pakistanigoneaussie
Senior ODI Player
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2010
- Runs
- 21,505
- Post of the Week
- 2
Given the recent developments and promotion of "Professor is a great bowler" myth, I feel this needs a thread.
Since his action issues began the Professor has taken:
14 wickets from 23 innings at 53 at an economy of 4.48
Outside of Asia, though excluding WI as those pitches are better for spin than even Asia at times, the Professor has taken :
1 wicket from 9 innings at an average of 316, economy of 5
he has not bowled out a single time in that period
So is this who is crucial to our success? We know he hardly bats well, has a seniority complex and is probably the worst fielder in the side now,
There is no doubting the fact that his economy reads brilliantly however
1. How much of it is duty to his pause and quick arm release which is clearly whats causing him to chuck
2. Our success is built on wickets. I reckon Haris could do a similar job. When he was in the side he took more wickets on average at a similar economy rate and that too with a far worse bowling attack supporting him
3. In a lot of the games where professor was so "crucial," Imad hardly bowled and Shadab never filled his quote. Well, Shadab is getting better and better. Plus as he has proven himself as a batsmen, and because we have Faheem as well, not to mention Hasan Ali's batting as well we can entertain thoughts of playing another spinner. Raza Hasan is decent batsmen, and his bowling was known for being miserly. He could easily replace Imad. Plus Imad himself has 6 wickets at 47 in england, with a better conomy rate than Proffesor as well.
So please Pak fans fight against the Stockholm syndrome and let go of the last member of the entitlement senior brigade.
we got over

We can get over the professor as well
Since his action issues began the Professor has taken:
14 wickets from 23 innings at 53 at an economy of 4.48
Outside of Asia, though excluding WI as those pitches are better for spin than even Asia at times, the Professor has taken :
1 wicket from 9 innings at an average of 316, economy of 5
he has not bowled out a single time in that period
So is this who is crucial to our success? We know he hardly bats well, has a seniority complex and is probably the worst fielder in the side now,
There is no doubting the fact that his economy reads brilliantly however
1. How much of it is duty to his pause and quick arm release which is clearly whats causing him to chuck
2. Our success is built on wickets. I reckon Haris could do a similar job. When he was in the side he took more wickets on average at a similar economy rate and that too with a far worse bowling attack supporting him
3. In a lot of the games where professor was so "crucial," Imad hardly bowled and Shadab never filled his quote. Well, Shadab is getting better and better. Plus as he has proven himself as a batsmen, and because we have Faheem as well, not to mention Hasan Ali's batting as well we can entertain thoughts of playing another spinner. Raza Hasan is decent batsmen, and his bowling was known for being miserly. He could easily replace Imad. Plus Imad himself has 6 wickets at 47 in england, with a better conomy rate than Proffesor as well.
So please Pak fans fight against the Stockholm syndrome and let go of the last member of the entitlement senior brigade.
we got over



We can get over the professor as well