[PICTURES] The Shan Masood dismissal on a no-ball drama on Day 1 of the SCG Test

MenInG

PakPassion Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Runs
216,740
Embarrassing error?!

==

9aCjOpb.png


Shan Masood was caught in the slips on the first day of the Sydney Test match but there seemed to be an error in the no ball check for the dismissal, which showed the Pakistan captain being in two places at once.

Four overs before his dismissal, Masood had survived another edge into the slip cordon after a review showed Mitchell Marsh had overstepped. On the no ball check for the incident, the TV umpire Joel Wilson was shown pictures of Marsh’s foot being well over the line as it came down, with Mohammad Rizwan standing at the non-striker’s end in the background.

When Masood once again edge to the slips off Marsh, giving an easy catch to Steve Smith, Wilson decided to check the front foot to make sure Marsh hadn’t overstepped for a second time. He was again showed the replay from a side-on angle of Marsh’s delivery stride, with his foot coming down behind the line this time. Masood had to walk back to the dressing room for 35, leaving Pakistan 96-5.

However, the replay Wilson was shown could not have been from the same ball to which Masood was dismissed. Rizwan was standing at the non-striker’s end during the dismissal, just as he had been when he appeared in the shot of Marsh’s delivery stride for the no ball check. But, on the footage of Marsh’s delivery stride for the dismissal delivery, the batter standing in the background of the shot was clearly not Rizwan and was actually Masood himself.
 
Embarrassing error?!

==

9aCjOpb.png


Shan Masood was caught in the slips on the first day of the Sydney Test match but there seemed to be an error in the no ball check for the dismissal, which showed the Pakistan captain being in two places at once.

Four overs before his dismissal, Masood had survived another edge into the slip cordon after a review showed Mitchell Marsh had overstepped. On the no ball check for the incident, the TV umpire Joel Wilson was shown pictures of Marsh’s foot being well over the line as it came down, with Mohammad Rizwan standing at the non-striker’s end in the background.

When Masood once again edge to the slips off Marsh, giving an easy catch to Steve Smith, Wilson decided to check the front foot to make sure Marsh hadn’t overstepped for a second time. He was again showed the replay from a side-on angle of Marsh’s delivery stride, with his foot coming down behind the line this time. Masood had to walk back to the dressing room for 35, leaving Pakistan 96-5.

However, the replay Wilson was shown could not have been from the same ball to which Masood was dismissed. Rizwan was standing at the non-striker’s end during the dismissal, just as he had been when he appeared in the shot of Marsh’s delivery stride for the no ball check. But, on the footage of Marsh’s delivery stride for the dismissal delivery, the batter standing in the background of the shot was clearly not Rizwan and was actually Masood himself.
Poor performance by back stage ICC media crew. It's a pity that such an incompetent team feeds third umpire with the stuff for referrals.
 
I have seen it being mentioned as error in no ball check?

Is it error in no-ball check or error in replay only? Did umpire actually check for no-ball in 2nd case. If the on-field umpire had declared it as legal delivery, then it's just a replay error.
 
I have seen it being mentioned as error in no ball check?

Is it error in no-ball check or error in replay only? Did umpire actually check for no-ball in 2nd case. If the on-field umpire had declared it as legal delivery, then it's just a replay error.

Think looks more like broadcast issue - I just hope this wasn't what the umpire saw!
 
I’m not convinced about the Babar dismissal too

Didn’t look out in live play. It had to be clipping leg at best
 
I’m not convinced about the Babar dismissal too

Didn’t look out in live play. It had to be clipping leg at best
Yeah initially it looked not out because after pitching ball took a sharp nip towards the leg side
 
This has happened many times. Often we are shown the hawk oeye of some other delivery.

This is an a broadcastin-umpiring issue
 
Either technology is not up to mark even in this age or it is just not good enoughas of now.
Its not consistent and too many things that can go either way and alter the outcome of match
 
Babar’s dismissal was dodgy at best it was clipping ball was curling inwards
 
The question is, how do we know it wasn't another no-ball if they've shown the wrong delivery.
 
The question is, how do we know it wasn't another no-ball if they've shown the wrong delivery.
As if Australia needs to cheat to beat this Pakistan team, Shan could have scored a century and Australia would still win this test
 
I once heard that TV umpire gets a different feed and more angles than what is broadcasted to us.
 
No wonder professor has been moaning about the technology and umpires .

Rizwan was out, but using technology it wasn't conclusive so benefit of doubt goes to the batsmen and the umpire never gave it out.

But double standards strike again for pakistan
 
Back
Top