[PICTURE] Salman Agha LBW reprieve by DRS - Correct decision taken?

[MenInG]

Salman given out - there is not bat involved – but the decision remains on height grounds with the ball set to bounce OVER middle stump.

Right decision?

 

[HitWicket]

Looked fine to me, hit him in the gut almost a couple of feet outside his crease.

 

[Rana]

100% not out

Poor decision by the umpire in the first place

 

[shokz1408]

Only looked out from front on. Side on view shows how far down the crease he was. Didn't look out on side view as the ball had a fair bit to travel.

 

[James]

I can totally understand why the on field umpire gave this one out, but DRS was correct. There has been more bounce in the wicket today which will have affected the ball tracking predictor on Hawkeye. (remember, a prediction tool is all that it is.) Earlier in the match, conversely this might have been predicted as out on DRS.

 

[MSaad1237]

Correct decision, he was standing way outside the crease and from the sideon its pretty clear that its going over the stumps.

 

[kingusama92]

Looked plumb from the front before the side-on view showed he got a proper stretch in. Although, I don't think it was bouncing that far over as DRS suggested.

Right decision in the end but I can't blame the umpire on that one.

It legitimately seemed out.

 

[Minnowbasher]

English commies lost it when they saw this going over the top. First time I've seen bias from them.

 

[Ashmal]

Correct decision.

 

[SpiritOf1903]

It was going over...hit his midriff

 

[Varun]

It's not the first time that DRS has proven to be gravity defying.