What's new

Libya - People for sale: Where lives are auctioned for $400

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
Tripoli, Libya (CNN) -- "Eight hundred," says the auctioneer. "900 ... 1,000 ... 1,100 ..." Sold. For 1,200 Libyan dinars -- the equivalent of $800.

Not a used car, a piece of land, or an item of furniture. Not "merchandise" at all, but two human beings.

One of the unidentified men being sold in the grainy cell phone video obtained by CNN is Nigerian. He appears to be in his twenties and is wearing a pale shirt and sweatpants.

He has been offered up for sale as one of a group of "big strong boys for farm work," according to the auctioneer, who remains off camera. Only his hand -- resting proprietorially on the man's shoulder -- is visible in the brief clip.

After seeing footage of this slave auction, CNN worked to verify its authenticity and traveled to Libya to investigate further.

Carrying concealed cameras into a property outside the capital of Tripoli last month, we witness a dozen people go "under the hammer" in the space of six or seven minutes.

"Does anybody need a digger? This is a digger, a big strong man, he'll dig," the salesman, dressed in camouflage gear, says. "What am I bid, what am I bid?"

Buyers raise their hands as the price rises, "500, 550, 600, 650 ..." Within minutes it is all over and the men, utterly resigned to their fate, are being handed over to their new "masters."

After the auction, we met two of the men who had been sold. They were so traumatized by what they'd been through that they could not speak, and so scared that they were suspicious of everyone they met.


Crackdown on smugglers

Each year, tens of thousands of people pour across Libya's borders. They're refugees fleeing conflict or economic migrants in search of better opportunities in Europe.

Most have sold everything they own to finance the journey through Libya to the coast and the gateway to the Mediterranean.

But a recent clampdown by the Libyan coastguard means fewer boats are making it out to sea, leaving the smugglers with a backlog of would-be passengers on their hands.

So the smugglers become masters, the migrants and refugees become slaves.

The evidence filmed by CNN has now been handed over to the Libyan authorities, who have promised to launch an investigation.

First Lieutenant Naser Hazam of the government's Anti-Illegal Immigration Agency in Tripoli told CNN that although he had not witnessed a slave auction, he acknowledged that organized gangs are operating smuggling rings in the country.

"They fill a boat with 100 people, those people may or may not make it," Hazam says. "(The smuggler) does not care as long as he gets the money, and the migrant may get to Europe or die at sea."

"The situation is dire," Mohammed Abdiker, the director of operation and emergencies for the International Organization for Migration, said in a statement after returning from Tripoli in April. "Some reports are truly horrifying and the latest reports of 'slave markets' for migrants can be added to a long list of outrages."

The auctions take place in a seemingly normal town in Libya filled with people leading regular lives. Children play in the street; people go to work, talk to friends and cook dinners for their families.

But inside the slave auctions it's like we've stepped back in time. The only thing missing is the shackles around the migrants' wrists and ankles.


Deportation 'back to square one'

Anes Alazabi is a supervisor at a detention center in Tripoli for migrants that are due to be deported. He says he's heard "a lot of stories" about the abuse carried out by smugglers.

"I'm suffering for them. What I have seen here daily, believe me, it makes me feel pain for them," he says. "Every day I can hear a new story from people. You have to listen to all of them. It's their right to deliver their voices."

One of the detained migrants, a young man named Victory, says he was sold at a slave auction. Tired of the rampant corruption in Nigeria's Edo state, the 21-year-old fled home and spent a year and four months -- and his life savings -- trying to reach Europe.

He made it as far as Libya, where he says he and other would-be migrants were held in grim living conditions, deprived of food, abused and mistreated by their captors.

"If you look at most of the people here, if you check your bodies, you see the marks. They are beaten, mutilated."

When his funds ran out, Victory was sold as a day laborer by his smugglers, who told him that the profit made from the transactions would serve to reduce his debt. But after weeks of being forced to work, Victory was told the money he'd been bought for wasn't enough. He was returned to his smugglers, only to be re-sold several more times.

The smugglers also demanded ransom payments from Victory's family before eventually releasing him.

"I spent a million-plus [Nigerian naira, or $2,780]," he tells CNN from the detention center, where he is waiting to be sent back to Nigeria. "My mother even went to a couple villages, borrowing money from different couriers to save my life."

As the route through north Africa becomes increasingly fraught, many migrants have relinquished their dreams of ever reaching European shores. This year, more than 8,800 individuals have opted to voluntarily return home on repatriation flights organized by the IOM.

While many of his friends from Nigeria have made it to Europe, Victory is resigned to returning home empty-handed.

"I could not make it, but I thank God for the life of those that make it," he says.

"I'm not happy," he adds. "I go back and start back from square one. It's very painful. Very painful."

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/11/14/africa/libya-migrant-auctions/index.html
 
Slave Trade in Libya

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...ees-human-trafficking-smugglers-a8087591.html

It is estimated hundreds of sub-Saharan Africans travelling to Libya in the hopes of getting on a boat across the Mediterranean to a better life in Europe are being sold by smugglers each week – either into lives of manual or sex slavery or ransomed to their families, passed between militia groups.

The UN is trying to decide if crimes against humanity charges can be brought against perpetrators. Protests erupted in Paris and several other cities and the Libyan government – only in control of around half the country – has promised an investigation.

“It is now clear that slavery is an outrageous reality in Libya. The auctions are reminiscent of one of the darkest chapters in human history, when millions of Africans were uprooted, enslaved, trafficked and auctioned to the highest bidder,” a statement from a group of UN human rights experts said.

Many Libyan activists and non-governmental organisations have been trying to raise the alarm about the worsening situation in Libya for months.

The UN’s International Organisation for Migration (IOM) released a report in April this year warning that sub-Saharan Africans who travelled north to Libya were routinely facing detention in squalid conditions, rapes, beatings and being sold into slavery.

It seems incredible that in this day and age we are seeing Africans being sold at slave markets like some scene from the old plantation days in the deep south of America.

What is going on in Libya that it's got to this stage? Is the govt there really so hopeless?
 
did this take place during gadaffi's time?
 
Cpt. Rishwat;9523914[B said:
]It seems incredible that in this day and age we are seeing Africans being sold at slave markets like some scene from the old plantation days in the deep south of America.[/B]

What is going on in Libya that it's got to this stage? Is the govt there really so hopeless?

Aren't Libyan's Arabs?
 
listen the allies bombed libya back to the stone ages, what do you guys expect. The usa funded these extreme backwards people to help get rid of Gaddafi, this is the bi product.
 
did this take place during gadaffi's time?

Of course not otherwise you would have known as you follow and accept western media.

Some of the people selling slaves are the heroic 'rebels' the west supported against Gaddafi. But do you hear the western governments condemning them much now? No because even while supporting them, these so called 'rebels' were killing and torturing black Africans in Libya.
 
What is the western world doing about this? The western world feels the need to intervene whenever there’s a dictatorship or some development that they’re not infavor of. But when the real human rights violations happen they do nothing.

Shame on the not only the western world but the entire international community.
 
What is the western world doing about this? The western world feels the need to intervene whenever there’s a dictatorship or some development that they’re not infavor of. But when the real human rights violations happen they do nothing.

Shame on the not only the western world but the entire international community.

Europe is north of Libya, not west. The west has finally learned from its past mistakes and decided to stay away from this new mess. Hopefully the great regional dictators will rescue them, and end the slavery for once and all.
 
Europe is north of Libya, not west. The west has finally learned from its past mistakes and decided to stay away from this new mess. Hopefully the great regional dictators will rescue them, and end the slavery for once and all.
Stay away after creating a problem that wasn’t there in the first place. Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and now Syria? Hmm, seems like a pattern.
 
Stay away after creating a problem that wasn’t there in the first place. Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and now Syria? Hmm, seems like a pattern.

We all know the “evil west” is going to rescue them eventually. Libya and other knackle draggers are the biggest problem makers along with their murderous “leaders”.
 
I disagree with them being the troublemakers. If a parasite invaded the host, disrupts its environment, leaves it to rot from within, and this results in the host going to the parasite as a reaction, surely it can’t be the hosts’ fault?
 
I disagree with them being the troublemakers. If a parasite invaded the host, disrupts its environment, leaves it to rot from within, and this results in the host going to the parasite as a reaction, surely it can’t be the hosts’ fault?

We can’t dehumanize these countries like this. If the whole system collapses because of one guy, it is the fault of that guy. He should have strengthened the institutions of his country so even if he leaves, at least the stability returns.
 
There’s a lot of distortion in this thread.

The UN Security Council voted 10-0 with five abstentions to create a no-fly zone to prevent Gaddafi from bombing the rebels who arose during the Arab Spring. UNHCR 1973 was proposed by France, Lebanon and the U.K. and voted for by three African states and Columbia.

Gaddafi chose to ignore UNSCR 1973, and an attack was launched by NATO and other nations on his airfields and military communications infrastructure in an attempt to halt the bloodshed.

This failed as the warlords overran Libya causing a relatively modern, advanced and unstable state to dissolve into the current unstable mess and refugee crisis.
 
Europe is north of Libya, not west. The west has finally learned from its past mistakes and decided to stay away from this new mess. Hopefully the great regional dictators will rescue them, and end the slavery for once and all.

The west learned to not constantly intervene in these countries exactly when the worst kind of human rights violation is happening.

Seems a bit like the case of the boy who cried wolf. Back in the day the West invaded countries all the time and left those counties in worst states than before, now when there is a real need to intervene no one wants to.

And I didn’t say anything about regional dictators being a good thing if thats what your implying.
 
There’s a lot of distortion in this thread.

The UN Security Council voted 10-0 with five abstentions to create a no-fly zone to prevent Gaddafi from bombing the rebels who arose during the Arab Spring. UNHCR 1973 was proposed by France, Lebanon and the U.K. and voted for by three African states and Columbia.

Gaddafi chose to ignore UNSCR 1973, and an attack was launched by NATO and other nations on his airfields and military communications infrastructure in an attempt to halt the bloodshed.

This failed as the warlords overran Libya causing a relatively modern, advanced and unstable state to dissolve into the current unstable mess and refugee crisis.

So what was the point of the intervention? Seems to me the current Libyan govt is far worse than Gaddafi, if this is going on under their writ.
 
So what was the point of the intervention? Seems to me the current Libyan govt is far worse than Gaddafi, if this is going on under their writ.

The point was to stop Gadaffi killing the rebels. The UNSC seems to have made it ten times worse.
 
Of course not otherwise you would have known as you follow and accept western media.

Some of the people selling slaves are the heroic 'rebels' the west supported against Gaddafi. But do you hear the western governments condemning them much now? No because even while supporting them, these so called 'rebels' were killing and torturing black Africans in Libya.

So this form of slavery you condemn?
 
listen the allies bombed libya back to the stone ages, what do you guys expect. The usa funded these extreme backwards people to help get rid of Gaddafi, this is the bi product.

Its unfair to describe the opposition to Gaddafi as a bunch of extremists, yes there was Al-Qaeda and ISIS but there were many discontented tribes alienated by Gaddafi who rose up against him.

The problem with ruling countries with an iron fist like Assad, Saddam and Gaddafi is that while for years there is the superficial appearance of stability, you store up problems waiting to explode down the line.

Libya is a country where tribal differences has played a key part in politics. Gaddafi's divide and rule policy towards the tribes enabled him to govern for decades but created tensions, especially between the Tripoli-based tribes and the more marginalised eastern tribes that were the first to turn against him in 2011.

The western intervention accelerated his downfall, but Gaddafi was losing control before the warplanes flew in. The major tribes turned against him, like the Warfalla who are one of the largest tribes in Libya who lent Gaddafi legitimacy for years, and the Zawiya.
 
Its unfair to describe the opposition to Gaddafi as a bunch of extremists, yes there was Al-Qaeda and ISIS but there were many discontented tribes alienated by Gaddafi who rose up against him.

The problem with ruling countries with an iron fist like Assad, Saddam and Gaddafi is that while for years there is the superficial appearance of stability, you store up problems waiting to explode down the line.

Libya is a country where tribal differences has played a key part in politics. Gaddafi's divide and rule policy towards the tribes enabled him to govern for decades but created tensions, especially between the Tripoli-based tribes and the more marginalised eastern tribes that were the first to turn against him in 2011.

The western intervention accelerated his downfall, but Gaddafi was losing control before the warplanes flew in. The major tribes turned against him, like the Warfalla who are one of the largest tribes in Libya who lent Gaddafi legitimacy for years, and the Zawiya.

So who should take responsibility now for this deplorable state of affairs? Isn't this the role of the govt?
 
<blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned data-instgrm-version="7" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:658px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);"><div style="padding:8px;"> <div style=" background:#F8F8F8; line-height:0; margin-top:40px; padding:56.625891946992866% 0; text-align:center; width:100%;"> <div style=" background:url(); display:block; height:44px; margin:0 auto -44px; position:relative; top:-22px; width:44px;"></div></div> <p style=" margin:8px 0 0 0; padding:0 4px;"> <a href="https://www.instagram.com/p/Bbp2t1inbKt/" style=" color:#000; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:normal; line-height:17px; text-decoration:none; word-wrap:break-word;" target="_blank">While very happy to be back, my prayers go to those suffering slavery in Libya. May Allah be by your side and may this cruelty come to an end!</a></p> <p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;">A post shared by Paul Labile Pogba (@paulpogba) on <time style=" font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px;" datetime="2017-11-18T22:50:52+00:00">Nov 18, 2017 at 2:50pm PST</time></p></div></blockquote> <script async defer src="//platform.instagram.com/en_US/embeds.js"></script>
 
The point was to stop Gadaffi killing the rebels. The UNSC seems to have made it ten times worse.

Stop being so niave Robert. Do you really think countries like USA, Britain, France care about Africans? It was to get rid of Gaddafi and install their puppets knowing very well they are evil.

So this form of slavery you condemn?

This is slavery. You are confusing slavery with cheap labour where people do have a choice whether to go for this type of employment and not. This happens all over the world and even in the UK it can be argued the minimum wage is cheap labour which is morally wrong.
 
The point was to stop Gadaffi killing the rebels. The UNSC seems to have made it ten times worse.

Robert i think you do this deliberately, what were the rebels doing may i ask? who was propping them up? USA wanted Gaddafi out and they used these rebels to do so, they trained them, but what happened after was a disgrace, warlords taking positions and take parts of Libya.

What will your position be if rebel groups decide to overthrow the govt here, will you be willing to provide no fly zones to protect the rebels, dont be silly, aim was to stop Gaddafi trading oil in new currency.....
 
Stop being so niave Robert. Do you really think countries like USA, Britain, France care about Africans? It was to get rid of Gaddafi and install their puppets knowing very well they are evil.

USA didn’t lead the charge, France did and they still have influence in Algeria and central Africa, while Britain is part of the Commonwealth, so yes I do think so for the latter two cases.
 
Robert i think you do this deliberately, what were the rebels doing may i ask? who was propping them up? USA wanted Gaddafi out and they used these rebels to do so, they trained them, but what happened after was a disgrace, warlords taking positions and take parts of Libya.

What will your position be if rebel groups decide to overthrow the govt here, will you be willing to provide no fly zones to protect the rebels, dont be silly, aim was to stop Gaddafi trading oil in new currency.....

Yes, I deliberately try to shed the light of truth and reason into the fog of knee-jerk prejudice. America didn’t propose the UNSCR Resolution, though they voted for it alongside several African states. You say the USA trained the rebels but they seemed to be using a lot of Soviet-manufactured weapons. Chad called on NATO to protect her citizens from the rebels.

As for your third point, I call strawman. The UK is never going to be in that situation so your analogy is meaningless.
 
Its unfair to describe the opposition to Gaddafi as a bunch of extremists, yes there was Al-Qaeda and ISIS but there were many discontented tribes alienated by Gaddafi who rose up against him.

The problem with ruling countries with an iron fist like Assad, Saddam and Gaddafi is that while for years there is the superficial appearance of stability, you store up problems waiting to explode down the line.

Libya is a country where tribal differences has played a key part in politics. Gaddafi's divide and rule policy towards the tribes enabled him to govern for decades but created tensions, especially between the Tripoli-based tribes and the more marginalised eastern tribes that were the first to turn against him in 2011.

The western intervention accelerated his downfall, but Gaddafi was losing control before the warplanes flew in. The major tribes turned against him, like the Warfalla who are one of the largest tribes in Libya who lent Gaddafi legitimacy for years, and the Zawiya.

More reason from [MENTION=53290]Markhor[/MENTION].
 
Yes, I deliberately try to shed the light of truth and reason into the fog of knee-jerk prejudice. America didn’t propose the UNSCR Resolution, though they voted for it alongside several African states. You say the USA trained the rebels but they seemed to be using a lot of Soviet-manufactured weapons. Chad called on NATO to protect her citizens from the rebels.

As for your third point, I call strawman. The UK is never going to be in that situation so your analogy is meaningless.

I dont suppose you have watched the movie American made, the cia gave russian made weapons which they confiscated from Hezbolla and gave to South American rebels, so dont tell me the allies are clean. That terrorist that killed innocent humans in Manchester Arena was part of the rebel group which the allies were supporting against Gaddafi.

The third point was hypothetical question, you didnt answer i wonder why :)) .. For godsake Blair threathened to bring out the military when we were about to have the fuel strike.
 
USA didn’t lead the charge, France did and they still have influence in Algeria and central Africa, while Britain is part of the Commonwealth, so yes I do think so for the latter two cases.

USA pretended to be in the background but we both know if they make the decisions not UK or France.

Attacking Libya was an act of terrorism which involved numerous war crimes. These were much much worse than anything ISIS has ever done. You should condemn this and be thankful you weren't born in Libya.
 
USA pretended to be in the background but we both know if they make the decisions not UK or France.

Attacking Libya was an act of terrorism which involved numerous war crimes. These were much much worse than anything ISIS has ever done. You should condemn this and be thankful you weren't born in Libya.

Actually the attack was led by France. They carried out 35% of the air strikes. British submarines fired off a lot of cruise missiles and sixteen Typhoons carried out strikes on airfields.

You bandy words like terrorism and war crimes about but the fact remains that the operation was sanctioned by the UNSC and therefore lawful with the intent of protecting civilians from civil war.

Sadly it failed because there was no plan to help Libya recover from civil war post-Gaddafi and now civil war has resumed.
 
Actually the attack was led by France. They carried out 35% of the air strikes. British submarines fired off a lot of cruise missiles and sixteen Typhoons carried out strikes on airfields.

You bandy words like terrorism and war crimes about but the fact remains that the operation was sanctioned by the UNSC and therefore lawful with the intent of protecting civilians from civil war.

Sadly it failed because there was no plan to help Libya recover from civil war post-Gaddafi and now civil war has resumed.

So what does that mean? Effectively it sounds like:

We, the USA along with our allies will sort out Gaddafi once and for all, for the sake of the rest of the world, we will set the example in world leadership.

Oops! That didn't turn out so well, sorry about that, never mind.

P.S. sorry about Iraq and those darned WMDs as well.
 
There are no oops about anything that was done in Libya. Have a read on the background of the Manchester bomber....
 
Golden rule of USA and its allies :

Invade countries with "Good intentions" of overthrowing regimes without having any clue of how to clean the mess in the end.
 
The point was to stop Gadaffi killing the rebels. The UNSC seems to have made it ten times worse.

You do realize its those rebels armed by NATO/US State Dept. who are enslaving Africans right? Perhaps Gaddafi was in the right to bomb them out of existence?
 
Actually the attack was led by France. They carried out 35% of the air strikes. British submarines fired off a lot of cruise missiles and sixteen Typhoons carried out strikes on airfields.

You bandy words like terrorism and war crimes about but the fact remains that the operation was sanctioned by the UNSC and therefore lawful with the intent of protecting civilians from civil war.

Sadly it failed because there was no plan to help Libya recover from civil war post-Gaddafi and now civil war has resumed.

I wrote US makes the decisions not it carried out the most strikes. France carried out 33% and US 11%. It makes no difference as they are an alliance and all have responsibility for each others bombs.

Terrorism isnt my bandy word, it's the bandy word of western governments and media to portray a groups as being 'evil' when in reality they are much much worse in their actions and conduct.

An estimated 30,000 people were killed, many of them women and young children. We know the North Atlantic Terrorist Organistion try to hide their murders by claiming they were targeting enemies. But I cant recall Libya or Gaddafi attacking the west and I thought it was to save people not to kill them and destroy a country.

Libya was the most fastest developing African nation where people were living in a relative good life now it is destroyed where slavery has done in the open.

Yet considering all this you still cannot condemn Nato's role but point to the UN which is a joke of an organistiation, out of date and kangaroo court which legitimises death and destruction's of nations for imperial greed.
 
Al Jazeera contributed to the racism...they labeled migrants from Niger and Mali as mercenaries....despite the fact that they had been Libyan citizens...this is why the ethnic cleansing of them went largely unreported...

Libya has always had a bit of a racism problem due to the fact that Gaddafi actually favoured black Libyans when he went all pro-Africa...

The country is an absolute shambles...Gaddafi was no saint but he ran a tight ship and was able to keep all the tribal issues under control...now its just complete anarchy...
 
NATO is a mass murderer; it along with the UK , the US and France destroyed such a progressive and prosperous nation.
 
NATO is a mass murderer; it along with the UK , the US and France destroyed such a progressive and prosperous nation.


I was reading about this in the News and it looks like most of the slaves being sold are Black Africans. These Africans wanted to escape to Europe through Libya. But instead were getting sold as slaves as the Middle men cheated them.
 
I was reading about this in the News and it looks like most of the slaves being sold are Black Africans. These Africans wanted to escape to Europe through Libya. But instead were getting sold as slaves as the Middle men cheated them.

Libya has basically become like the wild west. Iraq and Syria are probably not that much different, all of them have been sent back to the stone age, although one shouldn't forget, that was a promise made by a US general a long time back - in the Kuwait war if I'm not mistaken.
 
Al Jazeera contributed to the racism...they labeled migrants from Niger and Mali as mercenaries....despite the fact that they had been Libyan citizens...this is why the ethnic cleansing of them went largely unreported...

Libya has always had a bit of a racism problem due to the fact that Gaddafi actually favoured black Libyans when he went all pro-Africa...

The country is an absolute shambles...Gaddafi was no saint but he ran a tight ship and was able to keep all the tribal issues under control...now its just complete anarchy...

AlJazeera is a Qatari news publication. Qatar spent billions in trying to oust Gaddafi.

http://ig-legacy.ft.com/content/86e3f28e-be3a-11e2-bb35-00144feab7de

Libya has basically become like the wild west. Iraq and Syria are probably not that much different, all of them have been sent back to the stone age, although one shouldn't forget, that was a promise made by a US general a long time back - in the Kuwait war if I'm not mistaken.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RC1Mepk_Sw
 
Al Jazeera contributed to the racism...they labeled migrants from Niger and Mali as mercenaries....despite the fact that they had been Libyan citizens...this is why the ethnic cleansing of them went largely unreported...

Libya has always had a bit of a racism problem due to the fact that Gaddafi actually favoured black Libyans when he went all pro-Africa...

The country is an absolute shambles...Gaddafi was no saint but he ran a tight ship and was able to keep all the tribal issues under control...now its just complete anarchy...

lol

You blame Al Jazeera but not the powers who actually supported and helpted to install these racist terrorists.
 
You do realize its those rebels armed by NATO/US State Dept. who are enslaving Africans right? Perhaps Gaddafi was in the right to bomb them out of existence?

Life works in mysterious ways. He could have bombed the innocent Libyans out of existence but ended his own existence.
 
Back
Top