Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They could try imad instead of Fahim. Keeps the balance and adds a variation into the attack. Imad would lose nightmares on a 5th day uae pitch
Abbass
Aamir/Hassan
Faheem
Yasir
Shadab
Haris
You need a finger spinner, especially an off spinner since Aus have so many Lefties.
Moreover, give them no way to get breathe, just keep spinners going at them.
07.Shadab
08.Faheem(has bowled well with the new ball)
09.Bilal Asif
10.Yasir
11.Abbas
Bilal Asif ????![]()
- If we need a finger spinner I'd get Gohar in rather than Bilal Asif.
Bilal Asif ????![]()
- If we need a finger spinner I'd get Gohar in rather than Bilal Asif.
Faheem and shadab come as a package. Seems like Mickey can't play one without the other and rightly so because it gives the team balance. So has to be Yasir in for Hasan don't you think so
Imad could be a decent replacement for Fahim but I wouldn't drop Hasan for Yasir. I'd bench Amir then because playing him in UAE is useless and Abbas and Hasan are good enough to share the new ball. Imad wala idea isn't bad at all.
Imad's style of bowling is very similar to Jadeja and he could be a genuine menace on spinning wickets with his disciplined line. But don't see this happening since he has just returned from injury and is nowhere near the test team.
Predict Pakistan’s bowling lineup against Australia in first Test later this year
Jadeja has mastered flight, line, length, subtle variation and his action allows him to actually spin the ball.
Imad cannot spin the ball away from the right-handed therefore teams’ after facing him for 10-15 overs, play him as a military-medium in-swing bowler.
The reason he got spanked in AUS after having a wonderful intial two ODI’s.
Are you serious? Jadeja barely spins the ball. Yes, he has mastered all the areas you mentioned but he is not a conventional spinner like Ashwin.
I realize that Imad with his action poses even less of a chance of spinning the ball but he is one of those bowlers who is capable of bowling a disciplined and tight line which makes him difficult to get away and as a result he can capitalize on the batsman's mistakes. As a test bowler he has a lot of potential. Only problem I see in his bowling is that he currently does not possess the ability to deceive the batsman with flight. At all. Which is something you have to be good at if you can't spin the ball.
Yasir should be the first name on the Teamsheet and the attack should be built around him. As much as I love Faheem, he needs to sit these game out because with Yasir coming in and Sahadab being the spinner, he's the only guy who should make way (especially in the UAE).
Hasan is there for reverse while Amir and Abbas are new ball bowlers. The third spinner could be Harry.
Shadab
Faheem
Yasir
Hasan
Gohar
Faheem and Hasan can share the new ball and Hasan can bowl reverse swing later in the innings.
Just because Aussies have a bunch of lefties doesn't mean we need an off spinner, if we had a good enough off spinner I would recommend him but we don't and we're better off picking the better bowler even if he's a SLA
Faheem is not good enough to be the 2nd seamer. I would replace him with Abbas.
I agree with the rest of the attack.
I am not worried about our bowling, you pick any 4 Pakistani bowlers and they have the ability to bowl Australia under 250. The problem is our batting..,
When is the first Test match scheduled?
How are people putting both Shadab and Yasir in the same line-up....![]()
If Shadab plays then Yasir doesn't and vice versa. I for one would want Yasir to play and Shadab to be replaced with Gohar or Asghar. We need Shadab as a number seven batsman and competent bowler when we tour abroad, but on the dead pitches of UAE he might not be as effective as a bowler and his batting might not be needed.
Bowling attack for me:
Amir
Abbas
Fahim
Yasir
Asghar/Gohar
Pack your team with spinners.
No need of pacers against Aus. They will love to play against Hasan, Amir rather than Shadab, Imad, Yasir.
Yep, Amir just hasn't produced the goods in Test cricket when wickets have been flat. Given he's intimated that he wants to reduce his Test workload, his fitness issues and the fact we have a World Cup on the horizon - I would rotate him in UAE Tests with Hasan Ali who's also playing all three formats, with both playing together only outside Asia.3 spinners. Amir to sit out. 2 leggies and 1 offie.
I'd go with an overall line up of
1. Imam
2. Fakhar
3. Azhar
4. Haris
5. Babar
6. Asad
7. Sarfraz
8. Yasir
9. Zafar
10. Hasan
11. Abbas
[MENTION=143344]babajee[/MENTION]AUS might pick 6 lefties in their playing XI, which should force PAK to pick an Offie - add to that combined both sides, possible 3 left-arm pacers bowling over the wicket lots of overs. At this point, I am not sure whom but there must be a decent Off spinner in PAK, with a clean action.
Historically, Aussies are poor against finger spin, particularly Offies - may be one reason is their batting technique and their grooming. Aussie batsmen are groomed on hard, bouncy tracks and their game is built on back-foot. One disadvantage for that is in AUS, they hardly play finger spinners - it's mostly Leggis and may be few SLAO. There is Lyon indeed in recent times, still Off-spinners are fewer than Leggis in AUS domestics. Second reason is, Off-spin is a type, to dominate (or survive on turners), one has to play it on front-foot (by right handers), because it attacks the wicket and makes batting a little risky on back-foot. Some of the greatest demolishers of Off-spin were predominantly front-foot players - Sehwag, Zaheer, Hick, KP, Mahela, Gooch, Azharuddin, Dravid, Pujara .... Historically, if we notice Off-spinners have always troubled Aussies - from Laker, Hugh Tayfield, Prassanna, Gibbs, Tauseef, Bracewell to modern days Bhajji, Murali, Saqlin, Swan, Dilruhan... Off-spinners block their bread & butter shot - back-foot punch/cut squire of the wicket. That's one major reason in another way, Poms are vulnerable against Leg-spin - sweeping Leggi is a risky proposition.
Add to the Aussie woes against Offies, one has to consider 5/6 lefties, mostly in top half. It's a must that an Offie should play. If there is a no ready made Offie available, one has to take a risk and debut someone with potential or experience. Obviously every player has to debut at some point to start career, and it's not essential that the debut has to be always against tried & tested minnows, one can start against Aussies as well. I can recall Tauseef, who was hardly a FC cricketer when he was called for Karachi Test in 1979 against Aussies, probably less than 48 hours before toss and he won that Test with 7/8 wickets. Those days, PAK team/management had characters and people who would take risks with youngsters or unknown faces if the required skill set is there - these days, still PCB is stuck with an option of MoHa being Off-spinner!!!!
Yasir in an automatic choice and only reason Shadab I might play is that he is decent with bat and his stock ball is Googly, which takes it away from Lefties, other wise a classical SLAO spinner was better suited. At this point, I probably'll suggest Fahim to play as he & Shadab covers one less batsman, and Fahim can be decent with old ball. Rest 3 bowlers are Yasir, an Offie & a pacer - I don't mind Wahab, if he is fit. PAK is not going to hurt AUS much with new ball in desert - it has to be spin & old ball.
It's a race against time Vs 20 wickets to win a Test in UAE. If it takes about 200-210 overs to take 20 Aussie wickets, probably 160-170 have to be bowled by spinners - Wahab can bowl 25 overs absolute flat out, mostly with old ball in short spells while 12-15 overs from Fahim is fine, if he can chip in useful 20s & 30s with bat.
[MENTION=143344]babajee[/MENTION]
How much do you see of this happening?![]()
When have I ever doubted you![]()
Do you realize that, add a Gohar or Raza in that bowling mix - would have made PAK batting just twice in this Series?
[MENTION=143344]babajee[/MENTION]
How much do you see of this happening?![]()
its time to remind.AUS might pick 6 lefties in their playing XI, which should force PAK to pick an Offie - add to that combined both sides, possible 3 left-arm pacers bowling over the wicket lots of overs. At this point, I am not sure whom but there must be a decent Off spinner in PAK, with a clean action.
Historically, Aussies are poor against finger spin, particularly Offies - may be one reason is their batting technique and their grooming. Aussie batsmen are groomed on hard, bouncy tracks and their game is built on back-foot. One disadvantage for that is in AUS, they hardly play finger spinners - it's mostly Leggis and may be few SLAO. There is Lyon indeed in recent times, still Off-spinners are fewer than Leggis in AUS domestics. Second reason is, Off-spin is a type, to dominate (or survive on turners), one has to play it on front-foot (by right handers), because it attacks the wicket and makes batting a little risky on back-foot. Some of the greatest demolishers of Off-spin were predominantly front-foot players - Sehwag, Zaheer, Hick, KP, Mahela, Gooch, Azharuddin, Dravid, Pujara .... Historically, if we notice Off-spinners have always troubled Aussies - from Laker, Hugh Tayfield, Prassanna, Gibbs, Tauseef, Bracewell to modern days Bhajji, Murali, Saqlin, Swan, Dilruhan... Off-spinners block their bread & butter shot - back-foot punch/cut squire of the wicket. That's one major reason in another way, Poms are vulnerable against Leg-spin - sweeping Leggi is a risky proposition.
Add to the Aussie woes against Offies, one has to consider 5/6 lefties, mostly in top half. It's a must that an Offie should play. If there is a no ready made Offie available, one has to take a risk and debut someone with potential or experience. Obviously every player has to debut at some point to start career, and it's not essential that the debut has to be always against tried & tested minnows, one can start against Aussies as well. I can recall Tauseef, who was hardly a FC cricketer when he was called for Karachi Test in 1979 against Aussies, probably less than 48 hours before toss and he won that Test with 7/8 wickets. Those days, PAK team/management had characters and people who would take risks with youngsters or unknown faces if the required skill set is there - these days, still PCB is stuck with an option of MoHa being Off-spinner!!!!
Yasir in an automatic choice and only reason Shadab I might play is that he is decent with bat and his stock ball is Googly, which takes it away from Lefties, other wise a classical SLAO spinner was better suited. At this point, I probably'll suggest Fahim to play as he & Shadab covers one less batsman, and Fahim can be decent with old ball. Rest 3 bowlers are Yasir, an Offie & a pacer - I don't mind Wahab, if he is fit. PAK is not going to hurt AUS much with new ball in desert - it has to be spin & old ball.
It's a race against time Vs 20 wickets to win a Test in UAE. If it takes about 200-210 overs to take 20 Aussie wickets, probably 160-170 have to be bowled by spinners - Wahab can bowl 25 overs absolute flat out, mostly with old ball in short spells while 12-15 overs from Fahim is fine, if he can chip in useful 20s & 30s with bat.
You also said Waleed Ahmed should play.
As usual one liner summary .... anyway, I need to clear it, other wise one liner will grow brunches.
I said, one Off spinner is a must against AUS, why, I think there is an essay for explaining that. Now, if not a ready made one available either find a new kid or a new face with lots of experience, even if required he can debut against AUS.
Waleed's name came because his father was picked almost from nets 24 hours before Karachi Test 1979, against AUS ..... and he did take 7/8 wickets in his debut to win that Test. He is an Offie and took a 5 for in both List A & FC debut or something like that.
Why only Waleed - I named three others, excluding the guy taking a 6for today - one is 38 years old Tahir Khan, another two are a new kid Asiq Ali (or similar name), and the last one was some Hasseb guy taking 10 wickets in one game. Bottom line is to play a specialist Offie, instead of MoHa the all-rounder who has bowled in total 3/4 overs in this innings.
I believe, I have a bad reputation of writing essays, still looks like the only thing stuck is "Waleed" .... may be next time I'll have to write epics so that at least some context also reach below the skull.
The part you have missed is you also said Mickey wouldn't pick an offspinner.
As for your reputation, I think it is more that you refuse to accept when you are wrong and are very sensitive to criticism (your exchange with Saj today is a case in point).![]()
Mickey has a track record of playing 3 pacers in two UAE Tests, but I guess sarcasm also needs to be elaborated with essay so that it reaches below the skull. And, I am still not sure if Mickey would have picked Bilal had Shadab been full fit. Last year, SRL won the series not because of Herath, rather Karuna, a lefti who scored a daddy hundred in 1st Test, still Mickey didn’t pick 2nd spinner, let alone an Offie.
I am well aware of my reputation here, most of the posters are as well. Therefore, what exchange I had with Saj in case of point, I am not sure. Let’s call him here, just to make sure that someone is not trying to save own reputation after being called on bluffing.
[MENTION=9]Saj[/MENTION] - dear bro, did I refuse to accept something that I was proven wrong? I need to know that, so that I get myself corrected from reacting on “sensitive criticism”.
There won’t be found any one before MoHa retires, may be after 2027 WC. He has enough contacts to keep that space vacant - like this time Billal was picked to make sure that no new offie can get a shot at 5-6 Aussie lefti on turner.
Bilal was picked to ensure that the off-spinner's spot is NOT booked. What do you think - Mickey Arthur is a tool to play a 33 years old Offie, who has 59 wickets in 23 FC games, more importantly someone bowling 29 overs/FC game - when the requirement is more than 29 overs/innings.
Such insightful analysis: