)
Absolute striking by Afridi with 135SR benchmark, why not have a benchmark for ECon. No bowler except <8.00RPO and we are already winning everything there's only one issue though does any player fits into this criteria
Poor from Ishan & Hardik under Boom Boom philosophy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Correct. Babar has all the shots in the world and can play fast but has been holding himself back.
What kind of selection criteria is this? By this funny logic get ready for more "tullaaz" in playing XI
like
"Khushdil Shah" "Asif Ali"
Maybe it's not funny logic and you just don't understand t20
T20 has always been about strike rate first and average later... this was the the whole point to shorten the game from odi.
When t20 was introduced the purpose was it to make it more entertaining because odi was dying out
It was introduced to create a fast-paced game that would be attractive to spectators at the ground and viewers on television.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twe...ced to create,have a domestic cup competition.
I can provided you with many sources to prove that t20 was introduced to create a fast paced game
If you like slow paced cricket you can always watch odi's and tests
We don't want to see slow paced batsmen in a fast paced format of the game treat t20 as t20 not odi
All talk and no trousers
Definitely agree that we need higher strike rates even if it comes at the cost of players like MoRiz and Babar but don’t bring Misbah into the discussion here.
Yes I agree with you bro, Misbah did take us with his slow tuktuk inning over 200 mark when our batting order was crap (which he selected the team) . But did we really win those matches ? So what was the point of him batting so long lol. Mohali World Cup should’ve been his last Odi.
I was talking About international t20 stats. And i think only Iftikhar has strike rate of 130+ with 25+ average.
Saud Can't be in the team when you already have like of Rizwan and Babar.
I’m talking about ODIs
Common man, Rizwan is a world class player, probably the greatest ever WK batsman produced by Pakistan.
Here is a list of batsmen 1-3 who has averaged over 50 with strike rate above 100
| Player | Mat | Inns | NO | Runs | HS | Ave | BF | SR | 100 | 50 | 0 | 4s | 6s | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TM Head (AUS) | 1 | 1 | 0 | 109 | 109 | 109.00 | 67 | 162.68 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 7 |  |
| RG Sharma (IND) | 5 | 5 | 0 | 311 | 131 | 62.20 | 233 | 133.47 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33 | 17 | |
| Q de Kock (SA) | 6 | 6 | 0 | 431 | 174 | 71.83 | 368 | 117.11 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 15 | |
| DA Warner (AUS) | 6 | 6 | 0 | 413 | 163 | 68.83 | 367 | 112.53 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 38 | 19 | |
| R Ravindra (NZ) | 6 | 6 | 1 | 406 | 123* | 81.20 | 377 | 107.69 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 33 | 13 | |
| DP Conway (NZ) | 6 | 6 | 1 | 277 | 152* | 55.40 | 264 | 104.92 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 36 | 4 | |
I don't think anyone gives a toss about stat padding as long pakistan winning is your priority
How many of those from Pakistan?Here is a list of batsmen 1-3 who has averaged over 50 with strike rate above 100
Overall figures
Player Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 0 4s 6s TM Head (AUS) 1 1 0 109 109 109.00 67 162.68 1 0 0 10 7 RG Sharma (IND) 5 5 0 311 131 62.20 233 133.47 1 1 1 33 17 Q de Kock (SA) 6 6 0 431 174 71.83 368 117.11 3 0 0 44 15 DA Warner (AUS) 6 6 0 413 163 68.83 367 112.53 2 1 0 38 19 R Ravindra (NZ) 6 6 1 406 123* 81.20 377 107.69 2 2 0 33 13 DP Conway (NZ) 6 6 1 277 152* 55.40 264 104.92 1 0 1 36 4
How many of these are 5 over ponies?
This is exactly my point so far india nz and South Africa are doing well and Australia are catching up..
