What's new

"No there are no Hindu extremists in India"

KingKhanWC

KingKhanWC

World Star
Joined
Jan 2, 2010
Runs
50,457
A poster suggested.

"No there are no Hindu extremists in India."

Is this true or a Hindu Citizens of India in denial?

Muslims, Christians and others accept a small minority of extremists exist claiming to follow their faith.

Why are Hindus so reluctant or are we being misled by the news of events in India?
 
The poster who made this claim, sacred games must have bothered him soo much
 
Major said:
The poster who made this claim, sacred games must have bothered him soo much
Click to expand...

Do you feel this is a growing problem and many residents are either in denial or dont want to entertain this serious problem?

@Local Dada please explain.
 
Champ_Pal said:
It was a reactionary extremism to fight Islamic extremism. Both are equally bad.
Click to expand...

So Hindu extremism never existed before Muslims and its the fault of the Muslims too?

Can you then explain why Hindu extremist have been burning and killing Christians in India?
 
KingKhanWC said:
So Hindu extremism never existed before Muslims and its the fault of the Muslims too?

Can you then explain why Hindu extremist have been burning and killing Christians in India?
Click to expand...

It was very rare before 2000. Hindus were considered docile and weak and super soft. The thug Hindu image is a new concept. In India in sensitive areas, it was always about street power. Who ever rules the streets get their way with the blessings of secular liberals.
Hindus have stated fighting back as they gained organizational strength through RSS and BJP. You cut diamond with a diamond. You cannot go into a fight armed with nothing when the opposite side do not hesitate to kill.

We can never eradicate extremism as long as people are faithful to their religion and faith overrides common sense .
However there are things the Government can do to minimize extremism. Those includes monitoring what is being preached and taught at religious schools, public sermons and speeches.
 
KingKhanWC said:
Do you feel this is a growing problem and many residents are either in denial or dont want to entertain this serious problem?

@Local Dada please explain.
Click to expand...

How many designated Hindu terrorists do you know?

Please don’t tell me Kulbhushan Jadhav :)) booked by Pakistan courts but some legitimate terrorist who is wanted by CBI, FBI, Mi-6 for religious terrorism?

Modi etc are only terrorists in your little world.

Give me names.
 
Champ_Pal said:
It was very rare before 2000. Hindus were considered docile and weak and super soft. The thug Hindu image is a new concept. In India in sensitive areas, it was always about street power. Who ever rules the streets get their way with the blessings of secular liberals.
Hindus have stated fighting back as they gained organizational strength through RSS and BJP. You cut diamond with a diamond. You cannot go into a fight armed with nothing when the opposite side do not hesitate to kill.

We can never eradicate extremism as long as people are faithful to their religion and faith overrides common sense .
However there are things the Government can do to minimize extremism. Those includes monitoring what is being preached and taught at religious schools, public sermons and speeches.
Click to expand...

Attacks against Christians by Hindus go back to the 60's. In 80's,90's and 2000's they became regular.
Now even more so.

You claimed it was because of Muslims?

How many HIndu extremist would you estimate in India right now?
 
Local.Dada said:
How many designated Hindu terrorists do you know?

Please don’t tell me Kulbhushan Jadhav :)) booked by Pakistan courts but some legitimate terrorist who is wanted by CBI, FBI, Mi-6 for religious terrorism?

Modi etc are only terrorists in your little world.

Give me names.
Click to expand...

Lets stick to the topic please, the usual Indian diversion is boring.

You have maybe 1 billion Hindus in India. How many would you estimate as extremists?

Ill give you one name, Bajrang Dal. Thousands and thousands of members.
 
KingKhanWC said:
Lets stick to the topic please, the usual Indian diversion is boring.

You have maybe 1 billion Hindus in India. How many would you estimate as extremists?

Ill give you one name, Bajrang Dal. Thousands and thousands of members.
Click to expand...

I would estimate 0.

Banjrang Dal is not active anymore. Proud of Hindus to nip such things in the bud.

What diversion. Your topic was Hindu extremists. I said there aren’t any. If you know some legitimate ones, name them. Not certified by you but by some credible source.
 
Local.Dada said:
I would estimate 0.

Banjrang Dal is not active anymore. Proud of Hindus to nip such things in the bud.

What diversion. Your topic was Hindu extremists. I said there aren’t any. If you know some legitimate ones, name them. Not certified by you but by some credible source.
Click to expand...

Udaipur killing: VHP, Bajrang Dal demand gallows for the killers
Click to expand...

https://www.hindustantimes.com/citi...-gallows-for-the-killers-101656528241282.html

Hindutimes , many videos, audio and articles quoting them would suggest otherwise.

How about Shiv Sena?
 
KingKhanWC said:
https://www.hindustantimes.com/citi...-gallows-for-the-killers-101656528241282.html

Hindutimes , many videos, audio and articles quoting them would suggest otherwise.

How about Shiv Sena?
Click to expand...

Shiv sena :)))

You should click on the current headlines instead of googling some keywords and not even making an effort to read. Tough to miss given Shiv Sena has been in the headlines over the last week. Surprise that given how obsessed you are with Indian news you missed it.

Bajrang Dal is a non-entity now as already mentioned.

A criminal with a Hindu name doing a crime is not exactly Hindu terrorism.
 
KingKhanWC said:
Attacks against Christians by Hindus go back to the 60's. In 80's,90's and 2000's they became regular.
Now even more so.

You claimed it was because of Muslims?

How many HIndu extremist would you estimate in India right now?
Click to expand...

You have to be very religious to become an extremist. Among Hindus, majority are not very religious. Nationalism is the new mantra.

Attacks on Christians is not because of Christians. Its the Shudra Castes vs Dalits & Tribals that has been happening since independence. Many Dalits are Christians. Hence it is considered as attacks on Christians.
 
The fact that Op has to go on a scavenger hunt to the corners of the internet nullifies the argument.

It should be as simple as going to a legit site and getting some names on the list.

Till then thread can be dead and buried.
 
Champ_Pal said:
Shivsena is a secular party now. Once Bal Thackerey died, his successors jumped in bed with woke liberals.
Click to expand...

I am sure if he is competent enough to search on Google, he can read up on some of the names he is throwing around. Explaining it will not make it easy. Just a friendly advice.
 
Local.Dada said:
Shiv sena :)))

You should click on the current headlines instead of googling some keywords and not even making an effort to read. Tough to miss given Shiv Sena has been in the headlines over the last week. Surprise that given how obsessed you are with Indian news you missed it.

Bajrang Dal is a non-entity now as already mentioned.

A criminal with a Hindu name doing a crime is not exactly Hindu terrorism.
Click to expand...

You have kindly answered there are NO Hindu extremists in this world. I love the answer. :sachin
 
KingKhanWC said:
A poster suggested.

"No there are no Hindu extremists in India."

Is this true or a Hindu Citizens of India in denial?

Muslims, Christians and others accept a small minority of extremists exist claiming to follow their faith.

Why are Hindus so reluctant or are we being misled by the news of events in India?
Click to expand...

I thought the title of the thread was the beginning of a joke, but in actual fact, is a joke! :)))
 
Local.Dada said:
Not a religious organization. C’mon man. Rooting for you now. You need to try harder.
Click to expand...

Please give us YOUR definition of an EXTREMIST.

Tip - Extremists can come in all types in the real...
[MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] come on give us your number(s).
 
Technics 1210 said:
I thought the title of the thread was the beginning of a joke, but in actual fact, is a joke! :)))
Click to expand...

This will be another classic in the archives of Pakpassion.

I never thought, so many citizens of India believe a Hindu cannot be extremist. :)
 
To claim there is no such thing as a Hindu extremist is simply mindboggling.

The term Saffron Terror exists for a reason; terrorism carried out by Hindu extremists.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saffron_terror

We must all remember, Nathuram Godse, assassinated Mahatma Gandhi, and Godse is revered within the RSS ideology.
 
Local.Dada said:
How many designated Hindu terrorists do you know?

Please don’t tell me Kulbhushan Jadhav :)) booked by Pakistan courts but some legitimate terrorist who is wanted by CBI, FBI, Mi-6 for religious terrorism?

Modi etc are only terrorists in your little world.

Give me names.
Click to expand...

Why do you think terrorists wanted by India, US or UK are legitimate but not by Pakistan? Is this is the usual Indian logic that only West or India can pass judgement on what is terrorism and what is not?
 
Local.Dada said:
How many designated Hindu terrorists do you know?

Please don’t tell me Kulbhushan Jadhav :)) booked by Pakistan courts but some legitimate terrorist who is wanted by CBI, FBI, Mi-6 for religious terrorism?

Modi etc are only terrorists in your little world.

Give me names.
Click to expand...

Let me ask a similar question I asked CJ for which he had no answer to. Which Saudi government official is wanted for terrorism by the organizations you mentioned? By your logic then, Saudi government has nothing to do with terrorism anywhere.
 
There are plenty of Hindu extremists.

Even the tailor who was killed was perhaps a closet extremist too (based on his social media post).
 
JaDed said:
Just like you based on your posts here.
Click to expand...

How am I an extremist? When did I attack another faith or another human?

Yes. My views can be conservative/traditional but that's not extremism.

Stop supporting your fellow Indians who happen to be extremists.
 
Last edited:
sweep_shot said:
How am I an extremist? When did I attack another faith or another human?

Yes. My views can be conservative/traditional but that's not extremism.

Stop supporting your fellow extremist Indians.
Click to expand...

Can you tell everyone what did tailor post?
 
JaDed said:
Just like you based on your posts here.
Click to expand...

Hello

The thread is about Hindu extremism. Please stick to the topic, nobody cares for your opinion about posters but I care for your opinion on this subject.

Do you believe there are Hindu extremists as many of your friends dont? If yes, estimate a number.
 
sweep_shot said:
You can check on the internet.

He was an extremist just like many modern day Indians. It is a sad truth.
Click to expand...

Didn't find the post. Since you have already seen that or know about it, you can share details.

Meanwhile a week before getting beheaded he had filed a police complaint about death threats. He had mentioned that he didn't post anything and his son shared a post from his phone while playing a game.

He didn't open his shop for 6 days.

Police intervened and both sides reached agreement about the issue.

So he opened the shop and next day he was beheaded.

Which part looks like extremism to you?

Why was he beheaded after reaching an agreement with other side?
 
KingKhanWC said:
Please give us YOUR definition of an EXTREMIST.

Tip - Extremists can come in all types in the real...
[MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] come on give us your number(s).
Click to expand...

May be go to the UNSC list and try to find the count.
 
kumjsr said:
Didn't find the post. Since you have already seen that or know about it, you can share details.

Meanwhile a week before getting beheaded he had filed a police complaint about death threats. He had mentioned that he didn't post anything and his son shared a post from his phone while playing a game.

He didn't open his shop for 6 days.

Police intervened and both sides reached agreement about the issue.

So he opened the shop and next day he was beheaded.

Which part looks like extremism to you?

Why was he beheaded after reaching an agreement with other side?
Click to expand...

I am not defending the beheading. That was unnecessary and counterproductive.

But, the tailor seemed to have supported Nupur Sharma (who is clearly a Hindu extremist). Therefore, it is fair to call him a closet extremist (just like many BJP supporters).
 
sweep_shot said:
I am not defending the beheading. That was unnecessary and counterproductive.

But, the tailor seemed to have supported Nupur Sharma (who is clearly a Hindu extremist). Therefore, it is fair to call him a closet extremist (just like many BJP supporters).
Click to expand...

Did you read my previous post?

1. Apparently video of Nupur Sharma was shared from his account. Hasn't the video been shared even by non-Hindu journalists also earlier.
2. Tailor denied sharing the post.
3. Tailor complained about threats.
4. Police brokered the agreement between both parties and he opened the shop after that.
5. Tailor believed the other side and even gave a handwritten note to police that he doesn't want any action against other side.
6. He was beheaded after that.

From 1-6 which part looks like extremism?

Why would extremist believe other side and agree to police not taking any action on then after discussion?
 
kumjsr said:
Did you read my previous post?

1. Apparently video of Nupur Sharma was shared from his account. Hasn't the video been shared even by non-Hindu journalists also earlier.
2. Tailor denied sharing the post.
3. Tailor complained about threats.
4. Police brokered the agreement between both parties and he opened the shop after that.
5. Tailor believed the other side and even gave a handwritten note to police that he doesn't want any action against other side.
6. He was beheaded after that.

From 1-6 which part looks like extremism?

Why would extremist believe other side and agree to police not taking any action on then after discussion?
Click to expand...

Okay. If your information is right, he is not an extremist. But, that doesn't change the fact there are many radical Hindus in India currently.
 
sweep_shot said:
Okay. If your information is right, he is not an extremist. But, that doesn't change the fact there are many radical Hindus in India currently.
Click to expand...

There are no ifs and buts here.

No one on PP knows for sure that he supported Nupur Sharma and directly believed the version of story shared by people who beheaded him.

Why do you think that so many posters are ready to believe killers than the person who had already denied sharing the post?

Is it because there is support to killers to some extent?
 
KingKhanWC said:
Please give us YOUR definition of an EXTREMIST.

Tip - Extremists can come in all types in the real...
[MENTION=76058]cricketjoshila[/MENTION] come on give us your number(s).
Click to expand...

My definition is very clear. In my book it’s a terrorist and I said there hasn’t been a single designated Hindu terrorist who did terrorism using the name of religion. I still haven’t seen names.

It’s you who seemed to be confused. There is not a single incident I remember across the globe of Hindus destroying properties or acts of terrorism in the name of religion. As I said you are confusing criminals and terrorists. I gave you my definition and why do I get the feeling you understand it and are just stalling.
 
kumjsr said:
There are no ifs and buts here.

No one on PP knows for sure that he supported Nupur Sharma and directly believed the version of story shared by people who beheaded him.

Why do you think that so many posters are ready to believe killers than the person who had already denied sharing the post?

Is it because there is support to killers to some extent?
Click to expand...

I have not seen any post supporting these killers. These killers are extremists just like Nupur Sharma and her supporters.
 
sweep_shot said:
I have not seen any post supporting these killers. These killers are extremists just like Nupur Sharma and her supporters.
Click to expand...

So you are saying beheading someone and saying an offensive thing is the same thing.

I wonder if given a choice what someone would prefer someone insulting them or beheading them?
 
sweep_shot said:
I have not seen any post supporting these killers. These killers are extremists just like Nupur Sharma and her supporters.
Click to expand...

If they are not supporting killers to some extent, then why so many posters are ready to believe the version of story shared by killers?

Check the threads, many people by called tailor extremist or idiot. They aren't sure what he shared, they haven't seen his post, yet they are ready to believe that he insulted other religion.

How do people know for sure that he supports Nupur Sharma? Because killers said so?

How do you explain such faith in killers story without it being proved? If this is not partial support to killers, then what is it?
 
Last edited:
Local.Dada said:
My definition is very clear. In my book it’s a terrorist and I said there hasn’t been a single designated Hindu terrorist who did terrorism using the name of religion. I still haven’t seen names.

It’s you who seemed to be confused. There is not a single incident I remember across the globe of Hindus destroying properties or acts of terrorism in the name of religion. As I said you are confusing criminals and terrorists. I gave you my definition and why do I get the feeling you understand it and are just stalling.
Click to expand...

Im here to learn from our Indian friends, sure a little confused as I've never come across anyone saying there is no extremists in a group of a billion people.

What is your definition of a terrorist? Because your definition of an extremist is not compatible with the English language or you thinking in terms of Sanskrit ?

Sure, lets go back a few years and start with what INDIAN media calls Cow-Terorism. I have a feeling this is only in India.

2017 on track to be worst-ever year for cow-related violence

In the first six months of 2017, 20 cow-terror attacks were reported–more than 75% of the 2016 figure, which was the worst year for such violence since 2010.

The attacks include mob lynching, attacks by vigilantes, murder and attempt to murder, harassment, assault and gang-rape. In two attacks, the victims/survivors were chained, stripped and beaten, while in two others, the victims were hanged.

These attacks – sometimes collectively referred to as gautankwad, a portmanteau of the Hindi words for cow and terrorism, on social media – were reported from 19 of 29 Indian states, with Uttar Pradesh (10), Haryana (9), Gujarat (6), Karnataka (6), Madhya Pradesh (4), Delhi (4) and Rajasthan (4) reporting the highest number of cases.

In 23 attacks, the attackers were mobs or groups of people who belonged to Hindu groups, such as the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, Bajrang Dal and local Gau Rakshak Samitis.
Click to expand...

https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...me-to-power/story-w9CYOksvgk9joGSSaXgpLO.html

Please help me understand why those who killed someone because a cow is holy to them are not a terrorist?
 
My guess this thread is to indirectly defend the killing of the Tailor.. well ok good job where the tailor was to be called Hindu extremist..blockbuster thread
 
Last edited:
JaDed said:
My guess this thread is to indirectly defend the killing of the Tailor.. well ok good job where the tailor was to be called Hindu extremist..blockbuster thread
Click to expand...

You guess too much, this isnt a quiz. :sachin

Please stick to the thread, we are not in occupied Kashmir now.

Do you believe there are Hindu extremists in India and if so how many? Very easy question.
 
KingKhanWC said:
You guess too much, this isnt a quiz. :sachin

Please stick to the thread, we are not in occupied Kashmir now.

Do you believe there are Hindu extremists in India and if so how many? Very easy question.
Click to expand...

I have said multiple times in threads with BJP /Hindtuva, don't have to explain anything to you, your agenda is obvious.
 
There are plenty Hindu extremists in India like that fat guy who runs Sudarshan news on youtube, Adityanath, Uma Bharti, Pravin Togadia the list is endless.
 
PakLFC said:
There are plenty Hindu extremists in India like that fat guy who runs Sudarshan news on youtube, Adityanath, Uma Bharti, Pravin Togadia the list is endless.
Click to expand...

Don't tell me that troll has a following in Pakistan? He is a joker :))
 
My definition of extremism is extremism by principle. As far as I know an extremist is a person who takes their ideology to its logical extreme. Lets say a particular ideology prescribes death penalty as a punishment to homosexuals or death punishment to a person who doesn't follow that ideology. The believers of such ideology would carry out these punishments, no ifs and buts.

Based on above definition an Hindu extreme should be a person who follows hinduism to its logical extreme. But there is no particular ideology for Hindus. It is not a religion of the scriptures. The core tenet of Hinduisim is liberation of the soul from maya. Based on this definition, unfortunately there aren't many hindu extremists as every one is trapped in materialism and worldy desires.
 
Local.Dada said:
My definition is very clear. In my book it’s a terrorist and I said there hasn’t been a single designated Hindu terrorist who did terrorism using the name of religion. I still haven’t seen names.

It’s you who seemed to be confused. There is not a single incident I remember across the globe of Hindus destroying properties or acts of terrorism in the name of religion. As I said you are confusing criminals and terrorists. I gave you my definition and why do I get the feeling you understand it and are just stalling.
Click to expand...

Your definition of terrorism is if US, UK or India say someone is a terrorist. But of course by that definition there's no such thing as Saudi sponsored terrorism.
 
sweep_shot said:
I have not seen any post supporting these killers. These killers are extremists just like Nupur Sharma and her supporters.
Click to expand...

Really? Killers and Nupur Sharma are on the same boat? In that case, Richard Dawkins and most atheists are extremists.
 
KingKhanWC said:
A poster suggested.

"No there are no Hindu extremists in India."

Is this true or a Hindu Citizens of India in denial?

Muslims, Christians and others accept a small minority of extremists exist claiming to follow their faith.

Why are Hindus so reluctant or are we being misled by the news of events in India?
Click to expand...


It's as if, that poster was saying, "I am a prostitute and I am also a virgin".
 
Champ_Pal said:
It was very rare before 2000. Hindus were considered docile and weak and super soft. The thug Hindu image is a new concept. In India in sensitive areas, it was always about street power. Who ever rules the streets get their way with the blessings of secular liberals.
Hindus have stated fighting back as they gained organizational strength through RSS and BJP. You cut diamond with a diamond. You cannot go into a fight armed with nothing when the opposite side do not hesitate to kill.

We can never eradicate extremism as long as people are faithful to their religion and faith overrides common sense .
However there are things the Government can do to minimize extremism. Those includes monitoring what is being preached and taught at religious schools, public sermons and speeches.
Click to expand...

Massive falsehood. There are millions of Muslims around the world who are very very faithful to their religion and have nothing to do with extremism. Same goes for Christians, Hindus and all other religious denominations.

Tying extremism to religiosity is the argument of a pseudo intellectual. I am not a devout Muslim, yet I respect those who have a clear head about their faith, and most faiths in the world teach humility, tolerance, and value of human lives and have nothing to do with extremism.

Extremism is a product of politics, and unethical use of religion by politics combined with the severe lack of knowledge of religion, be it any religion.

Hindus are not fighting back, they have just learnt the ways of uneducated muslim extremists and are now setting fire to their own country. This is not a reaction borne of necessity but one borne of politics used by Modi and other right wing Hindus.
 
Local.Dada said:
Sacred games is not a documentary nor it is the reflection of any reality. Case in point: the story premise itself lol.
Click to expand...

Yet you ignore it touches on an important point of babri masjid
 
KingKhanWC said:
Do you feel this is a growing problem and many residents are either in denial or dont want to entertain this serious problem?

@Local Dada please explain.
Click to expand...

-1984 sikh riots
-babri masjid
-93 bombay riots
-gujrat under modi

If this is not hindu extremism and is all normal than we cant say much
 
Major said:
-1984 sikh riots
-babri masjid
-93 bombay riots
-gujrat under modi

If this is not hindu extremism and is all normal than we cant say much
Click to expand...

How does 1984 riots come even into picture here? It was one political party going after one community to take revenge of killing of their leader.
 
kumjsr said:
How does 1984 riots come even into picture here? It was one political party going after one community to take revenge of killing of their leader.
Click to expand...

The political party gave free hand the killing was being done by the locals
 
kumjsr said:
How does 1984 riots come even into picture here? It was one political party going after one community to take revenge of killing of their leader.
Click to expand...

One political party going after one community. Isn't that extremism?

It is like Nazis going after Jews.

Definitely extremism/terrorism.
 
sweep_shot said:
One political party going after one community. Isn't that extremism?

It is like Nazis going after Jews.

Definitely extremism/terrorism.
Click to expand...

Question is how is it related to Hinduism?

Thread title is about Hindu extremism.

Who claimed that there are no extremist in India? Recently two extremists beheaded a tailor and both killers are Indians.
 
Last edited:
There is no hindu extremism or terrorism. I mean there is no extremism in the form we know it. There are no Al Qaeda or ISIS or Boko Haraam or there is no hindu shouting Jai Shri Ram and shooting in Orlando nightclub or Ariana Grande's concert or in London Bridge or in Paris or in......list goes on and on. So there is no terrorism from any hindutva groups anywhere in the world, including in India. People who says otherwise is clearly lieing to themselves as no one else anywhere in the world buy such narrative.

Every extremist/terrorist organization has a cause. There is no reason for any hindus to take that route. Hinduism is the world's oldest religion and it is not into convesion. Hindusim only believes in Karma, Moksha and Dharma...it dont believe in forcing people to adopt hinduism. So for any hindutva organization to take the route of terrorism is meaningless as there is no need.

Now if by extremism, OP meant some idiot somewhere killing people for eating beef or spreading hatred in social media...ofcourse there are many in India. You will find such nutcases everywhere..UK, USA, Aust everywhere. India is a country of 1.5 billion people and there are nutjobs everywhere belonging to every religion. Infact, extremism can be of many form...meaningless hatred towards someone, extreme prejudice towards something or cult worshipping somebody is also some form of extremism and you will find many such people every where including in internet forums.

But there are no hindu terrorist/extremist groups in the form we know it is.
 
Rajdeep said:
There is no hindu extremism or terrorism. I mean there is no extremism in the form we know it. There are no Al Qaeda or ISIS or Boko Haraam or there is no hindu shouting Jai Shri Ram and shooting in Orlando nightclub or Ariana Grande's concert or in London Bridge or in Paris or in......list goes on and on. So there is no terrorism from any hindutva groups anywhere in the world, including in India. People who says otherwise is clearly lieing to themselves as no one else anywhere in the world buy such narrative.

Every extremist/terrorist organization has a cause. There is no reason for any hindus to take that route. Hinduism is the world's oldest religion and it is not into convesion. Hindusim only believes in Karma, Moksha and Dharma...it dont believe in forcing people to adopt hinduism. So for any hindutva organization to take the route of terrorism is meaningless as there is no need.

Now if by extremism, OP meant some idiot somewhere killing people for eating beef or spreading hatred in social media...ofcourse there are many in India. You will find such nutcases everywhere..UK, USA, Aust everywhere. India is a country of 1.5 billion people and there are nutjobs everywhere belonging to every religion. Infact, extremism can be of many form...meaningless hatred towards someone, extreme prejudice towards something or cult worshipping somebody is also some form of extremism and you will find many such people every where including in internet forums.

But there are no hindu terrorist/extremist groups in the form we know it is.
Click to expand...

That’s exactly the point all of us are making but you articulated it much better.

As you see people are equating an offensive comment with a beheading. Obviously the guy saying it above is someone no one takes seriously but there is an effort to find a balance between the 2.

If beheading and destruction of property is seen as the same as saying some offensive stuff than the criteria becomes broad, I guess 99% of the human population can be called extremists lol.

Just another example, the op went to pretty much most news websites but missed headlines about Shiv Sena and was coming up with the same rhetoric you see on clips of some random Pakistani morning shows catered to housewives that regurgitate the same RSS or RAA ki shazish, Shiv Sena this that, BJP, Modi etc lol.

Looks like most watch these shows than follow actual world news and get a more educated opinion

I want to have a good balanced debate.sure there are flaws in India or with the govt but the people who run the site need to decide if they want this to become a YouTube comment section or a place where there is actual balanced debate. I can understand if there is a Pakistani bias obviously but some of the intent behind these topics or attempts are crystal clear that they are just to get a reaction. That’s why it’s better to sit back and enjoy the ride rather than take it seriously.
 
Hindu extremists may not be like ISIS but they are still extremists. They are like far-right domestic terrorists from North America. Their goal is not necessarily world domination; rather, they seem to desire elimination/suppression of Muslims.

Under BJP, the number seems to have risen.
 
Last edited:
If this statement is true then one can only conclude:

a) All.hindus are extremists and extremism is a core part of who they are. Hence they can't even see it.

b) the person who said it is not very bright

I suspect it is "b"..

Every society has extremists..there are no societies where there aren't any..perhaps ignoring this thread would be better for many posters..
 
sweep_shot said:
Hindu extremists may not be like ISIS but they are still extremists. They are like far-right domestic terrorists from North America. Their goal is not necessarily world domination; rather, they seem to desire elimination/suppression of Muslims.

Under BJP, the number seems to have risen.
Click to expand...

Ironic you say this because muslims are flourishing in India. There are muslim representations in every field - sports, politics, cinema everywhere.

On the other hand, Hindus are denied of almost every right in countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh. India's ex president was muslim...can a hindu hold such position in Pak/BD?

But somehow muslims are being supressed in India..lol. Can anyone from a supress community have the guts to do beheading openly and record in camera?

The problem is no one buys this narrative unfortunately.
 
Major said:
-1984 sikh riots
-babri masjid
-93 bombay riots
-gujrat under modi

If this is not hindu extremism and is all normal than we cant say much
Click to expand...

1. Nothing to do with Hindus. It was congress party workers vs the Sikhs.

2. Bombay Riots: Muslims killed Hindus in muslim majority areas after the babri demolition. Hindu backlash started after that.

3.It was a spontaneous reaction to muslims burning alive 59 hindus in a planned attack.
 
sweep_shot said:
Hindu extremists may not be like ISIS but they are still extremists. They are like far-right domestic terrorists from North America. Their goal is not necessarily world domination; rather, they seem to desire elimination/suppression of Muslims.

Under BJP, the number seems to have risen.
Click to expand...

yeah like the tailor who you said was an Hindu extremist because his killers called him that.
 
JaDed said:
yeah like the tailor who you said was an Hindu extremist because his killers called him that.
Click to expand...

If he supported Nupur Sharma, he was an extremist. If not, he was not an extremist. That's my stance.

Supporting Nupur Sharma is equivalent to supporting Anjem Choudary or Westboro Baptist Church.

You are trying to change the topic by focusing on the beheading. Topic is about Hindu extremism. Do you think it exists? I think it does.
 
cricketjoshila said:
If it does, that country has to complain. Take the matter to the proper forums.No?
Click to expand...

Except the countries that are victims of Saudi sponsored terrorism have a conflict of interest due to being in bed with their government.

All that is to say, your argument that neutral organizations must certify that someone or some country is involved in terrorism doesn't work.
 
sweep_shot said:
If he supported Nupur Sharma, he was an extremist. If not, he was not an extremist. That's my stance.

Supporting Nupur Sharma is equivalent to supporting Anjem Choudary or Westboro Baptist Church.

You are trying to change the topic by focusing on the beheading. Topic is about Hindu extremism. Do you think it exists? I think it does.
Click to expand...

That was not ur stance, you said he was an extremist because the killers in the video killed him.

Don’t change your tune after someone corrected you
 
JaDed said:
That was not ur stance, you said he was an extremist because the killers in the video killed him.

Don’t change your tune after someone corrected you
Click to expand...

If I get corrected, I have no issue in changing my stance. That's very normal.

I am yet to see you condemn extremist Hindus. You always shift the goalpost. Why is that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

The Bald Eagle
  • Poll Poll
Is it harder to be a Muslim in India or a Hindu in Pakistan, or a Hindu in Bangladesh?
2
Replies
90
Views
2K
straighttalk
S
Bhaag Viru Bhaag
Who is Kashish Chaudhary? 1st Hindu woman assistant commissioner in Balochistan
Replies
10
Views
390
Bhaag Viru Bhaag
Bhaag Viru Bhaag
Cpt. Rishwat
Did the Ghar Wapsi movement fail in India?
2
Replies
88
Views
2K
Cpt. Rishwat
Cpt. Rishwat
Bhaag Viru Bhaag
A summary of Hindu-Muslim relations in India in the last two decades by Chatgpt
Replies
7
Views
516
Champ_Pal
C
FearlessRoar
Hypocrisy of India: No cricket, no trade, no artists—but why keep an embassy in Pakistan?
2
Replies
107
Views
2K
guard
G
Back
Top