HalBass9
Local Club Regular
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2024
- Runs
- 1,417
So Martians came and voted for Obama ( twice ) ?
Lol. Acting smart and yet so ignorant.
Think about how you want to support slaughtering of over 200k Indians.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So Martians came and voted for Obama ( twice ) ?
Lol. Acting smart and yet so ignorant.
Think about how you want to support slaughtering of over 200k Indians.
You seem overly desperate to gain approval from Muslims, attempting to justify and make excuses for a politician who suggests that over 200,000 Indian citizens should be slaughtered over religious beliefs.
You don’t need my approval or anyone else’s to try and downplay your extremist views, but anyone with a shred of humanity will never agree with you.
Do as you wish, and I’m sure you’ll get a few likes from your fellow Hindutva supporters. You’ve made your stance clear, and there’s nothing more to add.
200k Indians were not slaughtered over religious beliefs.
But Al Qaida Isis LeT JeM Hamas etc have slaughtered many more over religious beliefs.
I think we both know which country slaughtered 3 million people and raped 200,000 women from their own country.Where were 200k Indians slaughtered?
True, BJP and Sanatan will make sure of that. <3Just like Nazi Party faced their demise, I also expect BJP to collapse at some point.
In human history, no evil empire/state lasted for long.
Lol. Acting smart and yet so ignorant.
True, BJP and Sanatan will make sure of that. <3
How is he ignorant? How do you explain Americans voting Obama as their President twice if there is racism in USA?Lol. Acting smart and yet so ignorant.
Think about how you want to support slaughtering of over 200k Indians.
I hope, though you can never be sure with Hindutva followers,that, unlike your fellow supporter ‘uppercut,’ you don’t condone a BJP leader suggesting that over 200,000 Indians should be slaughtered simply because they may or may not have had a steak sandwich.
And enough with “what about this” lol.
lol. No sir. No one is disrespecting Hindu by having a steak just as no one disrespect Muslims by having pork chops. Everyone is practicing their beliefs in a civilized society.
Your extremist beliefs have made you mentally handicapped to realize that simple fact.
Killing a cow is a criminal offence in India.
How is he ignorant?
How is he ignorant? How do you explain Americans voting Obama as their President twice if there is racism in USA?
since I am not a Muslim, by default everything that I say is not true even if it is in the context of International relationships .. that's how he and most Muslims process responses from Indian posters
except that the pig is not equivalent to a cow in the context of Hindu/muslim conflict ( unless you claim to be a animal rights activist ... lol )
lol.
Both has to do with religion.
This is off topic stuff so please bump some other thread.But in your religion the pig has the exact opposite stature to what the cow has in Hinduism.
So if you want to make a comparison it would have to be with something that you consider sacred according to your beliefs and not with a pig that is actually despised or reviled and has no sanctity.
So you tell me what is the most sacred thing/belief per your religion that you expect non-muslims to respect unconditionally.
Drawing the prophets picture is the Closest that I can think of that comes remotely close to harming a cow ( the cow is actually far more sacred than that ).
Yes you are ignorant not because you are not Muslim but because you want to impose religious supremacy and those who do not agree with you then you have made it clear to support slaughtering as a last resort. That is ignorance, unless one is Hindutva.
Wah ji wah ... here you are labeling me as religious supremacist when it is you who is stubbornly refusing to respect Hindu beliefs and are not even apologetic about it ... in fact you openly support those who engage in such acts of religious intolerance and expect me to to tolerate that because in your mind it is your right to actually not respect Hindu beliefs. Classic case of bigotry.
This is like a thief claiming that thievery is his right and expects compliance from the Police.
But in your religion the pig has the exact opposite stature to what the cow has in Hinduism.
So if you want to make a comparison it would have to be with something that you consider sacred according to your beliefs and not with a pig that is actually despised or reviled and has no sanctity.
So you tell me what is the most sacred thing/belief per your religion that you expect non-muslims to respect unconditionally.
Drawing the prophets picture is the Closest that I can think of that comes remotely close to harming a cow ( the cow is actually far more sacred than that ).
For Muslim to draw is prohibited, for Muslim to kill over it isn’t acceptable.
This is a complete lie. Just lookup how many Islamic countries have capital punishment for blasphemy including Pakistan.
And BTW the Cow is actually worshiped as it is considered to be the abode of ALL hindu gods. So it is a far more important and sacred practice than the ban on drawing prophet.
This is a complete lie. Just lookup how many Islamic countries have capital punishment for blasphemy including Pakistan.
And BTW the Cow is actually worshiped as it is considered to be the abode of ALL hindu gods. So it is a far more important and sacred practice than the ban on drawing prophet.
Cow could be ultimate supreme power in the world but no one should be supporting to slaughter over 200k over it.
This is a complete lie. Just lookup how many Islamic countries have capital punishment for blasphemy including Pakistan.
And BTW the Cow is actually worshiped as it is considered to be the abode of ALL hindu gods. So it is a far more important and sacred practice than the ban on drawing prophet.
But even large proportions of Hindus don't believe that, so why would it be part of legislation?
Its about time you realize that the real world out there is much different from the utterly idiotic views that you have formed.
Interesting that your response didn't even attempt to address what I actually said.
It did ... it went straight to the root of the Problem Which is your faulty process of forming views
Still going full on ad hominem to skirt the point I see.
whatever I said about you is factually correct
Guys steer away from personal jibes and stick to the thread topic thanks.The topic is not me, neither can you prove any of your rants about me are factually correct.
Just stick to the topic and address that rather than the posters please.
Guys steer away from personal jibes and stick to the thread topic thanks.
Again find a way to upgrade from Neanderthal to homo-sapien and there wont be a need for anyone to seek corrective measures.... very simple solution really.
You can do it and science has proven that it can be done.
I’m not sure what you’re trying to convey here. Everyone on this forum is a Homo sapien.
Among them, only supporters of Hindutva are promoting and backing a politician who advocates slaughtering fellow humans over an animal, a behavior reminiscent of Neanderthals, who acted that way due to a lack of civilization.
It appears you’re struggling to defend those who support such massacres, which explains your immature comments and attempts to twist the meanings of words.
Absolutely not. Because otherwise you would have realized by now That cows are very Sacred for hindus and you need to be respectful of people who believe in that... just as there is an unwritten Expectation from Hindus to be respectful of Muslim beliefs and sensitivities
You, along with the majority of Hindutva supporters, have made it clear that you lack respect not only for fellow human beings but also for other religions, especially when you label anyone who disagrees with your beliefs as an ‘animal.’
Cows may be sacred to Hindus, but that is not the case for the rest of the world.
No one is asking Hindus to sacrifice a cow, just as Hindus don’t object when shopping at grocery stores that sell sliced steak.
Once Again if you lack the basic decency to respect others beliefs and worse double down on your primitive behavior despite being told in multiple different ways you cannot expect to be treated in civilized norms.
Not in India
Again not in India.
No one is forcing Hindus to sacrifice animals, yet Hindutva ideologies advocate for the persecution of fellow citizens, labeling them as ‘animals.’ This appears to reflect a primitive mindset rooted in Hindutva.
Their belief system seems territorial, willing to target individuals within India over a steak, but unbothered when shopping at stores abroad that openly sell the same. This suggests that Hindutva prioritizes enforcing religious supremacy within India, while their beliefs take a backseat outside the country.
This raises a question, Is the belief system inherently weak, or is the drive to impose religious dominance over those they label as ‘animals’ stronger? It cannot be both.
Once again It is our religious responsibility to protect cows. There is a reason why it a punishable offense IN INDIA. What part of it do you not understand? Ask me and I will explain it for the Nth time using smaller simpler words.
This Whataboutery has been explained extensively in other threads.
Every religion carries its responsibilities, but no one should advocate for the massacre of thousands or condone lynching.
While Hinduism reveres cows, it is highly doubtful that Hinduism itself promotes violence against those who consume beef.
Such actions are more aligned with Hindutva, a radicalized interpretation of the faith. Present day India appears to be leaning towards a radicalized religious ideology, something many followers of other faiths have been striving to distinguish themselves from.
The only explanation that was received was that, it’s not India, it sound more like an excuse to support the threats of mass murder.
Hold on ... if you want to go down the advocating business ... we need to start from the very beginning. This whole nonsense starts because Muslims have ABSOLUTELY NO COMPUNCTIONS, MORALS , OR ETHICS when it comes to respecting Hindu beliefs ( Hence why categorized as Animals ). Now MOST importantly this despicable behavior pattern is going on for CENTURIES !!!!
Now, if you object to that classification then the first order of business should be that YOU start first practicing the concept of decency, common courtesy and respect towards others beliefs (which is the basic expectation of any human being)
So therefore why are Cows being harmed in India in the first place even in 2024? Shouldn't prevention and unconditional condemnation of such despicable acts be the first and ONLY order of business ? Answer that CLEARLY if you are so big on civilized behavior.
Why do you think its a Punishable offense then ? You think someone randomly made up that law for no good reasons?
Yeah its quite remarkable how YOU JUST COMPLETELY ignore the fact that this is being going on for centuries and that all civilized means have been tried. What part of there is no other choice left that you do not understand ?
So in other words you need to be having this discussion with your fellow from your religion who are soo brazen and blatant that they don't have any compunctions in harming cows IN INDIA in 2024!! Why are you even expecting a different outcome for such brazen thuggery ?
I doubt anyone would take a lecture on compulsion, morals, and ethics from someone who refers to fellow human beings as ‘animals’ and supports a politician advocating for the slaughter of thousands simply because they hold different beliefs, in 2024, no less. You don’t need to look far back, just take a good look in the mirror.
Once again It is our religious responsibility to protect cows. There is a reason why it a punishable offense IN INDIA.
Not just Kerala, these are several other Indian states/UTs where cow slaughter isn't a punishable offence,If that is true, then why are there states where it is not punishable offence? Like Kerala for example?
What came first the animal behavior of Muslims for centuries or the response from Hindus ?
Go ahead tell me why cows are being harmed in the first place ? I have asked that question a dozens times and you doggedly DO NOT JUST ANSWER THAT BUT EXPECT ALL NICETIES OF CIVILIZED NORMS FROM HINDUS IN RESPONSE. THAT IS CLASSIC ANIMAL BEHAVIOR.
Go ahead answer that question if you are soo certain that you are on the right side of this debate.
Jews are allowed to sacrifice cows as long as they follow their religious teachings and believe it to be the most respectful way to perform the ritual.
Muslims are also permitted to sacrifice cows, provided they adhere to their religious guidelines and view the act as respectful.
Christians generally believe in stunning animals before slaughter, considering it the most humane and respectful method of sacrifice.
Hindus typically revere cows and believe they should not be sacrificed. While most Hindus uphold this principle, there seems to be no widely recognized scripture in Hinduism that advocates violence or the killing of those who consume beef. Such a scripture is highly unlikely to exist in Hinduism, I’m almost 100% certain though I could be mistaken.
Hindutva ideology, however, has been linked to acts of lynching and support for politicians who endorse violence, including the mass killing of individuals, simply for consuming beef.
In a historical context, if we consider the question of who has more “right” over a cow, Hindutva extremist bigotry ranks at the very bottom. Hindutva extremism is a relatively recent phenomenon, arising long after other religions had established practices involving the consumption of beef and after many in India converted to Islam.
Let’s not try to hijack hinduism for your extremist bigoted agenda.
Don't really give a rats tail what other religions do in their own countries. But based on your long winded answer it appears that you are supporting Muslims in India who have a long track record of having no considerations at all for Hindu beliefs.
Confirm if you agree with that conclusion. A simple yes/no will do.
You are free to draw your own conclusions,
as the question has always been whether Hindutva is inherently violent.
Hindutva has demonstrated its willingness to perpetrate violence against Indians based on their beliefs, driven by extremist, bigoted religious supremacism. This is the conclusion you helped everyone reached regarding Hindutva.
Finally !!! Phew !!
Thats YOUR agenda to lay the blame on Hindus and worse bat for the extremist jihadis in India. and we now know why. Nothing surprising at all.
Under the principles of natural justice, when a group like Muslims in India has spent centuries committing brazen and deliberate acts of intolerance , with blatant and deliberate disregard for the sacrilegious nature of these actions and the profound outrage they inflict on the religious beliefs of Hindus, then such a community forfeits any claim to civility or respect.
Civilization requires mutual respect and decency, but Muslims in India have repeatedly proven that they cannot meet even these basic standards. By knowingly persisting in such vile behavior, the Muslim community in India places itself outside the realms of civilized society. Hence making harsh consequences not only justified but a necessity to protect their interests.
And as for you, doubling down on this "legacy" of pure unadulterated hate and bigotry and yet having the cheek to demand compliance from Hindus ( and worse labeling us as uncivilized !!) , you are the very embodiment of moral depravity.
your moral compass is so shattered that it points squarely to bigotry and malice. Therefore you should be the very last living organism on Gods green earth to be using the word civilization; you’re a blatant enabler of unhinged bigotry, a cheerleader for intolerance, and a disgrace to any moral standard.
Its very simple ... if Muslims in India and their cheerleaders cannot respect others religious beliefs, don’t expect to be treated with respect in return. Sit down, reflect, and stop embarrassing yourself. Now that's the final definitive conclusion.
You are defending the belief in the right to harm Indian citizens based on a newly constructed version of Hinduism, and I am criticizing you for justifying such actions.
You cannot use this stance as a foundation to lecture others on morality.
After engaging with many supporters of Hindutva, one thing becomes clear, nearly all of them seem willing to find excuses to justify violence, lynching, and the mass killing of Indians in the name of defending a distorted version of Hinduism known as Hindutva. It is truly a regressive and troubling ideology.
@uppercut, I think you didn't know but @HalBass9 is a MuslimDude you are the follower of an ideology that does not even believe in the rights of others to practice their religion ( even when living in a predominantly non-muslim country like India ). Infact you are soo convinced in your mind about the "correctness" of your acts that you openly try to tell Hindus that your acts ( like harming cows ) are normal and those that take offense to such acts are the intolerant extremists. This is what is truly barbaric forget regressive as this has been going on for Centuries. The concept of live-and-let-live does not exist in your vocabulary at all.
If and when you and Muslims fix your inherent barbaric tendencies then you will magically find that there is no Hindutva extremism at all. But then that would require fixing the moral compass of a community at planet scale!
Yeah and you and none of your friends have challenged the premise successfully so far with facts and stats from third party or neutral credible sourcesThis thread is ridiculous . I can’t believe the topic is still being discussed.
What next? OBL is Islamophobic?
Yeah and you and none of your friends have challenged the premise successfully so far with facts and stats from third party or neutral credible sources
PS: another stats to address (besides many shared by me in earlier posts in this thread)
====
Key facts
In a nutshell, Indian Chronicles is:
- a 15 year-long operation running since 2005;
- 10+ UN Human Rights Council accredited NGOs, mostly resurrected;
- The resurrection of Prof. Louis B. Sohn, a prominent figure in human rights, deceased in 2006;
- Several identity thefts, including the name of Martin Schulz, former president of the European Parliament or the photo of James Purnell, a former UK Government minister;
- 750+ fake media outlets, covering 119 countries;
- 550+ domain names registered.
Indian Chronicles: deep dive into a 15-year operation targeting the EU and UN to serve Indian interests - EU DisinfoLab
by Gary Machado Alexandre Alaphilippe, Roman Adamczyk and Antoine Grégoire Following a preliminary investigation published in 2019, the EU DisinfoLab uncovered a massive operation targeting international institutions and serving Indian interests. “Indian Chronicles” – the name we gave to this...www.disinfo.eu
OK what source should I quote... Please enlightenA leftist NGO is your source
OK what source should I quote... Please enlighten
OK plenty other sources in this thread only... Plz check post 2 and some others on page 1NGOs are not sources.
The topic is about whether BJP is Nazi party. That is absolute bonkers and ridiculous.Yeah and you and none of your friends have challenged the premise successfully so far with facts and stats from third party or neutral credible sources
PS: another stats to address (besides many shared by me in earlier posts in this thread)
====
Key facts
In a nutshell, Indian Chronicles is:
- a 15 year-long operation running since 2005;
- 10+ UN Human Rights Council accredited NGOs, mostly resurrected;
- The resurrection of Prof. Louis B. Sohn, a prominent figure in human rights, deceased in 2006;
- Several identity thefts, including the name of Martin Schulz, former president of the European Parliament or the photo of James Purnell, a former UK Government minister;
- 750+ fake media outlets, covering 119 countries;
- 550+ domain names registered.
Indian Chronicles: deep dive into a 15-year operation targeting the EU and UN to serve Indian interests - EU DisinfoLab
by Gary Machado Alexandre Alaphilippe, Roman Adamczyk and Antoine Grégoire Following a preliminary investigation published in 2019, the EU DisinfoLab uncovered a massive operation targeting international institutions and serving Indian interests. “Indian Chronicles” – the name we gave to this...www.disinfo.eu
NGO’s are as good as private investigative journalists and paid by foreign sources.A leftist NGO is your source
NGO’s are as good as private investigative journalists and paid by foreign sources.
just look at you doubling down bindaas on your desire to continue your bigotry and also normalize it !!!
Your statement is the epitome of moral rot. You stand atop centuries of barbarism committed by Muslims in India, shrugging off their atrocities as if they were a birthright ( something that is very obviously visible when talking to even educated Muslims ), and then have the audacity to point fingers at me for refusing to tolerate this filth any longer.
Let me be crystal clear: you are not a critic—you are a shameless enabler of hatred and violence. If there is anything that is in urgent need of criticism and reform it is the animalesque behavior model of your fellow members of your community who insist on killing cows in 2024 despite being well aware of its reverence for Hindu. Heck you even had the cheek to tell me that I need to change my religious sensitivities or look the other way!!!
Your vile expectation that I should change my beliefs to accommodate the never-ending provocations and bigotry of your community is just plain grotesque and hence why you do not belong amongst humanity. It’s not my beliefs that need changing, but instead it’s your community’s relentless and deliberate disregard for basic decency that is need of correction. And given their primitive state of existence it can only happen thru brute force.
You and your ilk have no standing to lecture anyone on morality when your collective behavior has been nothing short of.. Sit down and take a long, hard look at the ugliness you are defending, because the only thing more despicable than the atrocities themselves is your insistence on justifying and normalizing them. You friggin had the cheek to tell me to modify my religious beliefs because the rest of the world doesn't consider the cow to be sacred.
@uppercut, I think you didn't know but @HalBass9 is a Muslim
====
Say: O disbelievers,
I do not worship what you worship.
Nor are you worshippers of what I worship.
Nor will I be a worshipper of what you worship.
Nor will you be worshippers of what I worship.
For you is your religion, and for me is my religion.
Surah al-Kafirun, Holy Quran
Engaging with someone who is so deeply brainwashed that they label all Muslims as ‘animals’ and justify violence against others based on religion is futile.
When you confront their bigotry, they have no valid defense, and their continued rhetoric only further exposes their prejudice. There is no justification for advocating the right to slaughter others over religious beliefs.
Call them what they are, bigots and extremists. Time and again, followers of Hindutva have revealed their intentions rooted in racism, bigotry, and religious supremacy.
You can moan as much as you want to but the only group that want to reserve the right to slaughter otherhumansAnimals in the year 2024 are Hindutva.
yeah by doubling down on your itch to mock, insult, disrespect Hindu beliefs and openly refusing to abide by rules and then shamelessly demanding your "right" to continue religious intolerance and then asking me to modify my religious beliefs if I am offended.
Thats your "method" of confronting i.e. Double down on your bigotry.
As I said before.... this is like a thief confronting police and arguing that theft is a legit profession. So what if the police think otherwise ... they are the ones brainwashed and all thieves need to call that out.
Or a parasite complaining that the host isn’t doing enough to accommodate its presence.
correction Animals ... see above for reasons why you cannot be considered as Humans.
Hindutva not Hindus.
Not asking anyone to modify, just highlighting Hindutva bigotry.
Muslims also need to first decide their stance on Adolf Hitler.
Due to Israel issue, many Muslims are Pro Adolf.
If you are not asking to alter my beliefs ( which you did but lets pretend that you didn't ) .. so then what is your solution to this dispute ?
No! Muslims aren’t
Muslims are anti-apartheid and anti-genocide in Gaza.
No! Muslims aren’t
Muslims are anti-apartheid and anti-genocide in Gaza.
I am talking about Adolf Hitler.
A good number of Muslims support Hitler’s Anti Jew stance.
apartheid
www.law.cornell.edu
"Apartheid refers to the implementation and maintenance of a system of legalized racial segregation in which one racial group is deprived of political and civil rights".
Now think and explain which group of people and countries follow this. Would love to hear from you.
apartheid
www.law.cornell.edu
"Apartheid refers to the implementation and maintenance of a system of legalized racial segregation in which one racial group is deprived of political and civil rights".
Now think and explain which group of people and countries follow this. Would love to hear from you.
Is that all you can say?lol. Okay!
Criticize them for supporting anyone who support the genocide of the Jews.