What's new

Pakistan v West Indies | 2015 World Cup | Group B | Match 11 | 21st Feb, 2015 | West Indies innings

Status
Not open for further replies.
He better score some runs today - otherwise all respect for him will be lost.

Don't worry he will score lackluster 20-30 and then he'll get out to put pressure on rest of the batsmen. He will cement his place for the next match.
 
Play yasir against a side that struggles against seam and drop him against a side that struggles against spin well done team pak bravo.
 
Sometime i wonder how come our management come up with these brilliant ideas match after match :bow:
 
He still bowled really poorly . In these conditions windies have players like Samuels who can play him easily . Zulfiqar baber should have been selected , two leggies isn't ideal

Leggie or left-arm spinners both would turn the ball into left-handers which is less effective against left handers, especially when the boundaries are so short. Pakistan is missing an off-spinner. Basically, we are missing Hafeez' bowling.
 
Based on team selection they're trying their best to lose. Yasir shouldve played against the windies, and well Younis... Seems he's got some dangerous connection.
 
Our orthodox spinners took 0-26 and 3-50 off their 20 overs vs the West Indies, its baffling why you'd drop a spinner against the same team, then again the team man needs accommodating I guess.
 
The inconsistent wahab riaz is due a poor game and mohammed Irfan could break down any minute worry not we have the superman to fill in yk2
 
Leggie or left-arm spinners both would turn the ball into left-handers which is less effective against left handers, especially when the boundaries are so short. Pakistan is missing an off-spinner. Basically, we are missing Hafeez' bowling.

This we are missing off-Spin attack badly
 
My rating of the subcontinent anthems

Bangladesh > Pakistan > India >>>>>>>>>>>> Sri Lanka
 
Who thinks WI will score 300+ against our bowlers?

With the bowling lineup we had against India, WI wouldn't go past 220. Now, however if WI batsmen are sensible, they can plan around scoring 80-100 runs against the part-time 5th bowler overs, and get to 270 or so. 300 is still difficult, but Pakistan needs to get wickets. They can't be happy restricting WI to 100/2 or 100/3 in let's say 30 overs, because WI 'll still end up with a very high total exploiting the lack of 5th bowler.
 
Leggie or left-arm spinners both would turn the ball into left-handers which is less effective against left handers, especially when the boundaries are so short. Pakistan is missing an off-spinner. Basically, we are missing Hafeez' bowling.

Yes but we don't have an offie atm :ajmal
 
Our orthodox spinners took 0-26 and 3-50 off their 20 overs vs the West Indies, its baffling why you'd drop a spinner against the same team, then again the team man needs accommodating I guess.

They probably think that Harris is enough as the spinner for WI :))
 
Dwayne Smith, Chris
Gayle, Darren Bravo,
Marlon Samuels, Denesh
Ramdin(w), Lendl
Simmons, Darren Sammy,
Andre Russell, Jason Holder(c)

batting looks scary God bless haris sohail :D
 
The fact that our anthem is not in our national language is a huge farce.
 
According to msg pak will win today

World Cup 2015 is fixed,
WhatsApp message claims

The shocking fact about this
message is that all the results
of the World Cup 2015 matches
so far have come true and
have matched what the
message states.

According to the message, India
will not be able defend their
World Cup title and will also go
on to lose against South Africa
and Zimbabwe.
And pakistan will lose against Uae

www.m.timesofindia.com/sports/icc-w...tsApp-message-claims/articleshow/46314020.cms

now just imagine the credibility of this WC if this msg prove to be entirely true. What a joke this world cup will look like. And nobody will ever believe in ICC.
 
Who is fatter? Nasir or Smith?



SOTFF-po-kung-fu-panda-23998226-853-480.jpg
 
Okay, the pitch looks dead.

it may swing for 2 or 3 overs and that's it.

Horrible decision!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top