What's new

Pakistan delivers joint statement at UNHRC on behalf of over 50 countries

Lonewarrior

First Class Star
Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Runs
3,417
1568140705.jpg


Pakistan has drawn urgent attention of the Human Rights Council and human rights mechanisms towards worsening human rights and humanitarian situation in Indian occupied Jammu and Kashmir, especially following the decisions taken on fifth of last month.

A joint statement delivered at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva today (Tuesday) by Pakistan on behalf of over 50 countries from across various regions says it shares the concern expressed by the High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet regarding the impact of recent actions on the human rights of Kashmiris.

http://www.radio.gov.pk/10-09-2019/pakistan-delivers-joint-statement-at-unhrc-on-behalf-of-over-50-countries

Good job on diplomatic front...
but we all know, india wont listen .... it only understand one language .... :)
 
Definitely a good win at diplomatic front, India will feel more pressure in coming days and it will definitely damaged their image of a great democracy. I have seen numerous world leaders speaking against Indian brutalities in Kahsmir which is encouraging and great to see.
 
He spoke very well exposing India to the core. India's reply was weak and unconvincing.
 
It was not a joint statement on behalf of over 50 countries - that is PR drivel.
 
Definitely a good win at diplomatic front, India will feel more pressure in coming days and it will definitely damaged their image of a great democracy. I have seen numerous world leaders speaking against Indian brutalities in Kahsmir which is encouraging and great to see.

What win? Can you name those 50 countries who reportedly signed this joint statement?
 
Wow Pakistan is gathering great momentum at UN. 50 countries support them? This is unheard of.. Imran is making some bold moves for sure! I just wonder what those 50 countries are!
 
Try to argue properly

This was a dead reply

You are mistaken if you think a statement like "India's reply was weak and unconvincing" without any reasoning deserves more consideration.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A joint statement on Kashmir was delivered by Pakistan on behalf of 50 countries during the UN Human Rights Council meeting today via <a href="https://twitter.com/SoulessInsafian?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@SoulessInsafian</a> <br><br>The statement calls India to:<br>• Lift curfew, end comm shutdown <br>• Halt excessive use of force<br>• Grant access for Int orgs <a href="https://t.co/dfLjiSK1oI">pic.twitter.com/dfLjiSK1oI</a></p>— Ragıp Soylu (@ragipsoylu) <a href="https://twitter.com/ragipsoylu/status/1171499977769488387?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 10, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>




<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">BREAKING — More than 50 countries, including Turkey, call India to stop human rights abuses in Kashmir - Anadolu Agency</p>— Ragıp Soylu (@ragipsoylu) <a href="https://twitter.com/ragipsoylu/status/1171490127668899844?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 10, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">A Joint Statement has been delivered by <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Pakistan?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Pakistan</a>, “on behalf of over 50 countries at the Human Rights Council on the human rights situation in IOJ&K which calls for FIVE basics including resolution of Kashmir conflict through UNSC resolutions”, says <a href="https://twitter.com/ForeignOfficePk?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@ForeignOfficePk</a></p>— Anas Mallick (@AnasMallick) <a href="https://twitter.com/AnasMallick/status/1171489865713643522?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 10, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


https://tribune.com.pk/story/2053766/1-pakistan-50-countries-demand-action-end-kashmir-humanitarian-crisis/

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/un-asks-india-to-end-rights-breaches-in-jammu-kashmir-/1578339
 
Pakistan just dosent get it at all , India has already got away doing what it wants . The only thing India wanted to avoid was a war and they know its not happening . The rest is just for Pakistani junta , infact India will be happy if Pakistanis think they won the twitter battles or getting some support from few irrelevant countries is all it was .
 
Pakistan just dosent get it at all , India has already got away doing what it wants . The only thing India wanted to avoid was a war and they know its not happening . The rest is just for Pakistani junta , infact India will be happy if Pakistanis think they won the twitter battles or getting some support from few irrelevant countries is all it was .

yes we are naive people ..... :)
 
Pakistan just dosent get it at all , India has already got away doing what it wants . The only thing India wanted to avoid was a war and they know its not happening . The rest is just for Pakistani junta , infact India will be happy if Pakistanis think they won the twitter battles or getting some support from few irrelevant countries is all it was .

war with whom?

you are still haven't lifted the curfew and all communications hasnt been put back on yet. India hasnt got away with anything.

Kashmiris have a right to resist the terrorists, hards times coming for the kashmir region and the people.
 
war with whom?

you are still haven't lifted the curfew and all communications hasnt been put back on yet. India hasnt got away with anything.

Kashmiris have a right to resist the terrorists, hards times coming for the kashmir region and the people.

With Pakistan off course .

Yes , the curfew is not lifted and it may take a little time to bring Kashmir back to normalcy if there is lot of resistance , but what makes you think it will be any different from before India removed article 370 ? Pakistan is banking on more Kashmiris taking up arms , which may not really happen .
 
Pakistan's actions have not made an iota of difference, and Pakistan needs a change of strategy.

if you really want to hurt india, you must attack them financially.

If India is going to act like Israel, they should be treated like Israel.

Form group like BDS. We may not garner support against india from other governments, but we can gain the support of their people.

expose india for what it is, get people to boycott 'made in india' products.

This could get traction in the people of the UK and most of the muslim countries.

Their economy is already suffering a downturn, this could be an opportunity to hurt them, non violently.
 
With Pakistan off course .

Yes , the curfew is not lifted and it may take a little time to bring Kashmir back to normalcy if there is lot of resistance , but what makes you think it will be any different from before India removed article 370 ? Pakistan is banking on more Kashmiris taking up arms , which may not really happen .

In your world the people are happy now?

On topic, this is all done so if/when a conflict starts the world cannot point fingers at Pakistan who warned them.
 
Pakistan's actions have not made an iota of difference, and Pakistan needs a change of strategy.

if you really want to hurt india, you must attack them financially.

If India is going to act like Israel, they should be treated like Israel.

Form group like BDS. We may not garner support against india from other governments, but we can gain the support of their people.

expose india for what it is, get people to boycott 'made in india' products.

This could get traction in the people of the UK and most of the muslim countries.

Their economy is already suffering a downturn, this could be an opportunity to hurt them, non violently.

Keep waiting. Confused Desis in the UK - sure (then again they were already into this game hardcore and have proven to be a nuisance to the British public at worst and utterly toothless to solve global problems at best), but no other Muslim nation gives two hoots.
 
There are 47 countries in the UNHRC.

But I guess "delivers statement on behalf of over 46 countries" doesn't have the same gong to it.

If they managed to convince all of them in the first place.
 
Pakistan's actions have not made an iota of difference, and Pakistan needs a change of strategy.

if you really want to hurt india, you must attack them financially.

If India is going to act like Israel, they should be treated like Israel.

Form group like BDS. We may not garner support against india from other governments, but we can gain the support of their people.

expose india for what it is, get people to boycott 'made in india' products.

This could get traction in the people of the UK and most of the muslim countries.

Their economy is already suffering a downturn, this could be an opportunity to hurt them, non violently.

do you remember Gandhi when he paraded india on foot and half naked. Did that make a difference?
 
Pakistan just dosent get it at all , India has already got away doing what it wants . The only thing India wanted to avoid was a war and they know its not happening . The rest is just for Pakistani junta , infact India will be happy if Pakistanis think they won the twitter battles or getting some support from few irrelevant countries is all it was .

Indians simply don't get it, they already were controlling Kashmir with 800,000 soldiers but they had still some Kashmiris supporting Indian rule but India has LOST THEM (This is admitted by MANY sane Indians). When you lose confidence of entire population of a region, you are bound to lose the land sooner or later. I personally know some Kashmiris who cheered Indian cricket team and favoured India on most issues but today they are literally abusing India. They are still locked and hatred is growing every single day, if you think you can control 8 million people with power an aggression then you are living in fool's paradise.

As for Pakistani reaction, you will NEVER get away with this (absolutely no doubt about it).
 
Indians simply don't get it, they already were controlling Kashmir with 800,000 soldiers but they had still some Kashmiris supporting Indian rule but India has LOST THEM (This is admitted by MANY sane Indians). When you lose confidence of entire population of a region, you are bound to lose the land sooner or later. I personally know some Kashmiris who cheered Indian cricket team and favoured India on most issues but today they are literally abusing India. They are still locked and hatred is growing every single day, if you think you can control 8 million people with power an aggression then you are living in fool's paradise.

As for Pakistani reaction, you will NEVER get away with this (absolutely no doubt about it).
India has not lost confidence of entire population of Kashmir. Kashmiri Pandits are totally with indian government. People outside main Kashmir are still with indian government.

Tibet is a good example regarding how a government stayed in control without zero support from locals....
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">I commend the 58 countries that joined Pakistan in Human Rights Council on 10 Sept reinforcing demands of int community for India to stop use of force, lift siege, remove other restrictions, respect & protect Kashmiris' rights & resolve Kashmir dispute through UNSC resolutions.</p>— Imran Khan (@ImranKhanPTI) <a href="https://twitter.com/ImranKhanPTI/status/1172096235358085120?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 12, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
So we should give statements based upon tweet of a politician and accept it as the truth?

No of course not.
However a simple google search will show multiple news outlets, largely from Pakistan, quoting the foreign minister and if any country disputes being on the list then surely we would have heard it by now.
Also, it was a letter on behalf of these countries so the UNHRC will have this in their possession and would have verified it themselves.

At this moment in time, and in light of any opposing facts, I choose to believe the Pakistan Government.
 
Why hasnt pakistan named those countries who signed the joint declaration with pakistan?

The Pakistani statements are in the public domain. Why have the U.N. not denied them?

Why should Pakistan name those countries?
Does it have any obligation to do this?
 
The Pakistani statements are in the public domain. Why have the U.N. not denied them?

Why should Pakistan name those countries?
Does it have any obligation to do this?

Why will UN say anything? Pakistan didnot say they delivered a statement on behalf of the UN. They havent named a country, so no country can come out and deny as well.
 
Why will UN say anything? Pakistan didnot say they delivered a statement on behalf of the UN. They havent named a country, so no country can come out and deny as well.
In that case as long as it creates 1.4 billion insomniacs then job well done
 
Why will it create 1.4bn insomniacs?

It may well create 220mn followers for Imran Khan.

Because they are frantically trying to work out how 47 turned into 58. Even some of your media is reporting this as headlines.
The stupidity is on a different level.
IK seems to have more Indians following his tweets nowadays
 
The fact that Pakistan could not even name a single country can mean only two things. Either Pakistan does not have the support and they claimed. Or the countries are too scared to be seen at the opposite end of India. Either way, this again demonstrates the ever increasing Indian clout in world diplomacy.
 
The fact that Pakistan could not even name a single country can mean only two things. Either Pakistan does not have the support and they claimed. Or the countries are too scared to be seen at the opposite end of India. Either way, this again demonstrates the ever increasing Indian clout in world diplomacy.

Wow.. the logic of your tweet reminds me of Sambit Patra. Are you him by any chance? :inti
 
The fact that Pakistan could not even name a single country can mean only two things. Either Pakistan does not have the support and they claimed. Or the countries are too scared to be seen at the opposite end of India. Either way, this again demonstrates the ever increasing Indian clout in world diplomacy.

Pakistan doesn’t need to do anything.
Too bad a mass of Indians have an issue with this. Go put some pressure on your own government to reduce the distress.
 
Pakistan doesn’t need to do anything.
Too bad a mass of Indians have an issue with this. Go put some pressure on your own government to reduce the distress.

Did my post say that Pakistan needs to do anything? I have zero issues with them not able to name a single country who allegedly supported them. Whatever keeps them happy.
 
Except that continued posts by you & your compatriots depict the opposite.

First, I have a grand total of 1 post on this topic. Following couple of posts are just a response. Don't really qualified as continued in my book. Second, this forum is for discussion. Don't be rattled by a counter point of view.
 
Pakistan doesn’t need to do anything.
Too bad a mass of Indians have an issue with this. Go put some pressure on your own government to reduce the distress.

Indian govt doesnt need to do anything. It has done its job by revoking article 35A.

Its Pakistan PM who is ranting away and needs to actually do something.
 
The Indians here seem really flustered.

I didn’t expect such mental disintegration so quickly.
 
Back
Top