What's new

"PCB incurred losses of around $200 million because of India's refusal to play us" : Shahryar Khan

Hitman

Senior T20I Player
Joined
Feb 25, 2013
Runs
17,328
"PCB incurred losses of around $200 million because of India's refusal to play us" : Shahryar Khan

Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) Chairman Shahryar Khan claimed on Monday that the body suffered losses of around $200 million due to India's refusal to play Pakistan in a bilateral series. Khan said that PCB would start legal proceedings against the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) after the confirmation of the draft constitution of the International Cricket Council (ICC), which is expected to take place in April later this year. He added that he had also informed the same to the BCCI representative at a recent ICC meeting.

"I informed the BCCI representative at the ICC meeting recently that PCB had incurred losses of around $200 million because of India's refusal to play us and these losses were mounting as the BCCI was not even honouring a legal agreement to play bilateral series between 2015 and 2023," Khan told reporters in Lahore.

"The new draft constitution has a clause for a disputes resolution committee and once the constitution is final we intend to take our case against the BCCI first to this committee," he added.

Khan said the BCCI representative had told him in the ICC meeting that the Indian board was willing to play with Pakistan but could not do this without first getting government clearance.

Khan said the BCCI official had said that because of government non-clearance, they saw the MoU not applicable as 'Force Majeure'.
"I told him that they should have thought about their government before signing the MoU which is a legal agreement as per our lawyers," he said.

"I told him that India had denied us two home series, the losses of which were around $200 million," Khan added.

India has not played any bilateral cricket with Pakistan since 2007 although in the winter of 2012/13, Pakistan made a short goodwill tour to India to play a couple of limited over games.

The PCB chief also said that even after the termination of the 'Big Three' system of governance and financial model, India would end up getting the biggest share from ICC earnings.

"Even under the new draft constitution India gets around 16 percent share of all ICC earnings which is higher compared to other boards. Under the Big Three formula India, Australia and England were taking home more than 50 percent of the revenues with other boards getting far less," Khan said.

"It was not an equitable system of revenue distribution and we only agreed to it because India agreed to sign the MoU and play six bilateral series with us which would have allowed us to get financially stronger."

Khan said while Pakistan led the move to end the 'Big Three' governance system and got 10 votes in support, India as expected opposed the move.

"Their representatives appointed by the Lodha Committee asked for the matter to be deferred to the next ICC meeting in April, but we pushed through the draft constitution which should be ratified in April after all Boards give their views on it and enforced by June," he said.

https://sports.ndtv.com/cricket/indias-refusal-to-play-pakistan-cost-pcb-200-million-1659061
 
Last edited by a moderator:
as long pcb donot become bankrupt i am fine with it .PCB have survive without it till now
 
That was always the plan sir...too bad Sethi didn't know who he was dealing with back then.
 
From what I have heard/read, ICC can't do anything in this matter (India not playing against Pakistan), BCCI is ready to play subject to NOC from the Indian government.
 
Last edited:
MOU is not a legally binding agreement in most cases.

From Wiki
A memorandum of understanding (MoU) describes a bilateral or multilateral agreement between two or more parties. It expresses a convergence of will between the parties, indicating an intended common line of action. It is often used in cases where parties either do not imply a legal commitment or in situations where the parties cannot create a legally enforceable agreement. It is a more formal alternative to a gentlemen's agreement.
 
Anyway with the demise of Big 3. Its hardly matters now. All the MOU have been gone for a toss.
 
Someone needs to explain to this guy the concept of profit and loss and the fact that "opportunity loss" is not same as "loss."

You make profit when your income exceeds your expenses. You make a loss when your expenses are more than your income.

In case of a series that never took place, there was no income but there was no expense either. How hard is that to understand?
 
Last edited:
Does he understand the meaning of force majeure?How will BCCI know if the govt will allow the tour or not?They fulfilled their legal requirement by applying for permission to tour.

Also afaik the MoU contains a clause that the series will happen subject to govt clearance.

No one will poke their noses in Indo Pak disputes.It must be look into who these lawyers are and who are they related to in the PCB.
 
Does he understand the meaning of force majeure?How will BCCI know if the govt will allow the tour or not?They fulfilled their legal requirement by applying for permission to tour.

Also afaik the MoU contains a clause that the series will happen subject to govt clearance.

No one will poke their noses in Indo Pak disputes.It must be look into who these lawyers are and who are they related to in the PCB.

It has come back to bite the BCCI in the backside. You will lose the large revenue you were getting from the original Big 3 agreement, partly because of this attempt to isolate Pakistan. Thoroughly deserved.
 
It has come back to bite the BCCI in the backside. You will lose the large revenue you were getting from the original Big 3 agreement, partly because of this attempt to isolate Pakistan. Thoroughly deserved.
Don't worry...it's not going to happen..still a very very long way to go. .be happy till then dreaming about the so called loss of revenue bcci is gonna face
 
It has come back to bite the BCCI in the backside. You will lose the large revenue you were getting from the original Big 3 agreement, partly because of this attempt to isolate Pakistan. Thoroughly deserved.

Everything in the world revolves around Pakistan isn't it?? Every action by anyone is taken to affect Pakistan intentionally.:srini
 
Don't worry...it's not going to happen..still a very very long way to go. .be happy till then dreaming about the so called loss of revenue bcci is gonna face

I'm not dreaming about anything - it is currently a reality, masterminded by a smart and respectable Indian. So far you have only coerced Sri Lanka to support you by offering them bribes and likely threatening them. Other than maybe Zimbabwe, no other country will fall into this trap. Even they will see that they benefit much more from this new agreement.
 
Everything in the world revolves around Pakistan isn't it?? Every action by anyone is taken to affect Pakistan intentionally.:srini

So you are saying that India choosing not to play Pakistan, is not an action taken to affect Pakistan intentionally? Please roll this thought through your mind several times again before committing to it. It is a political move to isolate Pakistan. It isn't a security issue, as this is not about playing in Pakistan.
 
I'm not dreaming about anything - it is currently a reality, masterminded by a smart and respectable Indian. So far you have only coerced Sri Lanka to support you by offering them bribes and likely threatening them. Other than maybe Zimbabwe, no other country will fall into this trap. Even they will see that they benefit much more from this new agreement.

Nope, I think clueless Bangla board is goona vote against this proposal. So there's a strong possibility that BCCI will get Bangla, sl and zim beside them which means they will have the required 4 votes to stop S. Manohar from Implementing his plan.
 
So you are saying that India choosing not to play Pakistan, is not an action taken to affect Pakistan intentionally? Please roll this thought through your mind several times again before committing to it. It is a political move to isolate Pakistan. It isn't a security issue, as this is not about playing in Pakistan.

Can you stay consistent in your argument here?
Big 3 had jack to do with Pakistan.
Anything BCCI does is always to isolate PCB just like any diplomatic endeavour by India is all about Pakistan. Get over yourself.

The bilateral thing is exactly about Pakistan and where BCCI would have played is linked to India- Pakistan relations in general. BCCI desperately wanted to play with Pakistan for Ind-Pak series is the biggest money making event both the countries can host. When it became apparent that Indian government will not allow an Ind-Pak series, a politician like Anurag Thakur did not want to shoot his own political career to forcefully tryto have the series.

Learn to form your views after going through news etc, not the other way round. Anyways I know my post would have jack effect on your understanding, your mind is already made up. :usman
 
So you are saying that India choosing not to play Pakistan, is not an action taken to affect Pakistan intentionally? Please roll this thought through your mind several times again before committing to it. It is a political move to isolate Pakistan. It isn't a security issue, as this is not about playing in Pakistan.

Just wondering is English board in favor of taking such a huge cut and loss of power? I assume they would vote against this proposal too.
 
Missing out on a supposed revenue can't be termed as a loss.

Its 5 years now since we last played, Pak cricket apart from PSL hasn't really done itself any favours. Sure, a series with India is lucrative but that shouldn't be their only option. They need to create several sources for revenue generation.
 
So you are saying that India choosing not to play Pakistan, is not an action taken to affect Pakistan intentionally? Please roll this thought through your mind several times again before committing to it. It is a political move to isolate Pakistan. It isn't a security issue, as this is not about playing in Pakistan.

India not playing Pakistan is down to a lot of factors, you can't just single out one reason and say that is it.

GOI obviously isn't interested in resuming cricket/cultural ties. Even if they did BCCI would love to have a Pak series but for them there 2 more important things. a) their power at ICC and b) IPL.

Pakistan from time to time keeps messing around with BCCI (not saying it was right or wrong). First they led opposition against Big-3, then with IPL they tried to threaten and boycott it hoping others would follow suit which only led to their exile from IPL ever since.

Honestly if PCB wants a series with India, they need to smooth things over with BCCI. So that once GOI gives permission, a series can take place. However, ego clashes is never going to stop with PCB and BCCI.
 
As long as our board acts like beggar just like our players nothing will improve. Our players already get more than too much base on their performance.
If India does not want to play with us why play with them in ICC tournaments. Restore some pride and avoid playing
 
Does he understand the meaning of force majeure?How will BCCI know if the govt will allow the tour or not?They fulfilled their legal requirement by applying for permission to tour.

Also afaik the MoU contains a clause that the series will happen subject to govt clearance.

No one will poke their noses in Indo Pak disputes.It must be look into who these lawyers are and who are they related to in the PCB.

So when they play in ICC tournaments against us where is the respect for the dead?

As I said PCB itself has to blame for this type of begging attitude. We are no Hong Kong, Kenya that we have to rely on India for finance for our infrastructure.
 
So when they play in ICC tournaments against us where is the respect for the dead?

As I said PCB itself has to blame for this type of begging attitude. We are no Hong Kong, Kenya that we have to rely on India for finance for our infrastructure.

Is it respect to the dead i Pakistan is given a walkover and allowed free points?The boycott is apparently to hurt PCB,which they are when India doesnt tour them.

I dont blame PCB.They need money to run the game and also pay for the gluttony off their office bearers and staff and Indian tour is the biggest money spinner.
 
Didn't the PCB threaten to take BCCI to courts a few months ago? Any further update on that? Or was it another instance of empty vessels making a lot of noise?
 
Can you stay consistent in your argument here?
Big 3 had jack to do with Pakistan.
Anything BCCI does is always to isolate PCB just like any diplomatic endeavour by India is all about Pakistan. Get over yourself.

The bilateral thing is exactly about Pakistan and where BCCI would have played is linked to India- Pakistan relations in general. BCCI desperately wanted to play with Pakistan for Ind-Pak series is the biggest money making event both the countries can host. When it became apparent that Indian government will not allow an Ind-Pak series, a politician like Anurag Thakur did not want to shoot his own political career to forcefully tryto have the series.

Learn to form your views after going through news etc, not the other way round. Anyways I know my post would have jack effect on your understanding, your mind is already made up. :usman

I think you're finding it quite hard to follow my thoughts. Check out the original post I responded to - it was about the MoU, and how it was violated to isolate Pakistan. The subsequent loss of the Big 3 revenue for India will be justice for their role in bringing politics into cricket.

My views are completely clear. If you have trouble following them, then it seems you are not understanding "jack".
 
I think you're finding it quite hard to follow my thoughts. Check out the original post I responded to - it was about the MoU, and how it was violated to isolate Pakistan. The subsequent loss of the Big 3 revenue for India will be justice for their role in bringing politics into cricket.

My views are completely clear. If you have trouble following them, then it seems you are not understanding "jack".

As I said you have "jack " understanding of your own language you use in posts. Your thought train and what you type seem to be running on divergent tracks till you were forced to reply to my post for a final convergence in your post above.

Your concept of justice is still so childish. Just a narrow parochial view of the world.
 
Everything in the world revolves around Pakistan isn't it?? Every action by anyone is taken to affect Pakistan intentionally.:srini

I thought it was just Bangladeshis suffering from paranoia. Having trouble making up your mind? A little gosht in the diet might supply essential nutrients and prevent such cognitive deficits in future...
 
As I said you have "jack " understanding of your own language you use in posts. Your thought train and what you type seem to be running on divergent tracks till you were forced to reply to my post for a final convergence in your post above.

Your concept of justice is still so childish. Just a narrow parochial view of the world.

Try not to confuse your slow processing with the thought train of others. Read things three or four times next time, it may help to comprehend.

It is quite ironic that one who supports a concept such as the Big 3 dares to accuse others of having a parochial view. This discussion became futile a long time ago. Cheers.
 
Try not to confuse your slow processing with the thought train of others. Read things three or four times next time, it may help to comprehend.

It is quite ironic that one who supports a concept such as the Big 3 dares to accuse others of having a parochial view. This discussion became futile a long time ago. Cheers.

As I said you communication skills are seriously lacking. Where on earth have I ever posted in favor of Big 3 or for the matter of fact given any view of it. This is your thought train, if I dont agree with you 100%, I must the guy trying to bring down Pakistan.
 
I thought it was just Bangladeshis suffering from paranoia. Having trouble making up your mind? A little gosht in the diet might supply essential nutrients and prevent such cognitive deficits in future...

ehhh ?? Why is there suddenly a twilight zone in this thread!
 
We can survive without India as repeatedly proved. The PCB has far bigger problems then playing India.
 
Back
Top