shabir kham
Debutant
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2017
- Runs
- 105
With new signings this season with the likes of buttler and Williamson, are they second in terms of foreign player quailty?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bpl as in the bengali league?
first pay the players then talk.
When payment becomes an issue players dont go for such leagues
BPL is a joke of a tournament, the quality and that Gola ganda coloured scoreboard ticker says evrrything you might need to know about the league.
Its probably 5th or 6th in the pecking order if we are to considering the overall global appeal of the tournament.
Yet it attracts a lot of sponsors TV viewership and lots of foreign cricketers like Williamson Buttler Gayle Narine Watson
Players like the ones mentioned will fly in for 1 or 2 games max, profit a handsome $50,000-$100,000 and depart more like a holiday camp rather than an international league.
Psl only overhyped by Pak posters...
There is a reason why most of the overseas stars prefer BPL over PSL. I am sure PSL is better than BPL for you.Not really.
Its 4th for me
There is a reason why most of the overseas stars prefer BPL over PSL. I am sure PSL is better than BPL for you.
Psl only overhyped by Pak posters...
with all due respect but according to people like Micheal Atherton many players speak highly of the league and how competitive it is. The matches are tough and the competition is tight. Hype is a totally different issue.
PSL is far better in quality, not because of it's foreign recruits, rather because of the other 7 local players of the XI. But, if you ask my honest opinion, PSL being arranged in relatively less busy period (when most English, WI and Kiwi players are free even from domestics), I was expecting better foreign recruits.
Having said that, I don't think there is much in it regarding foreign recruits outside IPL. PSL for it's initial branding, bought few retired/former greats, which is fair enough, but eventually it should move to hiring more & more current & younger players. It's already by far the oldest league in terms of average age and that's true for foreigners as well.
yes true but as word gets around we will see more younger players coming. Word goes around in the county circuit pretty quickly. Whats sad is that the BCCI doesnt let Indian players play in other leagues.
There is a reason why most of the overseas stars prefer BPL over PSL. I am sure PSL is better than BPL for you.
Retired kp who works as a TV analyst during ipl is the biggest star in PSL. Just shows the quality of PSL. Lol![]()
Retired kp who works as a TV analyst during ipl is the biggest star in PSL. Just shows the quality of PSL. Lol![]()
Retired kp who works as a TV analyst during ipl is the biggest star in PSL. Just shows the quality of PSL. Lol![]()
Buttler is equal roy
Williamson is equal Bmac
Morgan is equal Mathews
Now just tell me which more foreign players playing in BPL but not in PSL and the quailty of the bangladeshi players in it will make it dull and boring even if you hire de villeres and warner
Retired kp who works as a TV analyst during ipl is the biggest star in PSL. Just shows the quality of PSL. Lol![]()
Funny thing is PSL urges teams to play younger players, which in turn helps Pakistan. Names are there for attraction which is all understandable, and it's mandatory that IPL have bigger names since they've been going on for longer - but I know which league I'd want for the benefit of my country.
It's no accident that India haven't won the t20 WC since the advent of the IPL- tells you all you need to know: $ ahead of player development.
Pakistan meanwhile have already started to see the benefits of the PSL- the emerging category (EC) is a particularly good idea. The emerging players requirement should be increased once there are more teams playing in the PSL.
The emerging player requirement is an amazing tool since our domestic structure isn't the greatest, so it helps find hidden gems. Of course though, due to the domestic structure frailties, you might get average emerging talents playing ahead of amazing talents. However, I still think this is good for the future and we've already seen Shadab benefit from this.
I think the EC being increased is a tough one. Fans want to see foreign players because they possess a luxury tag, per se, and it's all the more enjoyable. If it increases, but say that you must include an U25 player with no internationals as a second player - maybe that'd be better. I'm still unsure what the EC requirements are (i think U21?) but if they do add to it, they have to expand the boundaries a little.
The great thing about the PSL is that it does help the future of Pakistan. I'd rather see a few young players in the franchises' starting XI than a team full of Sami's, Wahab's, Kamran's, etc who don't benefit us.
But you hit the nail on the head re: India. Which further says a lot about the development of the PSL compared to the IPL.
It's no accident that India haven't won the t20 WC since the advent of the IPL- tells you all you need to know: $ ahead of player development.
Poor logic
Indian Limited overs cricket teams has been unbelievably good due to the IPL exposure and skill development. No two ways about it
They won 1 WC post-IPL and in the other WC lost only one match to eventual champions Australia
They reached a T20 Final and also a semi which they should have won against Windies.
And 1 CT win and 1 CT final loss
Their Limited overs cricket hs really improved courtesy of IPL
Lol a team is kick out of the Bpl due to payment issues and that too before starting of the league
Something never changes
Poor logic
Indian Limited overs cricket teams has been unbelievably good due to the IPL exposure and skill development. No two ways about it
They won 1 WC post-IPL and in the other WC lost only one match to eventual champions Australia
They reached a T20 Final and also a semi which they should have won against Windies.
And 1 CT win and 1 CT final loss
Their Limited overs cricket hs really improved courtesy of IPL
I think, it's other way - since IPL, BCCI has increased match fees for Ranji players by at least 5 times; now they are paying insurance for FC players, pension schemes, medical facilitates, central contract for Ranji players. On top of that, Indian grounds & cricket facilities has improved beyond any first world country in cricket over last decade. Now, they have top level academies at Sate/Ranji level which is hiring top level Pro coaches even for Ranji teams. There are several junior academies/clinics funded by BCCI all over India and oblate India produces the most diverse cricket wickets across country - imagine in a same league today you play on that Banglaore track that BK debuted against PAK, the very next day you bat on wickets that produced 750 runs in 100 overs......
This is what IPL has done to Indian cricket, though popular belief is that Virat Kohli has learned batting from the 2 months Midas touch of AB & Gayle.
A little correction, as usual - a team is thrown out of BPL for their incapability to submit a bank guarantee, which should ensure the payment of every players - this is standard financial process for every bidding system. If a Contractor responds to a tender for building a bridge, he'll need to submit a certain amount of the project to prove his solvency, in terms of bank guarantee.
Not sure, where you see the payment issues here? Things are changing definitely, unfortunately only if you could see that.
A little correction, as usual - a team is thrown out of BPL for their incapability to submit a bank guarantee, which should ensure the payment of every players - this is standard financial process for every bidding system. If a Contractor responds to a tender for building a bridge, he'll need to submit a certain amount of the project to prove his solvency, in terms of bank guarantee.
Not sure, where you see the payment issues here? Things are changing definitely, unfortunately only if you could see that.
Players like the ones mentioned will fly in for 1 or 2 games max, profit a handsome $50,000-$100,000 and depart more like a holiday camp rather than an international league.
It also shows an inability to vet prospective team owners.
1) 1st BPL season had payment issues
2) 2nd BPL season had payment issues (after players demanded a 25% advance payment)
3) Owners of Dhaka Gladiators were given a lifetime suspension (fixing)
4) Barisal Bulls removed for failing to pay tournament fees
There's a clear concern here.
Retired kp who works as a TV analyst during ipl is the biggest star in PSL. Just shows the quality of PSL. Lol![]()
Many common fans around the world didn't even know it existed till they tuned in to watch Amir bowl for the first time since 2010. Have watched only a little bit of 1 game, think it was between batista bulls and the Chittagong team.
[MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION]
Please have some objectivity and let go of your patriotic bias.
Your arguments are a joke and you are losing credibility
Hate to say it, but BPL has been a snooze-fest so far.
Also, they need to employ a better production company. The camera quality and graphics are terrible.
Hate to say it, but BPL has been a snooze-fest so far.
Also, they need to employ a better production company. The camera quality and graphics are terrible.
T20 tournament etc so Pak players not there (yet) - also Shaheen Afridi going for U19 ASIA Cup
PSL has a lot of talented overseas players this season and many are likely to miss out. I believe Gayle, Bravo, Watson and Dwayne Smith will struggle to get signed this year among others.
Apart from its own young players, PSL has provided a platform for overseas youngsters such as Dawid Malan and Sam Billings to really showcase their talent.
The BPL has a lot of big names this year, however, one issue is that there are more overseas players than local players, meaning less opportunities for them. Therefore hopes of grooming young talent decreases slightly
They have some decent foreigners but quality of the matches and competitiveness isn't very good .
They have some decent foreigners but quality of the matches and competitiveness isn't very good .
That's partly because the domestic cricketers are below average.
Compare that to the likes of Australia, Pakistan, India, Windies etc. where home cricketers are of a better standard.
The Pakistani players are expected to join soon, as the West Indies series looks like it will be called off and postponed to after PSL
Not sure about that. Pakistani players so far haven't played the BPL because they didn't have NOCs as PCB wants them to play the National T20 Cup which is supposed to start in under a week (but there is no actual schedule available for it).... This is one heck of an amazing tournament, so mysterious.
Not sure how accurate it is but:
http://www.pcb.com.pk/tournament-re...ent_matches&tournament_id=1115&_no_redirect=1
Generally fixtures are announced then added to the list... funny, guess they decided to skip the 'announce' part.![]()
Not sure about that. Pakistani players so far haven't played the BPL because they didn't have NOCs as PCB wants them to play the National T20 Cup which is supposed to start in under a week (but there is no actual schedule available for it).... This is one heck of an amazing tournament, so mysterious.