You were complaining that middle order doesn't get too many deliveries and hence they struggle.
But, what's your opinion now after watching this series
I am going to answer your question on the "premise" you are not a troll and are really interested in a candid discussion with me.
We know Babar and Rizwan are good T20 openers. We knew at the end of Asia cup that Babar and Rizwan are two good openers who are average to above average and will be able to get Pakistan "middling scores".
We also know that every once in a while "have a great day and win the match by themselves".
We knew our middle order was non-existent before the T20 series and "desperately needed" some time to bat to get to know how "awful they actually were".
Now lets look at the T20 series vs England.
1st Match - Babar batted for 10 overs and Rizwan batted for 14.4 overs before being dismissed. Our openers literally gave middle order 6 overs to score the final total.
2nd Match - Babar and Rizwan batted for 20 overs to win the match for Pakistan.
3rd Match - Babar and Rizwan came at RR of over 11 runs per over and got dismissed in 4th over with the RR at 12.5 runs per over and 20 runs on the board chasing 222 to win. And people think it was a TEST of the middle order. You have to wonder....
4th Match - Babar and Rizwan battered for 12 overs before Babar got dismissed and Rizwan batted till 19th over. So middle order got 8 overs to smash it around?
5th Match - A low scoring affair in which middle order ACTUALLY GOT A CHANCE but Failed.
6th Match - Rizwan didn't play and Mr. Azam batted for the entire 20 overs. The only myth that was dispelled was that without Rizwan Pakistan would have crashed to 120 all out.
7th Match - Babar and Rizwan got out in 2 overs and asked the middle order to chase at 11 Runs per over to see if they are good enough...
I mean what are we trying to prove here?
That Babar and Rizwan can bat for as long as possible and can score bulk of the runs? Yes, we know that.
That they will sometimes win the games by themselves. Yes, we know that.
The middle order?
Bar one 5th game, was not even given an accurate chance.
In the 2 matches that Babar and Rizwan had the courtesy of departing in 2nd and 4th over, Pakistan were chasing 210 and 220 runs.
Are you telling me we are going to test our middle order by asking them to play at 12 an over ?
While Babar and Rizwan have the luxury to bat at 7 or 8 an over for 10 to 15 overs because that's how Pakistan play?
I can wager 1000 pounds with anyone right now that even if Shan Masood and Khushdil Shah open the batting they can score 40 to 50 without loss in 6 overs without any demons.
Babar and Rizwan are regularly duping the people into believing they are great openers and are quintessential for any result that gives victory to Pakistan.
In truth, the job of Rizwan and Babar can mostly be done by ANY BATSMEN that's given a long rope of 5 to 7 games to establish him at the top of the order.
But the reverse cannot be said.
If you ask Babar and Rizwan to chase 200 plus regularly against GOOD ATTACKS, they will go back to their huts under pressure and blame the middle order for not doing something that they themselves have not ability to do.
I rarely write long articles, but since you indulged you got your answer.
You want to know how can we find out our best players?
Don't play Babar and Rizwan in ANY MATCH OF THE TRI-SERIES.
What's the worst that can happen?
We will lose?
We already are.
But guess what?
They will be the first name on the team sheet because they need to dupe the nation into believing that they are the best openers since sliced bread.