Is it harder to be a Muslim in India or a Hindu in Pakistan, or a Hindu in Bangladesh?

[JaDed]

India is worse, no doubt. I saw a video a Bengali muslim from west bengal getting axed then burnt to death, not long ago. For “love jihad”

India is hell for Muslims and even christians getting oppressed for xmas celebrations.

Sure buddy, here soft tiger for you.

 

[finalfantasy7]

India's Hindu right squeezing Muslims, forcing them into submission: The New York Times​

@Rajdeep @cricketjoshila @Champ_Pal @Devadwal @uppercut @straighttalk @Vikram1989 @Romali_rotti @Bhaijaan @Cover Drive Six @rickroll @RexRex @rpant_gabba, @kron @globetrotter @Hitman @jnaveen1980 @Local.Dada @CrIc_Mystique @Van_Sri @nish_mate @SportsWarrior @kaayal @saimayubera @JaDed @Prince of Dorne @Cryin Out Loud @just a fan @deltexas @Ramsay @Hikaru @Bhimja turtle @GoogleToggle @big_gamer007

 

[finalfantasy7]

Sure buddy, here soft tiger for you.

how come you dont believe @Mas-LFC

 

[big_gamer007]

is that news is correct, then he should be punished by the law he lives in, that is disgusting = things like this should never happen, im not like you sanghis who looks the other way when this happens

you asked - does this happen in a muslim country = yes its called kashmir = you hindus are like netenyahu over thr = ive never read a post from you condeming the attacks on muslims every day in Kashmir, one of the worlds biggest violations = happen = you sooooo quiet.

First of all, Kashmir is not a separate country’s it’s governed by India and Pakistan. So your example is incorrect.

Give me example from Pakistan or Bangladesh where a Muslim was hulled by a Hindu for celebrating Eid.

If you can’t give an example then this thread should be closed by moderators. This thread is about comparing minority rights in India vs pak / BD. If you can’t give example that itself will tell minority in India have more power than those countries. That doesn’t mean minority in India are flourishing or have no issues, just means Pak and BD are worse.

 

[big_gamer007]

1 - How have you came to that conclusion - thrs no prove,

2 - Your a hindu, why would a death peanlty do anything = you believe in reincarnation


Just say if a hindu rapes a women (who is also hindu) - n shes dies in hospital due to this and being in shoc k= would you call for death penalty = its just i find it strange your now saying death penalty - is it because he was a muslim...... how many death penalties should occur on hindus in Kashmir ?

1. There are numerous videos circulating that show a politically motivated Hindu mob reaching the residence of the alleged perpetrators and causing damage. The property in question appears to be a corner plot building with approximately four to five stories and an estimated area of around 500 square meters. In Delhi, a property of that size and location would likely be valued at approximately ₹15–20 crore. Anyone owning such a property would most likely belong to a well-established business family — not necessarily elite, but certainly financially well-off.
2. That assertion is incorrect. The effectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent has been debated extensively throughout history, with many studies suggesting it can be counterproductive in certain contexts. However, India’s larger issue lies in the consistent enforcement of law and order. I have long argued that severe crimes such as rape should attract the harshest possible punishment, regardless of whether the perpetrator is Hindu, Muslim, or anyone else.

If the objective is to improve law and order and reduce heinous crimes, the focus must be on strict implementation of the law. Strong deterrents — including the death penalty in particularly egregious or high-profile cases, especially where influential individuals or politically connected persons are involved — can send a clear signal that such acts will not be tolerated. The same applies in cases where crimes stem from violations of religious freedom or communal tensions.

I do not engage with arguments rooted in whataboutism, as they serve primarily as distractions from the issue being discussed. If you wish to continue the discussion, I would encourage maintaining a high standard of discourse and focusing on substantive arguments rather than diversionary comparisons.