J&K has been taken, PoK and Balochistan are next: Shiv Sena MP discusses "Akhand Hindustan"

[Abdullah719]

J&K has been taken, PoK and Balochistan are next: Shiv Sena MP discusses "Akhand Hindustan"

The Shiv Sena on Monday vocally affirmed its support for the Narendra Modi government's decision to move to revoke Article 370 and bifurcate Jammu and Kashmir into two separate Union territories. A prominent Rajya Sabha member of the Shiv Sena declared “Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and Balochistan were next”.

Sanjay Raut, a Rajya Sabha MP and executive editor of Saamana, the Shiv Sena's mouthpiece, was speaking after Home Minister Amit Shah announced the plans. Raut was quoted by ANI as saying, “Today, Jammu and Kashmir have been taken; tomorrow, Balochistan and PoK will be taken. I have faith that the prime minister of the country will fulfil the dreams of a united India (Akhand Hindustan).”

Shiv Sena chief Uddhav Thackeray declared India had become “independent” in the true sense with the decisions on Jammu and Kashmir. Uddhav declared the Modi government's move on Article 370 was a fulfilment of the dreams of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray and Atal Bihari Vajpayee, the first prime minister from the BJP.

Aaditya Thackeray, the chief of the Yuva Sena, the youth wing of the Shiv Sena, dubbed the moves on Jammu and Kashmir as a "moment of pride" and a "historic day" for the country. "Historic day for India. 370 scrapped and Jammu & Kashmir now truly a part of India. The path to a safer, progressive and an open J&K determined by citizens, and not anti-national separatists has been paved," he said in a tweet.

https://www.theweek.in/news/india/2019/08/05/jk-taken-pok-balochistan-are-next-shiv-sena-mp.html

 

[sensible-indian-fan]

Beautiful lol.

 

[szundercover]

Bjp is no different than daesh or al Qaeda.Instead of focusing on balochistan or azaad kashmir india should worry about khalistan and call for many other independent states which is slowly gaining momentum.

 

[m.shah]

Taken is the word here to ponder.. Yes you have taken us illegally just like British took you illegally but this occupation will also end

 

[WhenSultansBowled]

Great times for that Muslim killer aka Modi and his followers.

No insult is enough for these people and their followers.

 

[Kashmirilion]

Come take it i dare you. Seen how the Americans have run from Afghanistan with tail between their legs. Indians will be worse off.

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

Bangladesh is there right next door, they were indebted to Indian army in 1971, yet India couldn't even take that area back.

Can't take these guys seriously about Kashmir or Balochistan when they have shown their impotence in Bengal.

 

[dhump]

Alright, he is talking, and everyone is listening now thank you for the comedy it was not even funny.

 

[Mamoon]

Bangladesh is there right next door, they were indebted to Indian army in 1971, yet India couldn't even take that area back.

Can't take these guys seriously about Kashmir or Balochistan when they have shown their impotence in Bengal.

Annexing Bangladesh would have been a foreign policy blunder. There are multiple reasons why it wasn’t a good idea for India.

Bangladesh were a poor country in 1971 with very strong national sentiment. They wanted independence and their own identity, thanks to the discrimination that they suffered at the hands of West Pakistan.

Taking over a Muslim majority country who wanted to carve out their own identity would have been an own goal for India. In addition, there were militant groups in Bangladesh who along with the Pakistani military attempted to sabotage the liberation movement.

Furthermore, helping Bangladesh gain independence exposed the Two Nation Theory.

It proved that religion was neither an important enough ground nor a strong enough binding force for independence.

More Muslims decided to stay back in India than the ones who migrated to Pakistan, and Pakistan successfully managed to discriminate and alienate millions of Muslims to the point where they fought for independence.

Today, Pakistan, the inspiration of the Two Nation Theory has a broken economy while India have a friend in Bangladesh which is now doing better than Pakistan economically.

 

[rhony]

What a joke. Obviously what one idiot says is representative of entire population

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

Annexing Bangladesh would have been a foreign policy blunder. There are multiple reasons why it wasn’t a good idea for India.

Bangladesh were a poor country in 1971 with very strong national sentiment. They wanted independence and their own identity, thanks to the discrimination that they suffered at the hands of West Pakistan.

Taking over a Muslim majority country who wanted to carve out their own identity would have been an own goal for India. In addition, there were militant groups in Bangladesh who along with the Pakistani military attempted to sabotage the liberation movement.

Furthermore, helping Bangladesh gain independence exposed the Two Nation Theory.

It proved that religion was neither an important enough ground nor a strong enough binding force for independence.

More Muslims decided to stay back in India than the ones who migrated to Pakistan, and Pakistan successfully managed to discriminate and alienate millions of Muslims to the point where they fought for independence.

Today, Pakistan, the inspiration of the Two Nation Theory has a broken economy while India have a friend in Bangladesh which is now doing better than Pakistan economically.

For all those reasons then, the idea of Akhand Bharat including Kashmir and Balochistan is also a pipe dream. That is the point.

Otherwise please India, reclaim all of Bengal and then the rest can also be plausible.

 

[pakistan cricket fan]

What are you waiting for please come and take it and you will get a phainti you will never forget begairat Sena.

 

[Syed1]

I'd like to see this Hindu rat try..... then his Akhand Bharat will be a radiation wasteland for a 1000 years.

 

[CCAD]

I'd like to see this Hindu rat try..... then his Akhand Bharat will be a radiation wasteland for a 1000 years.

������
India will still survive but not sure there will Pakistan on the map if the nukes come out.

 

[BobbySharma]

I'd like to see this Hindu rat try..... then his Akhand Bharat will be a radiation wasteland for a 1000 years.

I understand you are angry at whats happening.. but did you really have to openly come across as a bigot there? Instead of "Hindu rat".. you could have said "Indian rat".. yes?

 

[AamchiMumbaikar]

I'd like to see this Hindu rat try..... then his Akhand Bharat will be a radiation wasteland for a 1000 years.

There will still be some parts of India left but pak will be totally wiped. Have fun with nukes.

 

[blackanhyellow]

Annexing Bangladesh would have been a foreign policy blunder. There are multiple reasons why it wasn’t a good idea for India.

Bangladesh were a poor country in 1971 with very strong national sentiment. They wanted independence and their own identity, thanks to the discrimination that they suffered at the hands of West Pakistan.

Taking over a Muslim majority country who wanted to carve out their own identity would have been an own goal for India. In addition, there were militant groups in Bangladesh who along with the Pakistani military attempted to sabotage the liberation movement.

Furthermore, helping Bangladesh gain independence exposed the Two Nation Theory.

It proved that religion was neither an important enough ground nor a strong enough binding force for independence.

More Muslims decided to stay back in India than the ones who migrated to Pakistan, and Pakistan successfully managed to discriminate and alienate millions of Muslims to the point where they fought for independence.

Today, Pakistan, the inspiration of the Two Nation Theory has a broken economy while India have a friend in Bangladesh which is now doing better than Pakistan economically.

Chalo lets leave history aside.

Are you looking forward to the day India decides to achieve its Akhand Bharat goal?

Will you be happy living as a Hindustani citizen if their goals are achieved?

Do you reject Pakistan?

 

[JaDed]

Chalo lets leave history aside.

Are you looking forward to the day India decides to achieve its Akhand Bharat goal?

Will you be happy living as a Hindustani citizen if their goals are achieved?

Do you reject Pakistan?

No one will cross Official borders..

 

[Khan12]

Another day another Indian dog barking. These cowards can't do anything. Other then barking.

 

[wasimjunior]

There will still be some parts of India left but pak will be totally wiped. Have fun with nukes.

Is that not destroying your bharat mata. How sad you will never see akhand bharat

 

[Khan12]

Chalo lets leave history aside.

Are you looking forward to the day India decides to achieve its Akhand Bharat goal?

Will you be happy living as a Hindustani citizen if their goals are achieved?

Do you reject Pakistan?

He worships them. So off course yes. He will be massaging their feet.

 

[Syed1]

I understand you are angry at whats happening.. but did you really have to openly come across as a bigot there? Instead of "Hindu rat".. you could have said "Indian rat".. yes?

Haven't seen Sikh Indians or Christian Indians spew this Akhand filth

 

[AamchiMumbaikar]

No one wants akhand Bharat we already have 1.2 billion people.

 

[AamchiMumbaikar]

Is that not destroying your bharat mata. How sad you will never see akhand bharat

See my other post, I not bothered about this akhand Bharat sh**

 

[saeed5646]

������
India will still survive but not sure there will Pakistan on the map if the nukes come out.

But is there any guarantee"hindus"will survive. I can bet there will be none

 

[blackanhyellow]

No one wants akhand Bharat we already have 1.2 billion people.

RSS would beg to differ.

 

[Mamoon]

Chalo lets leave history aside.

Are you looking forward to the day India decides to achieve its Akhand Bharat goal?

Will you be happy living as a Hindustani citizen if their goals are achieved?

Do you reject Pakistan?

Absolutely not. Anyway, AB is just a crackpot idea by a few Hindutva idiots that will never be realized in any capacity. Indians who dream about AB are no different to the likes of Zaid Hamid and his dream of Ghazwa-e-Hind.

 

[Green Patriot]

And then they have the nerve to call Pakistan as terrorists.

Mind your own ****ing business,*******.

 

[BobbySharma]

Haven't seen Sikh Indians or Christian Indians spew this Akhand filth

wow just amazing.

 

[blackanhyellow]

Absolutely not. Anyway, AB is just a crackpot idea by a few Hindutva idiots that will never be realized in any capacity. Indians who dream about AB are no different to the likes of Zaid Hamid and his dream of Ghazwa-e-Hind.

But why dont you support it?

According to you India is a role model country, Pakistan is a burden on its neighbors because Pakistan is always in the wrong, without Pakistan the region would be at peace, you said yourself you are ashamed to be born in Pakistan, so why not support akhand bharat?

Dont you want to be part of shining Hindustan rather than what is according to you a hail hole in Pakistan?

I just want to understand the logic behind your posts, which is why I am asking these questions, feel free not to answer if you dont want to.

 

[BobbySharma]

Absolutely not. Anyway, AB is just a crackpot idea by a few Hindutva idiots that will never be realized in any capacity. Indians who dream about AB are no different to the likes of Zaid Hamid and his dream of Ghazwa-e-Hind.

100%. Akhand Bharat is an unreal concept.. however, it can and it will always win elections. Not even sure if the majority of people of India even want that to become a reality. A version of Pakistan that feels secure in itself is good for India.. but we are like few generations away from that.

 

[Khan12]

But why dont you support it?

According to you India is a role model country, Pakistan is a burden on its neighbors because Pakistan is always in the wrong, without Pakistan the region would be at peace, you said yourself you are ashamed to be born in Pakistan, so why not support akhand bharat?

Dont you want to be part of shining Hindustan rather than what is according to you a hail hole in Pakistan?

I just want to understand the logic behind your posts, which is why I am asking these questions, feel free not to answer if you dont want to.

Logic and him don't go together unfortunately.

 

[Mamoon]

But why dont you support it?

According to you India is a role model country, Pakistan is a burden on its neighbors because Pakistan is always in the wrong, without Pakistan the region would be at peace, you said yourself you are ashamed to be born in Pakistan, so why not support akhand bharat?

Dont you want to be part of shining Hindustan rather than what is according to you a hail hole in Pakistan?

I just want to understand the logic behind your posts, which is why I am asking these questions, feel free not to answer if you dont want to.

Because why would I support the idea of Pakistan absorbing into India? What you said about Pakistan is true, but that does not mean that we cannot mend our ways and carve out our own dentity.

 

[blackanhyellow]

Because why would I support the idea of Pakistan absorbing into India? What you said about Pakistan is true, but that does not mean that we cannot mend our ways and carve out our own dentity.

FYI I didnt say that about Pakistan, you did, in previous threads.

But fair enough I can respect that you have your opinion without respecting your opinion.

 

[szundercover]

������
India will still survive but not sure there will Pakistan on the map if the nukes come out.

Pakistan has stronger nuclear weapons than india.I dont think india will survive.

 

[szundercover]

Can some india poster please explain fully in detail about Akhand bharat?

 

[Vegitto1]

how about they focus on the dirty slums of Mumbai.