What's new

Is Euro 2020 the best football tournament ever?

SangasCoverDrive

Local Club Regular
Joined
May 12, 2021
Runs
1,360
I don’t remember any tournament being this exciting and full of rollercoaster games than this one. You can’t buy the script of this in club tournament. I thought WC 2018 was the best tournament but this one has clearly topped it.
 
Recency bias. I remember 1996 was epic, 2004 was dramatic with the Greeks and 2008 I think was the one where the Turks would sleep each match and come to life in the final 5 mins
 
Sounds like OP is watching his first ever international football tournament. The group stages were a borefest so I can't consider this to be anywhere near being the "best football tournament ever".
 
Hahahah, have you forgotten the 2014 World Cup, one of the best group stages ever, World Cup 2018 was damn good, Greek had an epic journey on Euro 2004 and the World Cup 2002 was just exceptional.
 
i thought the format of this tournament, with the 3rd place teams going through in most groups made the group stages abit boring teams were abit more cautious as they knew 3 points were enough to go through. The tournament came to life last few days hopefully it can end on a high. Too early to call it the best ever, Euro 96 had an even better feel good factor about it.
 
Not even close.

The World Cup in Russia is the best tournament iv'e seen. Overall, I've watched back tournaments from 66 onwards, 85 World Cup in Mexico is my favourite. Great games, great players, amazing crowds who invented the Mexican wave and not least, Maradonna was at his very best.

The two 3-3 matches were brilliant but some boring matches too.
 
I don’t remember any tournament being this exciting and full of rollercoaster games than this one. You can’t buy the script of this in club tournament. I thought WC 2018 was the best tournament but this one has clearly topped it.

Hell No. infact it’s unnecessarily stretched by including too many teams and too many matches.
 
Hell No. infact it’s unnecessarily stretched by including too many teams and too many matches.

The format needs to be changed.

There is no incentive for topping the group and I'm sick of hearing pundits, fans, etc talking about how so and so team should play for a draw or even lose their final game in order to get a more favourable match up in the round of 16.

In my opinion, as a reward for topping the group, you get a straight ticket to the quarter finals and a few extra days off. The 2nd and 3rd teams play a losers bracket eliminator, the winner of which progresses to the quarter finals.
 
The best tournament I've seen is the 2002 World Cup.

The last golden generation Brazilian team - R9, Rivaldo, Ronaldinho, Roberto Carlos, Cafu, Lucio, Gilberto Silva etc. R9 coming into the tournament having hardly played in 3 years, going home with the golden boot and personal redemption for the 98 final.

Ballack carrying Germany to the final and cruelly being suspended in the final. People forget what a player he was between 2001-2008.
 
No its been an awful tournament so far. With 24 teams you have cheapened the Group stage, when 16 of those teams advance to the knockout stage.

Because of politics they will not go back to the 16 team format, so I would suggest just expand the tournament to 32 and eliminate the group matches and just make it knockout from the beginning.
 
Personally, Germany winning the World Cup in 2014 easily tops any football tournament for me, so there´s no discussion on that for me. However, Euro 2004 was the best edition of this tournament and one of my favourite early life sports memories, if not the most, and it would´ve stood as the best tournament had Germany not won the aforementioned tournament.

Prior to that tournament, I hadn´t watched even a minute of football in my life, and I was 13 at that time. A long time ago, there was a thread here in the 'Cricket' section, asking what people´s earliest cricket memory is. I mentioned Sri Lanka´s World Cup Final victory from 1996 as my earliest memory, but I can´t still say it was the first cricket match that I had watched. I must´ve watched some cricket before that, surely, but it´s just that I don´t remember any beyond that point. However, in terms of football, I can confirm with hundred certainty that the opening game of the Euro 2004, between Portugal and Greece was the first match that I had ever watched. Only a few days into the tournament, and I fell in love with the great game and instantly came to admire it much more than cricket. We discovered about the tournament thanks to a schedule that we received in a German newspaper, and it was my brother who drew my attention to it, and switched to the German channels showing the tournament, and got me hooked to it for those weeks. In fact, we watched it with such a passion that we could mark the result of each game on the matches schedule which was published in the aforementioned newspaper.

It had some great matches. The England-France match will forever go down as amongst my favourite football matches ever, a match in which Zidane turned the game on its head with two goals in the stoppage time to seal a 2-1 win, not to forget Fabien Barthez stopping a penalty just moments before that to keep France in the game, instantly making him my favourite goal-keeper. There were some other great matches too, such as the match between the Netherlands and Czech Republic which the latter won by 3-2 despite being 0-2 behind at one stage. The Portugal-England match too was great. Czech Republic were the team of the tournament relying on some individual brilliance, always coming back from behind to win matches, until Greece shattered their dreams in the Semi-Final. A weak team like Greece winning the tournament was itself enough to increase the value of the edition. Ah´, some great, great, teenage life memories!
 
As for the ongoing edition, the Switzerland-France match was indeed one of the greatest matches that I´ve ever watched, no doubt, but the coming seven matches will decide how for a tournament it was. The most meaningful part of the tournament has just begin and to form an opinion about it before waiting for it to end will be too early, and also unfair, in my opinion. So let´s wait and see, no? :)
 
The best Euro me was the one Spain won in 2012 by beating Italy.
I was in Spain on that day.. and the celebrations were just so awesome. Can never forget that night.
Luckily i was in Spain on the night of 2010 WC win as well. Crazy times and seriously good Spanish team.
 
I'm biased towards 2004 on the basis that I was fortunate enough to be in Greece for the majority of the tournament as they won it. If only I was ten years older......

Every Euro's is normally great though. Even this format which I'm not a huge fan of, you're into the knockouts quickly and then its anyone's game, great viewing.

Compare it to cricket's rubbish where it takes 40 days for a group to end. Pfftttt.

Russia WC was probably the best overall tournament I watched. 2010 easily the worst, horrid tournament.
 
No its been an awful tournament so far. With 24 teams you have cheapened the Group stage, when 16 of those teams advance to the knockout stage.

Because of politics they will not go back to the 16 team format, so I would suggest just expand the tournament to 32 and eliminate the group matches and just make it knockout from the beginning.

That's a bad idea cause you can get lucky in knockout games, a group stage is necessary in any championship-level tournament as a team should show consistency, of course now the group stage has lost value in the Euros as only 3 of 4 teams progress to the round of 16, reverting back to the original format would be better. The group stage is what separates the real contenders from the minnows who somehow managed to qualify for the tournament.
 
That's a bad idea cause you can get lucky in knockout games, a group stage is necessary in any championship-level tournament as a team should show consistency, of course now the group stage has lost value in the Euros as only 3 of 4 teams progress to the round of 16, reverting back to the original format would be better. The group stage is what separates the real contenders from the minnows who somehow managed to qualify for the tournament.

Will a team get lucky 5 matches in a row? Its kind of like March Madness, the Cinderella teams can win a few here and there, but in the end one of the top teams usually wins.

The good thing of the group stage is normally the bad teams are knocked out, so when its time for the knockout stage you only get the best teams. But the drawback is seeing the bad teams play 3 times in the group stage. So you have to pick your poison.

Also I dont think they will ever go back to the 16 team format. Its very hard to qualify for the World Cup from Europe, so the enlarged Euro gives the smaller countries a chance to play in a big tournament.
 
Will a team get lucky 5 matches in a row? Its kind of like March Madness, the Cinderella teams can win a few here and there, but in the end one of the top teams usually wins.

The good thing of the group stage is normally the bad teams are knocked out, so when its time for the knockout stage you only get the best teams. But the drawback is seeing the bad teams play 3 times in the group stage. So you have to pick your poison.

Also I dont think they will ever go back to the 16 team format. Its very hard to qualify for the World Cup from Europe, so the enlarged Euro gives the smaller countries a chance to play in a big tournament.

I actually don't mind seeing "bad teams" play, in fact I'd say most people do enjoy watch random countries like Romania, Trinidad and Ecuador compete at these tournaments, it's only once every 4 years that you see so many different compete against each other. No one just wants to see the top countries compete otherwise football would be like cricket where it's the same top 10 rotation in every tournament.
 
Very enjoyable tournament, the recent World Cup in Russia was slightly more epic though.
 
82 World Cup was special - Brazil, Argentina and Italy in the same group in the second stage. Absolutely brilliant matches.

86 World Cup was also a brilliant tournament with Maradona at his best.
 
82 World Cup was special - Brazil, Argentina and Italy in the same group in the second stage. Absolutely brilliant matches.

86 World Cup was also a brilliant tournament with Maradona at his best.

Both of them were controoversy ridden though
 
82 World Cup was special - Brazil, Argentina and Italy in the same group in the second stage. Absolutely brilliant matches.

86 World Cup was also a brilliant tournament with Maradona at his best.

yes, 86 was the best one. Great coverage, some classic rivalries coming to sport with the "Hand of God and Head of Maradona". Liked the 1998 one too for similar reasons
 
Last edited:
Those of you complaining over the participation of 24 teams in the Euro Cup editions now, I may tell you all that FIFA, for a while, did consider the expansion of the next year´s World Cup to 48 teams! Yes, forty-eight teams! We´ve been saved, fellows, as otherwise we might´ve even seen the team from my village in Pakistan playing in Qatar. :))
 
Those of you complaining over the participation of 24 teams in the Euro Cup editions now, I may tell you all that FIFA, for a while, did consider the expansion of the next year´s World Cup to 48 teams! Yes, forty-eight teams! We´ve been saved, fellows, as otherwise we might´ve even seen the team from my village in Pakistan playing in Qatar. :))

It’s going to be 48 from 2026
 
94 WC was my fav because it was the first major football tournament i watched, then 2006 because Italy won.

In Euros i enjoyed 96
 
Knockout stages amongst the best ever.
Group stages largely disappointing, with the 24 team format the group stage will always be a bit disappointing.
Only real disappointment in the knockout stage was Ukraine making it to the Quarter-Finals.
Their match against Sweden was entertaining enough but they were the weakest team in the last 16 so them making it into the last 8 made for a very one-sided match.
England would have beaten Sweden (imo) but it would have been a tougher match and England would have had to work hard for the win.
 
It’s going to be 48 from 2026

Dear Lord! :facepalm:

If the expansion of the tournament means more knock-out matches, then I´m all for it. However, if it only would increase the number of the group phase matches, well, then..... I don´t know what to say!
 
More teams ruins the quality of the tournament i found when euro had 16 teams it was perfect. Also not a fan of third place team advancing. This euro has been good but not amazing. The best euro tournaments was 2008 followed by 2004. In terms if world cup it was 2002 for me
 
I don’t get the hate against third team rule. All the teams which made it to QF by finishing 3rd had to defeat much better teams in Round of 16. The format is perfect and it means that there are very few dead rubbers in group stages
 
Euro 2020 format unfair on fans because of travel inequalities, says Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin

Euro 2020 has been unfair for fans and a challenge for teams because of the vast difference in distances they have had to travel during the tournament, says Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin.

England play Italy in Sunday's final at Wembley after a championship that has been played in cities in 11 countries.

Switzerland travelled the furthest, 15,485km (9,622 miles), while Scotland clocked up the shortest at 1,108km.

"I would not support it anymore," Ceferin told BBC Sport.

Speaking to BBC sports editor Dan Roan on a special Euro 2020 episode of The Sports Desk podcast, Ceferin conceded the format had been "too challenging".

He added: "In a way, it is not correct that some teams have to travel more than 10,000km while others have to only travel 1,000km.

"It is not fair to fans, who had to be in Rome one day and in Baku over the next few, which is a four and a half hour flight.

"We had to travel a lot, into countries with different jurisdictions, different currencies, countries in the European Union (EU) and Non-EU, so it was not easy.

"It was a format that was decided before I came [into post] and I respect it. It is an interesting idea but it is hard to implement and I don't think we will do it again."

Matches have been held in London, Glasgow, Amsterdam, Copenhagen, St Petersburg, Seville, Munich, Baku, Rome, Bucharest and Budapest.

Belgium, knocked out in the quarter-finals, travelled the second furthest at 10, 245km.

The format was called a "joke" by Wales captain Chris Gunter after his side were beaten in the last-16 by Denmark in Amsterdam, having travelled a total of 9,156km. They played their first two group games in Baku, Azerbaijan, before heading to Rome for their final group game.

Finalists England and Italy both played their three group games at home in London and Rome.

England, who also played their last-16 and semi-final games at Wembley have only travelled 3,874km in the tournament, for their quarter-final against Ukraine in Rome.

Italy, who played their last-16 game at Wembley before going to Munich for their quarter-final win over Belgium, and returning to London for the semi-final and final, have travelled 4,714km.

However, Ceferin also said Euro 2020, the first under his tenure, was the "most interesting" European Championship.

The tournament had been delayed by a year because of the Covid-19 pandemic and Ceferin said thorough testing at all venues has prevented any significant outbreak between any of the players.

"It has been a special Euros, for sure," the 53-year-old Slovenian added. "I will remember it as the beginning of normality and the return of fans.

"I have never seen a dramatic Euros like this one, with great matches and surprising results.

"Our health protocols are extremely tough, and everyone is tested, even those who have been vaccinated. I was tested 76 times.

"The teams are highly professional and they all respect the bubble system. Also, in the stadiums, we are very strict and when I see politicians saying people were infected at the matches, without any proof, it disappoints me a bit.

"Some say 2,000 Scottish fans were infected, but the Scottish fans who went to the match [against England at Wembley] were tested.

"There were also 20,000 who came to London without tickets. You are not tested in the park, but to accuse all football of spreading the virus is irresponsible in my opinion."

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/57778285
 
Most likely, no. No member here will have witnessed all tournaments.
 
Definitely not.

I have seen better events.

FIFA World Cup 2014 was much better.
 
I don’t get the hate against third team rule. All the teams which made it to QF by finishing 3rd had to defeat much better teams in Round of 16. The format is perfect and it means that there are very few dead rubbers in group stages

I don´t currently mind the expansion of the tournament to 24 teams because it has, on the contrary, resulted in the addition of eight more knock-out matches, making the tournament more exciting, in my opinion. This is precisely why I said that the expansion of the FIFA World Cup too would be acceptable to me if it ends up increasing the number of knock-out matches.
 
European champions Italy will face Copa America winners Argentina next June.

Uefa, European football's governing body, said agreement had been reached to play three editions of the intercontinental match.

Uefa said the exact date and venue for the match were still to be confirmed, but Naples is reportedly a contender.

A game between the continental champions is the latest step in closer co-operation between Uefa and its South American equivalent, Conmebol.

The continued co-operation between the two confederations comes with both opposing Fifa's proposals to reform the international calendar, which include World Cups every two years.

The champions of each continent's premier club competition have met annually since 1960, before the match merged with the Fifa Club World Cup in 2005.

A similar agreement has not previously been in place for the champions of the respective international competitions, the European Championship and the Copa America.

"By reaching this agreement, Uefa and Conmebol express their commitment to the development of football beyond their geographical zones, as a bridge uniting people, countries, continents and cultures," a statement read.

"The Uefa executive committee and the Conmebol council also expressed a strong willingness to continue collaborating on other issues of mutual interest going forward."
 
Back
Top