As an all format batsmen, Head is > everyone single indian player minus Kohli who is > him.
Rohit is far worse then Head in test. He is better then head in odi and t20 however impact wise Head has remained > him in odi. At the end of rohit's career due to a massive decline, the gap isnt all that high anymore.
Every other indian player has been an absolute tragedy in 2 formats bare minimum.
Head is easily > Dhawan, Raina, Yuvi(all formats, yuvi is better in certain formats though), Dhoni (much better then Dhoni in t20 and test) etc etc.
Utterly delusional to think someone like sai will have a better career then Head

.
All format players need a different criteria from test specialists. Very ironic how agenda posters apply such metrics to Laxman and Pant but not to Head.
Name one all format batter in history who was equally good in all formats?
If Head avg 40 in both test and odi, is a solid htb in test, has impact knocks in odi especially in icc events and a freak strike rate in t20, then he is up their as a goat.
Warner, Ab, Kohli, Kp and Gayle are the only all format players > him.
Shame on agends Indian fans. No wonder they all ran away like chicken. And irony of the century they mocked me for being biased despite being indian

.
Brutal honestly truth is that despite a 1.4B mafia, and all formats existing for 18+ years now, you lot still cant find anyone minus Kohli that is > this so called technique less Head as an all format player.