What's new

Michael Clarke Hits Back at Hayden, Symonds and Buchanan

KevinFern

Tape Ball Star
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Runs
804
Michael Clarke has launched a scathing attack on former teammates Matthew Hayden and Andrew Symonds and slammed John Buchanan, saying his dog could have done as good a job as the former national coach.

The former captain used his Ashes Diary 2015, released this week, to square the ledger with members from Australia's glory era who took a public swipe at him after he announced his international retirement in August.

He described the "pot shots" thrown at him by Hayden and Symonds as a "low act", mounted a spirited defence of his leadership and contribution to Australian cricket and lambasted the media who had "smashed" him "for every failure of the team in the last 13 years".


Retiring Australian captain Michael Clarke of Australia is given a guard of honour as he leaves the ground.

While Clarke was careful to avoid publicly criticising players during his decorated 11-year international career, the gloves have come off in retirement.

Clarke is particularly upset former teammates had used his retirement to "publicly kick" him, suggesting the comments were motivated by publicity in an attempt to shore up their own media profile.

He savaged Symonds, with whom he was once close friends, after the all-rounder questioned Clarke's leadership style. "Andrew Symonds went on TV to criticise my leadership. I'm sorry, but he is not a person to judge anyone on leadership," Clarke wrote in a diary entry from the fifth Test of the Ashes. "This is a guy who turned up drunk to play for his country. It's pretty rich for him to be throwing rocks."

He hit back at Hayden's assertion Clarke had threatened to hand back his baggy green cap if asked to continue fielding at bat-pad by Ricky Ponting, saying it was a tongue-in-cheek comment that had been misunderstood by the former opener.

"I think I've shown over the past 12 years how much I've valued representing my country and how much my 389 baggy green means to me," Clarke wrote. "If Ricky had asked me to jump off the Harbour Bridge, I would have jumped. I loved playing for Australia that much."

Clarke hammered Buchanan, who presided over one of the most successful eras in Australian cricket, for alleging that the culture of the baggy green had deteriorated under his leadership.


"I don't think John knows a thing about the baggy green, having never worn one," Clarke wrote. "He's still living off the fact that he coached a team that anyone, even my dog Jerry, could have coached to world domination."

Clarke believed it was unfair the previous generation were still holding against him mistakes he had made as a 22-year-old in team of "wiser heads".

He took over when Australia was in disarray in the wake of the 2010-11 Ashes capitulation and though there were many lows - including the 2013 whitewash in India and homework scandal and subsequent Ashes defeat - there was also a lot of success under his watch. He said criticism of his leadership was "rough".


"Anyone hearing this commentary - and I've had to wear this kind of talk for a very long time - would think I've been the only problem with Australian cricket for the past 13 years," Clarke wrote.

"That's a tough rap for someone who has led this team to a World Cup victory at home, won a Test series against the best team in the world, South Africa, in South Africa won an Ashes 5-0, and in Tests has taken Australia from fifth to number one in the world."

"Any time we've lost, it's apparently been because of me - my personal life, my attitude, the way I've captained," Clarke wrote.

"Apparently I've been holding us back all along, and now that I'm leaving everyone will get along famously and the Australian team will never lose another game."

Clarke said the fierce criticism he received from the media in the wake of his retirement reaffirmed to him that he had made the right decision.http://m.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/m...gn_code=nocode&promote_channel=social_twitter
 
Here we go then, its the inevitable post-retirement book where the sportsman gets everything off his chest.

Pup fires back and given all the stick he's got over the years he's got every right to reply.
 
Kudos to Myke, the comment about Symma was spot on. lol
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's a bit unedifying to see him gobbing off at everyone like this. I think of him as an excellent player and excellent tactical skipper. His record speaks for itself so he shouldn't feel the need for this display.
 
It's a bit unedifying to see him gobbing off at everyone like this. I think of him as an excellent player and excellent tactical skipper. His record speaks for itself so he shouldn't feel the need for this display.

Can't go wrong with some pocket money though :yk I'd expect 99% of cricketers to write a book slagging everyone off after they've retired, maybe Misbah will be an exception but you never know..
 
Whatever he was holding within is coming out now. Nothing wrong there. This means while he was the captain he was responsible and held his emotions under check - the signs of a good leader.
 
Can't go wrong with some pocket money though :yk I'd expect 99% of cricketers to write a book slagging everyone off after they've retired, maybe Misbah will be an exception but you never know..

The Australian Cricket Captain's Diary is an annual release in Australia.

normally they're really PC stuff because the Captain is still playing.

Clarke went bang because he's not in it to make friends.

His autobiography could be interesting reading if he does it.
 
Apart from the idea that you need to have played test cricket to be able to criticise test cricketers, I don't begrudge Clarke for sticking up for himself and good on him for waiting until after he retired to do it. It's a lesson that Pakistani cricketers would do well to learn.
 
The Australian Cricket Captain's Diary is an annual release in Australia.

normally they're really PC stuff because the Captain is still playing.

Clarke went bang because he's not in it to make friends.

His autobiography could be interesting reading if he does it.
Since coming to Australia, I've noticed people dislike Clarke a lot due to a number of reasons.

One of them is him being too egoistic and the other is him not travelling with teammates but rather travelling with his partner.

Sent from my Lenovo A6000 using Tapatalk
 
Since coming to Australia, I've noticed people dislike Clarke a lot due to a number of reasons.

One of them is him being too egoistic and the other is him not travelling with teammates but rather travelling with his partner.

Sent from my Lenovo A6000 using Tapatalk

A majority of the population dislikes him for a variety of reasons that not everyone can articulate
 
A majority of the population dislikes him for a variety of reasons that not everyone can articulate
Yeah.I never knew that much about Clarke before coming to Australia.Always seemed like a nice bloke.

Sent from my Lenovo A6000 using Tapatalk
 
Since coming to Australia, I've noticed people dislike Clarke a lot due to a number of reasons.

One of them is him being too egoistic and the other is him not travelling with teammates but rather travelling with his partner.

Sent from my Lenovo A6000 using Tapatalk

There are a lot of articles on this subject, I'll post two of them that elaborate on why Clarke is disliked by some.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/the-ashes-2015/content/story/908005.html

http://www.news.com.au/sport/cricke...s/news-story/856aa491acc0035a525cec37d03f7500

Some extracts:

The whispers about his image as a Bondi-brunching bikini-babe-dating wannabe model were now constant screams. He posed in underwear, he liked expensive cars and wore the latest fashions, while Australia plodded around international cricket. People acted as if he did all that and didn't work on his game. As if the two couldn't go together. He was a young, rich, good-looking Australian who was moving his way up from working class to a Sydney mover and shaker. He was a slick publicity machine. And people despised him for it. There has always been a battle in Australia between working class, and those from the working class who aspire for more.

The great Australian dream is to own your own home. Not to be rich. Not to be famous. Do your job as well as you can, don't showboat, keep your head down, and have a cold beer at the end of the day. Michael Clarke, by no fault of his own, wanted more. While Shane Warne ate Hawaiian pizzas and smoked durries, Clarke sipped cocktails and ate at hot spots.


Australia, the sort of Australia that boos indigenous football legend Adam Goodes, couldn't handle that.

He wasn't good enough, he wasn't hard enough, he wasn't humble enough, he wasn't working class enough, he wasn't what they wanted. And deep down, he wasn't what he wanted, as he wanted to be loved. He was averaging 50 in Test cricket. That did not get him love. The love he craved, the love he thought he deserved.

The Australian captain, by accident, seems to mirror Australian society in his time. When Border led Australia, he led a country on the move, making a mark by working as hard as they could. Steve Waugh's aggressive patriotism and arrogance was the Australia of the late '90s. And Ponting's skill, frustration and anger at the little things were all there as he and Australia moved from a suburban country to a metropolitan one.

Clarke was also representative of Australia. He was the lucky batsman leading the lucky country. He hadn't worked as hard as the men before him. He hadn't got where he was through hard work but with natural resources. He wasn't content with just a home of his own. He wanted a property portfolio. He was rich, and no longer working class. He may not have been the sort of Australian captain Australia wanted, lusted after, thought they deserved. But he was very much the modern face of Australia. Maybe that mirror was the problem.
 
I liked Clarke, was one of my fav players in the recent Australia team. I think he's carried himself with dignity in a professional manner in his playing days. He's earned the right to defend himself he's, after all they came after him-not the other way around. I see no problem with his comments, especially now that he's hung it up.
 
Some people might want to compare all the glowing tributes given to Johnson and Ponting and Hussey when they retired by Australian cricket media and from other players to what Clarke got.
Most had enough class not to slag him off but the tributes weren't really as positive.
 
Some people might want to compare all the glowing tributes given to Johnson and Ponting and Hussey when they retired by Australian cricket media and from other players to what Clarke got.
Most had enough class not to slag him off but the tributes weren't really as positive.

Interesting, as I don't think Punter as a person rather than the cricketer was that much liked either due to his nature by the cricketing public outside Oz.
 
Interesting, as I don't think Punter as a person rather than the cricketer was that much liked either due to his nature by the cricketing public outside Oz.

Yeah but the Australian cricket public doesn't care whatsoever what other people think of our players
 
I think while there may be an element of truth, when people universally seem to think you're a d1ckhead and when almost all your teammates and former teammates and people involved with you think you'r a d1ckhead it's quite possible that you're just a d1ckhead

I agree some teammates seem to hate his guts but there are those who've never warmed to Clarke right from the outset. He even polled less than 15% of the vote in the Sydney Daily Telegraph for who people wanted as their next captain after Ponting. Cameron White got over 40% despite not being in the side.

The disparity between the Australian media and the foreign media is quite interesting as neutrals generally are positive of Clarke - maybe its the post-Hughes effect and the dignified way he dealt with the tragedy but the English press was quite glowing of him when he announced his retirement. Is Clarke really the villain he's made out to be ? The day before the ODI at the Gabba when he infamously got booed to the crease - Clarke walked a group of under-nines from a Brisbane club side onto the Gabba and spent time with them. The day before that, he spent time with schoolchildren affected by the Queensland floods. Two years earlier it had been Clarke’s idea for the Australian team to visit the victims of the Victorian bushfires, according to Ricky Ponting’s book so this perception that he's a prima donna flash harry who doesn't get Australian cricketing traditions is interesting.

I think Clarke is a lightening rod for broader social dissatisfaction in Australia. Resentment of his wealth, his social circles, his glamorous partners, his luxury cars probably goes hand in hand with resentment and powerlessness in the face of the rapid changes and political alienation of our neo-liberal world. Maybe you guys can explain more as to why he's so polarising in Aussie society.
 
Last edited:
The bloke used to talk about himself in the third person that tells you all you need to know about him.
 
Clarke had a crack at Hayden and Symonds for a few remarks they made, taking a swipe at Buchs is mandatory for any Australian player even those that didn't play under him.

Much ado about nothing really.
 
Nearly all our players are rich, have pretty wives and/or girlfriends, drive fancy cars and eat at better restaurants than we do so why aren't they all hated?

Real grasping at straws reason for the dislike for clarke that becomes just idiotic when you think of how loved others are even though lifestyle wise the are the same as clarke.
 
Nearly all our players are rich, have pretty wives and/or girlfriends, drive fancy cars and eat at better restaurants than we do so why aren't they all hated?

Real grasping at straws reason for the dislike for clarke that becomes just idiotic when you think of how loved others are even though lifestyle wise the are the same as clarke.

Wouldn't explain why seemingly so many other people involved in Australian or NSW cricket seem to dislike him as well.

I'm sure there's a different explanation than Australian social angst or neoliberal conspiracy
 
I think while there may be an element of truth, when people universally seem to think you're a d1ckhead and when almost all your teammates and former teammates and people involved with you think you'r a d1ckhead it's quite possible that you're just a d1ckhead

If I remember correctlyafter the 2010-11 Ashes capitulation Ricky Ponting was injured for the subsequent tri series and Clarke captained the side and was booed at every venue pretty much despite winning most of the matches. Aussie public didn't really warm to him till after the Ashes 5-0.

To me Clarke seemed to be a very manufactured , artificial and unnatural person whose most most moves were very measured and carefully planned by not just him but by his PR team or something. There was an air of not being wholly genuine with him for me for some reason. Even in the post Phil Hughes weeks
 
Can't go wrong with some pocket money though :yk I'd expect 99% of cricketers to write a book slagging everyone off after they've retired, maybe Misbah will be an exception but you never know..

Actually Misbah could earn big money, his book will be very interesting post fixing saga.
 
Not really a huge fan of Clarke. Was a very one dimensional, one trick pony captain who outside his comfort zone could not achieve anything special as captain.

He has had issues with the likes of Ponting, Katich, Hayden, Symonds, Watson and many others.
 
The Australian Cricket Captain's Diary is an annual release in Australia.

normally they're really PC stuff because the Captain is still playing.

Clarke went bang because he's not in it to make friends.

His autobiography could be interesting reading if he does it.

Good thing he isn't in to make friends because I understand he doesn't have many from cricket.
 
Should have just responded to the criticism factually rather than making personal remarks about teammates.
 
Never knew Clarke was that unpopular in Australia. Anyone, who wins a world cup at home and takes the test side from No.5 to the top, deserves some love and respect.

The outside world seems to have a very good image of Clarke and not so much of Ponting. Australia seems to a different story. It can't just be his money or good looks or model girlfriends. 99% of international cricketers in Australia have all those things.
 
I never liked Clarke for burying Katic's career. He was a gun batsman, but instead a hack like Cowan was promoted to the playing eleven.
 
If I remember correctlyafter the 2010-11 Ashes capitulation Ricky Ponting was injured for the subsequent tri series and Clarke captained the side and was booed at every venue pretty much despite winning most of the matches. Aussie public didn't really warm to him till after the Ashes 5-0.

To me Clarke seemed to be a very manufactured , artificial and unnatural person whose most most moves were very measured and carefully planned by not just him but by his PR team or something. There was an air of not being wholly genuine with him for me for some reason. Even in the post Phil Hughes weeks
Totally disagree about the Phil Hughes part - his emotion was entirely sincere be it the speech at the funeral or the initial press conference he had to make after the news.

https://youtu.be/q4SKcrV2_RY

https://youtu.be/GzAW_IUpB7o
 
I think Lehman sacrificed his spot and career in the team for Clarke. I don't think the senior players would have taken kindly to that, especially for an arrogant bloke they didn't deem 'hard working' enough. Refusing to field at bat-pad tongue-in-cheek or not, wouldn't have set well either. An outspoken young bloke coming in a side full of stars and egos won't make many friends, its best to keep your head down and your mouth shut. The Katic scandal didn't do him any favours either, another amicable bloke whose career was cut short because of Clarke.

I'm not sure if I heard correctly but it was allegedly said Clarke was a prat on the pitch as well. He would often shout at a struggling batsman at one end to get a 'move on', knowing well that his partner is struggling for form/confidence. Or refuse to take counsel on the batting approach in a particular pitch/innings/situation by stating 'mate! you do your thing, and I'll do mine'.
If true, then that's poor really.
 
It's really odd how much Clarke is disliked in Australia. People act if he is some Kevin Pieterson type back-stabbing arrogant maniac but I never got that impression from him at all. He was always polite in interviews, said the right things and seemed to always be trying his best.

The homework saga was a total disaster but you can't say people stopped liking him after that because they never liked him before it either!

Maybe it is just a general spitefulness for his 'perfect' life style where everything from the car he drove to the final strand of hair on his head had to be slick.
 
It's really odd how much Clarke is disliked in Australia. People act if he is some Kevin Pieterson type back-stabbing arrogant maniac but I never got that impression from him at all. He was always polite in interviews, said the right things and seemed to always be trying his best.

The homework saga was a total disaster but you can't say people stopped liking him after that because they never liked him before it either!

Maybe it is just a general spitefulness for his 'perfect' life style where everything from the car he drove to the final strand of hair on his head had to be slick.

Clarke is not disliked in Australia, mountains are being made out of molehills here. All players have one or two people they don't get on with and Clarke is no exception.
 
Spats between players and gossip is sure to bring up the heckles of the so called cricket purists. Look how some went into meltdown over a pitch, anyone would have thought that cricket would never be played again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If I remember correctlyafter the 2010-11 Ashes capitulation Ricky Ponting was injured for the subsequent tri series and Clarke captained the side and was booed at every venue pretty much despite winning most of the matches. Aussie public didn't really warm to him till after the Ashes 5-0.

To me Clarke seemed to be a very manufactured , artificial and unnatural person whose most most moves were very measured and carefully planned by not just him but by his PR team or something. There was an air of not being wholly genuine with him for me for some reason. Even in the post Phil Hughes weeks

Funnily enough that get ready for a broken arm moment was the height of his popularity
 
So, when PPers are having a whinge about Pakistani captains, (he's either picking the wrong team, or if he's not picking the team he's a "dummy captain" and should resign) I usually point out that the Aussie and Saffer captains don't have control over the final playing XI which is ALWAYS ignored.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia/content/story/942399.html

Australia's Ashes selectors Rod Marsh and Darren Lehmann indicated to Michael Clarke that Peter Nevill was set to retain his place for the third Test at Edgbaston before they told Brad Haddin they had not yet made a decision, the former captain has revealed.

Clarke has also suggested that the selectors erred by not considering the balance of Australia's bowling unit during the Ashes, and that persisting with Mitchell Starc and Mitchell Johnson together meant that neither left-armer could bowl at his best against England. One of Clarke's recurring statements as captain was that a winning team needed to pick the best attack as opposed to the best four bowlers, and he does not think this was the case during the Ashes.

More proof that the Aussie captain doesn't pick the team, yet I've never received any evidence that the Pakistani captain has selection powers beyond the usual vague nonsense from the famous 'anonymous sauces' or a soundbite that he 'asked for' a certain player.

Funnily enough, never see PP armchair experts saying that Clarke or Graeme Smith had no honour or integrity for sticking around as dummy captains. :13:
 
So, when PPers are having a whinge about Pakistani captains, (he's either picking the wrong team, or if he's not picking the team he's a "dummy captain" and should resign) I usually point out that the Aussie and Saffer captains don't have control over the final playing XI which is ALWAYS ignored.

http://www.espncricinfo.com/australia/content/story/942399.html





More proof that the Aussie captain doesn't pick the team, yet I've never received any evidence that the Pakistani captain has selection powers beyond the usual vague nonsense from the famous 'anonymous sauces' or a soundbite that he 'asked for' a certain player.

Funnily enough, never see PP armchair experts saying that Clarke or Graeme Smith had no honour or integrity for sticking around as dummy captains. :13:

The difference is the Aussie and SA captains do take stance about their most wanted players. They can afford to take stance because they merit not only their captaincy as well as their place in the side. We had skippers in the last 4 years who neither merited their place in the side nor they were good captains hence they couldn't take a tough stance on certain selections because that would make the selectors and board angry and could result in the axe.
 
The difference is the Aussie and SA captains do take stance about their most wanted players. They can afford to take stance because they merit not only their captaincy as well as their place in the side. We had skippers in the last 4 years who neither merited their place in the side nor they were good captains hence they couldn't take a tough stance on certain selections because that would make the selectors and board angry and could result in the axe.

So the captain's position is so weak that he can't take a tough stance on players but according to this thread you claim that Misbah was the man responsible for team selection?

http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/s...h-s-team-selections-are-they-harming-Pakistan

:13: :13: :13:
 
Last edited:
"I don't think John knows a thing about the baggy green, having never worn one," Clarke wrote. "He's still living off the fact that he coached a team that anyone, even my dog Jerry, could have coached to world domination."

http://m.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/m...gn_code=nocode&promote_channel=social_twitter

lol :)) I echoed similar sentiments of why Ponting was a match winner and captain, any tom dick and harry could captain that Australian side to victory because they were invincible.....................................
 
Funnily enough that get ready for a broken arm moment was the height of his popularity

Because it seemed like a real emotional response?

Funnily enough, the most popular thing our old Deputy PM Prescott did was punch a protester who had thrown an egg at him. People thought - blimey, one of them is a real human being!
 
lol :)) I echoed similar sentiments of why Ponting was a match winner and captain, any tom dick and harry could captain that Australian side to victory because they were invincible.....................................

Ponting was like Imran in that regard - not that good tactically, but a very good motivator who led by example. Ideally you'd want Ponting as skipper with Clarke as VC advising him on bowling changes and fielding places.
 
team selection is a different thing...and yes Misbah had a major say in the team selection until he was on his last legs struggling and finished in 2014.

A) Different thing? It's literally the thing that we're talking about.

B) Where's the evidence that he had a "major say in the team selection"?
 
lol :)) I echoed similar sentiments of why Ponting was a match winner and captain, any tom dick and harry could captain that Australian side to victory because they were invincible.....................................

Coach and captain aren't the same. The role of coach is minimal in a great team because the coach does not go out to the field and play - but the captain's role cannot be overlooked. Ponting led from the front and was the best batsman in the team for many years. He managed a team full of star players with big egos - unless the captain himself is among the best players and a born leader, he would not command any respect in an ATG team.
 
'Money is a good thing but it can be poison': Symonds on how big IPL paycheck might have triggered fall-out with Clarke

The Australian team that won the 2007 World Cup is widely regarded as one of the strongest cricketing sides; the Ricky Ponting-led Aussies secured an invincible run to their third-successive World Cup title, as they defeated Sri Lanka in the final of the tournament. However, as the years passed following the win and their star cricketers began to call time on their careers, the downfall began for the Australian team as they failed to defend the title in 2011. Over the years, it was also revealed that two of the most important members of the Aussie side that won the 2007 WC – Andrew Symonds and Michael Clarke – endured a breakdown in their friendship.

Symonds has now opened up on the reason behind their fallout, hinting that money could have played a part in it. Their friendship hit the rock during Symonds' ending stages of his international career, which also coincided with Clarke's substantial rise in stature inside the Australian dressing room.

Symonds suggested that Clarke might have become jealous after the former secured a big paycheck in the Indian Premier League. Ahead of the inaugural IPL in 2008, Symonds was the second-most expensive cricketer in the auction (and the most expensive overseas player).

“We became close. When he (Clarke) came into the side I used to bat with him a lot. So when he came into the side I really looked after him. That built a bond.

“Matthew Hayden said to me — when the IPL started, I got a pretty penny to go and play in the IPL — he identified it as there was a bit of jealousy that potentially came into the relationship (with Clarke) there,” Symonds told Brett Lee in the Brett Lee Podcast, as quoted by Fox Sports.

“Money does funny things. It’s a good thing but it can be a poison and I reckon it may have poisoned our relationship. I’ve got enough respect for him to probably not go into detail about what was said. My friendship with him is no longer and I’m comfortable with that, but I’m not gonna sit here and start slinging mud," Symonds said further.

Earlier, in an autobiography, Clarke had referred to Symonds criticising his captaincy by recalling an incident in 2005 when the Aussie all-rounder "turned up drunk to play for his country."

https://www.hindustantimes.com/cric...red-fall-out-with-clarke-101650769582930.html
 
Back
Top