What's new

Misbah-ul-Haq favours continuity over revolution as Pakistan begin a new era

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
Thanks to [MENTION=53290]Markhor[/MENTION] for typically astute analysis on the announcement of Pakistan's first ODI squad, under new Chief Selector and Head Coach Misbah-ul-Haq.


<img src="https://i.imgur.com/YQ5WBGY.jpg" width="700">​


The Pakistan Cricket Board made a radical break from history by hiring former captain Misbah-ul-Haq in a dual role as head coach and chief selector. Pakistan cricket history has often seen turf wars and ego clashes between captain and coach, or coach and chief selector, with the buck being passed from one individual to another with nobody any the wiser as to who is ultimately accountable for the team’s affairs.

Now, with Misbah having total control over selection matters, there is one person who has complete authority to shape the Pakistan team however he sees fit. As the saying goes, with great power comes great responsibility, but Misbah has built a reputation for cool-headedness and sound man management unlike many of Pakistan’s combustible ex-players. Hence, the PCB have trusted him, despite a lack of coaching experience, with a position akin to that of a football manager with influence over all matters relating to selection, strategy and training.

Every coach newly appointed to the role faces a choice between tearing up the playbook and starting all over again, or building on the foundations of their predecessor. Misbah’s first squad selection for a home ODI series vs Sri Lanka suggests continuity, not revolution. Eleven out of the sixteen members were part of the World Cup squad, with Misbah preferring to avoid the mass changes often seen in Pakistan after a World Cup campaign. The other five – Abid Ali, Mohammed Hasnain, Mohammed Rizwan, Iftikhar Ahmed and Usman Shinwari – are already capped for Pakistan at international level.

Some may criticise a retreat to familiarity, citing Misbah’s safety first approach that was often was evident as captain, and that picking seasoned players such as Wahab Riaz, Abid Ali and Iftikhar Ahmed highlights a lack of planning for the next World Cup in 2023 when they will be well north of 30 years old. It’s a fair criticism given Sri Lanka are not even sending out a full strength team, with several first choice players opting out citing security concerns.

However, Misbah stated in his press conference that the Pakistan team ought not to be a “laboratory” and that in picking the likes of Abid Ali and Iftikhar Ahmed he is merely rewarding consistent domestic performers. Iftikhar failed to impress in his initial stint in internationals in 2015/16, but a List A average of 51 at a SR of 91 and his ability to bowl off-spin meant a recall for a side struggling to find a reliable #6 batsman. Meanwhile Abid Ali, who already has an ODI century to his name, is one of the best performing openers in domestic cricket and provides much needed competition to Fakhar Zaman and Imam-ul-Haq who misfired at the World Cup.

Misbah also retains young speedster Mohammed Hasnain who failed to make an appearance at the World Cup, so youth is not entirely absent. However it remains to be seen how Hasnain, who has lit up the Caribbean Premier League bowling in excess of 90mph, fares bowling longer spells and whether he can sustain his pace over 10 overs. Hasnain also needs to demonstrate his ability to move the ball either in the air or off the pitch as pace alone without skills or variations cannot sustain a successful international career.

Given the 2023 World Cup is hosted by India, Misbah will need to identify match-winning spinners to exploit dry, turning wickets. The recall of Mohammed Nawaz raised eyebrows given the all-rounder’s mediocre ODI career so far. His last stint was Pakistan’s disastrous 2018 Asia Cup campaign where he took 3 wickets at 43 apiece on what should’ve been favourable UAE pitches.

What’ll be Misbah’s biggest call however is what he decides to do with the captain. Sarfraz Ahmed has struggled with the threefold burden of captaincy, wicket-keeping and batting. Misbah has already recalled Mohammed Rizwan no doubt to add competition to the keeping spot and to keep Sarfraz on his toes. Sarfraz was an integral part of Pakistan’s rise to #1 in the Test rankings under Misbah’s leadership, but it’s far from certain whether he’ll lead Pakistan into the 2023 World Cup. His on-field captaincy demonstrates an inability to kill opponents off when under pressure, and his batting has been abject in all formats whilst yo-yoing up and down the order.

As starts go, a rare limited overs home series against a depleted Sri Lankan side, is hardly a baptism of fire and an ideal opportunity for Misbah to display his ability to transition from playing to coaching. The Pakistan coaching job is never easy on its occupants and Misbah will need every bit of his famed calm, stoic temperament to succeed in the role.
 
Good read.

Nawaz aside, it is a pretty good squad.

Just need to get a specialist spinner in next time.
 
Since Misbah became the captain of Pakistan they have for the first and only time in history lost 11 consecutive Tests in the Southern Hemisphere.

Two of their three away World Test Championship Test series are in the Southern Hemisphere.

So presumably we can all agree that if Misbah goes for “continuity” of selection for the Test series in Australia in eight weeks, that would be a sackable offence.
 
It is not easy to make wholesale changes.Misbah should give chances to youngsters who perform well in domestic cricket.
 
I am 100% sure his appointment will be a disaster at the end, mark my words [MENTION=132916]Junaids[/MENTION].
 
Misbah’s start is as disappointing as it could be and I don’t think it’ll change much until there is a reality check. After Australia series (his first one, so he’ll get away with whatever happens there), PAK has lots of “soft” cricket for him to show “performance”, until the T20 WC in India (he can get away with the AUS WC before that).

He is the batting coach as well, which was my biggest fear - batting is PAK’s Achilles heel for eternity, almost like a fate and this guy isn’t technically qualified to be a batting coach. Functional coach needs to be subject matter experts.
 
Misbah’s start is as disappointing as it could be and I don’t think it’ll change much until there is a reality check. After Australia series (his first one, so he’ll get away with whatever happens there), PAK has lots of “soft” cricket for him to show “performance”, until the T20 WC in India (he can get away with the AUS WC before that).

He is the batting coach as well, which was my biggest fear - batting is PAK’s Achilles heel for eternity, almost like a fate and this guy isn’t technically qualified to be a batting coach. Functional coach needs to be subject matter experts.

He will still do better than tests than Mickey Arthur. Which is all I care about.
 
This is the same combo which delivered us the disaster which was the 2015 WC.

4 years won't have turned Misbah/Waqar's mindset around.

Expecting lots of disappointment in upcoming years :(
 
Misbah's thoughts on Australia tour:


"Whenever Pakistan has gone to Australia, we often think about the batting and focus on that a lot but as we saw in the last series, we only managed to bowl them out once in 3 Test matches and that's the biggest worry. We made 450 there, we were close to chasing 434 so we created chances with the batting but in the bowling dept., we have to improve a lot. Australia are very good in their own conditions and we will have to work hard on our bowling dept. and we have done that during the camp and we are also focusing on this in domestic cricket, how we can improve our bowling. Until we go to Australia and take 20 wickets, we can't win. At the moment, we need a lot of hard work and we are working on that. I am hopeful that the bowlers we will select will be able to do well in Australia"
 
Coming from the biggest Mickey Arthur fan on this planet, the post is not much of a surprise! :D
 
Misbah's thoughts on Australia tour:


"Whenever Pakistan has gone to Australia, we often think about the batting and focus on that a lot but as we saw in the last series, we only managed to bowl them out once in 3 Test matches and that's the biggest worry. We made 450 there, we were close to chasing 434 so we created chances with the batting but in the bowling dept., we have to improve a lot. Australia are very good in their own conditions and we will have to work hard on our bowling dept. and we have done that during the camp and we are also focusing on this in domestic cricket, how we can improve our bowling. Until we go to Australia and take 20 wickets, we can't win. At the moment, we need a lot of hard work and we are working on that. I am hopeful that the bowlers we will select will be able to do well in Australia"

Said by someone who was captain for 6 years when he went to Aus.hold on guys [MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION].yes disaster ahead.
 
Continuity of failure, no wonder team doesnt improve when players are comfortable knowing failure is accepted.
 
Said by someone who was captain for 6 years when he went to Aus.hold on guys [MENTION=79064]MMHS[/MENTION].yes disaster ahead.

From a problem identification perspective - he is spot on.

Every Asian team (Every team actually, barring WIN of 1970s to 1990s) touring Australia has struggled initially, but batting gets visibly more exposed, because it's easily measurable. I have seen teams winning toss have ended Day 1 in disaster either way. Also, Aussies used to put tourists at Gabba & WACA in first 2 Tests and invariably tourists' pacers will bowl at wrong length. Particularly Asian pacers, who bowl on a different length on our mud beds and often got too excited looking at the bounce of the tracks, often allowing Aussies to their comfort zone (on back foot). Also, typical AUS wickets are extremely bluffing - it gets faster on Day 2 and often batting on Day 2 & 3rd morning is the toughest period. Touring Captains, looking at the grass and carry sometimes opt to bowl first, then face 350+ on 2nd afternoon...... In any case, PAK won't do jack with bat, so bowlers have to carry extra load - max PAK can manage is 600 (combined Test total), hence it's not a bad idea to pick 5 bowlers and go for the kill - if Sarfraz can maintain his career average at 6 (:, 4 out and out bowlers and Shadab at 7 isn't the worst combination. It'll keep pacers fresh.

2nd thing is, in AUS you must have to control the scoring rate. It's very uncompromising land for old ball and if PAK starts to leak runs at brisk pace, even from 105/6, Aussies can race to 256 - if so, on same track, PAK won't walk much later, let alone race.

Misbah is talking lots of sense for sure (not only in this regard), but it can't happen that he has learned these after being appointed as HC/CS -hedid knew most of these even when he was Captain, but I didn't see much application that time, therefore a bit circumspective. Perfect 10 for problem identification - not sure about the solution or execution yet.
 
He will still do better than tests than Mickey Arthur. Which is all I care about.

He should be, because Arthur was absolute rock bottom. Also, the schedules are in favor - PAK is playing SRL & BD at home .... by the time Poms & Kiwis & Aussies return to UAE, Misbah might not .....
 
It's the same old Misbah. We are heading for a disaster under him for sure.
 
More like he favours going backwards than even continuity lol
 
Misbah so far has tryed to fix things that don't need fixing. Also prefers to select useless TTFs like Wahab over younger talents. Hasnain might be a bit wayward right now, but he will only get better as he plays more mathces, not by watching Wahab bowl.
 
Back
Top