* “The statistics office could announce GDP contraction of 17.5% year-on-year, which could subsequently be revised to a 25% contraction when the informal sector survey is available,” Pranjul Bhandari, chief India economist at HSBC Holdings Plc in Mumbai, was quoted as saying by Bloomberg.
 
Mumbai: South Asia’s biggest economy has been ineffective in stamping out the coronavirus outbreak and it will show up in its economic performance: India is set to lag regional peers in the race to recovery.

The relative success of Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh in containing the virus will help their economies recover at a faster pace than India, Capital Economics Ltd. said in a report to clients. India is now one of the world’s virus hotspots, with about 5.5 million cases.

“New cases per capita in these three economies are far lower than in India,” said Shilan Shah, senior economist at Capital Economics in Singapore. “This has enabled a faster rebound in activity.”

As a result, the drop in gross domestic product in 2020 will be much less severe in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. Whereas, India is expected to post a double-digit slump.

Although per capita testing is higher in India compared to its neighbors, the share of tests coming back positive have fallen in the three neighboring economies, suggesting genuine progress in getting the virus under control, according to Our World in Data figures produced by the University of Oxford and Global Change Data Lab.

“Whatever the reasons, the important point from the economic perspective is that the lower prevalence of cases has meant that containment measures have been scaled back at a quicker pace than in India,” said Shah.
 
COVID-19 may wipeout Indian, Mexican and Brazilian economies, UNCTAD warns

A report published by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCT) has warned that the global economy is likely to contract by 4.3 percent in 2020.

The report further noted that the looming economic crisis due to the COVID-19 may wipeout around USD 6 trillion global markets.

In its report titled From Global Pandemic to Prosperity for All: Avoiding Another Lost Decade, UNCTAD argues that “the idea that cuts in government spending can lead to economic growth – was an ineffective and ultimately destructive policy response to the 2008 global financial crisis, fostering weak demand, sluggish investment and tepid growth.”

IT notes that lockdowns worldwide have thrown economic challenges that the world has never seen before. The report predicts that the ongoing economic crisis may wipe out the Brazilian, Indian and Mexican economies.

"In the wake of these shocks the global economy will contract by an estimated 4.3 percent this year, leaving global output by year's end over USD 6 trillion short (in current US dollars) of what economists had expected it to be before the Covid-19 pathogen began to spread,” UNCTAD said.

"But the greatest economic and social damage will be in the developing world where levels of informality are high, there is continued reliance on a few commodities or tourism as a source of foreign exchange, and fiscal and policy space is limited," said UNCTAD report.

However, it cautioned that it is important to take calculated steps in the road to recovery. "Neither path is preordained. Building a better world is a matter of conviction and collective action. The lives of future generations and of the planet itself will depend on the choices we all take over the coming months," one official said while addressing the forum.

The UN expects that COVID-19 will push around 100 million people to extreme poverty in the developing world.

If governments opt for premature fiscal tightening in an attempt to bring down public debt and businesses adopt an aggressive cost-cutting strategy in an attempt to boost exports, the recovery will likely fizzle out, with a double-dip recession a real possibility in many countries in 2022,” it warned.

https://www.brecorder.com/news/4002...-mexican-and-brazilian-economies-unctad-warns
 
What exactly have the proved ?

Charitable trust not running away(although yes bankruptcy laws should be there),paying their employees.. etc etc?
How many scams or tax evasion issues are Tatas, Birlas involved in compared to others?
 
In Ahmedabad they set off fireworks, in Brisbane they drummed on dhols, even in Pakistan, India’s historical rival, fans and cricket luminaries labelled the against-the-odds victory against Australia astonishing.

Sharda Ugra in The Hindustan Times called them "the Unbreakables". Ajinkya Rahane's team may have had reached their zenith at the Gabba, but their rise was propelled for years by rising Indian confidence, new money and a removal of prohibitive restrictions on upward mobility.

The squad tells its own tale. Opener, Rohit Sharma, the son of a caretaker, Mohammed Siraj, the debutant bowler who played on after his father, a rickshaw driver, died while he was on tour. Washington Sundar, named after the man who sponsored his cricket education in Tamil Nadu, came to Australia as a backup bowler for the backup bowlers and finished striking boundaries around Brisbane. The 21-year-old had to borrow another player’s bat and pads.

Cricket, tied decades ago to caste and privilege in India, has been unleashed by years of economic forces that have moved the sport beyond the great spectacle that has always commanded the attention of its people to one where many more can aspire to play the sport professionally.

Rahane's team batted through quarantine, an injury list long enough to field another XI and racial taunts from Australian fans, to produce an unlikely win at a ground that Australia has not lost at in three decades.

"To go through quarantine, have multiple injuries right through the tour, to be bowled out for 36, our lowest score, and you come back to play like champions – it is unreal," said Indian coach Ravi Shastri. "What I've seen is unimaginable, the resolve and character the boys have shown is simply superb."

The way the young side handled themselves shows not just how a confident India might carry itself on a cricket field, but on a geopolitical and economic stage that is starting to catch up to the weight of its 1.4 billion people.

"There is a sense that essentially India's time has come," said Dr Pradeep Taneja, a fellow of the Australia India Institute at the University of Melbourne.

India’s economy is forecast to grow by more than 9 per cent in 2021, outpacing China as it deploys the COVID-19 vaccine, according to Nomura, after falling by more than 7 per cent during the coronavirus pandemic.

Driving it is surging digitisation, pharmaceutical production, automotive manufacturing and a young entrepreneurial small business sector that wants to see India innovate away from legacy industries and protectionism that have hobbled India's growth in the past.

"There is a new energy that these groups bring," said Taneja. "Over the last 10-15 years India has witnessed a rising confidence among its young people. The youth is highly motivated. You can see that reflected not just in cricket. But in technology and services where India is doing very well."

India now has the highest 4G mobile data use per smartphone in the world. Swathes of the country skipped fixed line connections in the 1990s and 2000s and went straight to mobile. Total traffic is projected to triple, reaching 21 exabytes per month in 2025, according to Ericsson.

“There was a time in India where very few people could travel overseas and still many people in small towns can’t afford it, but at the same time they are connected,” said Dr Taneja. “They can see consumer development, trends, fashion and sports. They are creating new ideas, which is an important part of driving the economic story.”

Despite the optimism, the tens of thousands of farmers who have camped outside the capital New Delhi show the deep structural issues still facing the country.

The protests have seen thousands of farmers rotate through sickness and exhaustion, enduring torrential rain to block New Delhi's main entry points since November.

The agriculture sector accounts for more than 50 per cent of the workforce but only 17 per cent of its GDP.

The farmers are angry at a proposal from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi that aims to make changes to the mandated minimum support price that the government buys crops at, while allowing them to sell to the private sector in the hope of the industry becoming more productive.

India’s Supreme Court will now decide if the legislation can be enacted in a country where reform is notoriously slow, and the world’s sixth largest economy is 144th on a per capita basis.

"In the long term the government's objective is to reduce the number of people engaged in agriculture to free up more people for industrialisation," said Taneja.

Targeted deregulation has been good to India and cricket before.

As part of the last wave of economic liberalisation measures in the 1990s, the Rao government ended the national TV monopoly for state broadcaster Doordarshan in 1991. The move saw an explosion in TV channels. They now number 857.

The advertising revenue that began to swell through cricket and fierce competition for broadcast rights eventually led to the Indian Premier League, a competition now worth $9 billion. The IPL along with the enormous viewer numbers that an Indian national side can guarantee have made the India the global cricket juggernaut that it is today. It allowed it to invest in grassroots cricket and turned the attention of millions more potential players to the more broadcast friendly three-hour version of the game.

With money came influence. India now dominates the International Cricket Council, once the domain of England and Australia, commanding playing schedules and broadcast rights, accounting for up to 80 per cent of the world’s cricket revenue. It threatened to walk away from the ICC if it did not get its way, a high stakes move that worked. It signalled the beginning of what Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar called India’s transition from “balancing power” to a “leading power”.

"It’s a highly visible showcase of the political effects of economic power, where sheer market size creates new forms of leverage," noted Dr Alyssa Ayres, the former deputy US secretary of state for south Asia in 2015 in the Octavian Report.

"India has not yet reached the point where its economic health is crucial to global prosperity. But as it grows faster, and as China slows, India has the opportunity to raise its importance to the slower-growing developed economies of the industrialised world.

"If India becomes even remotely as indispensable to the world economy as it has become to the cricket economy, it will have the throw-weight to demand changes in the world order to accommodate its goals. That may be India’s future as it seeks to transform itself into a leading global power."

India, through it fractious relationship with its neighbour China is increasingly making its geopolitical presence felt. As China accelerates its rollout of a COVID-19 vaccine to its economic partners, India this week began producing doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine to deliver to its neighbours in Bhutan, Maldives, Bangladesh, Nepal, Myanmar and Seychelles.

The Indian government has been lobbying for years without success to be given a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council.

"One of the things India feels about the international system, whether it is sports or politics, is that the international system has not been fair to India," said Taneja.

"India has a different point of view to China. It's temperament is democratic, India makes a claim based on facts. But given India's economy is growing, it has 1.4 billion people and India's diaspora is now the world's largest. There is a sense that India should be given its due."

https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/i...t-for-a-troubled-economy-20210120-p56vmd.html
 
A billion for every chip-maker who 'makes in India,' sources say


India is offering more than $1 billion in cash to each semiconductor company that sets up manufacturing units in the country as it seeks to build on its smartphone assembly industry and strengthen its electronics supply chain, two officials said.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'Make in India' drive has helped to turn India into the world's second-biggest mobile manufacturer after China. New Delhi believes it is time for chip companies to set up in the country.
"The government will give cash incentives of more than $1 billion to each company which will set up chip fabrication units," a senior government official told Reuters, declining to be named as he was not authorised to speak with media.


"We're assuring them that the government will be a buyer and there will also be mandates in the private market (for companies to buy locally-made chips)."
How to disburse the cash incentives has yet to be decided and the government has asked the industry for feedback, said a second government source, who also declined to be identified.
Governments across the world are subsidising the construction of semiconductor plants as chip shortages hobble the auto and electronics industries and highlight the world's dependence on Taiwan for supplies.
India also wants to establish reliable suppliers for its electronics and telecom industry to cut dependence on China following border skirmishes last year.
Chips made locally will be designated as "trusted sources" and can be used in products ranging from CCTV cameras to 5G equipment, the first source said.
But the sources did not say whether particular semiconductor companies have shown interest in setting up units in India. India's technology ministry did not respond to a request for comment.


India has previously tried to woo semiconductor players but firms were deterred by India's wobbly infrastructure, unstable power supply, bureaucracy and poor planning. The renewed government push to lure chipmakers is more likely to succeed, following the success of the smartphone industry,
industry insiders say.
Moreover, Indian conglomerates, such as the Tata Group, have also expressed interest in moving into electronics and high-tech manufacturing.
India in December invited an "expression of interest" from chipmakers for setting up fabrication units in the country or for the acquisition of such manufacturing units overseas by an Indian company or consortium.
The government extended the last date of submission for that expression of interest to end-March from January 31, given the level of industry demand, the government source said.
A consortium of investors led by Abu Dhabi-based fund Next Orbit Ventures has shown interest in setting up in India, an auto industry source said. Next Orbit did not respond to a request for comment.


A shortage of chips is holding back India's auto sector just when it sees early signs of a recovery in demand after sales plunged in 2020 because of the pandemic.
Indian technology ministry officials met executives from the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM), a leading auto industry body, earlier this year to assess car makers' demand for chips, three auto industry sources said on condition of anonymity. The government estimates it would cost roughly $5-$7 billion to set up a chip fabrication unit in India and take 2-3 years after all the approvals are in place, one of the auto industry sources said.
The source added that New Delhi is willing to offer companies concessions, including waivers on customs duty, research and development expenses and interest free loans.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/a-billion-for-every-chip-maker-who-makes-in-india-sources-say/articleshow/81776800.cms
 
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/int...sitharaman-2403499?pfrom=home-ndtv_topstories

No Interest Cut On Small Savings, "Orders Issued By Oversight"

New Delhi: Steep cuts on interest rates on small savings schemes, announced last evening, were rolled back by the government today with Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman declaring that "orders issued by oversight" would be withdrawn. The cuts in schemes ranging from the National Savings Certificates or NSC and Public Provident Fund or PPF, would have hurt millions of middle class depositors.

"Interest rates of small savings schemes of the government of India shall continue to be at the rates which existed in the last quarter of 2020-2021, ie, rates that prevailed as of March 2021. Orders issued by oversight shall be withdrawn," Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman tweeted this morning.
 
Oversight?

Really? Or assembly election worries?

We're being ruled by a bunch of clowns in turn being led by clown-in-chief!
 
Charitable trust not running away(although yes bankruptcy laws should be there),paying their employees.. etc etc?
How many scams or tax evasion issues are Tatas, Birlas involved in compared to others?

Response one year late. :P

They are all the same, having worked directly/as clients for Tata's for years I know not everything they is do is what you can call ethical. I know off at least 2 instances TCS was banned for bidding for Govt projects in Mumbai cos they were caught bribing, but that never became news and they continue to get preference for Govt projects. The only big difference is they spend on PR more than any other company .

A friend of mine was PRO for Rajasthan Royals, told me when RR was involved with fixing how while everyone associated with them was dragged into it but for TCS. if you ask her, Amitabh banchan and Tatas are best managed brands in India, you simply cant write anything negative about them.

As for paying employees, not sure any of Tata companies are known for being good pay masters .people work there as its mostly Govt like culture. As for taking care of employees, TCS lays of thousands of people every year and they have never made a loss in a quarter, but somehow its ok when a profit making company does this for what, more profits? but its criminal when some one like Vijay malya after his company going bankrupt fails to pay his employees .
I image built by media is the only difference, otherwise they are all there for profits and rightly so.
I remember a couple of years back seeing these watsaap forwards about how Azim Premji dint take salary and comparisons with other industry heads who took crores home. How stupid is this country? if I remember correctly Premji took home a dividend pay of ~900 crore that year.
 
Response one year late. :P

They are all the same, having worked directly/as clients for Tata's for years I know not everything they is do is what you can call ethical. I know off at least 2 instances TCS was banned for bidding for Govt projects in Mumbai cos they were caught bribing, but that never became news and they continue to get preference for Govt projects. The only big difference is they spend on PR more than any other company .

A friend of mine was PRO for Rajasthan Royals, told me when RR was involved with fixing how while everyone associated with them was dragged into it but for TCS. if you ask her, Amitabh banchan and Tatas are best managed brands in India, you simply cant write anything negative about them.

As for paying employees, not sure any of Tata companies are known for being good pay masters .people work there as its mostly Govt like culture. As for taking care of employees, TCS lays of thousands of people every year and they have never made a loss in a quarter, but somehow its ok when a profit making company does this for what, more profits? but its criminal when some one like Vijay malya after his company going bankrupt fails to pay his employees .
I image built by media is the only difference, otherwise they are all there for profits and rightly so.
I remember a couple of years back seeing these watsaap forwards about how Azim Premji dint take salary and comparisons with other industry heads who took crores home. How stupid is this country? if I remember correctly Premji took home a dividend pay of ~900 crore that year.

Spot on @ Tata
I have high regards for them (as an ex employee) but they are no better or worse than any other old business house of India. Tata's are untouchables because of the long running charitable work they do and due to the whatsapp fb messages factory which attribute all the quotes to Ratan Tata (even the ones quoted by people long dead).
Tata does run charities but to tell the truth this is done by many other business houses too.
Brand image propping is done only to increase the sales and keep the closely held minority Parsi community safe from allegations of hoarding money. The ultimate benefactor for Tata's profits is Tata Sons (their two trusts and nobody can trace how much % of that money is used for charity). Even the parsi don't know and they will never complain. The only person who was looking to clean up the governance issues was ousted in a board room coup.
 
A billion for every chip-maker who 'makes in India,' sources say


India is offering more than $1 billion in cash to each semiconductor company that sets up manufacturing units in the country as it seeks to build on its smartphone assembly industry and strengthen its electronics supply chain, two officials said.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 'Make in India' drive has helped to turn India into the world's second-biggest mobile manufacturer after China. New Delhi believes it is time for chip companies to set up in the country.
"The government will give cash incentives of more than $1 billion to each company which will set up chip fabrication units," a senior government official told Reuters, declining to be named as he was not authorised to speak with media.


"We're assuring them that the government will be a buyer and there will also be mandates in the private market (for companies to buy locally-made chips)."
How to disburse the cash incentives has yet to be decided and the government has asked the industry for feedback, said a second government source, who also declined to be identified.
Governments across the world are subsidising the construction of semiconductor plants as chip shortages hobble the auto and electronics industries and highlight the world's dependence on Taiwan for supplies.
India also wants to establish reliable suppliers for its electronics and telecom industry to cut dependence on China following border skirmishes last year.
Chips made locally will be designated as "trusted sources" and can be used in products ranging from CCTV cameras to 5G equipment, the first source said.
But the sources did not say whether particular semiconductor companies have shown interest in setting up units in India. India's technology ministry did not respond to a request for comment.


India has previously tried to woo semiconductor players but firms were deterred by India's wobbly infrastructure, unstable power supply, bureaucracy and poor planning. The renewed government push to lure chipmakers is more likely to succeed, following the success of the smartphone industry,
industry insiders say.
Moreover, Indian conglomerates, such as the Tata Group, have also expressed interest in moving into electronics and high-tech manufacturing.
India in December invited an "expression of interest" from chipmakers for setting up fabrication units in the country or for the acquisition of such manufacturing units overseas by an Indian company or consortium.
The government extended the last date of submission for that expression of interest to end-March from January 31, given the level of industry demand, the government source said.
A consortium of investors led by Abu Dhabi-based fund Next Orbit Ventures has shown interest in setting up in India, an auto industry source said. Next Orbit did not respond to a request for comment.


A shortage of chips is holding back India's auto sector just when it sees early signs of a recovery in demand after sales plunged in 2020 because of the pandemic.
Indian technology ministry officials met executives from the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM), a leading auto industry body, earlier this year to assess car makers' demand for chips, three auto industry sources said on condition of anonymity. The government estimates it would cost roughly $5-$7 billion to set up a chip fabrication unit in India and take 2-3 years after all the approvals are in place, one of the auto industry sources said.
The source added that New Delhi is willing to offer companies concessions, including waivers on customs duty, research and development expenses and interest free loans.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/a-billion-for-every-chip-maker-who-makes-in-india-sources-say/articleshow/81776800.cms

Excellent initiative! This is how nations prosper and build-up their international profile. Unfortunately, Pakistani leadership is all about making big claims and telling people to relive Ertugrul’s days of blood and gore.
 
The most insecure (mentally) Pakistanis are the ones who persistently compare themselves to India.

Pass the Kleenex bruv.
 
Response one year late. :P

They are all the same, having worked directly/as clients for Tata's for years I know not everything they is do is what you can call ethical. I know off at least 2 instances TCS was banned for bidding for Govt projects in Mumbai cos they were caught bribing, but that never became news and they continue to get preference for Govt projects. The only big difference is they spend on PR more than any other company .

A friend of mine was PRO for Rajasthan Royals, told me when RR was involved with fixing how while everyone associated with them was dragged into it but for TCS. if you ask her, Amitabh banchan and Tatas are best managed brands in India, you simply cant write anything negative about them.

As for paying employees, not sure any of Tata companies are known for being good pay masters .people work there as its mostly Govt like culture. As for taking care of employees, TCS lays of thousands of people every year and they have never made a loss in a quarter, but somehow its ok when a profit making company does this for what, more profits? but its criminal when some one like Vijay malya after his company going bankrupt fails to pay his employees .
I image built by media is the only difference, otherwise they are all there for profits and rightly so.
I remember a couple of years back seeing these watsaap forwards about how Azim Premji dint take salary and comparisons with other industry heads who took crores home. How stupid is this country? if I remember correctly Premji took home a dividend pay of ~900 crore that year.

Its better than govt job actually!!
 
Why CitiBank is selling its India business and who will be willing to buy


Even as it has decided to sell off the retail accounts and credit cards business, the bank has indicated that there won’t be any layoffs or closure of offices in India.

Even as it has decided to sell off the retail accounts and credit cards business, the bank has indicated that there won’t be any layoffs or closure of offices in India.

US banking major Citigroup, a leading foreign bank in India, on Thursday announced its exit from the consumer banking business in the country (along with 12 other countries) as part of a global strategy to focus on institutional business. The bank has, however, said that it will continue with its wealth management and institutional business in India. Even as it has decided to sell off the retail accounts and credit cards business, the bank has indicated that there won’t be any layoffs or closure of offices in India.

What is the scale of Citibank’s business in India?

Having started its India operations in 1902, Citibank serves 2.9 million retail customers with 1.2 million bank accounts. It has 2.2 million credit card accounts with around 6 per cent market share of retail credit card spends in the country.

Citibank India has 35 branches and as of the year ended March 2020, the bank had advances aggregating to Rs 66,507 crore and deposits worth Rs 157,869 crore.

The bank said that for the Citi franchise in India (Citi) in aggregate, total assets, including credit extended to Indian institutional clients from offshore Citi entities, stood at Rs 299,250 crore as on March 31, 2020.

In the year ended March 2020, the bank reported a net profit of Rs 4,918 crore. Bulk of the profit, however, came from the bank’s other income. While its profit on exchange transactions stood at a net of Rs 2,334 crore in FY’20, the bank earned income of Rs 1,727 crore in commission, exchange and brokerage during the year.

Why is Citi selling its consumer banking business?

Many feel the reason for selling the consumer banking business is that the profits of the consumer banking business have been under stress and a lot more capital was needed to run that business. “Citibank could not scale retail consumer franchise in India as it did not ‘glocalise’ fast enough,” said a banker.

Citigroup global Chief Executive Jane Fraser on Thursday said it will exit 13 international consumer banking markets, including India and China, shifting its focus to wealth management and away from retail banking in places where it is small.

Ashu Khullar, CEO, Citi India, said, “Citi has been a deeply embedded institution in India and the sharpened strategy announced today will strengthen our ability to bring the full global power of Citi to our institutional clients, reinforcing our leading positions across corporate, commercial and investment banking, treasury and trade solutions, as well as markets and securities services.” Citi’s commercial banking segment serves over 3,000 clients.

What did Citi bring to India and what does the franchise offer?

Citibank popularised the concept of credit cards and ATMs in India in the ‘80s. Many feel that alongside the assets, the acquirer of the bank will get high net worth clients and bank accounts. Some bankers say that while Citibank credit card programme could be a valuable proposition in this entire M&A, Citi franchisee could interest many because of its high quality SOPs, trained staff and product development capabilities among others.


Who will be interested in buying Citi’s consumer banking business in India?

Bankers say several mid-sized banks in India would be interested in buying Citi’s consumer banking business as it would provide them with scale. Industry insiders, however, point towards various models. While it could be tough to find a big buyer who can acquire the license in current times, the new buyer will also have to clear the fit and proper criteria of the Reserve Bank of India. The more feasible option could be ‘Sum of The Parts’ valuation approach where business segments would be valued independently and taken up by interested parties. So, if some bank is interested in its mortgage business, it can go for that and someone who is interested in the card business, can go for it.

What does it mean for the bank’s account holders?

The bank has said as of now there will be no change in the bank’s operations and they will continue to serve their clients with the same care and dedication that they do today. Also, the bank has clearly said that it is not closing down the consumer business in India and its plans is to sell off the business.

This means that while Citi will continue to serve its account holders for now, they would be serviced by the acquirer, once the sale concludes.

As for Citi Gold clients (most premium customers of the bank) who are serviced by Citigroup globally for their international needs, a banker said Citi may enter into a deal with the acquirer in India and offer them to continue to serve those clients for their international requirements.

https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-why-citibank-is-selling-its-india-business-and-who-will-be-willing-to-buy-7276086/
 
MUMBAI: India’s economy contracted 7.3 per cent in 2020-21, official data showed on Monday, its worst recession since independence as coronavirus lockdowns put millions out of work.

Asia’s third-largest economy grew by 1.6pc between January and March — the fourth fiscal quarter — after exiting its first “technical recession” since 1947 following two successive quarters of contraction.

About 230 million Indians fell into poverty due to the pandemic last year, according to a study by Bangalore’s Azim Premji University, which defined the poor as those living on less than 375 Indian rupees ($5) a day.

An easing of restrictions towards the end of 2020 helped propel a tentative recovery in activity, but this may prove short-lived following an explosion in Covid-19 cases in April and May.

India’s vicious second wave, which has killed 160,000 people in eight weeks, prompted further lockdowns and saw 7.3m people lose their jobs in April alone, according to the Centre for Monitoring the Indian Economy.

That means more pain in a country where 90pc of the workforce is in the informal sector with no social safety net, and where millions do not qualify for emergency government rations.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government has so far refrained from announcing any fresh major stimulus measures in response.

The government has faced growing criticism — including from Nobel prize-winning economists Esther Duflo and Abhijit Banerjee — for focusing on loans to hard-hit businesses rather than direct cash handouts to vulnerable households.

In a recent report, British financial services firm Barclays pegged the economic cost of India’s second wave at $74 billion, or 2.4pc of GDP.

But helped by output having slumped so much last year, the headline figures for the current fiscal year will still appear strong.

India’s central bank is projecting annual growth of 10.5pc and the International Monetary Fund 12.5pc, the fastest among major economies.

Continuous uncertainty

“We expect 10 per cent GDP growth in FY22, with a slight downside bias,” Upasna Bhardwaj, Senior Economist at Kotak Mahindra Bank, told AFP.

But she warned that analysts would “have to revisit this expectation much more often, given it depends on the pace of vaccinations and the pace of restrictions”.

“While the situation this year is not as bad as the national lockdown last year, the economy is coming under a lot of stress due to localised restrictions, which we expect to continue into the rest of the year.”

India’s economy was in the throes of a prolonged slowdown even before Covid-19 struck, but the pandemic affected years of gains.

An estimated 50m Indians were expected to climb out of poverty last year. But instead the poorest 20pc of households lost their entire income in April and May as business ground to a halt.

The stringent months-long nationwide lockdown put around 100 million people out of work, according to a report by Azim Premji University, with around 15pc unable to find jobs even by the end of the year.

Namdev Sakpal, 43, lost his job at tour operator Thomas Cook last year and has spent months trying to find work.

“With the local trains not functioning I can’t even go looking for jobs.

Everything is closed,” the father-of-three said.

A former sous-chef at a top Mumbai hotel said he was put on unpaid leave last June and has yet to resume work.

“The lockdowns are causing continuous uncertainty for all our jobs,” said Prateek, who declined to give his full name.

“We were told that we will get called back to work soon, but the lockdowns keep getting extended.”

Experts say the second wave, which has burrowed into India’s ill-equipped villages, could spark a fresh crisis among an impoverished population already reeling from last year’s shutdown.

“This time, unlike the last time, income destruction has been universal — both rural and urban India has been affected,” said Arvind Singhal, chairman of Technopak Advisors.

“The 200 million poorest families should be given cash directly. And that needs to be given right now, not later.”

India has recorded 28m coronavirus cases so far and distributed 213m doses of the Covid-19 jab, with its massive vaccination programme facing delays and shortages.

Published in Dawn, June 1st, 2021
 
1 Crore Indians Lost Their Jobs During Second Wave Of COVID; 97% Households' Incomes Declined

Over 10 million Indians have lost their jobs because of the second wave of COVID-19, and around 97 per cent of households’ incomes have declined since the beginning of the pandemic


Over 10 million Indians have lost their jobs because of the second wave of COVID-19, and around 97 per cent of households’ incomes have declined since the beginning of the pandemic last year, according to the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE).

The unemployment rate measured by the think-tank is expected to come at 12 per cent at the end of May as against 8 per cent in April.

This signifies that about 10 million or 1 crore Indians have lost jobs in this period.

Pandemic and sudden loss of employment daily-wagers, labourers and low-paid job holders
Reuters

Stating that the main reason for the job losses is “mainly the second wave” of COVID-19 infections. As the economy opens up, part of the problem will be solved but not entirely.

CMIE chief executive Mahesh Vyas explained that people who lose jobs find it hard to get employment, specifying that while the informal sector jobs come back quickly, the formal sector and better quality job opportunities take up to a year to come back.

Unemployment rate had touched a record high of 23.5 per cent in May 2020 because of the national lockdown. Many experts opine that the second wave of infections has peaked and states will slowly start to ease the economic activity-impacting restrictions in a calibrated fashion.

https://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/1-crore-indians-lost-their-jobs-during-second-wave-of-covid-97-households-incomes-declined-541693.html
 
Back
Top