[MENTION=143714]Kroll[/MENTION] At least acknowledge how well Misbah performed with the bat while being Captain in ODIs. Leading ODI run scorer worldwide in 2013 and was by far and away Pakistan's stand out batsman and top run getter in the 2013 Champions Trophy and 2015 World Cup while captaining the side. He was ranked in the top 10 in the ICC ODI batting rankings aged 40 when he bowed out of the game. This deserves respect and appreciation.
Even Wasim Akram and Imran Khan wouldn't have been good ODI captains in the modern era i.e. both were continuously supporting and pushing for Younis Khan's selection despite repeated failures from him in the format. They didn't get modern cricket.
Been 5 years since Misbah left ODIs and we've not won an ODI series vs Eng, Aus, SA or NZ since. Misbah's proven his worth as a white ball Captain in addition to his Test accomplishments through his own batting performance and by winning The Asia Cup, Faysal Bank T20 2013 and 2 PSL titles.
I don’t agree with that Imran/Wasim comment. A good cricket captain is a good cricket mind, a learning mind. They led their sides based on the then context - they could have easily adopted with the changing rules/context of the game. Both had three qualities that are like 99% of captaincy - 1. They were leaders, command respect from team, 2. They had a functioning brain that learned new things with every experience and most importantly 3. Both were champion cricketers, could lead from the front. Some of the tactics we see recent days was applied by IK 30 years back - he was the first to send a pinch hitter in power play (Salim Yousuf), he comprised WKeeping for batting depth (kept with Amir Malik, dropping Yousuf). PAK used ARazzak at 3 in WC 1999, which was quite an innovation that time.
Coming to YK - I don’t see any problem in that. (Asking for his inclusion). It was the role that PCT asked from YK didn’t fit suit him, not he he was unfit for ODI/T20. YK was a Test No. 3, whose primary task was to build innings from top and try to play for long innings, often against new ball and sometimes almost like an opener. His weakness at #3 was his poor start, which he could compensate in Test buying time (even in Test, he looked poor at the start of almost every innings) but struggled in ODI, which demands more dynamic batting from start. In his peak few years, he was a brilliant ODI player as well and scored three crucial hundreds in chases.
If either of those two were Captain, YK would have played many more games but at a different role - at No. 6. YK is a brilliant runner, extremely fit, a very good selective hitter and a proper batsman whose shot productivity (opposite index of dot ball) is very high - a perfect player for no. 6; who had multiple gears for different situations and a very good head on shoulders. I believe, in a low scoring game at Docklands (Melbourne), in summer of 2002, he chased a target against that Australian side clinically, from 5/6. Haven’t checked, but my hunch is, his stats at 5/6 could be surprisingly better than we think.
For best part of YKs career, he played in the most rigid and unimaginative PAK side, who never thought anything out side the box - if YK is to play, be at 3 or not .... and Afridi to finish from 7. A switch of positions - YK as finisher at 6 and Afridi as a floating pinch hitter between 1 to 8, depending on opponents (& condition), output could have been much better.