What's new

Pakistan’s misguided obsession with infrastructure

Mian

T20I Debutant
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Runs
7,014
http://www.economist.com/news/asia/...hough-existing-ones-are?fsrc=scn/tw/te/rfd/pe

The government is building more airports, roads and railways, even though the existing ones are underused

NEARLY 20 years after it opened, Pakistan’s first motorway still has a desolate feel. There is scant traffic along the 375km link between Islamabad and Lahore (pictured). Motorists can drive for miles without seeing another vehicle, save perhaps for traffic cops manning speed traps. As the two cities are already connected by the Grand Trunk Road, which is 90km shorter and toll-free, there is simply not much demand for a motorway.

Yet this $1.2bn white elephant is one of the proudest achievements of Nawaz Sharif, who was prime minister when it opened in 1997 and is once again running Pakistan. Mr Sharif, who enjoys comparisons to Sher Shah Suri, a 16th-century ruler who renovated the Grand Trunk Road, never tires of talking about it. He regained power in 2013 with a campaign which both harked back to his famous road and promised more infrastructure to come. He even pledged bullet trains that would enable pious passengers to leave Karachi after dawn prayers and arrive in Peshawar, more than 1,000km to the north, in time for evening worship.

It is an article of faith for Mr Sharif and his party, the Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N), that investment in infrastructure is a foolproof way of boosting the economy. His government is racing to finish umpteen projects before the next election, due by mid-2018, including a metro line in Lahore and a new airport for Islamabad. The likelihood is that the new airport (which has been plagued with problems, including runways that have been built too close together) will be as underused as most of the country’s other airports, many of which are modern and spacious.

Pakistan’s infrastructure is underused because the economic boom it was meant to trigger has never arrived. Over the past three years the government has successfully staved off a balance-of-payments crisis, achieving some measure of macroeconomic stability. It has trimmed the budget deficit, partly by broadening the tax take and partly by cutting energy subsidies. That, along with lower oil prices, has narrowed Pakistan’s trade deficit and allowed it to begin rebuilding its foreign-exchange reserves. The stockmarket has risen by 50% since the end of 2015.

But terrorism and insurgency have put off investors, both foreign and domestic. The country is also held back by inefficient and often cartelised industries, which have fallen behind rivals in India and Bangladesh. Exports, 60% of which are textiles, have been shrinking for years. Much more needs to be done to create an educated workforce. Almost half of all those aged five to 16 are out of school—25m children. Health, like education, is woefully underfunded, in part because successive governments shy away from taxing the wealthy. Only 0.6% of the population pays income tax. As the World Bank puts it, Pakistan’s long-term development depends on “better nutrition, health and education”.

But Mr Sharif’s government is pinning its hopes on yet more infrastructure to fix the country’s economic problems, in the form of a $46bn investment scheme known as the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). Much of it is being financed on commercial terms, including several power plants. Pakistan undoubtedly needs to relieve a chronic shortage of electricity. But critics fear the country will struggle to pay back the debt, especially if foreign-exchange earnings from exports continue to dwindle. At the very least, the government will need to continue chasing deadbeat customers to pay their bills and cutting expensive subsidies—steps that are deeply unpopular.

In addition to boosting Pakistan’s power supply, CPEC is supposed to link China by land to Gwadar, a deep-water port on the Arabian Sea, in the hope of creating a lucrative new trade route. New or upgraded roads will stretch the length of the country. The Karakoram Highway between the two countries, which was built in the 1960s at vast expense over a high and crumbly mountain range, is being upgraded as part of the trade corridor. But it forever needs patching up and is little used. Sceptics say Xinjiang, China’s westernmost region, is still too poor for better transport links to make much difference to Pakistan’s economy. Securing isolated stretches of road from separatist rebels in Balochistan is also gobbling up large amounts of cash.

Lijian Zhao, a Chinese diplomat, says China is all too aware that Pakistan needs more than just big-ticket infrastructure if it is to flourish. Disarmingly, he praises the efforts of Britain and other countries to improve Pakistan’s “software”, such as education and the rule of law. “But China’s expertise is hardware,” says Mr Zhao.

It may not concern Mr Sharif unduly if the next generation of roads is as deserted as the last. Civilian governments have often struggled to get much done in between military coups, but voters are impressed by gleaming new projects, even if they never use them. It’s an approach that has worked for Mr Sharif’s brother, Shehbaz, the popular chief minister of Punjab province. He has lavished resources on endless sequences of over- and underpasses to create “signal-free” traffic corridors in Lahore, the provincial capital, that are of most benefit to the rich minority who can afford cars.

There are limits, however. Khawaja Saad Rafique, the railways minister, recently admitted to parliament that the country would not be getting a bullet train after all. “When we asked the Chinese about it, they laughed at us,” he said.

Eye opener.

We need to get our priorities straight.
 
The Motorway is not desolate by any means, the traffic is not scant, and you can't go miles without seeing another vehicle.

Obviously it will have never as much traffic as the GT Road, but the Motorway is by no means underused and many, many people make good use of it on daily basis.

The people who criticize the Motorway themselves use it to commute around the country, yet find the audacity to criticize.

It is by no means a useless or a pointless project and yes I have my priorities right. There will always be problems, and improving infrastructure and improving healthcare, education, employment etc. are not mutually exclusive.

When the London Undergound was built in the 1860s, the British economy was in a bit of a crisis because of the Cotton Famine, I am pretty sure there would be other important priorities at that time as well.

A developing country needs infrastructure as well, and certainly a high class Motorway. Just because it is Nawaz's project doesn't mean that we have to undermine it.

What next - should we get rid of all the golf courses and resorts in the country since they take up acres of space and are underutilized and exist for the pleasure of the rich only? I'm sure they can be used to built homes for the homeless.

CPEC will be beneficial for the country in the long run as it will create jobs and unfortunately, more corruption, but that is how it is.

A lazy article that fails the basic test of objectivity because it failed to look at both the pros and the cons. Nonetheless, thank you for sharing.
 
Even first world Canada has just four lane highway (motorway) that runs through the country. I doubt there was a need for a super expensive six lane motorway in Pakistan.

However what is needed is a motorway to connect Karachi and Lahore. No one in 70 years had the bright idea of connecting the two biggest economic centers :facepalm:

They are building one now but don't know when it'll be completed.

However the need of the hour is to have full focus on educating our population. An educated population wouldn't need a loan to build infrastructure.
 
The Motorway is not desolate by any means, the traffic is not scant, and you can't go miles without seeing another vehicle.

Obviously it will have never as much traffic as the GT Road, but the Motorway is by no means underused and many, many people make good use of it on daily basis.

The people who criticize the Motorway themselves use it to commute around the country, yet find the audacity to criticize.

It is by no means a useless or a pointless project and yes I have my priorities right. There will always be problems, and improving infrastructure and improving healthcare, education, employment etc. are not mutually exclusive.

When the London Undergound was built in the 1860s, the British economy was in a bit of a crisis because of the Cotton Famine, I am pretty sure there would be other important priorities at that time as well.

A developing country needs infrastructure as well, and certainly a high class Motorway. Just because it is Nawaz's project doesn't mean that we have to undermine it.

What next - should we get rid of all the golf courses and resorts in the country since they take up acres of space and are underutilized and exist for the pleasure of the rich only? I'm sure they can be used to built homes for the homeless.

CPEC will be beneficial for the country in the long run as it will create jobs and unfortunately, more corruption, but that is how it is.

A lazy article that fails the basic test of objectivity because it failed to look at both the pros and the cons. Nonetheless, thank you for sharing.

Massive infrastructure projects take money from the gov't coffers which golf resorts don't because they are private entities. Additionally, the benefit of major infrastructure projects only come in handy when there is domestic expertise (think consulting and engineering firms) who can take advantage of it and hire specialists. I wouldn't be surprised if the engineering firms are foreign with grunt labor from Pakistan. Lastly, there has to be a growing economy which causes these roads to be used by commercial companies for transportation and logistics of goods.

People driving for vacation between cities is nice but that's not where the ultimate payback is for major infrastructure projects.
 
Pakistan will only come out of poverty when they start investing in education.

We are now behind Bangladesh in literacy rates.

Unfortunately Paksitan's elites want to keep the poor poor and profit off of them.

Shameful.
 
Massive infrastructure projects take money from the gov't coffers which golf resorts don't because they are private entities. Additionally, the benefit of major infrastructure projects only come in handy when there is domestic expertise (think consulting and engineering firms) who can take advantage of it and hire specialists. I wouldn't be surprised if the engineering firms are foreign with grunt labor from Pakistan. Lastly, there has to be a growing economy which causes these roads to be used by commercial companies for transportation and logistics of goods.

People driving for vacation between cities is nice but that's not where the ultimate payback is for major infrastructure projects.

Majority of the golf clubs in Pakistan are owned by the PAF and the Army and all the revenue goes into their coffers. The Pakistan Golf Federation itself is under the supervision of the Army. Secondly, I agree with the rest of your points but you have to start somewhere. In the future, these infrastructures might have better paybacks but you do need infrastructure for that in the first place.
 
Unfortunately Paksitan's elites want to keep the poor poor and profit off of them.

Those poor and illiterate help them increase their vote bank so forget about giving them education because that will decrease their vote bank.
 
First we have to feed, educate and create a good health care system before marvelling over tall buildings. Problems is that Nawaz makes money from construction more then anything else.
 
Upgrading infrastructure creates jobs, why are you expecting free doles from government ? One look at Lahore Airport's facade and you tend to mistake it for a 20th Century Railway Station.
 
However what is needed is a motorway to connect Karachi and Lahore. No one in 70 years had the bright idea of connecting the two biggest economic centers :facepalm:.

Are you sure no one had the idea? Or was it planned to keep it that way? ;)
 
Building airports that are only partially used upon opening isn't the worst result by any means. It creates a high ceiling early on, and as the economy grows in subsequent years it's a matter of time that the airport will be in used, and that's when the spare capacity will come in handy.

The article overall comes across as one-sided and anti government.
 
Building airports that are only partially used upon opening isn't the worst result by any means. It creates a high ceiling early on, and as the economy grows in subsequent years it's a matter of time that the airport will be in used, and that's when the spare capacity will come in handy.

The article overall comes across as one-sided and anti government.

I agree. Building a modern infrastructure might not pay off immediately but it should do down the line. While you'd like to see progress on other fronts mentioned in the article, there's no reason why they can't be pursued in parallel.
 
The article overall comes across as one-sided and anti government.

I can expect PMLN to blame Imran and PTI for this article of 'The Economist' just like they blamed him and his party for all those panama leaks material in BBC and German newspaper.
 
Building airports that are only partially used upon opening isn't the worst result by any means. It creates a high ceiling early on, and as the economy grows in subsequent years it's a matter of time that the airport will be in used, and that's when the spare capacity will come in handy.

The article overall comes across as one-sided and anti government.

This. the economist is an anti Pakistan hit rag. Ignore its nonsense. We need infrastructure but obviously the govt should also look at the literacy rates, but for now CPEC and infrastructure is teh need of the hour. ignore this garbage. Terrible article!!
 
I'm not pro pmln or pti but this article represent the mentality of Pakistanis even though it's written by the economist. If Pmln provided Pakistanis with better education, health care, security then our population would be complaining that we didn't get any infrastructure. I hate the Pmln government and I wish they're out of Pakistan very soon but this articles depicts the mentality of an average Pakistan.

When Metro was being built I was so against it that every day I was sharing stuff on fb on why it should not be built but since it's inception the buses are working over capacity throughout the day. I have used it many times and have had some difficulty finding a bus that wasn't already full. This really changed my perspective on the whole metro bus scenario. It would have been really nice if tons of corruption didn't come with this project but sadly that wasn't the case.
 
Lol what, does anyone know how FDR create jobs after great depression? Some of the criticism is just unwarranted the article should had been not only build but also "maintain" giving it to non-gov companies to maintain the infrastructure.

Something like WPA should be created though considering Pakistan's population is not huge it can be maintained and trained much easily.
 
By no means am I a supporter of PMLN or Nawaz Sharif but there are a few things in this article that I have a problem with. First of all, the Motorway. It is by no means desolated or abandoned and is used every day by many people. GT road (an alternative to Motorway) is not a safe road with pedestrians crossing over every now and then and the need to slow down every time you reach a city is very irritating. Traffic makes it worse. To link Islamabad and Lahore, a motorway was very much needed and still is and many businesses depend upon it.

Other than that, recently, I traveled by the motorway and stopped at Kalar Kahar for some sightseeing. As I spoke with a couple of locals, I was amazed to learn that they said that they owed their lives to the Motorway and business had flourished in the localities near it owing to the tourism and passengers that the Motorway brought.

Other than that, I also think CPEC is a very good initiative by the Govt. One of the few good things that the Govt. has managed to bring about during its regime.

However, I would agree, there is definitely the need for Pakistani politicians to get their priorities right and only focus on selective infrastructure and spend more on Health and Education; the most important of all priorities.
 
Building airports that are only partially used upon opening isn't the worst result by any means. It creates a high ceiling early on, and as the economy grows in subsequent years it's a matter of time that the airport will be in used, and that's when the spare capacity will come in handy.

The article overall comes across as one-sided and anti government.

I would very much agree with what you're saying but recently I was reading an article about the airport in Islamabad. The article stated that most aeronautics and expert pilots do not advise using the Islamabad airport because of the runways as it could lead to safety hazards. So, unless they solve the problems with the runway, I expect the lucrative, international standard airport to be abandoned for years to come even if the economy grows.
 
I would very much agree with what you're saying but recently I was reading an article about the airport in Islamabad. The article stated that most aeronautics and expert pilots do not advise using the Islamabad airport because of the runways as it could lead to safety hazards. So, unless they solve the problems with the runway, I expect the lucrative, international standard airport to be abandoned for years to come even if the economy grows.

The issue is not with the runway but with the approach. Islamabad is located right in the middle of a mountain range which often has strong gusts of downwinds and foggy conditions which makes landing aircraft a severe challenge.

All three of Pakistan's major aircrashes in recent years have been while approaching Islamabad.
 
I would very much agree with what you're saying but recently I was reading an article about the airport in Islamabad. The article stated that most aeronautics and expert pilots do not advise using the Islamabad airport because of the runways as it could lead to safety hazards. So, unless they solve the problems with the runway, I expect the lucrative, international standard airport to be abandoned for years to come even if the economy grows.

The issue is not with the runway but with the approach. Islamabad is located right in the middle of a mountain range which often has strong gusts of downwinds and foggy conditions which makes landing aircraft a severe challenge.

All three of Pakistan's major aircrashes in recent years have been while approaching Islamabad.

Just the name of the airport is Islamabad not location. Old Islamabad airport was in Rawalpindi and this new Islamabad airport is even outside Rawalpindi/Islamabad and the location is in Fateh Jang, District Attock. There were many issues with this airport and the new issue is runway. It's been more thn a decade now and still it isn't ready the work started during Musharraf time and the location was confirmed back in 80s.
 
Last edited:
The issue is not with the runway but with the approach. Islamabad is located right in the middle of a mountain range which often has strong gusts of downwinds and foggy conditions which makes landing aircraft a severe challenge.

All three of Pakistan's major aircrashes in recent years have been while approaching Islamabad.

That may be also a problem however, the problem with the runway is very much real as well. The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) has admitted a major design flaw in the runways of the New Islamabad International Airport due to which two aircraft cannot land or take off simultaneously.

Airports around the world are made in the most mountainous of areas so that shouldn't be that much of problem as compared to the faulty runways.
 
Airports around the world are made in the most mountainous of areas so that shouldn't be that much of problem as compared to the faulty runways.

True, the old Kai Tak Airport in Hong Kong is one example. Not only was it packed with mountains all around, the city itself is a concrete jungle of sorts.

0054350.jpg


7c8dd1221242cea7997502ecec836c20.jpg
 
NEARLY 20 years after it opened, Pakistan’s first motorway still has a desolate feel. There is scant traffic along the 375km link between Islamabad and Lahore (pictured). Motorists can drive for miles without seeing another vehicle, save perhaps for traffic cops manning speed traps. As the two cities are already connected by the Grand Trunk Road, which is 90km shorter and toll-free, there is simply not much demand for a motorway.

Didn't read after that.
Motorists don't go miles without seeing another vehicle.
And GT road is NOT toll free.
 
Last edited:
Just the name of the airport is Islamabad not location. Old Islamabad airport was in Rawalpindi and this new Islamabad airport is even outside Rawalpindi/Islamabad and the location is in Fateh Jang, District Attock. There were many issues with this airport and the new issue is runway. It's been more thn a decade now and still it isn't ready the work started during Musharraf time and the location was confirmed back in 80s.

Yeah, I have seen the area. It is close to Wah Cantt. and approachable by the Motorway. Distant from the hills and mountains.

As for the delay in construction, this is the norm in Pakistan. The signal free Express way had been approved of back in the early 2000's but work only commenced in 2015.
 
I support no political party, it is not about priorities things need to move in parallel. We have a minister for every service, we have a lot other issues to take care of other than the infrastructure.

Education,Health,Law,Power...All these need to be taken care of, work needs to be done on administrative level. The factor affecting our growth in all the sector is without any doubt corruption, which starts from the top and ends at the bottom.

I have had the unfortunate chance of visiting the emergency section of Jinnah Hospital believe me it is soul pinching to see hygiene level in a hospital. 1 Bed 2 patients both with open wounds , insects & cats are regular visitors.

We know the issue how to solve them therefore we need to improvise international standards for :

1.bed-related inpatient functions
2.outpatient-related functions
3.diagnostic and treatment functions
4.administrative functions
5.service functions (food, supply)
6.research and teaching functions


Same way quality education is to be made available to each and everyone , all the infrastructure and we don't have literate people to use them. How ever new is the structure we will find "paan spit" around because our people are not educated enough to keep themselves and their country tidy. We don't have any law opposing misuse of facilities.

A year back i was driving in Lahore was sidelined by a traffic sergeant for taking a call while driving, i was fined and it definitely was one of my proudest moment of being a Pakistani Citizen that was the last time i have used my phone while driving. I don't do it here in the Emirates because i know it is dangerous but back of my mind i know if i am caught i need to pay fines up to 200Dhs and black points would be issued on my permit. The implementation of Law is very important.

Concluding my Views, We need things to move in parallel and we definitely can if the resources are used rightly for this we need a strong administration & the treasurer should be looking forward to making peoples future and life better rather than his own family.

Last Point i need to add and would like to have posters views for the same, it seems now adays every individual carries a weapon, why are we allowing that?

In India it is only allowed to carry Pepper spray and any knife which is shorter than 5 Inch. If at all weapon is permitted it cannot be carried around.
 
I support no political party, it is not about priorities things need to move in parallel. We have a minister for every service, we have a lot other issues to take care of other than the infrastructure.

Education,Health,Law,Power...All these need to be taken care of, work needs to be done on administrative level. The factor affecting our growth in all the sector is without any doubt corruption, which starts from the top and ends at the bottom.

I have had the unfortunate chance of visiting the emergency section of Jinnah Hospital believe me it is soul pinching to see hygiene level in a hospital. 1 Bed 2 patients both with open wounds , insects & cats are regular visitors.

We know the issue how to solve them therefore we need to improvise international standards for :

1.bed-related inpatient functions
2.outpatient-related functions
3.diagnostic and treatment functions
4.administrative functions
5.service functions (food, supply)
6.research and teaching functions


Same way quality education is to be made available to each and everyone , all the infrastructure and we don't have literate people to use them. How ever new is the structure we will find "paan spit" around because our people are not educated enough to keep themselves and their country tidy. We don't have any law opposing misuse of facilities.

A year back i was driving in Lahore was sidelined by a traffic sergeant for taking a call while driving, i was fined and it definitely was one of my proudest moment of being a Pakistani Citizen that was the last time i have used my phone while driving. I don't do it here in the Emirates because i know it is dangerous but back of my mind i know if i am caught i need to pay fines up to 200Dhs and black points would be issued on my permit. The implementation of Law is very important.

Concluding my Views, We need things to move in parallel and we definitely can if the resources are used rightly for this we need a strong administration & the treasurer should be looking forward to making peoples future and life better rather than his own family.

Last Point i need to add and would like to have posters views for the same, it seems now adays every individual carries a weapon, why are we allowing that?

In India it is only allowed to carry Pepper spray and any knife which is shorter than 5 Inch. If at all weapon is permitted it cannot be carried around.

Security issues. But now, in the bigger cities of Pakistan for example Lahore and Karachi, carrying weapons or body guards with you has become a status symbol and to assert a psychological superiority over people.

Normal people carrying weapons has to do with arms easily being available and little check of licences.
 
Back
Top