What's new

Is Salman Agha captaincy material? Is Shadab Khan a reformed bowler? What I’m looking out for in Pakistan’s tour of New Zealand

Asad T

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Aug 1, 2023
Runs
4,591
What I’m Looking Out for in Pakistan’s Tour of New Zealand (T20 Format):

1) Salman Agha’s Captaincy:

Salman’s appointment as captain is a curious one for me. He has proven to be a clutch player over the past year, plays selflessly, and excels in all three departments. He also speaks good English and expresses himself eloquently. However, he doesn’t strike me as a natural leader. He isn’t the captain of his PSL team, lacks a strong leadership record in domestic cricket, and doesn’t really display commanding body language in the field or while giving press confrences.

I wish him well and believe he could grow into the role, but he has a lot to prove. Mike Hesson spoke positively about his appointment on his YouTube channel, but I remain skeptical given his lack of leadership experience. To me, it seems like he was made captain simply because he’s the only player guaranteed a spot in the XI from now until the World Cup. That said, I genuinely like Salman and hope he does well.

2) Mohammad Haris and Usman Khan – The Keepers:

While most people will focus on how they bat, I’m more concerned about how they keep. Both have looked shaky behind the stumps and have missed quite a few catches and stumpings over the past year or two.

We all know they can strike at a better rate than Rizwan, but there’s no doubt that Rizwan is the superior wicketkeeper. If either of them wants to cement their place for the World Cup, they need to prove they can keep cleanly while maintaining a strike rate of over 130. There’s no point in striking at 140 if you keep blowing chances behind the stumps.

3) Will New Players Play in Their Natural Positions?

There are quite a few new and returning players in this squad—Omair Bin Yousuf, Mohammad Haris, Hasan Nawaz—but will they actually be allowed to play in their natural positions?

We’ve seen this mistake happen far too often. Players like Sahibzada Farhan, an opener with years of domestic performances, were drafted into the team only to be played at #6. Kamran Ghulam was shuffled between #6 and #3. Saud Shakeel, primarily a middle-order batter, was bizarrely asked to open in the Champions Trophy.

If the new players aren’t played in their proper roles, then it’s simply unfair to them. I hope this tour is different.

4) Will We Go Hard in the Powerplay?


The whole point of dropping Rizwan and Babar is to inject more intent in the first six overs. But if the new openers also go at six an over in the powerplay, then what’s the point of this change?

I remember when Saim Ayub first came into the team in 2023—his strike rate was just 123, basically the same as Riz-Bar, and many thought he was a fraud batter. But in 2024, he truly found his rhythm, finishing the year with a strike rate of 144 in 18 innings.

The new openers won’t have the luxury of time to settle. If they don’t perform aggressively from the start, Riz-Bar will be back before we know it. They need to show fearlessness from the get-go.


5) Shadab’s Bowling:


Pakistan desperately needs a bowling all-rounder, but I’m unsure if Shadab is the answer. He has been out of the national side since June 2024 and has since toiled away in domestic cricket. He has reportedly worked on his bowling action, particularly how he lands his front foot. But has it actually improved?

Looking at his domestic numbers this year, the results are far from convincing:

First-Class (Presidents Trophy Grade 1)
5 matches: Batting average of 34, bowling average of 115 (only 2 wickets)

Champions Cup (T20)
5 innings: Batting average of 6 (SR 70), bowling average nil (didn’t take a wicket)


I’m not sure why he was selected when his domestic performances don’t justify his inclusion. While he has put in the effort, I remain skeptical about whether he has actually improved.

Overall, I’m excited about this new-look team and hope the players play for the badge rather than for themselves.
 
I don't think he will be the captain for a long period of time. We may see Shadab as the captain of the Pakistan T20 side, especially if his team Islamabad United does well in the upcoming PSL.
 
What I’m Looking Out for in Pakistan’s Tour of New Zealand (T20 Format):

1) Salman Agha’s Captaincy:

Salman’s appointment as captain is a curious one for me. He has proven to be a clutch player over the past year, plays selflessly, and excels in all three departments. He also speaks good English and expresses himself eloquently. However, he doesn’t strike me as a natural leader. He isn’t the captain of his PSL team, lacks a strong leadership record in domestic cricket, and doesn’t really display commanding body language in the field or while giving press confrences.

I wish him well and believe he could grow into the role, but he has a lot to prove. Mike Hesson spoke positively about his appointment on his YouTube channel, but I remain skeptical given his lack of leadership experience. To me, it seems like he was made captain simply because he’s the only player guaranteed a spot in the XI from now until the World Cup. That said, I genuinely like Salman and hope he does well.

2) Mohammad Haris and Usman Khan – The Keepers:

While most people will focus on how they bat, I’m more concerned about how they keep. Both have looked shaky behind the stumps and have missed quite a few catches and stumpings over the past year or two.

We all know they can strike at a better rate than Rizwan, but there’s no doubt that Rizwan is the superior wicketkeeper. If either of them wants to cement their place for the World Cup, they need to prove they can keep cleanly while maintaining a strike rate of over 130. There’s no point in striking at 140 if you keep blowing chances behind the stumps.

3) Will New Players Play in Their Natural Positions?


There are quite a few new and returning players in this squad—Omair Bin Yousuf, Mohammad Haris, Hasan Nawaz—but will they actually be allowed to play in their natural positions?

We’ve seen this mistake happen far too often. Players like Sahibzada Farhan, an opener with years of domestic performances, were drafted into the team only to be played at #6. Kamran Ghulam was shuffled between #6 and #3. Saud Shakeel, primarily a middle-order batter, was bizarrely asked to open in the Champions Trophy.

If the new players aren’t played in their proper roles, then it’s simply unfair to them. I hope this tour is different.

4) Will We Go Hard in the Powerplay?


The whole point of dropping Rizwan and Babar is to inject more intent in the first six overs. But if the new openers also go at six an over in the powerplay, then what’s the point of this change?

I remember when Saim Ayub first came into the team in 2023—his strike rate was just 123, basically the same as Riz-Bar, and many thought he was a fraud batter. But in 2024, he truly found his rhythm, finishing the year with a strike rate of 144 in 18 innings.

The new openers won’t have the luxury of time to settle. If they don’t perform aggressively from the start, Riz-Bar will be back before we know it. They need to show fearlessness from the get-go.

5) Shadab’s Bowling:


Pakistan desperately needs a bowling all-rounder, but I’m unsure if Shadab is the answer. He has been out of the national side since June 2024 and has since toiled away in domestic cricket. He has reportedly worked on his bowling action, particularly how he lands his front foot. But has it actually improved?

Looking at his domestic numbers this year, the results are far from convincing:

First-Class (Presidents Trophy Grade 1)
5 matches: Batting average of 34, bowling average of 115 (only 2 wickets)

Champions Cup (T20)
5 innings: Batting average of 6 (SR 70), bowling average nil (didn’t take a wicket)


I’m not sure why he was selected when his domestic performances don’t justify his inclusion. While he has put in the effort, I remain skeptical about whether he has actually improved.

Overall, I’m excited about this new-look team and hope the players play for the badge rather than for themselves.
Opening slots are not up for grab as Saim and Fakhar will walk into any Pakistan T20 and ODI teams for this role. Most important positions to be sworn up are from 3-7 and I am hoping we will find players to fill this role in order to not go back to Babar or Rizwan (minimum in T20's and hopefully in ODI as well).
 
New Zealand sometimes has weird pitches. Same wicket that is usually 190 vs 200 paata sometimes they leave grass on it and it becomes 145-160 shootout.

I hope the new batting order assess the wicket and adapt.
 
I don't think he will be the captain for a long period of time. We may see Shadab as the captain of the Pakistan T20 side, especially if his team Islamabad United does well in the upcoming PSL.
Another tried and tested failure whose susar is throwing his weight around in PCB...
 
Shadab himself does not know whether he is a batting all rounders or bowling all rounder. I do not think he has any performance in recent past to be back in squad. 1990 cricketers need to be kept away from team , because this is precise issue .
 
If a guy who isn’t thought of as a T20 player can go out and play fearlessly, why can’t those who are Supposedly rated change their games and play according to the requirements of their position?

In 2 games, Salman Agha has shown that he wants to walk the walk.
 
Shadab is in this team as a batsman. No need to judge him on his bowling. With Saim and Khushdil, you won't even need Shady's bowling.

He was decent with the bat in 2nd T20. Should be given a long rope at 4 in T20s.
 
Salman Ali Agha is the best possible option, give him some time. Shadab is an experienced player but as a captain, he is too inconsistent.
 
Shadab is in this team as a batsman. No need to judge him on his bowling. With Saim and Khushdil, you won't even need Shady's bowling.

He was decent with the bat in 2nd T20. Should be given a long rope at 4 in T20s.
Why should we go out of our way to accomodate Shadab when we can you know give chances to actual batsmen or maybe actual all rounders like Mehran Mumtaz? Pakistan team is not their baap’s jaager that we will fall over to accommodate them.
 
So far Salman at personal level is having ok series, what else he can do if the Premier bowler is spanked for 4x 6s in a single over. Though selection of playing XI is debatable , guys like ObY Usman and Abass should have been preferred from game 1
 
Shadab is in this team as a batsman. No need to judge him on his bowling. With Saim and Khushdil, you won't even need Shady's bowling.

He was decent with the bat in 2nd T20. Should be given a long rope at 4 in T20s.
Be happy with a quick 20s-30s from a number 4 batsman:giggle:
 
Shadab is in this team as a batsman. No need to judge him on his bowling. With Saim and Khushdil, you won't even need Shady's bowling.

He was decent with the bat in 2nd T20. Should be given a long rope at 4 in T20s.

He batted well in the second T20 at #6 -- 26 (14), but he continued to bowl a lot of short deliveries. His landing foot still points towards mid-wicket (when it should point straight), which indicates he has still not rectified his bowling action and will likely continue to bowl sub-par.

So this means he needs to develop into a batter who can bowl 1-2 overs per game instead of a bowling-all-rounder. He is apparently only 26 so he can easily evolve his game. He has the hand-eye coordination to be a decent batter as well imo.

C9Gam9W.png
 
Leadership skills and captaincy skills are two different things.

Leadership skills are not that important, as much as captaincy skills are.

Captaincy skills is basically, making strategy, game plans etc. Leadership is about leading a team which isnt that important and overstated in cricket.

I dont know whether Salman is a good captain or not, so will need to look at his captaincy decisions.
 
Why should we go out of our way to accomodate Shadab when we can you know give chances to actual batsmen or maybe actual all rounders like Mehran Mumtaz? Pakistan team is not their baap’s jaager that we will fall over to accommodate them.
Because he has done well at 4 in last PSL. Mehran Mumtaz is not number 4. Name me your replacement ?
 
He batted well in the second T20 at #6 -- 26 (14), but he continued to bowl a lot of short deliveries. His landing foot still points towards mid-wicket (when it should point straight), which indicates he has still not rectified his bowling action and will likely continue to bowl sub-par.

So this means he needs to develop into a batter who can bowl 1-2 overs per game instead of a bowling-all-rounder. He is apparently only 26 so he can easily evolve his game. He has the hand-eye coordination to be a decent batter as well imo.

C9Gam9W.png
He trained all his life as a batter. Bowling was always part time for him.

He gained reconition due to his bowling. THats the whole issue with him.
 
A 30 (15) from a number 4 during middle phase of a T20 innings is Gold worthy. Try to understand modern day cricket.
I think you should try to understand modern day cricket, a 30(15) is good enough for a number 7-8.
Just look at other teams and their batting resources from number 1-6 even in a T20 game.
Try to increase your bar of calling someone a good batsman.
 
I think you should try to understand modern day cricket, a 30(15) is good enough for a number 7-8.
Just look at other teams and their batting resources from number 1-6 even in a T20 game.
Try to increase your bar of calling someone a good batsman.
Idhr udhr ki baat choro. Give me your number 4 ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Shadab 4 overers 1/33 did well in the end considering that 204 was conceeded. There was also not much on offer for the spinners, and yet Shadab produced 9 dot deliveries, the most of any bowler (Pak and NZ both).

He also did better that Ish Sodhi (who went at 14 an over) and Bracewell (who went at 11.5 an over)

He still was bowling a lot of half-trackers though, and his control still seemed to be off, so I wasn't so convinced. Let's see how he goes in the next game.

shPo2ha.png
 
Back
Top