What's new

Pitches suited Australia more, England don't use home advantage: James Anderson

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
England pace legend James Anderson lamented that the pitches in the ongoing Ashes series have suited Australia more than England.

Australia retained the Ashes urn with victory in Anderson's home ground, the Old Trafford in Manchester, taking an unassailable 2-1 lead in the series. Ahead of the final Test at The Oval, Anderson said England don't use home advantage enough.

"I think they've probably suited Australia more than us," Anderson was quoted as saying by The Telegraph. "I would have liked to have seen a bit more grass but that's the nature of the game here. When you're selling out - like Lancashire selling out five days of Test cricket - it's hard not to produce a flat deck but, you know, that's one of the frustrations from a player's point of view. We go to Australia and get pitches that suit them. They come over here and get pitches that suit them. It doesn't seem quite right.

"I thought they were good pitches here against India [in 2018]. I thought they weren't green seamers but I thought they suited us more than India. We as a country don't use home advantage enough. When you go to Australia, go to India, Sri Lanka, they prepare pitches that suit them. I feel like we could just be a little bit more biased towards our own team."

Anderson played very little part in the series; he bowled only four overs in the first innings of the first Test before walking out with a calf injury. He was subsequently ruled out of the entire series.

Anderson, 37, said he is not thinking of retirement and said he'd even explore the possibilities of going vegan if it helped him prolong his Test career.

"When I start this rehab, I'm going to try and investigate every possible avenue of what do I need to do at my age to keep myself in good shape," Anderson said. "I feel in really good condition. I feel as fit as I ever have. It's just the calf keeps twanging.

"I'm going to look at every possible thing I can to make sure I can play for as long as possible. I'll look at how other sportspeople have done it throughout their careers to keep going into their late 30s. Whether there's anything specific I can do, diet, gym programme, supplements, whatever it might be. Because I've still got a real hunger and desire to play cricket. I still love the game and still feel like I can offer something to this team and still have the skills and can bowl quick enough to have a positive effect.

"It'll be an ongoing process through the rest of my career. I still feel like I can be the best bowler in the world. So as long as I've got that mentality I'm going to keep pushing myself. Keep trying to improve my skills with the ball, work hard at my batting, and try to find every possible thing to help me stay fit."

"I'm realistic. If I'm not good enough and feel I'm detracting from the team and I'm too slow, or whatever it might be, then I'm not going to embarrass myself or drag the team down. I'll only keep playing if I think I can be one of the best bowlers in the world and if I think I can help this team win games of Test cricket. I'm not just blinkered thinking I'm going to just drag out as many possible games as I can."

https://www.news18.com/cricketnext/...dont-use-home-advantage-anderson-2304593.html
 
In before the “Poms are crying and making excuses again” posts.
 
On a serious note, he does have a point. However, England ultimately failed because they simply didn’t bat well enough.

The bowling was largely impressive except that they simply had no idea how to stop Smith.

England batted better against India on tougher pitches. Had they produced similar performances, India would have won the series comfortably.
 
James Anderson's autobiography should be named 'Pitches and Clouds - The making of a green track bully'
 
England batting is weak when it’s not their rules.

Flat tracks
White ball
Field restrictions and these guys will chase 500 on a final day
 
England lost because

1. They batted very poorly and that too at home.

2. They had no answer to Steven Smith.

Personally, I don't think Anderson's presence would have made any difference at all.
 
I hate when ever England loses its the pitches and not there performance. Both teams play on the same pitch, both teams have to adapt to them. Stop crying and play!
 
England bowled well in bits and pieces but overall they were poor. The inability to tidy up the lower order has come back to haunt them time and time again. The writers were all claiming England had the best pace attack out of the two teams before the series, Jofra Archer et al, so how did these conditions suit Australia, their bowlers just utilized and applied themselves more than the complacent English bowlers.
 
We saw the same pitch excuse used in the WC when England started losing their way. The reason they lost is their LOI specialists batted horribly on flatter pitches & also the bowling except Archer & Broad was below par. Come up with a better excuse next time, cant use the same one on the loop every time!
 
Blind fans won't criticize english players whining i can only imagine backlash if this was said by Pakistani cricketer
All i see supporting wicket which was best chance for England to defeat aus .Aus are masters of flat track i don't think they would have change end result one bit
 
Pitches are effected by the weather as well, an international team should be able to adapt irrespective of these issues especially when the opposing team also has to adapt. Australian wickets are generally flat with a lot of pace and bounce, these wickets in Ashes were not even close to those wickets and even Aussies had to adapt but they did it better in most of the tests.

Even commies mentioned how Cummins and Hazlewood adjusted their length to make it fuller in this ashes series which was opposed to the lengths they are used to in Australia.
 
Last edited:
While I do agree with Anderson that pitches are not the as the traditional English wickets in Ashes but, saying they suited Australia more is bit far fetched as aussie bowlers still had to adjust their lengths as the wickets werent "Hit the deck" kind which we see in Australia with a lot more consistent bounce and carry.

So even if we consider it neutral conditions for both sides, Eng still should have competed better than they did. Except the heroics from Stokes they havent even come close to win any test.
 
I don’t understand why they didn’t produce green seamers like they did in 2015.
 
England honestly have the fairest pitches out of anyone, why away teams often love playing there. England are always going to lose more home matches than they probably deserve to as a result.

They're also right bang in the middle. Too green, bouncy and it's more like SA, Aus. Flatter pitches like what you see often at the oval, suits the subcontinent sides more. Very tough to give England pure home advantage pitches.
 
Damn this guy is a cry baby.

He said the same thing when Pakistan won.

Dude, grow up...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
James Anderson's autobiography should be named 'Pitches and Clouds - The making of a green track bully'

haha, so true. Am surprised Anderson didnt complain about the weather and lack of cloud cover all series.
 
It’s true what he says. We don’t make pitches to suit our own bowlers. Other nations do.
 
While I do agree with Anderson that pitches are not the as the traditional English wickets in Ashes but, saying they suited Australia more is bit far fetched as aussie bowlers still had to adjust their lengths as the wickets werent "Hit the deck" kind which we see in Australia with a lot more consistent bounce and carry.

So even if we consider it neutral conditions for both sides, Eng still should have competed better than they did. Except the heroics from Stokes they havent even come close to win any test.

Came close to winning at Lord’s. Robbed by rain.
 
Main thing is they were Seam friendly not Swing friendly. He isn't saying they were flat or batting friendly
 
Anderson is talking nonsense . Conditions for batting have been consistently harder when Australia have batted rather than when England have batted throughout this series.
 
Back
Top