Is the current South Africa team the weakest in the history of South African cricket?

Last Monetarist

T20I Debutant
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Runs
7,910
It's hard to make a judgement on South African sides prior to the 2nd World War, but there is certainly a case to be made that the current team is the weakest since the 1950s.

For a short period during the 1960s, they were the best team on the planet and it's not hyperbole to suggest that if they hadn't been banned they would have run the great West Indian sides very close during their heyday under Clive Lloyd. That is neither here nor there though, but the talent in South African cricket remained exceptional during exile.

They were welcomed back to the fold in 1992 and they responded by taking the World Cup by storm, a tournament which they deserved to win if not for a mix of cynical captaincy by Kepler Wessels in the semi-final and a horrendous rain rule which only seemed to make sense to Richie Benaud.

Their Test team through much of the 90s was on par with Australia and arguably stronger in Asia. They were a team to be feared and with good reason. That didn't change at the turn of the century despite the match-fixing scandal that ended Hansie Cronje's career. The side led by Shaun Pollock was still competitive against all teams not led by Steve Waugh.

Graeme Smith oversaw a period of transition between 2004 and 2006, which ultimately resulted in an ascent to the summit of the Test rankings, a position they didn't relinquish for up to six years.

Which leads us to the current era of South African cricket:

The board is embroiled in a governance scandal, struggling to find sponsors, while allegations of racism during the heady period of the 2000s and 2010s are afoot.

The talent drain to Kolpak has stopped, but the damage will take a few years to unravel. Domestic South African cricket has struggled financially for more than a decade, forcing the board to restructure the shape of domestic cricket last year.

On the field, results have been mixed and the talent on display is a far cry from the great South African sides of the past. The Test team has slid down the rankings since the retirements of Hashim Amla, AB de Villiers, and Dale Steyn. It is not easy to replace players of that calibre, so inconsistent results were to be expected, however, the decline also seems systemic.

The team led by Dean Elgar has fought manfully against India, but has clearly been the underdog throughout the series. In comparison to all those sides of the past, it is difficult to escape the impression that the current team is amongst weakest in the history of South African cricket.

Is there a way back for South African cricket to regain its place at the top of the international game?
 
Last edited:
They will still beat most sides at home with their bowling

I don’t think Pakistan can beat this SA side in a 3 match series, even though Pakistan have a much more stable batting order and lower order in comparison to SA
 
When I think of South African Test sides I think of Jacques Kallis, Allan Donald, Hansie Cronje, Shaun Pollock, Hashim Amla, AB de Villiers, Graeme Smith, Dale Steyn etc.

Cricketers who will always be mentioned amongst the greats and teams who were very difficult to beat, especially in their own conditions.

However these days it seems that South African cricket is going through a rebuilding phase with cricketers who are average to good, but they are not producing very many great Test cricketers.

Lots of problems and issues in South African cricket. I'm not sure their leadership at CSA has the foresight to correct and deal with the many problems they are facing.
 
The end of Kolpak will be a massive gamechanger. Its hard to estimate the damage Kolpak did to domestic cricket

In 3-4 years from now south african cricket will be fine. They still have very good side for home conditions
 
Hard to say. In these conditions, the pace attack looks threatening - especially Rabada and Jansen. Last time Saffers were strong at home was the Sandpaper series when they still had AB . Not that good now.
 
Last edited:
Their bowling is still top notch. I’d say second / third best in their conditions after Australia and maybe India.

Their pitches are generally juicy so don’t see oppositions amassing huge totals against them. All their batsmen need to do is score 200-250 each innings and they will most likely win the game. Question is against good bowling line ups (Aus / Ind / NZ / Eng) who will score those runs? Their batting is ordinary and will go further down when Elgar retires.
 
Their bowling is still top notch. I’d say second / third best in their conditions after Australia and maybe India.

Their pitches are generally juicy so don’t see oppositions amassing huge totals against them. All their batsmen need to do is score 200-250 each innings and they will most likely win the game. Question is against good bowling line ups (Aus / Ind / NZ / Eng) who will score those runs? Their batting is ordinary and will go further down when Elgar retires.

They prepare extremely bowling pitches nowadays to make it a bowling shootout. Pitches with a lot of variable bounce on day 1 at the Wanderers was a poor pitch but no one called that out :rabada2
 
Yes, they are the weakest since 1960.

They do not have a single batsman in this team that averages higher than Herschelle Gibbs in Test Cricket. Forget stats, among all the batters they have, only Elgar who can claim to finish as greater test cricketer than Gibbs in Test Cricket.

Their batting is absymal to say anything more and their bowling is good at home conditions only as they can play with four pacers on juicy green wickets and Maharaj's role is mostly insignificant.

But overseas, the fast bowling is nothing special either. The Nortje, Ngidi and Maharaj have a lot to prove outside South Africa. Rabada is no doubt one of the most complete bowler in the game but he too looked pretty off in India and Pakistan last time around. In India, he showed some spark( in one of the innings, he got three four top order batters ) but simply lacked the support while in Pakistan, he was just not in the right rhythm.

To conclude, this team is at same level to South African team of 1950s when they had Neil Adcock as their lone warrior pacer.
 
Bowling looks top notch of the current SA side . Would further be bolstered by Nortje. Pietersen is great find. I believe Makram would also mature . Still feel that in home conditions this can beat any side on given day. Reservation system had made it weaker but with Kolpak players returning again in SA would help in long term
 
They prepare extremely bowling pitches nowadays to make it a bowling shootout. Pitches with a lot of variable bounce on day 1 at the Wanderers was a poor pitch but no one called that out :rabada2

A 1st-day uneven ounce shouldn't be tolerated anywhere. It is ugly to watch.
 
Their bowling attack of yesteryear could blow away any opposition and they had enough class in their batting to hold their own against bowling attacks.

However nowadays other teams bowling attacks have caught up with them and in some cases gone ahead of them. As for their Test batting, probably amongst the lower levels as a unit in international cricket.
 
Their bowling attack is world class but thier batting is about average.
 
This series has shown they are rising again after a brief transition period.

They are weaker but they are still a force.
 
To be honest Qoutas are blamed but the bad that's happened is caused by bad people in coaching and admin. The current coach is out of his depth, so as the selectors. There is batting talent in first class but they don't select it. There is no reason why Janneman Malan is not opening with Elgar and Markram at 4. There is no justification to having Jansen bat 7, yet it's happening. Bavuma shouldn't have played as much as he's done but here we are. Indians and Pakistani posters always blame Qoutas but there is no qouta that says we are forced to select a poor player. Sipamla did well against Sri Lanka and recently against India A but he hasn't been selected, instead guys like Hendricks got the gig.

The talent is there but so long as incompetent people like Boucher and Mpitsang are in charge, you'll get shocking performance from the team.
 
Ya, the weakest team is going to win the series against a top-class side. It is at home but still...
 
The end of Kolpak will be a massive gamechanger. Its hard to estimate the damage Kolpak did to domestic cricket

In 3-4 years from now south african cricket will be fine. They still have very good side for home conditions

Absolutely, and England will be the biggest looser here.
 
Back
Top