We Bleed Green
Debutant
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2015
- Runs
- 226
Pakistan has been playing defensive Cricket for a while now, which is fine but it is an unforgivable crime if you don't play aggressively when you have wickets in hand and end up losing them all when the innings ends.
The list is too long but I will give you couple of examples.
The T20 worldcup semi final against Australia in 2021 where we lost only 4 wickets and could have easily scored 210 if we had played more aggressively but ends up scoring only 176.
It also happened today in 1st test match against Australia. We have declared the innings at 476/4. This is unforgivable as we never saw the surge from Pakistan and batsmen did not even try to take risks.
Does Pakistan think they get some bonus points for keeping wickets in hand. Why is the team obsessed with keeping wickets in hand. If you have wickets in hand, this means you just did not play as aggressively as you should have.
The whole Duck Lewis method is based on the idea that wickets in hand will mean you will score more quickly but they forgot to tell Pakistan about this concept.
It was such a big blunder to declare at 476 for four and Australia is proving it. Rather than batting Australia out of the game, we allowed them back in. Australia could now score 700 on this road in the first 2 days and Pakistan will then have to bat last to save the match. Pathetic captaincy by Babar and equally pathetic was Iftikhar, Babar and Rizwan playing for themselves particularly Iftikhar and Rizwan, who were sent above Fawad Alam to score quickly but they both end up playing one of the most defensive innings ever when you take the situation in account.
The list is too long but I will give you couple of examples.
The T20 worldcup semi final against Australia in 2021 where we lost only 4 wickets and could have easily scored 210 if we had played more aggressively but ends up scoring only 176.
It also happened today in 1st test match against Australia. We have declared the innings at 476/4. This is unforgivable as we never saw the surge from Pakistan and batsmen did not even try to take risks.
Does Pakistan think they get some bonus points for keeping wickets in hand. Why is the team obsessed with keeping wickets in hand. If you have wickets in hand, this means you just did not play as aggressively as you should have.
The whole Duck Lewis method is based on the idea that wickets in hand will mean you will score more quickly but they forgot to tell Pakistan about this concept.
It was such a big blunder to declare at 476 for four and Australia is proving it. Rather than batting Australia out of the game, we allowed them back in. Australia could now score 700 on this road in the first 2 days and Pakistan will then have to bat last to save the match. Pathetic captaincy by Babar and equally pathetic was Iftikhar, Babar and Rizwan playing for themselves particularly Iftikhar and Rizwan, who were sent above Fawad Alam to score quickly but they both end up playing one of the most defensive innings ever when you take the situation in account.
Last edited: