What's new

[PICTURE] Will this image haunt Allan Donald forever? [June 17, 1999 World Cup Semi-Final]

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
218,136
http://www.espncricinfo.com/series/...tralia-vs-south-africa-2nd-sf-world-cup-1999/


120851.jpg



(Article dated 12 July 2016)

It's grim irony that sees Allan Donald now serving as one of Darren Lehmann's trusted lieutenants given their central yet conflicting roles in one of cricket's most heroic or heartbreaking finishes.

Depending on which side of the Indian Ocean one was viewing it 17 years ago.

Donald was the walk-on extra who became cast as villain when the plot he had done so much to pen that sunny June afternoon at Edgbaston was rewritten over and over in escalating chaos.

Lehmann could easily have filled that part if the final act had played out differently when he fluffed his climactic line.

With one run needed to carry South Africa into their first World Cup final but no batsmen left in the wings, Donald skittishly set sail from the non-striker's end thinking the winning moment had arrived.

But the ball was with Lehmann running towards the unguarded bowler's end stumps, needing only to hit his target with an underarm throw from barely five metres – with Donald stranded almost as far from safety – to tie the match and send Australia through to the final at Lord's three days hence.

In the tension, Lehmann's pitch missed by a whisker and Donald was reprieved, offering a disbelieving smile and a grateful glance skywards as he sank to his knees and contemplated how close he had taken his team to self-immolation.

"I remember standing at the non-striker's end, not having faced a ball thankfully in the short period I was there," Donald recounted in Colombo where he has begun his two-month tenure as bowling coach with the team that brought down the darkest hour of his celebrated playing career.

"And I thought ‘how nice is this, just one blow and it's done and we're in the final'."

His fellow batsman, muscle-bound and enigmatically silent Lance Klusener who was crowned best player of that epic 1999 tournament, believed that blow had been landed off the toe end of his bat the very next ball.

Donald, still shaken by his near miss, was understandably more circumspect and kept his bat firmly planted in his crease as he watched Mark Waugh cruise, gather and release the ball once again in the shadow of the non-striker's stumps.

But by the time he turned back to gauge where his batting partner was in the descending maelstrom he felt Klusener disappearing behind him having completed what he believed was the victorious single.

To ensure this tragi-comic moment retained its hypnotic visual appeal for years to follow, Donald symbolically lost his grip on his bat and – torn by the conflicting instincts to save his wicket, to retrieve his weapon and to run like hell – he belatedly, almost apologetically took off for cricket's most famous incomplete run.

A moment whose haunting, harrowing impact has not dimmed on the champion South African fast bowler despite the passing of almost two decades.

"I suppose that YouTube thing will never stop," said Donald, whose imperious 4-32 in Australia's sub-par innings earlier on that day did not deserve to be overshadowed by the calamity that was to come and the internet videos that ensures it cannot fade.

"They will never take that off.

"I've watched it a hundred and whatever times, and I think that's just something I had to deal with personally – being involved in that sort of incident.

"I think the best thing for me was to watch that, and the best therapy to try and get to terms with what actually happened there.

"It was ugly, it was one of sport's very, very big disappointments and one of the biggest mistakes that you'll ever probably see in cricket that I wouldn't wish upon my worst enemy."

Quick Single: Starc bound for the 300 club: Lehmann

Part of the reason it remains so perpetually raw is that South Africa has since come close but never got closer to reaching a World Cup final, and it is widely agreed the 1999 title was theirs for the taking had Klusener and Donald held their nerve.

Subsequent World Cups have only compounded the angst – bounced out on a dressing room miscalculation on their home turf in 2003, brutalised by Australia in a far more lopsided semi in 2007, thwarted by rain and Grant Elliott's historic blow for New Zealand last year.

But 1999 will always be, for Donald and for so many long-suffering South Africans who have seen so many powerful teams form but fail to grasp history, the one that was thrown away.

"I felt we had the best team in that World Cup without a question of a doubt, the best one-day side that I think I've ever played in," he mused.

"It was a wonderful team and to have gone out in that way was fairly sickening.

"But maybe some day … maybe some day South Africa will get there."

https://www.cricket.com.au/news/all...uth-africa-australia-bowling-coach/2016-07-12
 
Last edited:
Professionals tend to get on with life, but I'm sure Alan Donald will feel some resentment when he thinks of this. It is only human.

Reminds me of the last ball six Miandad hit off Chetan Sharma in the 1986 Austral-Asia cup final. Sharma never was the same bowler again.
 
How was it Donald's fault? Klusener couldn't get past a packed field. The run-out was always there.
 
Perhaps the most dramatic moments in ICC Cricket World Cup history came in 1999 when Lance Klusener got South Africa to the brink of a famous win in the semifinal against Australia at Edgbaston, only to falter at the last hurdle.

Nineteen years since that unfortunate run-out that ended South Africa’s campaign, Klusener, looking back, acknowledges he could have been a little patient.

Chasing 214 for a win to enter the final of a World Cup for the first time, Jacques Kallis (53) and Jonty Rhodes (43) helped South Africa get closer to the target. However, a four-wicket haul by Shane Warne stymied the side’s progress.

Klusener, who was in terrific form with both bat and ball throughout that edition and was later named Player of the Tournament, almost single-handedly got South Africa to the doorstep of victory.

With nine runs to get in the final over, but only one wicket left, Klusener smoked Damien Fleming for two fours off successive deliveries to leave his side needing just one run in four balls.

The fourth ball of the over, Fleming bowled a full length delivery outside off, which Klusener mistimed to mid-off and set off for a run. Allan Donald, though tried to get back to his crease at the non-striker's end, and didn’t hear his partner's call.

Lance Klusener was named Player of the Tournament of the 1999 Cricket World Cup Lance Klusener was named Player of the Tournament of the 1999 Cricket World Cup

Mark Waugh threw the ball to Fleming, who trickled it back to Adam Gilchrist, who whipped the bails off, running Donald out and sparking wild celebrations in the Australian camp.

The match ended in a tie, but because Australia had a superior net run rate in the group stage, they qualified for the final and eventually won the tournament, beating Pakistan.

Looking back, Klusener says he could have been more patient with the run, but insisted that he thought it was the right opportunity to end the game.

"I was upset with myself that I could have maybe been a little more patient," recalls Klusener. "But hindsight is a brilliant science. You can always sit and say ‘what if we only would have waited’ or whatever it was.

"But those last two balls could have been brilliant yorkers and we could have been sitting saying, 'Oh why didn't we take out opportunity early on'."

Klusener finished on an unbeaten 31 in just 16 deliveries. "I was a little cross with myself that I hadn't been a little more patient with myself in trying to just get that one more run but that's just the beauty of the game," he added.

"I am always one for taking the opportunity when it's there. I thought that was the right opportunity but it didn't turn out to be."

https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/690753
 
Klusener played an absolute blinder and what could have been the greatest finishing knock of all time but come on you need to be a bit more patient with your running when all you need is 1 off 4. Most South African cricketers completely lose their mind when the pressure is on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Klusener played an absolute blinder and what could have been the greatest finishing knock of all time but come on you need to be a bit more patient with your running when all you need is 1 off 4.Most South African cricketers completely lose their mind when the pressure is on.

True They had plenty of deliveries and just needed a clam head, klusener / donald messed it up That run certainly wasnt on They just couldnt handle the pressure in the end
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I blame klusner equally , there was 2 balls still left after that delivery with only 1 run needed.
Klusner just panicked, nothing else.
He his two fours in two ball why not wait as there was still 2 balls left or again go for stroke.
 
South Africa was my second favorite team after India in the 90's. I was really disappointed after the match.
 
I feel sorry and depressed when I recall this.SA would have won the title easily beating Pakistan if they won this match.Now I don't see any chance in near future of SA winning WC.
 
Klusener should have been caught inside the boundary the over before. Still can’t believe Rieffel missed such an easy chance.
 
Proteas: 20-year anniversary of THAT heartbreaking run out

https://www.sport24.co.za/Cricket/C...ersary-of-that-heartbreaking-run-out-20190617
London - Monday marked the 20-year anniversary of South Africa's heartbreaking run out in the 1999 Cricket World Cup semi-final.

There is not a South African sports fan who doesn't remember or at least know the story of the Allan Donald and Lance Klusener mix-up when the Proteas needed just 1 run off 3 balls to beat Australia to book their place in a World Cup final for the first time.

The images of the moment it all came crashing down for the Proteas have been played countless times, and exactly 20 years later South Africa find themselves on the verge of World Cup elimination once more.

It may not be as dramatic as in 1999, but if South Africa lose Wednesday's clash against New Zealand in Birmingham - the same venue as their heartache 20 years ago - they will almost certainly not qualify for the 2019 semi-finals.

Lungi Ngidi, who was just three-years-old back then, has been passed fit and will play against the Black Caps on Wednesday, and he insists that what happened in 1999 doesn't count for anything now.

"When you look at that game, it was crucial for the guys at that stage," the 23-year-old speedster said.

"I don't think that it has had any effect on us now.

"It's a new tournament for us and if we are going to keep looking back at things that have happened, I don’t think that is going to help us move forward.

"We've got another game to play at this field and we're looking to win. We haven't been focusing on anything other than the game plan we have to win the tournament."

Play on Wednesday starts at 11:30 (SA time).
 
Worst brain fade in the history of brain fades, Aus were incredibly lucky that day.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-partner="tweetdeck"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Jubilation for <a href="https://twitter.com/CricketAus?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@CricketAus</a>. Heartbreak for <a href="https://twitter.com/OfficialCSA?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@OfficialCSA</a>.<br><br>On this day in 1999, an absolute classic <a href="https://twitter.com/cricketworldcup?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@cricketworldcup</a> semi-final. <a href="https://t.co/JUt0n8iekT">pic.twitter.com/JUt0n8iekT</a></p>— ICC (@ICC) <a href="https://twitter.com/ICC/status/1405427514781143045?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 17, 2021</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
It's somewhat forgotten due to the madcap ending that there was a spell of mesmerizing leg-spin by Shane Warne that saved Australia from certain defeat, he seemed to pull Australia back from the brink through sheer force of personality.

He hadn't been bowling particularly well in the lead-up to the match, but you just knew at 0-48 or whatever it was after 10 overs when he was thrown the ball by Waugh that Warne will not go down without a fight.

There are only two truly genius cricketers that I have seen in my life, and one of them was Shane Warne.
 
The previous ball was a near run out.

Gilchrist/Fleming stated in an interview that he was surprised the two batsmen did not have a word with each other after that incident, and just proceeded to face the next delivery regardless.

South Africa were clearly frazzled mentally, and haven't won any other trophy of note to present day.
 
It's somewhat forgotten due to the madcap ending that there was a spell of mesmerizing leg-spin by Shane Warne that saved Australia from certain defeat, he seemed to pull Australia back from the brink through sheer force of personality.

He hadn't been bowling particularly well in the lead-up to the match, but you just knew at 0-48 or whatever it was after 10 overs when he was thrown the ball by Waugh that Warne will not go down without a fight.

There are only two truly genius cricketers that I have seen in my life, and one of them was Shane Warne.

Who is second? Brian Lara?
 
It was mistake of both players. They shouldn't have run it because they would have two deliveries still left for 1 run and most importantly it was the last wicket.

The thing that would probably hurt them more is that they haven't won any World Cup even now. So, that 1999 heartbreak will still be fresh because that was their best chance for a trophy. Aussies weren't invincibles by then.
 
No it won't bother Allan Donald now. When people get over the death of loved ones then a Cricket match is nothing. Time is a great healer.
 
Some more memories of this day

<div style="width: 100%; height: 0px; position: relative; padding-bottom: 80.000%;"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/e/ftllep" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="100%" allowfullscreen style="width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute;"></iframe></div>
 
Klusenars fault. He choked. He had two extra balls to get the winning runs and given the form he was in, he could have done it. He had no reason to run for such a risky single.
 
Not only Donald but it is haunting South African cricket team now also.
 
It looks both's fault but more of Donald's fault: the ball just previous to this one, there was a missed run out of Donald, but Klusener and Donald did not have a conversation after that (Steve Waugh confirmed this in his interview and/or book) to agree on something, hence Donald could be just cautious on this run out ball but on the other hand, the call was from Klusener who was running to danger end and made it to his crease whereas Donald did not signal, respond or pay attention to Klusener.

Watch the clip closely, rather than dropping the bat upon his final attempt to run, Donald drops it while out of his crease and watching Mark Waugh throw the ball and as it almost hit the stumps, suggesting that Donald had either blanked out about the situation or fumbled because he was aware (but still kept on watching) that Klusener is coming from the other end.
 
It looks both's fault but more of Donald's fault: the ball just previous to this one, there was a missed run out of Donald, but Klusener and Donald did not have a conversation after that (Steve Waugh confirmed this in his interview and/or book) to agree on something, hence Donald could be just cautious on this run out ball but on the other hand, the call was from Klusener who was running to danger end and made it to his crease whereas Donald did not signal, respond or pay attention to Klusener.

Watch the clip closely, rather than dropping the bat upon his final attempt to run, Donald drops it while out of his crease and watching Mark Waugh throw the ball and as it almost hit the stumps, suggesting that Donald had either blanked out about the situation or fumbled because he was aware (but still kept on watching) that Klusener is coming from the other end.

Don't agree with this. Given the form Klusenar was in, he should have backed himself to smash the winning runs. He had 2 balls left. There was no rush. He is the one who choked.
 
Back
Top