What's new

Jewish women brutally attacked by man shouting 'dirty Muslims'

Muhammad10

T20I Debutant
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Runs
6,284
A man has been arrested on suspicion of committing a hate crime in New York after police say he beat and abused a mother and daughter, calling them "dirty Muslims."

The women, who are Jewish, were leaving a subway station at New York's 67th Avenue when they came across a man police say was Dimitrios Zias, 40, who was drunk.

"Go back to your ******* country you dirty Muslims," Mr Zias is alleged to have said, before spitting in the 37-year-old daughter's face and punching her to the ground.

He then grabbed her by the hair and pulled her back upwards, according to authorities.

When apprehended by police, the attacker apparently didn't understand why he was being arrested. "Is it because I’m rich and white?” he is said to have asked.

Mr Zias was charged with assault as a hate crime. Bail was set at $50,000 and he will next appear in court on 27 September.

New York City police figures released in March showed that hate crimes had risen by 55 per cent on the year before.

Crimes listed included a bomb threat at the Manhattan Anti-Defamation League and swastikas appearing on subways. This came despite an overall drop in crime across the city.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...sm-islamophobia-anti-semiticism-a7949076.html
 
The Anglo Saxons should be the first to leave America. They are the original invaders and murderers of indigenous Americans. That is what I always tell white American's shutting them up.
 
The Anglo Saxons should be the first to leave America. They are the original invaders and murderers of indigenous Americans. That is what I always tell white American's shutting them up.

Truth be told, America would not be the America of today without the white man.
 
This waste of skin then asks "is it because I'm rich and white"... I'm sure the justice system will try to defend him as much as possible because of those two reasons.

These macho white folks can only attack helpless women, why not pick on someone your own size? Maybe because that requires cajunas and these folks have none.
 
Truth be told, America would not be the America of today without the white man.


Not true. America would not be the America of today without many different ethnic groups, including Europeans (of varying nationalities), African-Americans, Asians, and so on, ad infinitum.
 
Not true. America would not be the America of today without many different ethnic groups, including Europeans (of varying nationalities), African-Americans, Asians, and so on, ad infinitum.

Agree till white europeans, african americans and jews. Don't think any other community deserves credit for making america what it is now.
 
Truth be told, America would not be the America of today without the white man.

This excuse is similar to justifying the colonisation of India by saying that it aided the country's development. So what if scores of non-whites ended up dead, at least there was some "development".
 
Not true. America would not be the America of today without many different ethnic groups, including Europeans (of varying nationalities), African-Americans, Asians, and so on, ad infinitum.

Whitman was the brains . Africans were manual labourers.

Asians? Please. Asians and the rest started migrating to states when USA was already the no.1 county in the world.
 
Africans are very much part of America.. And they didn't willingly come here in the first place.
 
Whitman was the brains . Africans were manual labourers.

fc80463_barack-obama-facepalm.jpg
 
Asians? Please. Asians and the rest started migrating to states when USA was already the no.1 county in the world.

Dont agree with your first part

But I always laugh when Indians and Pakistanis and many others claim US is great cuz of their hard work and whatnot

The only reason we went there was cuz its already #1.
 
This excuse is similar to justifying the colonisation of India by saying that it aided the country's development. So what if scores of non-whites ended up dead, at least there was some "development".

??SC along with China were top 2 economies before colonization happened,totally different scenario,they came to exploit,white man initially did come for similar reasons but then settled down and made it big,invested in education,research and what not.
 
Don't see what's wrong in saying white people were majorly responsible for America being #1 today,they did all evil no doubt but exploitation is how every country goes to top anyway.
 
Don't see what's wrong in saying white people were majorly responsible for America being #1 today,they did all evil no doubt but exploitation is how every country goes to top anyway.

Because of its ridiculous connotations were you to extrapolate your "logic" and apply it as a measure.
 
??SC along with China were top 2 economies before colonization happened,totally different scenario,they came to exploit,white man initially did come for similar reasons but then settled down and made it big,invested in education,research and what not.

SC was top two economy because Mughals and other emperors had mountains of gold stacked up. It's not like the average citizen was driving around in a souped-up horse cart.

Poverty levels may have risen during the British but even before them the average person in SC was poor.
 
Sugarcoating slavery? :danish

They were brought to Americas not to be chained and fed scraps.
They were brought to clear up the forest and work on plantations and road and rail network.

Africans were not involved in the design or planning of any projects. It was all European immigrants who were planning and designing.
 
They were brought to Americas not to be chained and fed scraps.
They were brought to clear up the forest and work on plantations and road and rail network.

Africans were not involved in the design or planning of any projects. It was all European immigrants who were planning and designing.

Planning and designing is all well and good, but if you don't actually do the physical work, the plans aren't really much use on paper.
 
SC was top two economy because Mughals and other emperors had mountains of gold stacked up. It's not like the average citizen was driving around in a souped-up horse cart.

Poverty levels may have risen during the British but even before them the average person in SC was poor.

True but compared to global poverty levels,SC person was not dying of hunger,could be because of good fertile lands,but also coz of very good civilization esp down south.

Inspite of Wars and everything SC was still considered good enough to be exploited,as opposed to North America.
 
Back
Top