- Joined
- Oct 2, 2004
- Runs
- 218,058
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
<div style="width: 100%; height: 0px; position: relative; padding-bottom: 55.000%;"><iframe src="https://streamable.com/s/srppe/pckznj" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="100%" allowfullscreen style="width: 100%; height: 100%; position: absolute;"></iframe></div>
.
Look at Haris Sohail.
That belly has grown several inches. Many folded layers of fats.
His runs will determine his performance not his weight.
Same criticism is used for Imad who's been consistently our best performer in LOIs.
Heck even Sharjeel was criticised for this, despite having a fantastic series in AUS.
Shadab and Hasan Ali are very fit. When was the last time they won a match for us?
Why do we think weight is a huge factor in performances?
That was the problem with Mickey Arthur. Too much focus put into fitness and not in performances. Do many cricketers are quite good but not deemed "fit", who honestly cares as long as they can perform. In cricket it's mostly skill. Fitness just has to be decent.
That was the problem with Mickey Arthur. Too much focus put into fitness and not in performances. Do many cricketers are quite good but not deemed "fit", who honestly cares as long as they can perform. In cricket it's mostly skill. Fitness just has to be decent.
Look at Haris Sohail.
That belly has grown several inches. Many folded layers of fats.
His runs will determine his performance not his weight.
Same criticism is used for Imad who's been consistently our best performer in LOIs.
Heck even Sharjeel was criticised for this, despite having a fantastic series in AUS.
Shadab and Hasan Ali are very fit. When was the last time they won a match for us?
Why do we think weight is a huge factor in performances?
That was the problem with Mickey Arthur. Too much focus put into fitness and not in performances. Do many cricketers are quite good but not deemed "fit", who honestly cares as long as they can perform. In cricket it's mostly skill. Fitness just has to be decent.
That was the problem with Mickey Arthur. Too much focus put into fitness and not in performances. Do many cricketers are quite good but not deemed "fit", who honestly cares as long as they can perform. In cricket it's mostly skill. Fitness just has to be decent.
Drop Amir and Wahab and select Musa and Hasnain
Good to see morale is not down and team is enjoying the sessions.
Looks like Musa is debuting in 3rd T20 and there is a chance for Imam and Khushdil as well.
TBH I'm more excited about Musa than Hasnain. Musa just looks like a proper fast bowler, not that Hasnain doesn't. Musa is just good to watch when he bowls, he is built like a tank and keeps on bowling non-stop like a machine.
Musa is definitely a one to look for as he has rushed almost every batsman I have seen but only when he got his lengths and lines right. He is fit and well built, though his height isnt ideal but overcome to an extent by the fact that batsmen get surprised with the kind of speed he generates off the pitch with a smooth action.
He has the skills and the fitness but he needs to perfect his lines snd lengths as when you are a bit short than poor deliveries get more easy to hit for batsmen than a tall bowler who gets bit of natural bounce in bad balls and thus sometimes gets away. If he can work hard on his accuracy he will have a good future for sure.