What's new

Opinion: Imran Khan used to criticize enforced disappearances. Why is he silent now?

hoshiarpurexpress

First Class Captain
Joined
Jul 29, 2020
Runs
6,161
Opinion by Hamid Mir
July 1, 2021 at 5:07 a.m. GMT+10


0
Hamid Mir is a Pakistani journalist and author.

Sachal is a 3-year-old Pakistani boy. Lately he has spent long hours sitting outside a court in Islamabad with his grandmother, waiting to hear news of the father who was snatched from him when he was just a few months old. Sachal’s father, the journalist and poet Mudassar Naaru, suddenly disappeared when the family was on holiday in August 2018. He hasn’t been heard from since. Sachal’s mother, Sadaf, who led a brave and determined search for answers, passed away last month. The pain of the past three years was too much for her to bear, contributing to a fatal heart attack.

Enforced disappearances — in which people are torn away from their loved ones and held in undisclosed locations without any notice — are sadly not new to Pakistan. The roots of this injustice reach back to the military rule of Gen. Pervez Musharraf. People in different parts of the country were abducted without arrest and held outside the protection of the law. Musharraf began the practice ostensibly for the sake of the “war on terror.”Today, by contrast, people such as Naaru can disappear after making a critical Facebook post against alleged rigging in the 2018 election. One of the few politicians who did raise his voice back then was Imran Khan, who is now Pakistan’s prime minister.

Back then, Khan was the sole member of his party in Parliament. In his memoir, “Pakistan: A Personal History,” Khan proudly notes that he “led the first demonstration with the families of missing persons outside parliament [in 2003].” Khan was a prominent guest on the Geo TV show I’m now banned from hosting, “Capital Talk.” He criticized intelligence agencies for kidnapping people without evidence.

Khan’s appearances on my show triggered Musharraf’s rage. One day, the then-dictator summoned me to his residence and said, “You invite this mad sportsman every second day, he speaks in support of suspicious people picked up for their involvement in terrorism. Don’t invite him again.”

I ignored Musharraf’s order. One day, at a demonstration outside Parliament, Khan introduced me to Amina Masood Janjua, the wife of businessman Masood Janjua, who was abducted in 2005. Amina is among the bravest people I know. She continues her work fearlessly, 16 years after she last saw her husband. She once participated in my show along with Khan.

For the past three years, since Khan became prime minister, Amina has been seeking an appointment with him. She wants to remind him of the promise he made to her and the other wives, mothers, sisters and daughters anxiously waiting for word of their loved ones. There are thousands who looked to Khan for hope. One of them is Sammi Baloch, the daughter of Deen Mohammad Baloch, who was kidnapped by security forces in 2009.


Sammi was only 11 at the time. She first came to Islamabad to protest in 2010. Four years later, she walked for 1,600 miles from her home province of Balochistan with other families of the disappeared. She was forced to return with no answers. But she tried again in March this year, hoping Khan’s government would be different. “He always claimed on your show that he will end enforced disappearances,” she told me. “I will remind of him of his words and will appeal for help.” She met Khan but returned without her father.

The families of the disappeared are protesting mostly in Balochistan, Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Baloch families have been sitting outside the Quetta Press Club for more than 4,000 days. Sindhi families are on a hunger strike outside the Karachi Press Club for many days. They are present where everyone can see them, but few stop to hear of their pain.

Politicians such as Akhtar Mengal, president of the Baluchistan National Party (BNP-M), supported Khan’s government in 2018 and introduced a list of 5,128 missing persons only from Baluchistan in the Parliament. Mengal withdrew his support for Khan in 2020. He told me that “450 out of 5,128 missing people returned in three years, but 1,500 more disappeared in the same period.”

The open wounds of enforced disappearances in Pakistan can only be healed by truth and justice. The protests of Pakistani women recall comparable efforts by their counterparts in Latin America, who have struggled to draw attention to loved ones who fell victim to past dictatorships. Truth commissions have helped some of them to find answers. Many of their countries have also appealed to Pakistan at the U.N. Human Rights Council to learn from their history and end the cruel practice of enforced disappearances. A commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances has been working in Pakistan since 2011 but to little effect. The International Commission of Jurists expressed its disappointment with the inquiry commission’s performance last year.

Under international pressure, the Pakistani government recently introduced a bill outlawing enforced disappearances. It’s a welcome step, but it won’t be enough. Laws mean little when they cannot be implemented. Pakistanis such as Sachal, Amina and Sammi need to know the truth of what happened to their loved ones.

Moreover, every Pakistani needs the guarantee that no individual or institution is above the law. Prime Minister Imran Khan used to stand for these principles when he was out of office. He needs to remind himself of his own words.

Source : https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/06/30/imran-khan-silent-on-enforced-disappearances/
 
The hypocrisy from Imran Khan continues !!! Why is he not meeting Amina now.
May be he will not be to look her in the eyes now and promise to bring her husband back.
 
The hypocrisy from Imran Khan continues !!! Why is he not meeting Amina now.
May be he will not be to look her in the eyes now and promise to bring her husband back.

He cant do much, as the people who are doing the disappearing can topple his government. He only has a slight majority right now in parliament. However he has met some families, as well as proposing a bill to "fast track" a bill which criminalizes enforced disappearances.

Prime Minister Imran Khan on Thursday met a three-member representative committee of the families of missing persons — who held a week-long sit-in in the capital last month — and committed to keeping them updated regarding the progress made on ascertaining the status of their missing family members.

Details about the meeting were shared by Minister for Human Rights Shireen Mazari in a tweet. Mazari, who also attended the meeting, said Prime Minister Imran had directed the principal secretary to "ascertain quickly the exact status of the missing family members" while assuring the relatives that they would be kept updated about the search.

The premier also emphasized that the government's bill to criminalize enforced disappearances would be "fast-tracked along with whatever other laws needed to be amended", Mazari added.


https://www.dawn.com/news/1613219
 
The guy has made so many U-turns till date, it's not even funny anymore. And then he yells at the top of his lungs on Twitter regarding Kashmir, and wonders why no one blinks and eyelid on his claims.
 
He does speak out enforced disappearances - the ones in Indian occupied Kashmir
 
The guy is a show pony, what ever happened to him doing everything to get Afia back, hes forgetton about everything he asked for votes on, sold out muslims in china for money and is waiting to get payment from india and israel.

He even tried with india when he was desperate to restart trade then was slapped by the army and made a uturn in less than a week.
 
The guy is a show pony, what ever happened to him doing everything to get Afia back, hes forgetton about everything he asked for votes on, sold out muslims in china for money and is waiting to get payment from india and israel.

He even tried with india when he was desperate to restart trade then was slapped by the army and made a uturn in less than a week.

Yeah you don't get geopolitics, Pakistan won't sell out to Israel or India because they're opposed Pakistan's geopolitical interests however China is needed to make Pakistan economically strong and they haven't crossed any of Pakistan's redlines (Kashmir & independent Palestine). Critics of Imran Khan's "China policy" forget the fact that Pakistan have always been close to China, CPEC wasn't started by Imran Khan and the ties go back several decades long before there was any news of Uyghur persecution.
 
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2304170/bill-criminalising-enforced-disappearance-introduced-in-na

The government on Monday introduced a bill in the National Assembly, criminalising enforced disappearance with 10-year imprisonment for anyone found guilty of it.

Minister for Interior Sheikh Rashid Ahmed proposed to amend the Pakistan Penal Code of 1860 and the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1898 with new sections pertaining to enforced disappearance.

On Monday, Minister for Human Rights Shireen Mazari introduced the bill – the Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021. The bill states that a new section 52-B (enforced disappearance) should be inserted into PPC after section 52-A.

The proposed section states that the “term enforced disappearance relates to the arrest, detention, abduction or any other form of deprivation of liberty by an agent of the state or by person or group of persons acting with the authorisation, support or acquiescence of the state, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person, which place such a person outside the protection of the law.”

The bill also stipulates that there should be three requisite elements that define enforced disappearance. These elements include, an unlawful or illegal deprivation of liberty or a deprivation of liberty that was legal but no longer is; an act allegedly carried out by agents of the state or by person or group of persons acting with the support, authorization or acquiescence of the state; and refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person.


The bill also seeks to insert new sections 512 and 513 in the PPC Penal Code, after section 511. It states that “whoever commits, orders, solicits or induces the commission of attempts to commit, is an accomplice to or participation in the forcible or involuntary disappearances of a person or group of persons is said to cause forcible or involuntary disappearances of that person” and falls within 512 (forcible or involuntary disappearances). Section 513 - punishment for forcible or involuntary disappearances - states that “whoever causes forcible or involuntary disappearance of any person from Pakistan or within Pakistan shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to a fine.”

“It is the rule of law, specifically adherence to Rule of Law that is the hallmark of any democratic society.”
It adds that the “practice of enforced disappearances is a particularly heinous crime not only because it removes human rights from the protection of the law but also due to the inherent cruelty inflicted upon families as a consequence of denial of information concerning the disappeared person.”
It further states that enforced disappearance is unconstitutional and is against international commitments made by Pakistan through ratification of the ICCPR.

Additionally, it continues, the United Nations General Assembly, in its resolutions 477/133 of 18th December, 1992, has emphasised that enforced disappearances undermine the “deepest values of any society committed to respect for the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms.”
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Maybe, just maybe most of the people that are disappearing are terrorists? I’ve seen many posts on SM where some of the people that have disappeared were actually in the BLA.
 
Maybe, just maybe most of the people that are disappearing are terrorists? I’ve seen many posts on SM where some of the people that have disappeared were actually in the BLA.

BLA is terrorist for you yet Kashmiri terrorists are freedom fighters for you.
 
BLA is terrorist for you yet Kashmiri terrorists are freedom fighters for you.

Baluchistan is not a disputed territory- they have an elected govt which is part of the coalition in the present govt. So yes they are terrorists. Kashmir is a disputed territory, AND each and every person hates you with all their soul, its the reason you need a million troops to keep them down.
 
Baluchistan is not a disputed territory- they have an elected govt which is part of the coalition in the present govt. So yes they are terrorists. Kashmir is a disputed territory, AND each and every person hates you with all their soul, its the reason you need a million troops to keep them down.

I am not entirely sure if ethnic Balochs have anything good to say about Pakistan army? Why did Pak army kill Akbar Bugti?
 
BLA is terrorist for you yet Kashmiri terrorists are freedom fighters for you.

Not just me, but the UK and the US. 😬

BLA is terrorist organisation that’s being funded by countries who are trying to break Pakistan.

Kashmir is a disputed area, the freedom fighters are fighting a military that rapes it’s mothers and sisters, blinds their kids with pellets, kidnaps their fathers and brothers.
 
Yeah you don't get geopolitics, Pakistan won't sell out to Israel or India because they're opposed Pakistan's geopolitical interests however China is needed to make Pakistan economically strong and they haven't crossed any of Pakistan's redlines (Kashmir & independent Palestine). Critics of Imran Khan's "China policy" forget the fact that Pakistan have always been close to China, CPEC wasn't started by Imran Khan and the ties go back several decades long before there was any news of Uyghur persecution.

geopolitics isnt something that you guys plan while sitting on a dinner table or what they teach you on a media controlled by the establishment.

countries are only opposed to you when you make them opposed and isolate yourself.
China is not needed to make pakistan strong, thats a wet dream spread by establishment stooges, China is only here for its own geopolitical interests which will end up making pakistan a battleground in its war with the USA.
Everyone is aware CPEC was started by NS, something iks followers themselves forget when prasing the investment. Theres also a reason why a courrpt general is in charge of the whole project still and not a minister, what does that tell you?
 
Not just me, but the UK and the US. ��

BLA is terrorist organisation that’s being funded by countries who are trying to break Pakistan.

Kashmir is a disputed area, the freedom fighters are fighting a military that rapes it’s mothers and sisters, blinds their kids with pellets, kidnaps their fathers and brothers.

US, UK, EU designates most of the Kashmiri freedom fighters as terrorists too.
 
The guy has made so many U-turns till date, it's not even funny anymore. And then he yells at the top of his lungs on Twitter regarding Kashmir, and wonders why no one blinks and eyelid on his claims.

Where are you now. That was a quick exit.
 
Opinion by Hamid Mir
July 1, 2021 at 5:07 a.m. GMT+10


0
Hamid Mir is a Pakistani journalist and author.

Sachal is a 3-year-old Pakistani boy. Lately he has spent long hours sitting outside a court in Islamabad with his grandmother, waiting to hear news of the father who was snatched from him when he was just a few months old. Sachal’s father, the journalist and poet Mudassar Naaru, suddenly disappeared when the family was on holiday in August 2018. He hasn’t been heard from since. Sachal’s mother, Sadaf, who led a brave and determined search for answers, passed away last month. The pain of the past three years was too much for her to bear, contributing to a fatal heart attack.

Enforced disappearances — in which people are torn away from their loved ones and held in undisclosed locations without any notice — are sadly not new to Pakistan. The roots of this injustice reach back to the military rule of Gen. Pervez Musharraf. People in different parts of the country were abducted without arrest and held outside the protection of the law. Musharraf began the practice ostensibly for the sake of the “war on terror.”Today, by contrast, people such as Naaru can disappear after making a critical Facebook post against alleged rigging in the 2018 election. One of the few politicians who did raise his voice back then was Imran Khan, who is now Pakistan’s prime minister.

Back then, Khan was the sole member of his party in Parliament. In his memoir, “Pakistan: A Personal History,” Khan proudly notes that he “led the first demonstration with the families of missing persons outside parliament [in 2003].” Khan was a prominent guest on the Geo TV show I’m now banned from hosting, “Capital Talk.” He criticized intelligence agencies for kidnapping people without evidence.

Khan’s appearances on my show triggered Musharraf’s rage. One day, the then-dictator summoned me to his residence and said, “You invite this mad sportsman every second day, he speaks in support of suspicious people picked up for their involvement in terrorism. Don’t invite him again.”

I ignored Musharraf’s order. One day, at a demonstration outside Parliament, Khan introduced me to Amina Masood Janjua, the wife of businessman Masood Janjua, who was abducted in 2005. Amina is among the bravest people I know. She continues her work fearlessly, 16 years after she last saw her husband. She once participated in my show along with Khan.

For the past three years, since Khan became prime minister, Amina has been seeking an appointment with him. She wants to remind him of the promise he made to her and the other wives, mothers, sisters and daughters anxiously waiting for word of their loved ones. There are thousands who looked to Khan for hope. One of them is Sammi Baloch, the daughter of Deen Mohammad Baloch, who was kidnapped by security forces in 2009.


Sammi was only 11 at the time. She first came to Islamabad to protest in 2010. Four years later, she walked for 1,600 miles from her home province of Balochistan with other families of the disappeared. She was forced to return with no answers. But she tried again in March this year, hoping Khan’s government would be different. “He always claimed on your show that he will end enforced disappearances,” she told me. “I will remind of him of his words and will appeal for help.” She met Khan but returned without her father.

The families of the disappeared are protesting mostly in Balochistan, Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Baloch families have been sitting outside the Quetta Press Club for more than 4,000 days. Sindhi families are on a hunger strike outside the Karachi Press Club for many days. They are present where everyone can see them, but few stop to hear of their pain.

Politicians such as Akhtar Mengal, president of the Baluchistan National Party (BNP-M), supported Khan’s government in 2018 and introduced a list of 5,128 missing persons only from Baluchistan in the Parliament. Mengal withdrew his support for Khan in 2020. He told me that “450 out of 5,128 missing people returned in three years, but 1,500 more disappeared in the same period.”

The open wounds of enforced disappearances in Pakistan can only be healed by truth and justice. The protests of Pakistani women recall comparable efforts by their counterparts in Latin America, who have struggled to draw attention to loved ones who fell victim to past dictatorships. Truth commissions have helped some of them to find answers. Many of their countries have also appealed to Pakistan at the U.N. Human Rights Council to learn from their history and end the cruel practice of enforced disappearances. A commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances has been working in Pakistan since 2011 but to little effect. The International Commission of Jurists expressed its disappointment with the inquiry commission’s performance last year.

Under international pressure, the Pakistani government recently introduced a bill outlawing enforced disappearances. It’s a welcome step, but it won’t be enough. Laws mean little when they cannot be implemented. Pakistanis such as Sachal, Amina and Sammi need to know the truth of what happened to their loved ones.

Moreover, every Pakistani needs the guarantee that no individual or institution is above the law. Prime Minister Imran Khan used to stand for these principles when he was out of office. He needs to remind himself of his own words.

Source : https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/06/30/imran-khan-silent-on-enforced-disappearances/

Where are you, you quoted an American newspaper and I have shown the law proposed by IK. Do you have the courage to apologise?
 
[MENTION=152959]hoshiarpurexpress[/MENTION]
Where are you? It took a simple Google search to show what he has done. And you have disappeared.
 
[MENTION=152959]hoshiarpurexpress[/MENTION]
Where are you? It took a simple Google search to show what he has done. And you have disappeared.

lol. It is already mentioned in the article..


Under international pressure, the Pakistani government recently introduced a bill outlawing enforced disappearances. It’s a welcome step, but it won’t be enough. Laws mean little when they cannot be implemented. Pakistanis such as Sachal, Amina and Sammi need to know the truth of what happened to their loved ones.

What more I need to say. Answer the simple question.. Why is he not meeting the lady which Imran Khan used as political leverage when he was in opposition.

The article is an OpEd, written in Washington Post by a Pakistani Journalist, for Pakistan' PM Imran Khan.
And You want me to do google searches. lol.

This is the same story as Kerry-Lugar-Berman Act(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enhanced_Partnership_with_Pakistan_Act_of_2009).
I mean how shameless can a country be where the Americans openly decide what kind of the government and structures Pakistan can have, and Pakistanis are obliging for that to get some aid.
 
With so many badniyaat losers on here, i thought i have to correct them with a single Google search.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/2304170/bill-criminalising-enforced-disappearance-introduced-in-na

The government on Monday introduced a bill in the National Assembly, criminalising enforced disappearance with 10-year imprisonment for anyone found guilty of it.

Minister for Interior Sheikh Rashid Ahmed proposed to amend the Pakistan Penal Code of 1860 and the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1898 with new sections pertaining to enforced disappearance.

On Monday, Minister for Human Rights Shireen Mazari introduced the bill – the Criminal Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021. The bill states that a new section 52-B (enforced disappearance) should be inserted into PPC after section 52-A.

The proposed section states that the “term enforced disappearance relates to the arrest, detention, abduction or any other form of deprivation of liberty by an agent of the state or by person or group of persons acting with the authorisation, support or acquiescence of the state, followed by a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or by concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person, which place such a person outside the protection of the law.”

The bill also stipulates that there should be three requisite elements that define enforced disappearance. These elements include, an unlawful or illegal deprivation of liberty or a deprivation of liberty that was legal but no longer is; an act allegedly carried out by agents of the state or by person or group of persons acting with the support, authorization or acquiescence of the state; and refusal to acknowledge the deprivation of liberty or concealment of the fate or whereabouts of the disappeared person.


The bill also seeks to insert new sections 512 and 513 in the PPC Penal Code, after section 511. It states that “whoever commits, orders, solicits or induces the commission of attempts to commit, is an accomplice to or participation in the forcible or involuntary disappearances of a person or group of persons is said to cause forcible or involuntary disappearances of that person” and falls within 512 (forcible or involuntary disappearances). Section 513 - punishment for forcible or involuntary disappearances - states that “whoever causes forcible or involuntary disappearance of any person from Pakistan or within Pakistan shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to a fine.”

“It is the rule of law, specifically adherence to Rule of Law that is the hallmark of any democratic society.”
It adds that the “practice of enforced disappearances is a particularly heinous crime not only because it removes human rights from the protection of the law but also due to the inherent cruelty inflicted upon families as a consequence of denial of information concerning the disappeared person.”
It further states that enforced disappearance is unconstitutional and is against international commitments made by Pakistan through ratification of the ICCPR.

Additionally, it continues, the United Nations General Assembly, in its resolutions 477/133 of 18th December, 1992, has emphasised that enforced disappearances undermine the “deepest values of any society committed to respect for the rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms.”

Oh My God!! You literally believe that the Pakistan Army will never pick up someone in the name of National Security.. lol.
That they will play nice when someone is on the verge of exposing their corruption, may be some pizza franchises of Papa John in some part of the world.

Man PTI and Imran Khan supporters are next level. Please come up with something intelligent. Else, do not waste my time.
 
Can someone from IKs fan club please explain why he has forgotten Afia please.

He was suppose to become the PM just so he can free her.
 
This is your thread, I assumed you wanted to discuss the disappearance of the Pakistani journalist and poet Mudassar Naru. From what I can see, there isn't even any proof that his disappearance was enforced, yet now you are talking about Usma binLladen, Kashmir and Uyghurs. What is it you actually want to discuss?

If you care to read the thread from top to bottom, I did not change the topic. I was just replying to comments related to Kashmir which was brought up tagging me.

I will let the mods decide if my reply was off topic and I will respect the decision if it is deleted.

My post still stands, and the OPED is written by a Pakistani journalist, Hamid Mir in Washington Post.
I have asked the question already, did not get answer from any one. So, I will ask again.

Why is Imran Khan not meeting Amina now, despite her asking for appointments multiple tine

For the past three years, since Khan became prime minister, Amina has been seeking an appointment with him. She wants to remind him of the promise he made to her and the other wives, mothers, sisters and daughters anxiously waiting for word of their loved ones. There are thousands who looked to Khan for hope. One of them is Sammi Baloch, the daughter of Deen Mohammad Baloch, who was kidnapped by security forces in 2009.
 
Can someone from IKs fan club please explain why he has forgotten Afia please.

He was suppose to become the PM just so he can free her.

Had to check the thread title to see why we are talking about Afia wohever she is. Desperation probably.
 
Had to check the thread title to see why we are talking about Afia wohever she is. Desperation probably.

Maybe your to young, but she was a disappearance who IK made political on a daily basis during musharraf era and said he will do whatever it takes to get her back, so im asking why is he now ignoring her, that he is in power? whys is IKs fan club quite and ignoring the question like he himself is?
 
https://tribune.com.pk/story/2333684/ihc-expresses-displeasure-over-enforced-disappearances-says-practice-should-end

The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday expressed displeasure over the practice of enforced disappearances, with IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah wondering if the senior government officials can be tried under Article 6 of the Constitution.

During a hearing of the case pertaining to the disappearance of journalist and poet Mudasir Naaru, IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah said if the practice of whisking people away continued, then the court will initiate proceedings under Article 6 and include the "chief executives" in the case too.

Justice Minallah said there was no accountability in Pakistan, adding that the Commission for Inquiry of Enforced Disappearances was formed but it does nothing except postpone hearings.

He said, “There are thousands of families whose loved ones have gone missing, but no one bothers with them”.

The IHC chief justice further said there was no “state within a state” in Pakistan as the country has a Constitution and laws but still no investigations were conducted in the missing person cases.

The state is responsible for these missing persons and this practise should be ended, he added. Justice Minallah said even a terrorist cannot be extra-judicially killed and asked who has the authority to label another person a terrorist.

If such practice is to be enforced, a SHO will pick people up for talking against him, the judge warned.

Attorney General Khalid Jawed Khan said Naaru’s family met Prime Minister Imran Khan earlier this month and the government was serious about the recovery of the missing person, adding that the government needed more time to submit a report on the matter.

About Justice Minallah’s Article 6 remarks, the AGP said that even the government couldn’t implement the sentences given under Article 6, while adding that it was also important for the federal government to keep national security in view.

Justice Minallah then stated that the court could decide for the government and hold all past and incumbent chief executives responsible for the heinous practice.

A person went missing in Islamabad last year and then it was said he had gone to the Northern Areas for a picnic, the IHC CJ said, adding that there was an impression that enforced disappearance was the policy of the state.

The chief justice further said he does not know if the media is free or not, but if it were, then pictures of the missing persons would have been on the front page.

“Either the chief executive take responsibility for the missing persons or he holds his subordinates [involved in this practice] accountable,” the IHC CJ added.

Justice Minallah added that the practice of enforced disappearances has been going on in Pakistan since the 1970s. "Former military dictator Gen Pervez Musharraf admitted to this crime in his autobiography but still, there was no action against him," he added.

AGP Khan said not every issue can be fixed by the courts as some issues can only be resolved by people themselves. “They should come out on streets [to protest],” he said, adding that since the 70s extra-judicial murders have been taking place in Pakistan.

Justice Minallah responded that the court verdict can also fix issues if the government can identify the ones responsible for this practice.

“When there is an impression that the state is involved in these crimes, then nothing can be more serious than that,” he added.

He said the government can show its seriousness by prosecuting the individuals who admitted to making people disappear forcibly.

AGP Khan said he was ready to assist the court in the matter as he supported democracy and rule of law. Naaru’s counsel Iman Mazari also expressed her willingness to assist the bench.

The case was then adjourned till Jan 18.
 
Back
Top