What's new

Kashmir Files (trailer) - propaganda or a reality film?

KingKhanWC said:
The Int Community is not the law, its Nato and its lapdogs. This also includes India as Nato want India to do its bidding against China.

Thanks for confirming you believe Might is right and you accept Kashmir is being occupied. But dont then be upset if those fighting for freedom attack your beloved forces.
Click to expand...

Lol...you bought the topic of int'l community and lectured me how they are helping Ukraine against invading Russians. So why you think same int'l community don't help the Kashmir separatist movement and supply them with weapons like they are doing in Ukraine? That is why I said the answer lies in your question. The fact is no int'l community believes Kashmir is an illegal occupation irrespective of how much narrative some try to build.
 
Rajdeep said:
Lol...you bought the topic of int'l community and lectured me how they are helping Ukraine against invading Russians. So why you think same int'l community don't help the Kashmir separatist movement and supply them with weapons like they are doing in Ukraine? That is why I said the answer lies in your question. The fact is no int'l community believes Kashmir is an illegal occupation irrespective of how much narrative some try to build.
Click to expand...

lol. They do believe its, because its the law. I bought it up because I knew the weak response you would provide. They just dont support it because of the reason I mentioned. Being a puppet of Nato against China isnt something to be proud of.

Are you telling me Kashmir is not occupied? Please prove it.
 
I read this thread and the hatred against India and Indians, and i thank my stars that the leaders of our Independence chose partition over agreeing to the demands of M A Jinnah.

And i am glad that we chose Modi and his foreign policy.
 
KingKhanWC said:
lol. They do believe its, because its the law. I bought it up because I knew the weak response you would provide. They just dont support it because of the reason I mentioned. Being a puppet of Nato against China isnt something to be proud of.

Are you telling me Kashmir is not occupied? Please prove it.
Click to expand...

PoK is ofcourse occupied. No doubt.
 
cricketjoshila said:
I read this thread and the hatred against India and Indians, and i thank my stars that the leaders of our Independence chose partition over agreeing to the demands of M A Jinnah.

And i am glad that we chose Modi and his foreign policy.
Click to expand...


Is that policy giving up land for China to construct toilets for you?
 
KingKhanWC said:
lol. They do believe its, because its the law. I bought it up because I knew the weak response you would provide. They just dont support it because of the reason I mentioned. Being a puppet of Nato against China isnt something to be proud of.

Are you telling me Kashmir is not occupied? Please prove it.
Click to expand...

Ok...so they (int'l community) do believe Kashmir is illegal occupation but still wont say anything to India because NATO want us in their geo political bidding against China? I myself was not aware we are such a powerful country...thanks for enlightening me...LOL.

So if you know the above then you must also realize Kashmir is a lost cause because:

A) India will NEVER give up its land.
B) Int'l community will not go against India bcoz apparently its the lapdog of NATO (as per you)

What is the issue then? Accept status quo and move on.


See its so easy to tangle you into your own debate ;-)
 
Pakpak said:
On other portals online I see Indians admit this, so many of them now. Somehow its only PP which attracts the scummy Hindutuva brigade who agree with isolate Pakistan everywhere yet infest this board
Click to expand...

This is the thing for me. India's been in this weird place since the 1990's since the rise of the BJP and Hindutva movement. I don't want to watch Bollywood movies about Kashmir or Pakistan, but I can get why they might be popular over there.

But why come on here to talk about it? I didn't even know there was a movie called the Kashmir Files, neither did I care. But now I end up dissing it purely because I am annoyed at being spammed with this nonsensical propaganda.
 
Rajdeep said:
Ok...so they (int'l community) do believe Kashmir is illegal occupation but still wont say anything to India because NATO want us in their geo political bidding against China? I myself was not aware we are such a powerful country...thanks for enlightening me...LOL.

So if you know the above then you must also realize Kashmir is a lost cause because:

A) India will NEVER give up its land.
B) Int'l community will not go against India bcoz apparently its the lapdog of NATO (as per you)

What is the issue then? Accept status quo and move on.


See its so easy to tangle you into your own debate ;-)
Click to expand...

lol. The Int Community has also said NOTHING reg Pakistan occupying Kashmir. In fact India claim Pak has control of its territory, yet it cant fight to liberate it and neither will its master support or call out Pak. Is Pak just as powerful too? See you arguments are so weak and poor. So easy to dangle the worm at you.

Its not India's land lol.

So you think India is not an occupying force even though Int Law inc UN resolutions clearly state it is? And you want me to take you seriously ?

Nobody is accepting anything but the right to defend against and attack against invaders/occupiers. Pulwama should be a good reminder for you. ;)
 
Last edited:
cricketjoshila said:
PoK is ofcourse occupied. No doubt.
Click to expand...

Sure, I agree acc to Int law but not according to the Kashmiris on this side.

Yet the 'great' Indian army cant liberate Kashmir. You wrote years ago India would but we are still waiting while eating popcorn and watching Bollywood epics.
 
So let me get this straight, Indian army are trained for retaliation through rape, torture, and maming?

Got it.
 
KingKhanWC said:
Sure, I agree acc to Int law but not according to the Kashmiris on this side.

Yet the 'great' Indian army cant liberate Kashmir. You wrote years ago India would but we are still waiting while eating popcorn and watching Bollywood epics.
Click to expand...

I wonder if the movie is in Dolby Atmos filmed in IMAX?

Saving Private Rishan Kishan.
 
KingKhanWC said:
Sure, I agree acc to Int law but not according to the Kashmiris on this side.

Yet the 'great' Indian army cant liberate Kashmir. You wrote years ago India would but we are still waiting while eating popcorn and watching Bollywood epics.
Click to expand...

Sweet and salty popcorn. This is the irony.
 
Technics 1210 said:
I wonder if the movie is in Dolby Atmos filmed in IMAX?

Saving Private Rishan Kishan.
Click to expand...

Its a action/thriller movie called Rickshaw 1 down.

I wonder if in this movie Kashmir files the audience were treated to when Pakistan waltzed into to take half of Kashmir or was this file missing ?
 
KingKhanWC said:
Sure, I agree acc to Int law but not according to the Kashmiris on this side.

Yet the 'great' Indian army cant liberate Kashmir. You wrote years ago India would but we are still waiting while eating popcorn and watching Bollywood epics.
Click to expand...

Well there is a reason why that LoC is there and India hasn't tried to take PoK. This is why your PM is reduced to rants on twitter and no one listens to you in the international community.

Pakistan has tried to take Kashmir thrice, failed, lost Bangladesh. Imran said many things couldn't do jack when article 370 was removed.

All you guys can do is post online,while the tricolour flies in Srinagar.
 
Last edited:
KingKhanWC said:
Its a action/thriller movie called Rickshaw 1 down.

I wonder if in this movie Kashmir files the audience were treated to when Pakistan waltzed into to take half of Kashmir or was this file missing ?
Click to expand...

Pakistan fought a poorly equipped army of Hari Singh, the moment Indian Army came, they ran back from near Srinagar to the small strip called PoK.

I am sure we can make a movie on the retreat of pakistan.
 
cricketjoshila said:
Well there is a reason why that LoC is there and India hasn't tried to take PoK. This is why your PM is reduced to rants on twitter and no one listens to you in the international community.

Pakistan has tried to take Kashmir thrice, failed, lost Bangladesh. Imran said many things couldn't do jack when article 370 was removed.

All you guys can do is post online,while the tricolour flies in Srinagar.
Click to expand...

Reason is India has failed to liberate its territory after 70 years. The fact it hasnt even tried, shows how much Indians really take their combat skills seriously. Pak will continue to always support the resistance.

Have you seen the movie? To save me boredom, how long into the film do they mention this fact? As the trailer says its 'brutally honest'?
 
cricketjoshila said:
Pakistan fought a poorly equipped army of Hari Singh, the moment Indian Army came, they ran back from near Srinagar to the small strip called PoK.

I am sure we can make a movie on the retreat of pakistan.
Click to expand...

You should have been there for Hari instead of watching Mohammed Rafi. No point crying 70 years and not being brave enough to liberate.
 
KingKhanWC said:
lol. The Int Community has also said NOTHING reg Pakistan occupying Kashmir. In fact India claim Pak has control of its territory, yet it cant fight to liberate it and neither will its master support or call out Pak. Is Pak just as powerful too? See you arguments are so weak and poor. So easy to dangle the worm at you.

Its not India's land lol.

So you think India is not an occupying force even though Int Law inc UN resolutions clearly state it is? And you want me to take you seriously ?

Nobody is accepting anything but the right to defend against and attack against invaders/occupiers. Pulwama should be a good reminder for you. ;)
Click to expand...

Its all so confusing..you clearly getting more tangled in your own words.

First of all its you who dragged int'l community and said look how they are helping Ukraine against Russian invasion. Basically trying to take a moral high ground and equating Russian invasion with Kashmir issue.

So I asked why they are they not interfering in Kashmir then like they are doing in Ukraine? You said bcoz NATO needs India to deal with China as India is their lapdog. So if you yourself know international community wont interfere in Kashmir issue, what is the point of bringing them into this debate? I am clearly not following.

Then I said (to my amusement) that even I didnt knew India is such a strong country geo politically that NATO cant say a word to India even though they have invaded Kashmir and violating all human rights. They can bully Russia but not India...wow.

You then knew you got cornered and now saying they also dont say anything to Pakistan for POK. Thats what you said right? Your words...not mine.

So the question is, India we understand is a lapdog of Nato and hence west dont say anything. But now you are saying they also dont interfere in POK affairs. So is Pakistan also a lapdog of NATO? Just asking bruv...all your words not mine.

Anyway, India wont give up its land and int'l community wont interfere. So thats why I asked what is the solution? People have to accept status quo and move on.

Ofcourse there will be fringe terror attacks like Pulwama but then Indian army will deal with them 10 times more strongly.

I am seriously not following at all...anyway thanks for the amusement King Khan bhai.
 
Rajdeep said:
Its all so confusing..you clearly getting more tangled in your own words.

First of all its you who dragged int'l community and said look how they are helping Ukraine against Russian invasion. Basically trying to take a moral high ground and equating Russian invasion with Kashmir issue.

So I asked why they are they not interfering in Kashmir then like they are doing in Ukraine? You said bcoz NATO needs India to deal with China as India is their lapdog. So if you yourself know international community wont interfere in Kashmir issue, what is the point of bringing them into this debate? I am clearly not following.

Then I said (to my amusement) that even I didnt knew India is such a strong country geo politically that NATO cant say a word to India even though they have invaded Kashmir and violating all human rights. They can bully Russia but not India...wow.

You then knew you got cornered and now saying they also dont say anything to Pakistan for POK. Thats what you said right? Your words...not mine.

So the question is, India we understand is a lapdog of Nato and hence west dont say anything. But now you are saying they also dont interfere in POK affairs. So is Pakistan also a lapdog of NATO? Just asking bruv...all your words not mine.

Anyway, India wont give up its land and int'l community wont interfere. So thats why I asked what is the solution? People have to accept status quo and move on.

Ofcourse there will be fringe terror attacks like Pulwama but then Indian army will deal with them 10 times more strongly.

I am seriously not following at all...anyway thanks for the amusement King Khan bhai.
Click to expand...

You wont follow bhai because your mind is full of bias and conditioned to believe India is just in Kashmir. Its not personal, almost every Indian citizen who is not a Muslim feels this way.

Ill explain.


The Kashmiris in Pakistani side are not being killed, not being tortured, not being raped and they are happy Pakistani forces protect them from Indian forces.

The same cannot be said of the people in the Indian side of Kashmir. We both know the vast majority hate the Indian state and armed forces. Hundreds of articles, docus and human rights reports testify to this.

Therefore the the Int community cant say anything to Pakistan, the people are happy. They also dont say much to India but for a totally different reason as explained.

Acc to Int law both are occupying forces but only one is abusing human beings.

Hope that helps.

Have you seen the movie? Is it really 'brutally honest' explaining these basic facts?
 
WhenSultansBowled said:
So, in the movie, you are portraying Kashmiri Muslims as individuals who won't even hesitate to kill their own mothers.

When in reality, your army is torturing unarmed youth. And the video was posted by Indian army itself.

This post is very relevant to this hate spreading movie.

Brainwashed and sick, to the core.
Click to expand...

Again stop drifting..

You want to talk about Indian army and Kashmiri muslims, start a NEW THREAD...
 
This film is a vile attempt to make the victims (Kashmiri Muslims) seem like the oppressor, and to make the aggressor (Hindus) seem like the victim. Not surprising since besharam people like Vivek Agnihotri directed it.

Over 70,000 Kashmiri Muslims have been killed by India. Countless women have been raped. So many men have been tortured. Their is zero comparison between the suffering of Kashmiri Hindus and Kashmiri Muslims. The number of Kashmiri Hindus who have dies is minuscule compared to Kashmiri Muslims, not to mention Kashmiri Muslims have been asking them to come back to the valley for decades. And the real reason Hindus left the valley was because the Hindu governor told them to leave Kashmir.


Hindus could care less about the deaths and rapes of Kashmiri Muslims, they dont care how many Muslims were killed in the Dogra era, dont care about the Jammu Muslim massacre. However they keep on crying about the suffering of the so called "Pandits", who are 5% at best of the Kashmiri population yet think they should rule the valley. This the two nation theory in nutshell. Hindus will feel closer to their fellow religious adherents, and the same for Muslims.
 
cricketjoshila said:
I read this thread and the hatred against India and Indians, and i thank my stars that the leaders of our Independence chose partition over agreeing to the demands of M A Jinnah.

And i am glad that we chose Modi and his foreign policy.
Click to expand...

Their is zero hatred for Indian Muslims in Pakistan. The rest of Indians can be neighbors, but they are family.
 
cricketjoshila said:
I read this thread and the hatred against India and Indians, and i thank my stars that the leaders of our Independence chose partition over agreeing to the demands of M A Jinnah.

And i am glad that we chose Modi and his foreign policy.
Click to expand...

Which policy - the one you fly across borders in search for fantastic tea.
 
Gharib Aadmi said:
This film is a vile attempt to make the victims (Kashmiri Muslims) seem like the oppressor, and to make the aggressor (Hindus) seem like the victim. Not surprising since besharam people like Vivek Agnihotri directed it.

Over 70,000 Kashmiri Muslims have been killed by India. Countless women have been raped. So many men have been tortured. Their is zero comparison between the suffering of Kashmiri Hindus and Kashmiri Muslims. The number of Kashmiri Hindus who have dies is minuscule compared to Kashmiri Muslims, not to mention Kashmiri Muslims have been asking them to come back to the valley for decades. And the real reason Hindus left the valley was because the Hindu governor told them to leave Kashmir.


Hindus could care less about the deaths and rapes of Kashmiri Muslims, they dont care how many Muslims were killed in the Dogra era, dont care about the Jammu Muslim massacre. However they keep on crying about the suffering of the so called "Pandits", who are 5% at best of the Kashmiri population yet think they should rule the valley. This the two nation theory in nutshell. Hindus will feel closer to their fellow religious adherents, and the same for Muslims.
Click to expand...

Which part of what is shown in the movie is untrue?

People have just been deflecting from the beginning.
 
Perhaps a lot of questions people have about why they feel Indians have so much animosity towards Kashmiris can be understood by seeing all the atrocities done on people by the JKLF and radicalised Muslims. This movie is about events that happened in 1989 and 1990.

Not expecting much from Pak as keeping this conflict alive with crocodile tears.
 
Anyways - this movie is meant to educate people about the things that happened during this time period mentioned above. A lot of people in India are waking up to the fact that their govt and machinery was actively involved in keeping this story under wraps as they played dirty politics.
 
Gharib Aadmi said:
This film is a vile attempt to make the victims (Kashmiri Muslims) seem like the oppressor, and to make the aggressor (Hindus) seem like the victim. Not surprising since besharam people like Vivek Agnihotri directed it.

Over 70,000 Kashmiri Muslims have been killed by India. Countless women have been raped. So many men have been tortured. Their is zero comparison between the suffering of Kashmiri Hindus and Kashmiri Muslims. The number of Kashmiri Hindus who have dies is minuscule compared to Kashmiri Muslims, not to mention Kashmiri Muslims have been asking them to come back to the valley for decades. And the real reason Hindus left the valley was because the Hindu governor told them to leave Kashmir.


Hindus could care less about the deaths and rapes of Kashmiri Muslims, they dont care how many Muslims were killed in the Dogra era, dont care about the Jammu Muslim massacre. However they keep on crying about the suffering of the so called "Pandits", who are 5% at best of the Kashmiri population yet think they should rule the valley. This the two nation theory in nutshell. Hindus will feel closer to their fellow religious adherents, and the same for Muslims.
Click to expand...

Non sense. From 14th century AD, the hindu population in J&K vanished from 100% to 0%.
 
I appreciate that right wing is getting creative as well, kudos to them Pallavi Joshi and Anupam Kher are amazing actors so it’s good to see a balance as creative arts is usually a leftist field, with right wing being utter useless in it.
 
Lego20 said:
Non sense. From 14th century AD, the hindu population in J&K vanished from 100% to 0%.
Click to expand...

Not J&K .. just K - and that too from a few districts of the valley.

Hopefully, all this leads to justice for the victims of this genocide. Expedient punishment to all those involved in the genocide and suitable reparation and repatriation of those driven out by terrorists to their homes.
 
JaDed said:
I appreciate that right wing is getting creative as well, kudos to them Pallavi Joshi and Anupam Kher are amazing actors so it’s good to see a balance as creative arts is usually a leftist field, with right wing being utter useless in it.
Click to expand...

Which part of the movie do you disagree with? What is the "creative" part?
 
LongtimeLurk3r said:
Not J&K .. just K - and that too from a few districts of the valley.

Hopefully, all this leads to justice for the victims of this genocide. Expedient punishment to all those involved in the genocide and suitable reparation and repatriation of those driven out by terrorists to their homes.
Click to expand...

Thanks for correcting. The perpetrators must have died of natural death by now.
 
JaDed said:
Who is Pallavi Joshi playing here? JNU professor? Do i need to remind you about Vivek and Urban Naxal remark?
Click to expand...

JNU prof Niveditha Menon and Arundati Roy. In fact in one scene there is a photo which is a replica of one that Arundathi Roy has with Yasin Malik. Possibly others as well. But these 2 were obvious
 
Film makes no difference. A few Indian's were taken care off my the freedom fighters yesterday too. The freedom fighters and Pak don't care about such film's at all.
 
LongtimeLurk3r said:
JNU prof Niveditha Menon and Arundati Roy. In fact in one scene there is a photo which is a replica of one that Arundathi Roy has with Yasin Malik. Possibly others as well. But these 2 were obvious
Click to expand...
lol so it’s creative , here is another:


The Kashmir Files also tries to pin the blame on Farooq Abdullah and the Rajiv Gandhi-led government in Delhi. During the exodus, V.P. Singh was the prime minister, but the blame is pinned on Home Minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed.

https://theprint.in/features/reel-t...t-vivek-agnihotri-gives-it-death-blow/871254/
 
Why are posters getting mad, I was praising right wing to have finally found a footing in creative fields lol, too touchy!

Pallavi Joshi and Anupam Kher are people I respect as actors.
 
JaDed said:
Why are posters getting mad, I was praising right wing to have finally found a footing in creative fields lol, too touchy!

Pallavi Joshi and Anupam Kher are people I respect as actors.
Click to expand...

Who is mad? Since you are insinuating that this movie is a propaganda movie by aligning it with a political ideology rather than a factual representation of what happened - what part do you think is propaganda?
 
JaDed said:
lol so it’s creative , here is another:


The Kashmir Files also tries to pin the blame on Farooq Abdullah and the Rajiv Gandhi-led government in Delhi. During the exodus, V.P. Singh was the prime minister, but the blame is pinned on Home Minister Mufti Mohammad Sayeed.

https://theprint.in/features/reel-t...t-vivek-agnihotri-gives-it-death-blow/871254/
Click to expand...

This was a process that grew from sprouts of hatred during the Rajiv Gandhi era. Pls read the letter from then Governor Jagmohan to Rajiv Gandhi - https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2019/aug/17/potatoes-one-day-the-pope-the-next-2020117.html

Rajiv Gandhi and Abdulla played a big part in this.
 
LongtimeLurk3r said:
Who is mad? Since you are insinuating that this movie is a propaganda movie by aligning it with a political ideology rather than a factual representation of what happened - what part do you think is propaganda?
Click to expand...

I posted above, You asked me which part i think is creative , what I meant was creative as in creative field.
Unless you are saying every incident in this movie is true to every detail?
 
JaDed said:
That’s not the right answer, so they took creative liberty here?
A true story should have facts , no?
Click to expand...

Like I said - take a peek at that letter. That article you posted said that the movie pins the entire problem on RG and FA. Not true. Also - the movie does not show that the wife dies in the shooting of the guy. I guess this reviewer wrote the review based on the trailer as well
 
LongtimeLurk3r said:
Like I said - take a peek at that letter. That article you posted said that the movie pins the entire problem on RG and FA. Not true. Also - the movie does not show that the wife dies in the shooting of the guy. I guess this reviewer wrote the review based on the trailer as well
Click to expand...

I posted only one instance because others were the writer’s view.(which i couldn’t care about)

I don’t care about the letter I’m just asking who had the power to stop the relocation or exodus and who were present in power at that time?
It’s a simple question, don’t tell me who the put the seed or what not, I can always find reasons that way and Modi can keeping blaming Nehru in 2034z
 
JaDed said:
I posted only one instance because others were the writer’s view.(which i couldn’t care about)

I don’t care about the letter I’m just asking who had the power to stop the relocation or exodus and who were present in power at that time?
It’s a simple question, don’t tell me who the put the seed or what not, I can always find reasons that way and Modi can keeping blaming Nehru in 2034z
Click to expand...

What do Modi and Nehru have to do with this movie?

And yes - the intent of the movie is to show the immense apathy and ineffectiveness of our govt during those times. Time for justice for the victims. Let us start with acceptance of what happened and learn so that something similar doesn't happen in other parts of India.
 
Last edited:
What I find super remarkable is BJP wants a cake and eat it to.

1989-1991 was one of the disastrous times ever in our country and BJP was in bed with VP singh.

1991-1996 is when we took all of our toughest decisions unfortunately riots happened under NV rao and thanks to AB Vajpayee being an excellent opposition that helped the country as well.
 
JaDed said:
What I find super remarkable is BJP wants a cake and eat it to.

1989-1991 was one of the disastrous times ever in our country and BJP was in bed with VP singh.

1991-1996 is when we took all of our toughest decisions unfortunately riots happened under NV rao and thanks to AB Vajpayee being an excellent opposition that helped the country as well.
Click to expand...

Not sure what this has to do with the movie again. Where does BJP feature in the movie at all? Maybe we can have a separate thread on this?
 
LongtimeLurk3r said:
What do Modi and Nehru have to do with this movie?

And yes - the intent of the movie is to show the immense apathy and ineffectiveness of our govt during those times. Time for justice for the victims. Let us start with acceptance of what happened and learn so that something similar doesn't happen in other parts of India.
Click to expand...

In that logic time for BJP supporters to accept their netas were in bed with VP singh, simple no?

Why did you bring in Rajiv Gandhi and stuff here , my point is simple who had the power to stop the exodus, you have changed your goal now which is alright.
 
JaDed said:
In that logic time for BJP supporters to accept their netas were in bed with VP singh, simple no?

Why did you bring in Rajiv Gandhi and stuff here , my point is simple who had the power to stop the exodus, you have changed your goal now which is alright.
Click to expand...

RG has a direct bearing on the events that unfolded. Read that letter I posted above :)

And yes BJP was wrong for not supporting the Pandits at the time. I don't know what part of the entire govt of the time was apathetic to what was happening doesn't make that clear.
 
People should never forget their past. Until now KP genocide was not know to masses. Now it is known by many. Anyone saying this movie promotes islamophobia is denying the living experience of many Kashmir pandits.
 
Gharib Aadmi said:
This film is a vile attempt to make the victims (Kashmiri Muslims) seem like the oppressor, and to make the aggressor (Hindus) seem like the victim. Not surprising since besharam people like Vivek Agnihotri directed it.

Over 70,000 Kashmiri Muslims have been killed by India. Countless women have been raped. So many men have been tortured. Their is zero comparison between the suffering of Kashmiri Hindus and Kashmiri Muslims. The number of Kashmiri Hindus who have dies is minuscule compared to Kashmiri Muslims, not to mention Kashmiri Muslims have been asking them to come back to the valley for decades. And the real reason Hindus left the valley was because the Hindu governor told them to leave Kashmir.


Hindus could care less about the deaths and rapes of Kashmiri Muslims, they dont care how many Muslims were killed in the Dogra era, dont care about the Jammu Muslim massacre. However they keep on crying about the suffering of the so called "Pandits", who are 5% at best of the Kashmiri population yet think they should rule the valley. This the two nation theory in nutshell. Hindus will feel closer to their fellow religious adherents, and the same for Muslims.
Click to expand...

Excellent post. Pandits may well have suffered due to the strife at the time between the two communities, but it has been blown up way out of proportion. This is the MO of the Hindutva brigade, they inflict massacres themselves in Gujarat, Kashmir and Ayodhya, then invent some pretext that Muslims started it by burning trains, kidnapping a cow, or marrying a hindu girl.

That is the whole point of this rubbish being brought up on Pakistan sites, this is the cyber bot warfare which they think they specialise in.
 
Cover Drive Six said:
Is Deccan Herald and Deccan chronicle same?

Reading Deccan Herald news since last Couple of months.
Before elections they have published lot of garbage against BJP and Bahubali elevations to Priyanka, Akhilesh and others. They were on bashing mode until results day.

DH is Left leaning news paper like many other mainstream media with full bias.
Click to expand...

Two different papers. Chronicle is Hyderabad-based. Herald is Bengaluru-based. Chronicle used to own the Deccan Chargers IPL team. Herald is a more serious paper :)

If you call a paper that tries to cover the truth, left-leaning and biased, it's not shocking anymore actually.
 
pillionrider said:
Two different papers. Chronicle is Hyderabad-based. Herald is Bengaluru-based. Chronicle used to own the Deccan Chargers IPL team. Herald is a more serious paper :)

If you call a paper that tries to cover the truth, left-leaning and biased, it's not shocking anymore actually.
Click to expand...

btw, in the '80s the offices were ransacked by Muslims because of a story carried in the paper. So much for left-leaning bias :))
 
JaDed said:
Who was the PM when exodus began? Which government supported That PM?
Click to expand...

Which government brought AFSPA in J and K and under pressure from which party?

Which party was in power in J and K in 1990 and supported by whom?

Which party was in power in India from 1987 to 1989 under whom the militancy and exodus began?
 
pillionrider said:
Two different papers. Chronicle is Hyderabad-based. Herald is Bengaluru-based. Chronicle used to own the Deccan Chargers IPL team. Herald is a more serious paper :)

If you call a paper that tries to cover the truth, left-leaning and biased, it's not shocking anymore actually.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the info.

For highlighted part: As I said they have changes tone after Results.
Recently they Published a joke that Ashok Gehlot, a BJP agent.
 
Kashmiri pundits were taken out to provide them comfy jobs and reservations while the muslims suffered a genocide which is still going on. Anyway pundits formed an insignificant minority in Kashmir and most of them have been helped on to do decently in life outside JK.
 
IndoorCricket said:
People should never forget their past. Until now KP genocide was not know to masses. Now it is known by many. Anyone saying this movie promotes islamophobia is denying the living experience of many Kashmir pandits.
Click to expand...

Are you a k pundit? How do u know the movie has depicted the truth?
 
A great movie depicting the truths about brutality against KPs. The only people who are talking against the movie are the ones who support such cruelty and inhuman acts
 
Mrhandsome said:
Kashmiri pundits were taken out to provide them comfy jobs and reservations while the muslims suffered a genocide which is still going on. Anyway pundits formed an insignificant minority in Kashmir and most of them have been helped on to do decently in life outside JK.
Click to expand...

How do you know? Are you a Kashimri Pandit?
 
In the latest endorsement for Director Vivek Agnihotri's hotly-debated movie 'The Kashmir Files,' Prime Minister Narendra Modi today said that such films "reveal the truth" and claimed that there has been a "conspiracy" to discredit it. Speaking at the BJP parliamentary party meeting in Delhi, PM Modi took a swipe at the critics of the films and said that they are furious because the recently-released movie is foregrounding the truth that was deliberately kept hidden.
"The entire Jamaat (gang) that raised the flag of freedom of expression has been furious for 5-6 days. Instead of reviewing the film on the basis of facts and art, there's a conspiracy to discredit it," he said.
Click to expand...

What a topic to comment on, by the PM of a country - a bgrade movie by a third-class director.

At least now, Modi found his voice on the plight of the Pandits. I've been in power for 8 years and done nothing for them, let me comment now on a film and change the perception, like I've been tirelessly working for them.

Modi doesn't care about anyone. His Hindu supporters will learn this soon. He's a sociopath who will do anything for power and will do nothing to improve the life of the average Hindu.
 
pillionrider said:
What a topic to comment on, by the PM of a country - a bgrade movie by a third-class director.

At least now, Modi found his voice on the plight of the Pandits. I've been in power for 8 years and done nothing for them, let me comment now on a film and change the perception, like I've been tirelessly working for them.

Modi doesn't care about anyone. His Hindu supporters will learn this soon. He's a sociopath who will do anything for power and will do nothing to improve the life of the average Hindu.
Click to expand...

Yes removal of article 370 and 35A and clipping the wings of extremists there really showed ppl he didn't care.
 
Which MSM in India is biased towards left? Most have towards BJP right wing lol.

Zee- WION
TOI
HT
REPUBLIC
INDIA Today
CNN iBN
ABP
lol all the above ones are pro BJP.

Leftist:
The Hindu
The Wire
NDTV
 
pillionrider said:
What a topic to comment on, by the PM of a country - a bgrade movie by a third-class director.

At least now, Modi found his voice on the plight of the Pandits. I've been in power for 8 years and done nothing for them, let me comment now on a film and change the perception, like I've been tirelessly working for them.

Modi doesn't care about anyone. His Hindu supporters will learn this soon. He's a sociopath who will do anything for power and will do nothing to improve the life of the average Hindu.
Click to expand...

His Hindu supporters dont want any entitlements or special privileges. Just fairness and equality - no appeasement based secularism.
 
pillionrider said:
What a topic to comment on, by the PM of a country - a bgrade movie by a third-class director.

At least now, Modi found his voice on the plight of the Pandits. I've been in power for 8 years and done nothing for them, let me comment now on a film and change the perception, like I've been tirelessly working for them.

Modi doesn't care about anyone. His Hindu supporters will learn this soon. He's a sociopath who will do anything for power and will do nothing to improve the life of the average Hindu.
Click to expand...

B grade movie? Have atleast some compassion for a community who have suffered a genocide and have been displaced.

Its not about Modi or BJP, its about what happened to Kashmiri hindus in the muslim majority valley.

As long as Modi makes sure that the law is fair to hindus and hindus are not treated as second class, its fine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top