Bewal Express
Test Star
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2005
- Runs
- 38,739
That was classic leavingImad wasim left well against axar Patel in the t20 WC.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was classic leavingImad wasim left well against axar Patel in the t20 WC.![]()
Our fans have a problem with one of our best players, it are fine with rubbish like imad.That was classic leaving
Ask Rana about the guy that once scored 42, not averaged 42 and not became one of the best WK in the World.
What kind of honesty is asking a complete unknown to be picked over one of the best WKs. If that is how you rate honesty, can i recommend my next door neighbour as as PK fast bowler, he once took a WK in a club gameEven if it's wrong, I rate him for being honest. You're not. Your assessment of Babar is anything but honest. Like a 30 year old is too young? In which world bro?
What kind of honesty is asking a complete unknown to be picked over one of the best WKs. If that is how you rate honesty, can i recommend my next door neighbour as as PK fast bowler, he once took a WK in a club game
So you think Babar is too old. Jesus wept
Babar is young. Babar should be coming into his prime. If Babar is old than what does that leave all these the 33-36 year old guys?If you were honest:
- You'd admit that you fumbled when you claimed Babar was "too young"
- You wouldn't put words in my mouth by saying "you think Babar is too old". The truth is he's neither young or old
He might be young compared to you but in cricketing terms that's not young. If that's young, you're either being stupid or dishonest. I think we all know which one it is.Babar is young. Babar should be coming into his prime. If Babar is old than what does that leave all these the 33-36 year old guys?
So you think Babar is too old.![]()
So only 1 person can be from KPK. Only 1 poster dislikes imad. Only 1 person can defend Babar who I have criticized more than I have praised. I can bet that poster who has linked me to another poster is probably on my ignore list.You and @PakEngFan have the following similarities:
Anyway another poster has confirmed that you are ex-PakEngFan.
- From KPK
- Hate Imad
- Hate Misbah - at least you got this one right
- Extremely defensive of Babar
It's good to know who you are.
OK. So you are saying he is old. But around 30 is when the batsman come into their prime. So If that is the case what is your problem. Do you want him dropped permanently?He might be young compared to you but in cricketing terms that's not young. If that's young, you're either being stupid or dishonest. I think we all know which one it is.
OK. So you are saying he is old. But around 30 is when the batsman come into their prime. So If that is the case what is your problem. Do you want him dropped permanently?
It's interesting that when I reply the Mods see it fit to delete. This guy claimed he owned me on this and I asked him if Babar was too old. And boy did he resort to word salads. So once again-is Babar too old?You do realise not everything in this world is black and white? Just like how you can have all kinds of colours in between black and white, you can also lie somewhere between young and old. If I have to explain basic sh1t like this to you because you can't be honest then what's the point in having this discussion? I feel like I'm talking to a child.
It's interesting that when I reply the Mods see it fit to delete. This guy claimed he owned me on this and I asked him if Babar was too old. And boy did he resort to word salads. So once again-is Babar too old?
II wouldn’t bother arguing with people who have no clue. This is the same guy who thinks Babar is still a youngster and says footwork doesn’t matter in cricket. I remember when most cricketers retired by 33 or 34, and then Misbah started the trend of playing until 40. Back then, a player’s peak used to be from around 25 or 26.Even if it's wrong, I rate him for being honest. You're not. Your assessment of Babar is anything but honest. Like a 30 year old is too young? In which world bro?
II wouldn’t bother arguing with people who have no clue. This is the same guy who thinks Babar is still a youngster and says footwork doesn’t matter in cricket. I remember when most cricketers retired by 33 or 34, and then Misbah started the trend of playing until 40. Back then, a player’s peak used to be from around 25 or 26.
Is Babar too old to play for PK? Wasn't that the reason you found a quote from me? If that wasn't the point then what was the point? Stop the word salads and answer the question.Not sure why you need to ask this again, as I already addressed this in post 85 but I'll repeat he's neither young or old. Why is that so hard to understand?
Not being young isn't synonymous with old or "too old".
It says a lot about you though. You live in a world which is either black or white. A very simplistic mind I must say.
Just be honest for once and admit that you fumbled when you claimed Babar was too young because you're just digging a hole for yourself.
This will be my last my post on this subject because we're just going around circles and like I said before, I feel like I'm talking to a child.
Stick to Timepass buddy.
I never paid attention to the toxic narratives pre 2020 bro. For me, everyone who represented Pakistan was one of my players. Couldn’t care less who they were. I didn’t pay attention to player hate groups. It’s all becoming very clear now. Should have remained vigilant then. The whole Misbah/Rizwan thing has made me lose faith in the entire system.The guy criticised Sarfraz for years, only to advocate this Humperdoo (from the Preacher show) as our saviour
don't blame him really its very rare he will get a 50 in tests unless its Bangladesh so he's just making the most of the opportunityBro celebrating 50 like a double ton
You got this from the PCB?Yet again, Mohammad Rizwan answered his critics with a well-crafted fifty as he reached 51 on Day 1 of the first Test against West Indies, before bad light forced stumps to be called
I'm adding salt to the wound.You got this from the PCB?
One-eyed leading the blind never rung truerI'm adding salt to the wound.
Ok so it’s your caption and not what the PCB sent you as a caption for the video?I'm adding salt to the wound.
Ok so it’s your caption and not what the PCB sent you as a caption for the video?
Rana is always worried about Rizwan's success; probably goes to bed thinking about Rizwan.Bro celebrate your beautiful day of Babar’s selfish review, why worry about Rizwan's success
Arguably Asia's GOAT Wicket Keeper bat.Another clutch innings from the best wicket-keeper batsman in the world.
Better than Dhoni for sure, but I would rank him behind Sangakkara for sure. He was different class. Arguably the second best lefty batsman in history after Lara.Arguably Asia's GOAT Wicket Keeper bat.
Sangakkara I don't rate that high, cashed in on some big phattas in Pak and was usually a failure in England, India, SA and WI. In any case he didn't keep for a lot of his runs. But yes we can have Rizwan behind Sanga for now. Miles better than overrated Dhoni, Pant, Kaluwitharna, SarfarazBetter than Dhoni for sure, but I would rank him behind Sangakkara for sure. He was different class. Arguably the second best lefty batsman in history after Lara.
Rizwan is also better than Pant especially in white ball cricket. Pant is excellent in Test cricket in spite of his flop show in Australia.
You are hurting the haters too much.Another clutch innings from the best wicket-keeper batsman in the world.
Pant doesn't make indian loi team going forward with samson and kl around tooBetter than Dhoni for sure, but I would rank him behind Sangakkara for sure. He was different class. Arguably the second best lefty batsman in history after Lara.
Rizwan is also better than Pant especially in white ball cricket. Pant is excellent in Test cricket in spite of his flop show in Australia.
Was highest scorer from pakistan in Australian test seriesHe is a good player of spin and just struggles in overseas venues. But still can produce some good knocks there
Its plural. The haters are severalLooks like Rizwan smiling 50 today was answer to a certain poster,![]()
Its plural. The haters are several
i still think he plays pace better than spin but today he was just exceptional... played every ball on merit througout the inning.He is a good player of spin and just struggles in overseas venues. But still can produce some good knocks there
I mean the chief orchestrator,
Name and shame them, go at full throttle this is extreme level bugz-e- RizwanPeople are just jumping on the bandwagon as most pakistanis do with smth that makes them prominent. Pure attention seeking and when you question them about replacement they ll just run away or hide.
Sauds fifty was great meanwhile they dint have guts to appreciate the other pakistani who played same innings
One of them thought that Sky paid £6bn for IPL rights. This is the level of intellect of these haters.Its plural. The haters are several
Ah that guy. Fair enough.I mean the chief orchestrator,
It feels like I torment you guys more than I do Rizwan.Ah that guy. Fair enough.
I don’t think we are particularly concerned about how you feel.It feels like I torment you guys more than I do Rizwan.
LolI don’t think we are particularly concerned about how you feel.
Rohail would have scored a double ton on this phattaYet again, Mohammad Rizwan answered his critics with a well-crafted fifty as he reached 51 on Day 1 of the first Test against West Indies, before bad light forced stumps to be called.
Tera bhi abhi biodata nikaalta hoonRohail would have scored a double ton on this phatta
Tag? Lol. I rarely tag.Lol
I think you definitely are. It’s you guys who tag me when Rizwan scores more than 15 runs
Which one? 2 off 6?Another clutch innings he played in crucial win for team
He thinks he’s David Warner?Guess now only becoming a lefty can bring his form back
Well he finally played a shot on the offsideHe thinks he’s David Warner?
But it still counts as the side he wants to goWell he finally played a shot on the offside![]()
I still dont get it? Do people in pakistan not practise techniques? It baffles me, because years ago we produced cricketers like yk, Inzi, Yousaf etc etc. Even not so great cricketers like imran nazir had solid techniques. You could argue that he was brainless but his technique was fine. Same scenario for kamran akmal and umar akmalBut it still counts as the side he wants to goGuy just favours doing everything on that side of the ground
I still dont get it? Do people in pakistan not practise techniques? It baffles me, because years ago we produced cricketers like yk, Inzi, Yousaf etc etc. Even not so great cricketers like imran nazir had solid techniques. You could argue that he was brainless but his technique was fine. Same scenario for kamran akmal and umar akmal
Afridi didn't have a good technique but that's cause he wasnt interested in becoming a full fledged batter.
How did pakistan go from that to people like rizwan, Abdullah and ima? Even decent batters like tayyab, Kamran ghulam don't really have good techniques.
Saud and saim are exceptions but batters with good techniques use to be the norm
Oh yes now Rizwan’s tailender like technique differs slightly to all of those batsmenMost of Pakistan batsmen have/had technical issues but they somehow have managed to score runs at decent average.
Ijaz Ahmed, Ramiz Rambo Raja, Muhammad Hafeez, Azhar Ali , Misbah ul Haq , Sarfraz Ahmed, Fawad Alam all had technical deficiencies same is the case with Rizwan.
Low Bounce and flat wickets are the main reason for out batsmen with flawed technique
It is still leg side for the right handers so he is targeting the same area that he usually targetWell he finally played a shot on the offside![]()
Oh yes now Rizwan’s tailender like technique differs slightly to all of those batsmen
Oh bhai, tu rehnde!
Nothing you say in favour of those two players is logically backed. It’s simply a biased statement.You got my point therefore no logical argument![]()
Oh yes now Rizwan’s tailender like technique differs slightly to all of those batsmen
Oh bhai, tu rehnde!
And yet none of them looked like a tailender the way Rizwan does.For all those who have watched cricket over decades will testify Ijaz Ahmed, Ramiz Raja, Hafeez , Fawad Alam, Azhar Ali,Sarfraz , Misbah none had thr perfect technique to survive in international cricket yet they somehow find a path.
Who can forget Misbah's ugly lunges against spin, Azhar Alis pendulum type pokes against moving ball, Hafeez slanted foot against new ball etc etc
Rizwanophobia nothing else , the no.1 keeper in Pakistan by a country mileAnd yet none of them looked like a tailender the way Rizwan does.
Ijaz Ahmed yes his technique was ungainly.Most of Pakistan batsmen have/had technical issues but they somehow have managed to score runs at decent average.
Ijaz Ahmed, Ramiz Rambo Raja, Muhammad Hafeez, Azhar Ali , Misbah ul Haq , Sarfraz Ahmed, Fawad Alam all had technical deficiencies same is the case with Rizwan.
Low Bounce and flat wickets are the main reason for out batsmen with flawed technique
Rizwan is easily the ugliest batsmen I've ever seen that's survived more then 50 international games.Oh yes now Rizwan’s tailender like technique differs slightly to all of those batsmen
Oh bhai, tu rehnde!
Bang average guy doing bang average things that are glorified to legendary status by bang average people.Rizwan is easily the ugliest batsmen I've ever seen that's survived more then 50 international games.
Yes uglier batters have existed but none of them have lasted longer them 20 to 30 international games.
People like to use the words Limited but effective and punches > his weight but the correct translation is Ugly batter who survives longer then he should due to selfish batting and managed to play 2 to 4 good innings in his entire international career spanning 100+ t20 games, 80+ odi games and 30+ test games
It's because Pakistan hasn't had a single good keeper in its entire history. Sarfi's best moments are in test where he's played atg innings and ct where he was captain and played a crucial 62 not put against sri lanka.Bang average guy doing bang average things that are glorified to legendary status by bang average people.
Does he really view himself as things?He views himself as some Warner level opener in t20, some crucial inzi level odi batter and some clutch lower order test bat, when in reality the likes of kamran ghulam, Saud shakeel, agha(in odi and test) are better batters then he is.