What's new

"PCB needs to give more priority to 50-over & 4-day cricket instead of T20 tournaments" : Umar Gul

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
217,998
"PCB needs to give more priority to 50-over & 4-day cricket instead of T20 tournaments" : Umar Gul

Umar Gul in his interview with us:

http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/s...t-I-am-bowling-with-good-rhythm-quot-Umar-Gul

“Too many of our players are only focusing on Twenty20 cricket and that is causing problems for the Pakistan ODI team. They are keen on playing in Twenty20 tournaments in Pakistan but are reluctant to take part in the longer format tournaments, whether that be 50-over or 4-day competitions. The Pakistan Cricket Board needs to give more priority to 50-over and four-day cricket instead of this continued emphasis on Twenty20 domestic competitions. The scheduling is such that so many of our national players and players playing for Pakistan A mainly play in twenty over domestic tournaments and that as far as I am concerned is not healthy for our batsmen or for Pakistan cricket. Our batsmen are losing sight of how to build innings and how to bat for long periods.”

"Batsmen are playing with technical issues that are not highlighted in the 20 over format but are shown up in 50-over and 4-day tournaments. Batsmen improve by spending time at the crease and by having the ability of playing long innings, not by hitting a few shots and then walking back to the pavilion. The best batsman have the ability to play well in all three formats and convert their skills from 4-day cricket down to twenty-over tournaments. If you are technically good then you can succeed in every format, but what we are now producing in Pakistan are a lot of batsmen who have the skills for twenty over cricket but not for fifty over or Test cricket. We are producing batsmen who can hit a few fours and sixes but struggle to build innings and hit shots through gaps and rotate the strike and this needs to be looked at with all seriousness before it's too late."
 
Last edited:
Don't think T-20 cricket on its own is to blame, blame the poor quality of domestic wickets
 
Gul has a point.

The problem is T20 cricket is where the money is and if you are good at this format then that will earn you a heck of a lot more money than playing 50 Tests for your country.
 
Gul has a point.

The problem is T20 cricket is where the money is and if you are good at this format then that will earn you a heck of a lot more money than playing 50 Tests for your country.

India focuses quite a bit on t20 cricket, but it hasn’t affected their one-day form at all.
 
India focuses quite a bit on t20 cricket, but it hasn’t affected their one-day form at all.

When you have a batsman like Kohli in your team, then that argument becomes irrelevant.
 
When you have a batsman like Kohli in your team, then that argument becomes irrelevant.
Add Shikhar Dhawan and Rohit Sharma to the list and you dont even need to organise domestic cricket.
 
Playing T20s isn't that bad.

All top teams do it. They're still competitive in other formats.

It's mostly about the mindset and approach. Our players and captain thinks winning T20 is a huge deal. They'd celebrate like anything.
 
Playing T20s isn't that bad.

All top teams do it. They're still competitive in other formats.

It's mostly about the mindset and approach. Our players and captain thinks winning T20 is a huge deal. They'd celebrate like anything.

It is pretty bad when you use a T20 tournament like PSL to select players on the national team. It is completely absurd to use a T20 format for selection and even more ridiculous when players abilities are recognized through T20 tournaments.
 
I agree with Gul. We need to improve domestic pitches and find a way to make it more competitive and attract the audience. Other than this forum, I don't know many Pakistan fans who have any knowledge of domestic cricket. Australia and England first class cricket is followed and players are known by the fans who follow the national team.
 
When you have a batsman like Kohli in your team, then that argument becomes irrelevant.

Right, but he is not a random occurrence, he is a good batsman who can play all formats. And it’s not jist Kohli the batsman, it’s also Bumrah and Bhavneshwar. Or for that matter Dhawan or Rohit.
Our batsmen are not in any hindered in one days because of t20. Its only because they are not the same league and that’s down to selection and coaching in formative years and not an unnecessary focus on t20
 
Its not T-20 cricket, its the pathetic quality of pitches which make stroke play nonconducive and a score of 150 in T-20's and a score of 220-250 in ODI's a winning score whereas in most pitches around the world the par score in T-20's is 200 and in ODI's is 350 plus atleast.
 
Its not T-20 cricket, its the pathetic quality of pitches which make stroke play nonconducive and a score of 150 in T-20's and a score of 220-250 in ODI's a winning score whereas in most pitches around the world the par score in T-20's is 200 and in ODI's is 350 plus atleast.

There is probably one 350 score in an entire series. I think the standard is around 300. I believe in UAE, decent batting teams can score around 270 consistently.
 
Not sure how much money is involved in domestic T20. I understand the importance of PSL, but this domestic T20 is too much focused, rather they should arrange a premium List A tournament with at least 12 games per team/season - draft system, club, department or region doesn't matter, but more or less top 100 players must participate in that.

I feel, PAK domestic wickets have improved a little in last couple of years for sure. But, more than wicket, I think bigger issue is the duration of the game & the FC season - this year average over per game has definitely increased for the early start, but still it's way below 400/game (probably around 320 this year).

Also, this OCT-DEC period for FC game needs to change. PCB can't change PAK's climate and 7 weeks for PSL window has to be allocated - may be best solution is to split domestic FC season in to 2 parts, and slot T20/List A between NOV to JAN. FC Season can start in early SEP to early NOV, then 3.5 months break and restarts in mid FEB to early MAY.
 
Play 4 day cricket from mid feb to mid may , the stats of fast bowlers and batsmen will be balanced and the spinners too will have some part to play. The the moment domestic cricket is played when the pitches are damp and the days are short , not good for cricket in short.
 
Not sure why other countries are producing good batsmen despite playing T20s.
 
Not sure why other countries are producing good batsmen despite playing T20s.

I am sure, PAK is producing good batsman as well. Finding an ATG great batsman is different issue (IND has one in every 10-12 years max), but there are enough good batsman to build on. There must be several batsmen who can score crispy 20s & 30s.

Apart from usual blame on selectors (which is a major issue for sure - half of the batsmen doesn't fit the format, then they somehow managed to "rest" a potential 45/85 player for 4 years), I think batsmen are not played in right position either. I can say, Test team is picked better for the purpose and it's batting better among 3 formats, while ODI team is at complete mess - Imam as opener, Hafeez, Malik, Sarfraz at 4-5-6, Rana Fahim as all-rounder (now I read, he has better batting potential than bowling), Imad as ODI No. 7, Asif Ali for ODI in Josh Buttler "role", Haris Sohail carrying drinks .... Hafeez opening, Umar Akmal drinking water ....... Azhar Ali invested for 2 years to be ODI opener (now replaced by Imam in that Azhar Ali "role") ...... come on......

But, outside selection issues, one major problem is other teams play FC cricket (at whatever quality) like a proper FC game, hence batsmen get the chance to bat for 2-3-4 sessions, and score may be a double, even triple; PAK plays 4 extended List A, even T20 innings combined as FC cricket - which probably will convert more Umar Akmals in to Asif Alis; rather than Iam Ul Haqs in to Haris Sohails. Couple of weeks back, this guy Ariful scored 236 in 2nd innings of a game - in PCB's FC, most 2nd innings doesn't reach 236 - how batsmen are going to learn batting? Hitting one boundary is not batting - even Mustafiz hit one few days back, but batsmen need to stay in middle enough time to hit may be 35 boundaries.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Pakistan cricket's priorities at the moment:<br><br>1. PSL<br>2. Everything else<br><br>What Pakistan cricket's priorities should be:<br><br>1. 4-day cricket<br>2. Everything else<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/1064479138994638848?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 19, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Pakistan cricket's priorities at the moment:<br><br>1. PSL<br>2. Everything else<br><br>What Pakistan cricket's priorities should be:<br><br>1. 4-day cricket<br>2. Everything else<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Cricket?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Cricket</a></p>— Saj Sadiq (@Saj_PakPassion) <a href="https://twitter.com/Saj_PakPassion/status/1064479138994638848?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 19, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

What are the priorities of other cricket teams? Would they have botched up this chase of 175?
 
Back
Top