Pakistan most dangerous country, its leaders don’t care about their people, says Jim Mattis

[Major]

You must be a newbie. Check how Pakistan was culturally and economically before the Jihadi grooming. Pak was better than India, it's leaders sophisticated and palling with Western powers. Pakistan could have been where China is now. With population much lower, you could have been an industrial power house like a Korea or Japan or Taiwan. Instead you made a series of bad moves and changed your identity.

Bro,no one is going to accept this aswell.

Infact they will critisize the likes of Zulfiqar ali bhutto...

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

Yeah, sure. If you can't be trusted it must be because you will not "bend the knee".

Submissive people do not become leaders and CEOs like Indians do. Continue living in your delusional world.

Which Indian leader is a CEO?

 

[AMSS]

Mad dog Mattis knows what's up.

 

[Kaptan]

Bend the knee like India. Why would USA bomb Pakistani territory unless it was insubordinate to American wishes? India is like the house servants of the old slave trade era in USA. They know if they don't upset the master power, they will be allowed a few extra crusts of bread. The slaves who refused to bend the knee got a good whupping.

) Triggered as usual.

What you wrote is your opinion not a fact.

Fact is American drones bombed Pakistani "citizens" not once or twice but for 14 straight years and there was nothing Pakistan could do to stop it. Fearing it may upset Americans which might lead to cancellation of funds.

In this case the slave decided to bend the knee and get a good whipping from the master thinking the master would reward him for his faithfulness, instead what he got was more whipping and insults.

 

[ahsan17]

) Triggered as usual.

What you wrote is your opinion not a fact.

Fact is American drones bombed Pakistani "citizens" not once or twice but for 14 straight years and there was nothing Pakistan could do to stop it. Fearing it may upset Americans which might lead to cancellation of funds.

In this case the slave decided to bend the knee and get a good whipping from the master thinking the master would reward him for his faithfulness, instead what he got was more whipping and insults.

You guys make no sense. You claim right here that Pakistan is America's slave, but in another post you will claim that Pakistan is helping militants against in Afghanistan against US. Which is it?

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

) Triggered as usual.

What you wrote is your opinion not a fact.

Fact is American drones bombed Pakistani "citizens" not once or twice but for 14 straight years and there was nothing Pakistan could do to stop it. Fearing it may upset Americans which might lead to cancellation of funds.

In this case the slave decided to bend the knee and get a good whipping from the master thinking the master would reward him for his faithfulness, instead what he got was more whipping and insults.

Isn't that what I said? Countries that get attacked by America are those that don't fall in line. The ones with a slavish mentality would never dare to upset 'Massah'.

 

[AMSS]

Isn't that what I said? Countries that get attacked by America are those that don't fall in line. The ones with a slavish mentality would never dare to upset 'Massah'.

Not at all. Pakistan did fall in line, rather caved in, and allowed those slow moving drones that are a sitting duck against the most primitive air defence (just ask Iran that shot down a far more advanced american drone only weeks ago) - to casually blow up pakistani citizens in Pakistani territory. A finer example of slavish mentality you shall not find.

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

Not at all. Pakistan did fall in line, rather caved in, and allowed those slow moving drones that are a sitting duck against the most primitive air defence (just ask Iran that shot down a far more advanced american drone only weeks ago) - to casually blow up pakistani citizens in Pakistani territory. A finer example of slavish mentality you shall not find.

Pakistan is not in a position to take on the USA in a war, which shooting down drones would undoubtedly have led to. They would only do that as a last resort, and certainly not to defend terrorists who themselves consider Pakistan govt as infidels.

 

[AMSS]

Pakistan is not in a position to take on the USA in a war, which shooting down drones would undoubtedly have led to. They would only do that as a last resort, and certainly not to defend terrorists who themselves consider Pakistan govt as infidels.

Of course Pakistan doesn't have the wherewithal to take on US. That, and the fact that they have historically been benefactors of US largesse in terms of weapons and money is another reason why Pakistan has had the traditionally meek and obsequious attitude towards US.

Till china came along.

And now you see Imran Khan hysterically feign complete ignorance to the treatment meted out to Uighyurs by the Chinese. Once again, can you think of a more spinelessly slavish attitude than this?

 

[Gharib Aadmi]

The most dangerous countries in the world are in Latin America, and Africa. El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico have people ever checked how much homicide is there? Pakistan is like Switzerland in terms of safety compared to those countries.

According to this list there are more than a 100 countries with a larger homicide rate per capita than Pakistan.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

 

[Ronaldo7]

The most dangerous countries in the world are in Latin America, and Africa. El Salvador, Honduras, Mexico have people ever checked how much homicide is there? Pakistan is like Switzerland in terms of safety compared to those countries.

According to this list there are more than a 100 countries with a larger homicide rate per capita than Pakistan.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

Pakistan's terrorist attacks number has decreased by 89% since 2010

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

Of course Pakistan doesn't have the wherewithal to take on US. That, and the fact that they have historically been benefactors of US largesse in terms of weapons and money is another reason why Pakistan has had the traditionally meek and obsequious attitude towards US.

Till china came along.

And now you see Imran Khan hysterically feign complete ignorance to the treatment meted out to Uighyurs by the Chinese. Once again, can you think of a more spinelessly slavish attitude than this?

So when the former US Defence Secretary calls Pakistan the most dangerous country in the world, you are calling him a liar then?

How can a meek and obsequious nation be a danger to anybody? Are you sure you haven't just been triggered by the comments about India falling in line? That was a direct answer to an Indian who asked how come India were so trusted by America.

 

[AMSS]

So when the former US Defence Secretary calls Pakistan the most dangerous country in the world, you are calling him a liar then?

How can a meek and obsequious nation be a danger to anybody? Are you sure you haven't just been triggered by the comments about India falling in line? That was a direct answer to an Indian who asked how come India were so trusted by America.

The root of your angst and grief is the comical understanding of dangerous. You seem to think it's some sort of backhanded compliment for Pakistan being independent and not bowing down to foreign powers. It's cute and hysterical if that's how see it.

Mattis isn't a liar at all, and I'd repeat myself here saying he has nailed it. Pakistan, unlike the headstrong and independent Iran and North Korea, has historically been a subservient and meek partner to its donors, especially the US. And Mattis himself says that this subservience of the Pakistani leadership is what has served it well all these years.

He calls Pakistan dangerous not because of its leadership or economic and technological heft - it's laughable - but because of the radicalized awaam. In other words, Mattis fears that the historically meek and subservient Pakistani leadership can be undermined by infiltration of radicalized islamists in Pakistani institutions.

Hope I made it clear.

 

[Cpt. Rishwat]

The root of your angst and grief is the comical understanding of dangerous. You seem to think it's some sort of backhanded compliment for Pakistan being independent and not bowing down to foreign powers. It's cute and hysterical if that's how see it.

Mattis isn't a liar at all, and I'd repeat myself here saying he has nailed it. Pakistan, unlike the headstrong and independent Iran and North Korea, has historically been a subservient and meek partner to its donors, especially the US. And Mattis himself says that this subservience of the Pakistani leadership is what has served it well all these years.

He calls Pakistan dangerous not because of its leadership or economic and technological heft - it's laughable - but because of the radicalized awaam. In other words, Mattis fears that the historically meek and subservient Pakistani leadership can be undermined by infiltration of radicalized islamists in Pakistani institutions.

Hope I made it clear.

Yes you made it perfectly clear. You are saying that Mattis fears the Pakistanis who are fundamentalist and politically aggressive Muslim awaam, not the ones who are less religious and share more Hindu spiritual philosophies, and more subservient and meek as a result.

Not the message I would want to send personally, I think there is nothing wrong with being peaceful and spiritual, but shame to see you describe this as meek and subservient.

 

[kk1992]

The root of your angst and grief is the comical understanding of dangerous. You seem to think it's some sort of backhanded compliment for Pakistan being independent and not bowing down to foreign powers. It's cute and hysterical if that's how see it.

Mattis isn't a liar at all, and I'd repeat myself here saying he has nailed it. Pakistan, unlike the headstrong and independent Iran and North Korea, has historically been a subservient and meek partner to its donors, especially the US. And Mattis himself says that this subservience of the Pakistani leadership is what has served it well all these years.

He calls Pakistan dangerous not because of its leadership or economic and technological heft - it's laughable - but because of the radicalized awaam. In other words, Mattis fears that the historically meek and subservient Pakistani leadership can be undermined by infiltration of radicalized islamists in Pakistani institutions.

Hope I made it clear.

Pakistanis have never elected radicalized Islamists as PM or President.

The only country with Nuclear weapon has elected radicalized Hindu as PM, is India.

 

[Hitman]

Pakistanis have never elected radicalized Islamists as PM or President.

The only country with Nuclear weapon has elected radicalized Hindu as PM, is India.

Radicalized Hindu as PM according to whom? According to the UN? According to the US? According to other influential countries?

Or according to a country where Osama Bin Laden was living peacefully?

 

[Manager101]

The most dangerous countries are those which are the current superpowers acting as the peacekeepers and still invade weaker nations/states directly or indirectly to fulfill their imperialist and fraudulent economic agenda.

Modern superpowers are allies of oppressors and use most of their resources in brainwashing their people in thinking that the one oppressed are the real evil. This is the so called "enlightened era" in a nutshell.

 

[kk1992]

Radicalized Hindu as PM according to whom? According to the UN? According to the US? According to other influential countries?

Or according to a country where Osama Bin Laden was living peacefully?

You want white people to tell you who is radicalized and who isn't?

I thought White people left India in 1947, your ancestor fought hard to give you freedom so try to appreciate.

If you don't understand what slavery looks like then try visit Kashmir, Modi's army are probably doing a fantastic job and you can't deny it since you take white person word as gospel.

 

[Hitman]

You want white people to tell you who is radicalized and who isn't?

I thought White people left India in 1947, your ancestor fought hard to give you freedom so try to appreciate.

If you don't understand what slavery looks like then try visit Kashmir, Modi's army are probably doing a fantastic job and you can't deny it since you take white person word as gospel.

So who exactly shares your views? Any other country? Any other fellow Muslim nation? UN? Or should we take the word of a country where Osama Bin Laden was living a luxurious life?

 

[kk1992]

So who exactly shares your views? Any other country? Any other fellow Muslim nation? UN? Or should we take the word of a country where Osama Bin Laden was living a luxurious life?

LOL.

You do not have to.

Just look inward and your country.

Look into rise in sectarianism and minority treatment before Modi and after.

Look at the electing of politician in political offices where they make life changing decision for a common people including minority and their narrative against minorities to get elected, isn't their narrative Hindu dominated, a sane person would call it, radicalized Hinduism.

Look at your media, where Arnab is the most popular Journalist, who get trigger and quick to tell anyone who does not agree with him to go Pakistan.

Like I have said, a smart secular brown person does not need white person to tell them what to believe in unless slave mentality is prevalent.

And before you come back with OBL, neither UN nor Obama's government has claim that Pakistani official knew where OBL was hiding.

 

[cric_man]

Looks like Mad Dog has gone Swamp Dog for India

Fox News
☰
THE NEXT REVOLUTION
Published September 09, 2019 Last Update 8 hrs ago
Steve Hilton: Gen. James Mattis goes from defending America to selling out America
Steve Hilton By Steve Hilton | Fox News

Over the last week or so, Gen. James Mattis has been running around hawking his new book, but it was revealed on Sunday that he's planning to cash in on his government service in a much more swampy way.

It was reported by Axios that Mattis is joining the Cohen group, a massive advisory firm started by another former defense secretary, William Cohen. Here's how the Cohen Group describes some of its services:

JIM MATTIS CITES 'CONTEMPT' AMONG AMERICANS AS TOP NATIONAL SECURITY CONCERN

"...Understanding and intervening to beneficially affect political, legislative, and regulatory issues, including shaping public policy debates, maneuvering through regulatory processes, development of standards and regulations, securing public sector funding..."

This is also known as “lobbying.” It's quite the fall from grace: From “Mad Dog” Mattis to swamp lobbyist. But worse than that, it's not even lobbying for American interests.


On the aerospace and defense page of the Cohen Group's website, it lists, among other triumphs on behalf of its clients, the following:
Assisted U.S. and Indian firms to develop a partnership to manufacture military aerostructures in India.
Advised a German aviation firm on its acquisition of a 49 percent stake in a U.S. commercial air carrier.
Assisted an Indian firm to partner with a U.S. firm on the manufacture in India of night vision equipment.
Secured Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) approval of a French acquisition of a leading U.S. maker of aerospace composite tooling.
Assisted an Indian aircraft manufacturer in aircraft sales to U.S. state and local government agencies.
Well, isn't that fantastic! General Mattis is now taking his years of taxpayer-funded government service to a firm that boasts about shipping defense manufacturing jobs overseas, selling American defense companies to the French and the Germans, and lobbying state and local governments in this country to use your tax dollars not to buy American, but to buy Indian.


Now, it's only fair to note the Cohen group does also talk about helping American companies. And I guess it's possible that General Mattis has insisted on a clause in his contract that limits him to such work.

But even if that's the case - and he's welcome any time on “The Next Revolution” to tell us - it's shameful for him to have anything to do with this swampy firm that shows no loyalty to the country that put it where it is.

Adapted from Steve Hilton's monologue from "The Next Revolution" on Sept. 8, 2019.

Steve Hilton is host of "The Next Revolution with Steve Hilton" on Fox News Channel at 9pm ET Sundays and author of the book "Positive Populism: Revolutionary Ideas to Rebuild Economic Security, Family and Community in America." Follow him on Twitter [MENTION=19392]steve[/MENTION]Hiltonx.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/steve-hilton-james-mattis-swamp-lobbyist-cohen-group.amp

 

[imrankhannsu]

Show me a nation where its leaders to do care about their people?

Run along Mattis.

Was about to say the same thing