Pete Rose
Senior ODI Player
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2011
- Runs
- 22,848
- Post of the Week
- 2
I want to repeat this again. Not reporting an approach by a bookie is a crime. It might be a minor crime, but it is still a crime. I know irfan would like to muddy the waters and say that the only real crime is match fixing and he did not do that, he just heard the bookie out.
The reason you are supposed to report bookie approaches is so that the authorities can watch out for that person and to ensure that he is no longer in the wider of circle of the entourage that players often have. If possible they would also want legal action against that bookie.
It shouldn't be so difficult to understand: a crime begins with a plan, then a recruitment, preparation, and then action. In involvement in each and any of these phases makes a personal liable to the maximum punishment allowed for each or all of these actions.
I personally believe Irfan is guilty of a lot worse in terms of intent, but since you can't prove intent easily, he should definitely be punished for not reporting the approach.
If I were a journalist I would hound him with the same question: 'Did you not report the bookie because you thought you might need him at some stage? Or was it because he was introduced to you by fellow players and you don't want to get them in trouble? Why did you keep quiet despite the rpeated anti-corruption training?
The reason you are supposed to report bookie approaches is so that the authorities can watch out for that person and to ensure that he is no longer in the wider of circle of the entourage that players often have. If possible they would also want legal action against that bookie.
It shouldn't be so difficult to understand: a crime begins with a plan, then a recruitment, preparation, and then action. In involvement in each and any of these phases makes a personal liable to the maximum punishment allowed for each or all of these actions.
I personally believe Irfan is guilty of a lot worse in terms of intent, but since you can't prove intent easily, he should definitely be punished for not reporting the approach.
If I were a journalist I would hound him with the same question: 'Did you not report the bookie because you thought you might need him at some stage? Or was it because he was introduced to you by fellow players and you don't want to get them in trouble? Why did you keep quiet despite the rpeated anti-corruption training?
Last edited: