Trust me few days back I was thinking the same. You wrote down a number of things that PCB need to do and most of them have came to be true.
You talked about pitches in Pakistan and that Aga guy needs to go he has been booted. You talk about making NCA a high performance centre and even though at first I thought what will this name change do but looking up the whole structure of high performance centre I got to know your point. PCB did that and they are currently hiring people for it. About domestic cricket you wrote a lot and they have changed the structure. So I see a lot of similarities and I see a lot of positive changes in PCB. Now I don’t think they have read your posts and made those changes, before someone points that out. Even though they might make a few mistakes as well but the wholesale changes and reorganising almost every other department in PCB they are on the right path.
What are your thoughts on Nadeem Khan as Director-High performance?
Every business/operation model has a Gold standard - for cricket, it was Australian system. I did study their system, and IK wants to implement something similar, therefore conceptually there has to be lots of similarities - difficult part is execution. Few years back, I had a detailed post on possible domestic reforms for PAK cricket, based on the model they use (used to, at least till 1990s) in Australia & UK - this guy WK has touched almost every bullet points of that... including the second XI games, the city/district based second tier (non FC), which is basically a cascade of the Grade cricket in Australia or the minor County in in UK.
I hope he proves me wrong, but I am not so confident about Nadeem - may be my experience/knowledge about PAK administrators is the reason, but then there is also a reason for it as well. In my memory, I think I praised three Pakistani guys in PCB over my association into 4th decade now - Gen Zia for at least trying to fix a prehistoric mad house, Shahriar Khan for his polished appearance and Arif Ali Khan Abbasi for his professionalism - he snatched that 1996 WC Final from India, which these days PCB probably would serve in plate for a little smile from them (Air Marshall Noor & AH Kardar was before my time) - rest are in between ..... you know.
I don't have much clue about Nadeem's technical qualifications - it's a role for high performance, means the guy might not be a good player or even coach, but must be well aware/experienced with the development programs, resource management, facilitation and trouble shooting - that's more education than cricket to me. HP centres are not for accommodating at an average 40-50 kids every quarter to teach them the game, rather it should work with very selective few and work on short but intensive care - on particular issues, like why Babar struggles against off-spin (or his banned cousin was a walking wicket against SLAO spin), why PAK pacers are struggling with new ball, why Yasir is losing his loop & drop ..... May be PCB should have tried someone like Peter Moores or Andy Flower; even I believe Arthur will be MUCH better Director HP Centre than the coach he was for PAK.
Any way, he is appointed and as I wrote for Misbah - hardly anything is quantum mechanics, if the guy has passion, honesty, open mind and learning appetite, he can definitely add vale. BUT, what PCB needs is at least 4 qualified coaches for batting, fielding and bowling; two for batting if possible - one will teach the batsmen, other will work on erasing the rubbish that Basit Alis & Ali Zias have taught over the years. And, most importantly, PAK cricket badly needs couple of qualified, impartial scouts/selectors/talent spotter, who has the passion to live on scouting talent 24/7, have the integrity for the task and have the balls to stand for their picks - this one definitely is not available in PAK.