He’s going to miss the World Cup bus, I suspect. No place to hide: after South Africa we play Australia (he might get some breathing room, because it’s in UAE) and then England in England.
His position requires a batsman who can strike at 150 to 170 if they have wickets in hand. It doesn’t matter that others are floundering, they are the future wheeareas this is malik for pretty most of his career.
People will talk about how Malik could be required if we lose the top 3 to 4 wickets and he needs to see it out the innings. Well (a) you have Sarfaraz for that and (b) If you lose your top 3 under 50 and Malik comes to bat, you will crawl to a 220 type score which means by modern standards you will lose that fame 9 out 10 times
Honestly, this is an easy decision the only thing holding it back is Mickey/inzi’s collective criticism in the press:
- that they dropped hafeez before
- that they dropped perennially half unit junaid khan
- that Mickey in particular clashed with Azhar/Asad/Sarfaraz