What's new

Kane Williamson will never be rated among ATGs due to playing for a weaker team

The_Odd_One

ODI Debutant
Joined
Dec 27, 2015
Runs
8,950
Here are his scores in this CT.

100, 87, and 57. Got run out twice.

Sad to see him not playing anymore games in CT, a very good batsman who will not get as many chances as Kohli, Smiith, Root, etc. to perform on the big stage.
 
A great but a soft player, and doesn't score big either. He is the master of scoring half-centuries in losing cause. The hundred vs Australia earlier in the group was one of the few impactful ODI knocks that he has played.

He will forever remain in the shadow of Kohli, Root and Smith, and I don't think it necessarily because he plays for NZ, but yes it does play a part to an extent.
 
Lara played majority of his career with a poor windies side yet is one of the greatest batsman of all time
 
That won't affect him being an ATG. He is consistent as ever in all formats.

It would however mean less trophy winning chances for him as compared to the others in Fab 4.
 
Lara played majority of his career with a poor windies side yet is one of the greatest batsman of all time

He was also one of the most entertaining and charismatic players to play the game. Williamson has no personality and star quality. He will not be remembered in history except by those who watched him play.
 
Even if he plays for a better team, he won't

Because, he's not.

He can be 50+ averaging player, but he's not impactful. He takes his own time before striking at over 90.

On a side note, Babar is the early version of Williamson, not Kohli.

Babar has strike rate issues(a bit of selfishness), which he didn't had prior to the WI series at UAE.

Back then he was playing for the team's cause, post west indies series where he got 3 100's, he has begun to play for his milestones
 
He was also one of the most entertaining and charismatic players to play the game. Williamson has no personality and star quality. He will not be remembered in history except by those who watched him play.

It was sad to see him lacking energy as the game slipped away
 
Time is on his side, he is still young. Out of Kohli, De Villiers, Root, Smith and Williamson, I would rate them in this order

1) De Villiers
2) Kohli
3) Root
4) Williamson
5) Smith

I just find Smith incredibly ugly to watch and Root has a boring technique.
 
Williamson is Amla II.

Top quality Test batsman, very good ODI player but lacks impact, a gentleman but has no charisma, and a below average captain. His fans will consider him an ATG, but most of the cricketing world will not put him on the same pedestal.
 
One of the best players. But very soft. Doesn't have the X-factor. Oppositions don't fear him the same way they do Kohli, Smith, or Root - I feel.

Agree . When you play NZ , you know KW is their best player but you still are more worried about Taylor , Anderson or Guptil .
 
Time is on his side, he is still young. Out of Kohli, De Villiers, Root, Smith and Williamson, I would rate them in this order

1) De Villiers
2) Kohli
3) Root
4) Williamson
5) Smith

I just find Smith incredibly ugly to watch and Root has a boring technique.

Smith is to Tests what Kohli is to ODIs. Both are on the brink of becoming ATGs in these respective formats. They need to be top two.

de Villiers is a difficult one. He is an overrated Test cricketer and in spite of ATG stats in ODIs, he has failed to win big matches for SA. In addition, he is one of the worst captains ever. He could potentially end up below all of these names except Williamson.
 
Williamson will soon be at an ATG and so will Shakib. Small team doesn't matter
 
Williamson will soon be at an ATG and so will Shakib. Small team doesn't matter
I don't rate Shakib that highly because he plays for a small team. Kane will probably be the same, Without trophies and big series wins, you've got zilch.
 
Time is on his side, he is still young. Out of Kohli, De Villiers, Root, Smith and Williamson, I would rate them in this order

1) De Villiers
2) Kohli
3) Root
4) Williamson
5) Smith

I just find Smith incredibly ugly to watch and Root has a boring technique.
List is all wrong...

If were' considering all formats, de Villiers should be nowhere near the top.

Smith
Kohli
Root
Warner
Qdk
 
I don't rate Shakib that highly because he plays for a small team. Kane will probably be the same, Without trophies and big series wins, you've got zilch.

Performing for your side is all that matters.

Don't give a damn about big series wins
 
Performing for your side is all that matters.

Don't give a damn about big series wins
No offense, but Shakib was fortunate was of the lack of quality, hence he wasn't overshadowed as much. Kane is going to be overshadowed by Kohli, Smith and Root for most of his career because their teams will win trophies, win big series which they'll be a part of. Kane can't even dream of ever winning an ICC title, winning a Test series in Eng, SA, India or Aus, or becoming the number 1 Test side in the world. It's next to impossible.

Kane is by and far the leading run scorer of the tournament, but look where that's got him. Nowhere, his side is out first round and didn't win a single game. One of Root, Kohli or Smith can still win the tournament despite being behind and further distance themselves from him.
 
Last edited:
No offense, but Shakib was fortunate because of the lack of quality, hence he wasn't overshadowed as much. Kane is going to be overshadowed by Kohli, Smith and Root for most of his career because their teams will win trophies, win big series which they'll be a big reason behindf. Kane can't even dream of ever winning an ICC title, winning a Test series in Eng, SA, India or Aus, or becoming the number 1 Test side in the world. It's next to impossible. What is possible is losing Tests to Bangladesh, SL, WI and getting humiliated in ICC tournaments like this.

Kane is by and far the leading run scorer of the tournament, but look where that's got him. Nowhere, his side is out first round and didn't win a single game. One of Root, Kohli or Smith can still win the tournament despite being behind and further distance themselves from him.
Ops*
 
Last edited:
Williamson will finish behind the other 3. He doesn't have there impact and lacks that extra gear for LO. Will be a brilliant batsman and a very good captain though.
 
Williamson will finish behind the other 3. He doesn't have there impact and lacks that extra gear for LO. Will be a brilliant batsman and a very good captain though.
I'll be shocked if he lasts another 12 months.

Kane will either step down or he will be given a tap on the shoulder.
 
Shakib is the number 1 allrounder in all formats. Enough saif
Who is there to compare him to?

Shakib is neither among the best batsmen in the world nor is anywhere among the best bowlers in the world.
 
I'll be shocked if he lasts another 12 months.

Kane will either step down or he will be given a tap on the shoulder.



There aren't many other options. It's not like he has a world class team where going out at this stage is all of his fault .

He showed at the worldt20 that he is good tactically. I think NZ should give him another year minimum
 
There aren't many other options. It's not like he has a world class team where going out at this stage is all of his fault .

He showed at the worldt20 that he is good tactically. I think NZ should give him another year minimum
The team is going backwards at a rapid rate under him. The fact that he can't make the tough decisions and continues to allow for the selections of duds is unacceptable.
 
Is it just me who feels Kane is a brilliant captain? Maybe because people give more importance to overall result rather than watching match or they don't like Kane not being animated on the field.
 
Virat Kohli
- 2011 World Cup
- 2013 Champions Trophy
- 2016 Asia Cup winners
- Led his team to number 1 Test ranking and was part of a team ranked number 1 in ODIs

Steve Smith
- Test series win in SA
- Led his side to number 1 Test ranking and was part of team who was ranked number 1 in ODIs.
- 2015 World Cup winner - one of Australia's stand out players who performed in the SF and Final.

Joe Root
- Test series wins in SA and India

David Warner
- 2015 World Cup winner
- Test series wins in SA
- Part of a team who was ranked number 1 in Tests and ODIs

Quinton de Kock
- Test series win in Australia

Hashim Amla
- Test series wins in Aus and England

Kane Williamson, after 8 years at the international level
-

------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane will finish as a great of his generation, but I don't think he can be among the games elites without team success.
 
Last edited:
Virat Kohli
- 2011 World Cup
- 2013 Champions Trophy
- 2016 Asia Cup winners
- Led his team to number 1 Test ranking and was part of a team ranked number 1 in ODIs

Steve Smith
- Test series win in SA
- Led his side to number 1 Test ranking and was part of team who was ranked number 1 in ODIs.
- 2015 World Cup winner - one of Australia's stand out players who performed in the SF and Final.

Joe Root
- Test series wins in SA and India

David Warner
- 2015 World Cup winner
- Test series wins in SA
- Part of a team who was ranked number 1 in Tests and ODIs

Quinton de Kock
- Test series win in Australia

Hashim Amla
- Test series wins in Aus and England

Kane Williamson, after 8 years at the international level
-

------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane will finish as a great of his generation, but I don't think he can be among the games elites without team success.


Smith also has match winning knocks vs England home and away in tests. Also 3 centuries in 1 series vs India in India is a brilliant achievement.
 
He will end up as an ATG. Already a better player than Root in tests and played memorable knocks against quality attacks. Kohli doesnt come in top 10 test batsmen as of now in his 50+ test match career. He s the Hashim Amla of tests. Soft runs when they dont matter hardly making impact on his team winning even though they have a star batting side.

Williamson needs better support in odis. He is at par to Smith and Root who have much better support. Kohli in odis is an ATG.
 
Is it just me who feels Kane is a brilliant captain? Maybe because people give more importance to overall result rather than watching match or they don't like Kane not being animated on the field.
He's terrible because the team seems so down in the field, before Kane they were really energetic and talkative, that has gone down hill since then. Doesn't surprise me in the slightest that fielding standards have slipped and NZ is no longer among the best fielding sides in the world.
 
Smith innings in quarter , semi and final of world cup triumphs all otherwise there isnt much difference between him, Root and Williamson in odis.
 
Smith innings in quarter , semi and final of world cup triumphs all otherwise there isnt much difference between him, Root and Williamson in odis.
There's a huge difference.

6.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lara played majority of his career with a poor windies side yet is one of the greatest batsman of all time

Lara was one of the greatest because had the ability to do well against all teams and score big in a really swift manner. His natural talent was greater than all barring a handful of other batsmen in the game's history. Lara was a legend among the legends.

Williamson on the other hand is not a sure shot legend, he does score runs but many a time, they often seem soft almost invisible as others have mentioned. If Williamson is currently judged as to his career trajectory, I would say someone like Mahela Jayawardena's marks are where he will end up - very good, world class on occasion but not really at the level of the best in his era. By NZ standards, Williamson will be their best batsman when he retires but by ATG standards he doesn't have one mountain to climb but several.
 
Lara's knock in 1999 vs Australia, that was rated by Wisden as one of the greatest innings of all time.
 
There's a huge difference.

6.jpg

Yeah thats why Smith better than Root , Williamson.

btw Williamson also scored a fine 40 odd in wc group match against Aus to guide his team to victory in a thriller. That was quite a good little innings against quality bowling. This guy isnt bad as people are making him out. That innings was better than all of Root innings in WC.

Williamson's problem is he is no Kohli who will regularly score and chase you 300s single handedly. Kohli has set the bar very high for others in odis that we expect others to be like him. He is on a different level imo.

Williamson is good against quality bowling and will more often then not singlehandedly can guide his team to 260-270s but that are not enough in modern ods. For 300+ Kane needs dynamic reliable openers, selfess middle order partners and someone like Dhoni down the order. He will start winning more matches once he has better support.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kane Williamson is better then Kohli,Smith and root doesn't convert oftenly so I rate Kane higher

The man plays on green mambas that swing and seam didn't we notice the pitches in New Zealand for the last season they were all green but he knew how to play on them give kohli and smith them pitches they would average about 35 and 45 for smith but kohli would struggle big time

New Zealand are becoming a poor team of late and probably don't fit modern day cricket a lot they like making 260-280 a lot which isn't good enough
 
Last edited:
Babar is a young Williamson that is so true he isn't the young kohli nor Root,Root is special really special,Smith is good as well but Root is miles ahead my reason listen carefully -ROOT HAS THE ABILLITY TO ADAPT TO CERTAIN SITUATIONS AS HE HAS DONE IN ODIS,KOHLI ISNT A GREAT BATSMEN HIS TECHNIQUE IS FAULTY.ROOT IS THE TOP DEAL HE WILL AVERAGE 55 IN TESTS AND 52 IN ODIS

Have a feeling Babar will play 100 tests but he will only average 40 but he will be a gr8 one day player

The anchorman in 20/20
 
Kane Williamson is better then Kohli,Smith and root doesn't convert oftenly so I rate Kane higher

The man plays on green mambas that swing and seam didn't we notice the pitches in New Zealand for the last season they were all green but he knew how to play on them give kohli and smith them pitches they would average about 35 and 45 for smith but kohli would struggle big time

New Zealand are becoming a poor team of late and probably don't fit modern day cricket a lot they like making 260-280 a lot which isn't good enough
I would trade Kane for Smith and Kohli in a heart beat. Both are far more driven and can get more out of their players than Kane ever will.
 
I would trade Kane for Smith and Kohli in a heart beat. Both are far more driven and can get more out of their players than Kane ever will.

Atleast he is a more humble and gracious human being and trust me when kohli gets older his technique will burry him and smith will definitely face problems.Williamson however makes batting easy and even in his mid 30s he will score hundreds
 
Well Brian Lara played for a rubbish team for greater part of his career.
 
Him and Root both will fell behind Kohli and Smith..

I dont find anything extraordinary in Root either . He has thrown it away so many times after playing breezy knocks.
 
Williamson isn't even in the league below Lara.
I know. Just saying that its possible to be rated highly even while playing for a poor team. And NZ team isnt as bad as that Wi team of Lara.
 
Kohli is shockingly overrated on here

overall (tests + odis):

Smith
Root
Williamson
Kohli
 
My favourite non-Indian player. He has shown he has game for limited over as well. They just need a good batsman in a lower middle order to close out matches which they have been losing more often than not. He will go down as an ATG if he keeps on performing like this regardless of how people think of him on forums.
 
Back
Top