What's new

Pakistan has world's highest newborn mortality rate, reveals Unicef report

hussain.r97

ODI Debutant
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Runs
11,153
Pakistan has the world's highest newborn mortality rate, with one in every 22 babies born dying within a month, according to a Unicef report released on Tuesday.

The report reveals that babies born in the world's poorest countries, most of them in Africa, still face "alarming" risks of death that can be 50 times as high as those in the richest countries.

Japan, for instance, is highlighted as the best place for a baby to be born, with only one in 1,111 babies at risk of dying within a month of birth.

While the last quarter-century has seen broad improvements in older children's health, "we have not made similar progress in ending deaths among children less than one month old," said Henrietta Fore, Unicef's executive director.

“Given that the majority of these deaths are preventable, clearly we are failing the world's poorest babies.”

The differences are stark.

The countries with the lowest newborn mortality rates, after Japan, are mostly well-off countries with strong education and health care systems: Iceland (a one in 1,000 chance of death), Singapore (one in 909), Finland (one in 833), Estonia and Slovenia (both one in 769), Cyprus (one in 714) and Belarus, Luxembourg, Norway and South Korea (all with risks of one in 667).

The United States ─ generally affluent, but with considerable income inequality and wide variations in access to health care ─ was only the 41st safest country for newborns.

Of the 10 highest-risk countries, eight are in sub-Saharan Africa, countries where "pregnant women are much less likely to receive assistance," due to poverty, conflict or weak institutions, according to the report.

Those eight countries are the Central African Republic (a one in 24 chance of death); Somalia, Lesotho, Guinea-Bissau and South Sudan (all with a one in 26 chance); Cote d'Ivoire (one in 27) and Mali and Chad (both with a one in 28 chance).

Each year, some 2.6 million babies do not survive through their first month.

Preventable deaths

The report was released in conjunction with the launch of a global campaign, called Every Child Alive, aimed at ensuring "affordable, quality health care solutions for every mother and newborn."

More than 80 per cent of newborn deaths can be prevented, the report says, "with access to well-trained midwives, along with proven solutions like clean water, disinfectants, breastfeeding within the first hour, skin-to-skin contact and good nutrition."

But shortages of properly trained health workers and midwives are a major problem in poorer nations.

While a rich country like Norway has 18 doctors, nurses and midwives for every 10,000 people, impoverished Somalia has only one.

Every year, one million babies die the day they are born.

"We know we can save the vast majority of these babies with affordable, quality health care solutions," Fore said.

Rwandan success story

In general, babies born in richer countries fare far better, but there are differences within countries.

Among countries that have made dramatic improvements is low-income Rwanda, which more than halved its rate from 1990 to 2016, illustrating that "political will to invest in strong health systems... is critical," the report said.

Babies born to the poorest families are 40pc more likely to die than those born to the least poor. Sadly typical was the story of Mary James, an 18-year-old from rural Malawi.

When her labour started, she and her sister made the long trek to a health centre on foot. When her baby was delivered, he was small and terribly weak.

She says an overstretched staff did its best, but by night the child was gone.

"I felt like my heart was breaking," James told Unicef staff. "I had a name for the child but he never opened his eyes."

Since improvements to health care can be expensive, "it is crucial to invest the money in a smart way," Unicef's global maternity and newborn programme chief Willibald Zeck told AFP.

That can mean something as simple as ensuring that a pregnant woman who has walked three days to a health care facility is received with "dignity", so she remains long enough to receive proper postnatal care.

But the dearth of expensive equipment matters. Zeck, who worked as an obstetrician/gynecologist in Tanzania, said women were often unsure how pregnant they were, and he would have to use his hands to estimate whether a fetus was premature or seriously underweight.

Education matters, too. Babies born to mothers with no education face nearly twice the risk of early death as babies whose mothers have at least a secondary education.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1390592
 
‘Maternal and infant mortality rate declining in Sindh’

KARACHI: An international nonprofit health organisation on Friday said that maternal and infant mortality rate, which was extremely alarming in Sindh five years back, had been “brought down to a large extent”.

The officials said Maternal and Child Health Integrated Programme (MCHIP), conducted from 2013 to 2018, was funded by USAID, and aimed at taking steps for saving maternal, neonatal, and child lives in rural areas across Sindh.

MCHIP had the vision to prevent maternal, newborn and child deaths by providing quality MNCH services across selected districts of Sindh through a total market approach, empowered communities, timely referral of complications to hospitals providing emergency obstetric and newborn care (EmONC), and improved access to family planning (FP) and child health services including immunisation and nutrition.

It aims at leaving behind at least 1,000 MNCH centres or functional units in public and private health facilities that provided a full range of high quality MNCH services through referral and transportation system.

Dr Farid Midhat, country Director Jhpiego Pakistan, accompanied by officials Dr Wajiha Javed and Dr Kamran Baig said unassisted deliveries at homes, excessive bleeding during childbirth, delay in reaching healthcare facilities to prevent blood loss, and unavailability of trained CMWs and LHWs during childbirth and infections were some of the major reasons behind high maternal mortality in Sindh, which were tackled under their project and now the situation in Sindh had improved.

Sindh was facing high incidence of maternal and infant mortality, followed by Balochistan, in 2013 when around 311 in every 100,000 live births due to childbirth related complications.

But, officials said, due to sustained efforts by Jhpiego in collaboration with USAID and the Sindh government, maternal and infant mortality rates have been brought down to a large extent.

Jhpiego is an international health organisation affiliated with John Hopkins University.

The media was told overall maternal mortality rate in Pakistan in 2013 was 276 death per 100,000 live births including 311 women deaths in Sindh but due to sustained efforts by the public and private sector organisations including Jhpeigo, it was estimated that infant mortality rate had been brought down to 140 deaths per 100,000 live births.

They said maternal and infant mortality were major issues for Pakistan for many decades and in that regard, Pakistan was far behind than other neighbouring and South Asian countries including India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.

The media was informed that maternal mortality in Balochistan was 765 in 2013 as per an international survey, the highest in four provinces of Pakistan, followed by 311 in Sindh, 272 in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and 227 in Punjab while overall maternal mortality rate was 276, which was highly alarming for the whole world. However, Dr Midhat said with dedicated efforts and interventions by those international organisations, maternal mortality had brought down to such a large extent in Sindh during last five years.

He said between 2013 to 2017, his organisation improved healthcare facilities at 1,100 hospitals in 15 underdeveloped districts of Sindh, trained around 1,100 lady health workers (LHWs) and community midwives (CMWs), improved transportation facilities to shift pregnant women to healthcare facilities without delays and introduced family planning services which resulted in spacing births and saving lives of women during childbirth.

According to him, unassisted deliveries at homes, excessive bleeding during childbirth, delay in reaching healthcare facilities to prevent blood loss, unavailability of trained CMWs and LHWs during childbirth, and infections were some of the major reasons behind high maternal mortality in Sindh, which were tackled under their project and “now situation in Sindh is better than Punjab”.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1385446
 
and these things will remain same in south asia because

in south Asia we adding population of 20 million every year which stress healthcare system in south Asia even more
 
I read that report yesterday and I am disgusted with the state of Pakistan’s healthcare. 1 in 22 baby dies within a month of his or her birth.

Unfortunately, Pakistanis as usual, will regard this report as a western conspiracy to tarnish the image of Pakistan.

‘How come the media doesn’t report about the 21 babies that survive.’
 
Just look at the comments on this news on Facebook. The attitude of so many Pakistanis is just sad to see. Calling this fake news to spoil our image etc. These people have no shame
 
Truly disgusting state of healthcare in Pakistan, and even worse to see Pakistanis shamelessly labelling this as fake news.

Human development based issues such as healthcare should be the #1 priority of our government, and credit where it's due, it is great to see the Sindh government actually putting in an effort and making strides in issues such as healthcare, and population control.

Unfortunately, the Punjab government sees mega infrastructure projects as something more important, while I am not sure why this isn't being taken more seriously by KPK. The less said about Baluchistan the better.
 
Chalo kam se kam humaray hukmuraan tou UK ja saktay hain ilaaj ke liyay.... awaam gayi bhaar mein




But but but Shaukat Khanum is a front for money laundering don't say anything bad to my Nawazo :sree :sree
 
At least Kulsoom gets treated well in London.

The Sharif's did try to put in place a National health programme, which is a lot more than what could be said about previous Governments. Nawaz pushed through the PM's Healthcare program despite resistance from various quarters.

ISLAMABAD: The federal government has decided to pay full premium of the Prime Minister’s National Health Programme (PMNHP) for Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to ensure its success in the two provinces which had earlier refused to become part of this programme. Moreover, the scheme, which was initially started for 23 districts of the country, is now being expanded to 60 districts.

It is pertinent to mention here that Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif launched the programme on Dec 31, 2015, for Islamabad and described it as the first step towards making Pakistan a welfare state. The scheme was supposed to be expanded to all parts of Punjab, Balochistan, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Gilgit-Baltistan and the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) as the governments of Sindh and KP had declined to become part of the federal government programme in which they also had to contribute.

https://www.dawn.com/news/1323904
 
The Sharif's did try to put in place a National health programme, which is a lot more than what could be said about previous Governments. Nawaz pushed through the PM's Healthcare program despite resistance from various quarters.



https://www.dawn.com/news/1323904

So if the health service is so good then why does SS, NS, Kulsoom and Dar go abroad?Surely it holds to reason that if the millions spent going abroad at the expense of the go poor ( nothing is paid out of their own pocket) was spent on hospitals in PK, they would be good enough. Its not as if they havent had time, in Punjab they have been in power for 25 of the last 33 years. Surely they could have set up a Cancer hospital, a hospital to carry angiograms or even a hospital for hair transplants for the brothers.
 
India otoh was ranked 31 on the list and saw 25.4 deaths per 1000 in 2016. But before Indians rejoice and feel jubilant at beating Pakistan , it's no achievement since a small mortality rate can translate to numerous deaths when the birth rate is high. In fact India lost 640,000 babies in 2016 , more than any other country .
Both India and Pakistan needs to realize that financial resources are not the biggest constraints in improving this health indicator , political will is.

For instance , take the example of Rwanda , which falls in the lowest income group of less than $1000 per capita and which has brought down it's mortality rates from 41/1000 in the 90s to 16.5 through programmes targeted at poor and Vulnerable mothers.
Money matters , but intent matters more.
 
A shameful statistic.

For instance , take the example of Rwanda , which falls in the lowest income group of less than $1000 per capita and which has brought down it's mortality rates from 41/1000 in the 90s to 16.5 through programmes targeted at poor and Vulnerable mothers.
Money matters , but intent matters more.

Paul Kagame has dictatorial tendencies which I don't support but no doubt he's overseen major improvements in health, education, women's rights etc.

90% of the Rwandan population has health insurance, and this is a country that suffered a horrific genocide in the 90s.
 
A shameful statistic.



Paul Kagame has dictatorial tendencies which I don't support but no doubt he's overseen major improvements in health, education, women's rights etc.

90% of the Rwandan population has health insurance, and this is a country that suffered a horrific genocide in the 90s.

I don't understand what one wants from Kagame,he has done wonders for the Rwanda look at their IT and communication,its way ahead of others in the same region.

West might never appreciate the man for his dependency on China but tbf he did well for a country with not much resources,wish India had leaders like that.

This is what western liberals have to say about him

http://www.bbc.com/news/10479882
 
India otoh was ranked 31 on the list and saw 25.4 deaths per 1000 in 2016. But before Indians rejoice and feel jubilant at beating Pakistan , it's no achievement since a small mortality rate can translate to numerous deaths when the birth rate is high. In fact India lost 640,000 babies in 2016 , more than any other country .
Both India and Pakistan needs to realize that financial resources are not the biggest constraints in improving this health indicator , political will is.

For instance , take the example of Rwanda , which falls in the lowest income group of less than $1000 per capita and which has brought down it's mortality rates from 41/1000 in the 90s to 16.5 through programmes targeted at poor and Vulnerable mothers.
Money matters , but intent matters more.

Achievement is going from 47 deaths per thousand births in 2015 to 25 in 2016. Quite a big improvement for the lack of political will, won't you agree?
 
Nothing new. The elite always go abroad for the slightest ailment. No one gives a damn about the poor. All hospitals even the private ones are highly unprofessional with rude and unhelpful staff.
 
Back
Top